Managing Environmental Spatial Planning meets the Change at the - - PDF document

managing environmental
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Managing Environmental Spatial Planning meets the Change at the - - PDF document

22/08/2012 Managing Environmental Spatial Planning meets the Change at the Fringe: Ecosystem Approach Reconnecting Science and Policy with the Rural-Urban Fringe Alister Scott Claudia Carter, Richard Coles, David Collier, Chris Crean, Rachel


slide-1
SLIDE 1

22/08/2012 1

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Spatial Planning meets the Ecosystem Approach

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Managing Environmental Change at the Fringe: Reconnecting Science and Policy with the Rural-Urban Fringe

Alister Scott Claudia Carter, Richard Coles, David Collier, Chris Crean, Rachel Curzon, Bob Forster, Nick Grayson, Andrew Hearle, David Jarvis, Miriam Kennet, Peter Larkham, Karen Leach, Mark Middleton, Nick Morton, Mark Reed, Hayley Pankhurst, Nicki Schiessel, Ben Stonyer, Ruth Waters and Keith Budden

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

  • 1. The Spatial Planning

lens

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

  • 1. The Spatial Planning

lens

  • 2. The

disintegrated development

  • f the built and

natural environment

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

  • 1. The spatial planning

lens

  • 3. Introducing

the NPPF

  • 2. The

disintegrated development

  • f the built and

natural environment

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

  • 1. The spatial planning

lens

  • 3. Introducing

the NPPF

  • 2. The

disintegrated development

  • f the built and

natural environment

  • 4. Fusing SP and EA :

One night stand or meaningful relationship?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

22/08/2012 2

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Connecting People-Place-Environment

  • Dan’s cartoon please EA

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Spatial Planning

EUROCITIES (2004) The Pegasus files: a practical guide to integrated area-based urban planning EUROCITIES, Brussels

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Academic Ingredients

1. Culture change (Nadin, 2007) 2. Positivity and Proactivity (Mommaas and Jansen, 2008) 3. Place making (Davoudi and Pendlebury 2010). 4. Evidence-based (UCL and Deloitte 2007) 5. Multiple (Fluid) Scales (Allmendinger and Haughton 2006) 6. Multiple Sectors (Jordan and Halpin 2006: Morphet, 2010) 7. Partnerships (Scott M 2003: Allmendinger 2009)) 8. Long Termism/Visions (Low, 2002) 9. Connectivity (Albrechts, 2004: Hodge and Monk 2004)

  • 10. Values (Healey, 2008: Inch 2010)
  • 11. Inclusion (Healey 2008)
  • 12. Social learning (Bull et al 2008 )

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

  • “Applied common sense” David Collier.

Policy Ingredients

Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Mind the gap

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Disintegrated Development

  • Natural Environment lens

1. Natural Environment White Paper 2. Habitat and Landscape 3. DEFRA 4. Ecosystem Approach 5. Classifying and Valuing 6. National Ecosystem Assessment 7. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 8. Nature Improvement Areas 9. Local Nature Partnerships

  • Built Environment lens

1. National Planning Policy Framework 2. Local 3. DCLG 4. Spatial Planning 5. Zoning and Ordering 6. Sustainability Assessments 7. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 8. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts 9. Local Enterprise Partnerships

slide-3
SLIDE 3

22/08/2012 3

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Disintegrated Development

  • Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. National Ecosystem Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships
  • Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. National Ecosystem Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. National Ecosystem Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighborhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. National Ecosystem Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighborhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. National Ecosystem Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighbourhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. National Ecosystem Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighbourhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships
slide-4
SLIDE 4

22/08/2012 4

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. Ecosystem Services Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighbourhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. Ecosystem Services Assessment 8. Integrated Biodiversity Development Areas? 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighbourhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. Ecosystem Services Assessment 8. Landscape Scale Delivery Areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighbourhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Natural Environment lens

1. Incentives 2. Natural Environment White Paper 3. Habitat and Landscape 4. DEFRA 5. Ecosystem Approach 6. Classifying and Valuing 7. Ecosystem Services Assessment 8. Landscape Scale Delivery areas 9. Nature Improvement Areas

  • 10. Local Nature Partnerships

Built Environment lens

1. Control 2. National Planning Policy Framework 3. Local and Neighbourhood 4. DCLG 5. Spatial Planning 6. Zoning and Ordering 7. Sustainability Assessments (SEA) 8. Development/Neighbourhood Plans 9. Enterprise Zones / Green Belts

  • 10. Local Enterprise Partnerships

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Disintegrated decision-making problem

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

NPPF in 1 powerpoint slide.

  • Simplifies 1000 pages of previous guidance to 65 (including appendices?)
  • Plan led system*
  • Sustainable development is a golden thread *
  • Viability and deliverability *
  • Duty to cooperate
  • Paragraph 109
  • Sequential test Town centre first* Brownfield first*
  • Protection for countryside (proportionate)*
  • Mapping ecological networks.
  • Green Space designation
  • Rural offices
  • Protect best grades of agricultural land *
  • Paragraph 109
  • Neighbourhood Plans
  • Community right to build
slide-5
SLIDE 5

22/08/2012 5

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Issues

  • 50 pages = Scope for Interpretation
  • Lack of strategic planning layer.
  • Planning by case law decisions
  • 12 months to get plans in conformity or

published or else SD will take over

  • Linkages with NEWP there but weak

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Uniting Spatial Planning and the Ecosystem Approach

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Alister Scott

Claudia Carter, Mark Reed, Peter Larkham, Nicki Schiessel, Karen Leach, Nick Morton, Rachel Curzon David Jarvis, Andrew Hearle, Mark Middleton, Bob Forster, Keith Budden, Ruth Waters, David Collier, Chris Crean, Miriam Kennet, Richard Coles and Ben Stonyer relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Crossing the Divide

  • New thinking about

tools that help unite rather than divide

– Rufopoly* – Green Infrastructure – Strategic Environmental Assessment – Community Infrastructure Levy – Visitor Payback

relu

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

  • Danger of preparing plans and strategies with
  • ne lens in isolation
  • Target-led culture creates agency insularity
  • Power of inclusive processes and partnerships

integrate economy, society and environment

  • Importance of planners and environmentalists

becoming bedfellows

  • Come into my bed in the NEA 2 follow on !!!

Summary

Building interdisciplinarity across the rural domain