Mapping equilibrium and non-equilibrium entropy landscapes : the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mapping equilibrium and non equilibrium entropy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mapping equilibrium and non-equilibrium entropy landscapes : the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mapping equilibrium and non-equilibrium entropy landscapes : the path-sampling approach Manuel Athnes Service de Recherches de Mtallurgie Physique - CEA Saclay Gilles Adjanor, EDF, Les Renardires Florent Calvo, Laboratoire de Physique


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Mapping equilibrium and non-equilibrium entropy landscapes : the path-sampling approach

Manuel Athènes Service de Recherches de Métallurgie Physique - CEA Saclay Gilles Adjanor, EDF, Les Renardières Florent Calvo, Laboratoire de Physique Quantique, Toulouse

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Introduction

Statistical mechanics in ensembles of paths rather than of states Transition-path sampling implicitely computes entropies

« migration » entropies, Sinai-Kolmogorov entropy

Extentions to compute entropies in various contexts Adequate to compute non-equilibrium entropies Efficicient in rugged energy landscapes Built-in diagnosing tools in methods based on non- equilibrium work theorems

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Non-equilibrium and equilibrium entropy

( )

= - ( )ln ( )d ( ) d

eq eq eq eq

S H F H F

ρ χ ρ χ χ ρ χ β χ β χ β β = − = −    

∫ ∫

  • N particle system

state with hamiltonian

  • définition of ensemble : phase space + associated probabilities
  • entropy
  • equilibrium :Boltzmann

( )

( )=exp - +

eq

H F

ρ χ β χ    

( )

=-ln exp - d ln = −    

F H Z

β β χ χ

=( ) χ

r,p H( )

r,p

= - ( , )ln ( , )d

neq neq neq t

S t t

ρ χ ρ χ χ

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Nonequilibrium Entropy

  • rder parameter q

F(q)

t

χ

nonequilibrium ensemble equilibrium ensemble

χ

( ) ( )

( )

+ cond z,

, = P ( )D

∈ ∫

neq eq t

t z z

χ

ρ χ ρ χ

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Nonequilibrium Entropy

q’- q’/2 q’+ q’/2

  • rder parameter q

F(q)

j

χ

nonequilibrium ensemble equilibrium ensemble

i

χ

i

χ

j

χ

  • cond

P (z)

eq

( ) ρ χ

+ cond

P (z) ×

neq( , )

t

ρ χ

×

+

  • (

) ( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

+ cond z,t

  • cond

z,t + cond

  • cond

, ,

P (z)Dz , = P (z)Dz P (z) P (z) exp

∈ ∈

= = − + −    

∫ ∫

eq neq eq R R

t H F Q

χ χ χ χ

ρ χ ρ χ ρ χ β χ β β

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Nonequilibrium Entropy

q’- q’/2 q’+ q’/2

  • rder parameter q

F(q)

j

χ

nonequilibrium ensemble 0 : ensemble à l’équilibre

i

χ ( ) ( )

j

,

, exp = − + −    

neq R

H F Q

χ

ρ χ τ β χ β β

( ) ( ) ( )

,

, ln , ln exp = − = − − + −    

neq neq neq R neq

S d H F Q

χ

ρ χ τ ρ χ τ χ β χ β β ( ) ( ) ( )

1 ,0

, exp = − +    

neq

t z z

χ

ρ χ σ σ

( )

cond

ln

  = − + −  

H F Q P

θ β

σ θβ χ

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Space-time thermodynamic perturbation

r

t

t λ = τ

( ) ( )

s r V r F

λ β

= β −β

( ) ( ) ( )

1 ,0

ln ex , p − − +     =

s z t z

χ

σ χ σ

1

( )

,

s t

χ Σ

( )

,

m t

χ

( ) ( )

( )

1 ,

− − Σ

z z

χ θ

δ σ σ

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Space-time thermodynamic integrations

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] ( ) ( )

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

d exp D ln exp D ln exp D var ln exp var

= = = = = = = = = = =

− = = − − = − ⋅∂ − =   = ∂ − − − − ∂ + + ∂ ∂  +  =

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫

t neq t t t t t t t t

S Q d z S z d z d

θ τ θ τ θ θ τ θ θ χ θ θ χ τ τ θ θ χ τ θ θ τ τ

θ σ σ σ θ σ β θ θ σ θ θ σ σ σ θ σ

Method 1 Method 2 Method 3

1

(1 ) = + −

θ

σ θσ θ σ

Integration by part Implies second law

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Analogy with equilibrium thermodynamics

( )

1

var − = − − = ∂

t

total total neq t

S Q S S S d

θ τ θ χ

β θ θ σ

( )

