ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PROCESS FOR HUD GRANTEES
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PROCESS FOR HUD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PROCESS FOR HUD GRANTEES National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Nixon named Man of the Year in Signed into law, January 1, 1970 1972, environmental policy cited. CEQ issues NEPA Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PROCESS FOR HUD GRANTEES
Signed into law, January 1, 1970
Nixon named Man of the Year in 1972, environmental policy cited.
President Carter issued an Executive Order
authorizing the CEQ to establish definitive regulations for implementation of NEPA.
Issued on Nov 29, 1978, effective on Nov 30, 1979 40 CFR Part 1500 1500.6 Instructed federal agencies to adopt their
CFR 58 & 50)
4
24 CFR Part 58 -- Local Government Review
Unit of Local Government accepts HUD responsibility
24 CFR Part 51 -- Manmade Hazards
Noise Explosives and Thermal Runway Clear Zones
24 CFR Part 55 -- Floodplains & Wetlands
5
incorporates CEQ regulations assumption procedures for unit of local
Responsible Entity – accepts federal status
applicable to most HUD programs
defines levels and thresholds of
environmental reviews
procedures for Release of (environmental
Grants to Local Government
LG Responsible RROFs to State
Grants to Others
State Responsible RROF to HUD Headquarters
Approve HUD
Complete
Maintain log
4/3/2013
8
The physical activities
No after the fact reviews
9
HUD guidance on allowance for reimbursement
actions under H.R. 152 Hurricane Sandy Supplemental Appropriation
Only Single Family Residential Minor Rehab
Conducted/committed to prior to action plan. Must meet minor rehab definition and be exempt from
8 step flood process
Outside of floodway
Flood Insurance is still required ERR will be conducted post commitment
11
Environmental Review
Environmental Review
Environmental Review Record
Funds Process (Pt 58)
Funds for Project
changes
Receive Project Application Project Description
Should focus on the physical nature of the
proposed activities, the more detail provided the
the level of review.
Project Location Budget
13
No physical impact upon the environment – by
their very nature
Exempt Activities listed under 58.34(a) Additional activities listed under 58.35(b) as
Categorically Excluded Not Subject To the related laws & authorities
E.g., Administrative and management activities,
engineering and design costs, limited emergency responses
Temporary forbearance 24 CFR 58.34(a)(10) Actions necessary to control the immediate
impacts of the emergency
HUD Guidance: Exemptions for Disasters and
Imminent Threats (May 16, 2008)
ARE subject to:
the Laws and Authorities, but NOT NEPA
Require Statutory Checklist
1.
i.
B.The project does not involve changes in land use from residential to non-residential; and
75 percent of the total estimated cost of replacement after rehabilitation.
including commercial, industrial, and public buildings:
will not be changed in size or capacity by more than 20 percent; and
use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another.
Change in use Rehab value > 75% New Construction
Alternatives
Requires Environmental Finding Access the EXTENT of Environmental
24
high thresholds for HUD projects (e.g.,
includes 58.5 & 58.6 review requires notices, draft & final EIS, etc
requires RROF
Historic Preservation Floodplain & Wetlands Coastal Zone Aquifers Endangered Species Wild & Scenic Rivers Air Farmlands HUD Env. Standards – Noise, Acceptable
Distance, Toxics, Runway Clear Zones
Environmental Justice
Applies to any listed or eligible historic
resources
Resources can be buildings, sites, districts or
archeological sites
Building are generally over 50 years in age or
younger if identified with a significant historical event.
Contact your State Historic Preservation Officer
to identify eligible resources and determine impact avoidance strategies.
Work with your FEO Programmatic Agreements can be helpful for
expediting review times on individual sites.
Standard consultations can take a minimum of
30 days for SHPO concurrence.
Complex projects can take much longer Begin Consultation early in process.
Applies to federal actions
within FEMA mapped floodplains
24 CFR Part 55.12
defines what activities may be exempt
Non-exempt activities are
subject to an 8 step review process
Identify floodplains Early notice of proposed activity – 15 days Evaluation of potential impacts (steps 3 & 4) Determination of measures to offset, minimize
Decision & Final Notice – 7 days Implement Actions http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/progra
m_offices/comm_planning/environment/review/fl
National Flood Insurance Program Coastal Barrier Resources Act Runway Clear Zones
Only allowed under H.R. 152 Hurricane Sandy
Supplemental Appropriation
HUD grantees providing supplemental assistance to
actions under certain sections of the Stafford Act
HUD grantees may adopt environmental reviews
performed by another federal agency
Submit a RROF to HUD with a copy of review No notices or comment periods are required Policy Guidance memo dated 4 March 2013