( )

1 1

var ∂ − = ∫

eq eq

d S H Sβ

β β β β

β β β

( ) ( )

1

, var = ∂

t

m t d

χ θ θ

χ θ θ σ

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Brownian tube proposal

  • G. Stoltz, J. Comp. Phys. 2007
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

First and second moment integration

r

t

t λ = τ

( ) ( )

s r V r F

λ β

= β −β

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Three path-sampling methods

[ ] ( )

1 1

var ln exp

= = = =

=

− −∆ + = ∆ + ∆ = = ∫

t t t t

neq t

d S Q d

S

α θ τ τ τ

τ

β θ θ ϕ ϕ α ϕ

( ) ( ) ( )

1

1

  • var

= ∫

eq eq

S S d H

β β β

β β β β

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Non-equilibrium entropy

Equilibrium entropy Non-equilibrium entropy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Perspectives

N-particle system Entropy at glass transition Formalism for non-conservative dissipative systems

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

( ) ( )

+ cond 3

1 D P ! =

%

i N

Z zN z h N

χ

1 1

= %

Z Z

( ) ( )

+ cond 3

1 d D P !

=

∫ ∫

%

i

i i N

Z N z z h N

χ χ

( )

3

1 d ! = =

%

i i N

Z N Z h N

χ χ

[ ]

1

exp − ∆ =

% %

Z F Z

β

Free energy calculations in path ensembles

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

( ) ( )

1

D exp 2 D exp 2   − +     =   − −    

∫ ∫

% % % % % %

z U W Z Z z U W

β β

( )

1 1

ln exp ln exp   − = − −     =  

% %

F F W W

β β β

Thermodynamic perturbation

( )

1

exp 1 1 ln exp   −   − = −    

% %

W F F W

θ θ

θ β β θβ

( ) ( )

1

D exp exp 2 D exp 2     − − −       =   − −    

∫ ∫

% % % % % % %

z W U W Z Z z U W

β β β

Work distribution

( )

1

D exp 1 D exp   −   =    

∫ ∫

% % % % % %

z W K Z Z Z Z z W K

θ θ θ θ

θ β θβ

Jarzynski’s approach

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

incomplete icosahedron (fivefold symmetry) E=-173,252 ε€ [r.u.] truncated

  • ctahedron

(fcc symmetry ) E=-173.928 ε [r.u.]

Q4=0.19 Q4=4·10-2

  • rientational order

parameter Q4

The 38-atom cluster « LJ38 »

liquid structures (desordered)

T Tmelt=0.17

(reduced units)

Tss=0.12

→ (Q4) ?

4·10-2 ≤Q4 ≤9·10-2

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Q4-Energy contour plots at decreasing temperatures

Λ(Q4-E)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Free energy landscape of the LJ38 cluster

Q4=0.12

[u.r.]

[u.r.]

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Comparison with state-sampling methods (F. Calvo)

  • Wang-Landau method:

auxiliary potential

  • parallel tempering :

Monte-Carlo exchanges between N replica

  • f the system at various temperatures

ln (E) ∝

paths parallel tempering Wang-Landau method

[u.r.]

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Comparison with harmonic superposition approximation

  • harmonic superposition

approximation in class D →validation of the path-sampling approach

Adjanor, Athènes and Calvo, EPJB (2006) harmonic approximation paths N=2·103 paths N=2·104 parallel tempering Wang-Landau method [u.r.]

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

( )

1 1

ln exp ln exp   − = − −     =  

% %

F F W W

β β β

Thermodynamic perturbation

( )

1

exp 1 1 ln exp   −   − = −    

% %

W F F W

θ θ

θ β β θβ

Work distribution

( )

1

D exp 1 D exp   −   =    

∫ ∫

% % % % % %

z W K Q Q Q Q z W K

θ θ θ θ

θ β θβ

Free energy computations: what is the

  • ptimal bias?
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

1 2 1 1 2

1 e x p 2 1ln 1 ex p 2   −     − =−      

% %

W F F W

β β β

Work distribution

Athènes EPJB (2004), Oberhofer, Geissler and Dellago JPCB(2005), Adjanor and Athènes, JCP (2005) Ytreberg, Zuckerman and Swendsen JCP(2006) Lechner and Dellago J. Stat. Phys. (2007)

Optimal bias distribution

Oberhofer and Dellago (2007)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Information retrieving from the webs

Ceperley, Kalos, PRB (1977), Frenkel Boulougouris, JTCT (2005) Jourdain, Delmas (2007) Athènes, PRE (2002), EPJB (2007), Wu and Kofke (2005) Statistical error RW AIR M PIR