Commonwealth Environmental Water John Foster Director, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Commonwealth Environmental Water John Foster Director, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Commonwealth Environmental Water John Foster Director, Environmental Water Planning Commonwealth Environmental Water Office Commonwealth environmental water CEWH comments on environmental outcomes having priority over social and economic.
- CEWH comments on environmental outcomes having priority
- ver social and economic.
- CEWH plans/options documents.
- Yarrawonga flows/MSWT (15,000ML/day)
- Localism – discuss CEWO views
- Monitoring and Evaluation
- .... and anything else the committee would like to discuss
Commonwealth environmental water
Commonwealth environmental water
Water Act – establishes Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder to make decisions on using Commonwealth environmental water holdings to protect or restore environmental assets in the Basin.
Management of the Commonwealth water holdings:
- Must be in accordance with statutory requirements (Water Act and
the Basin Plan) - water is used to meet environmental demands
- The Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder can consider the ancillary
social, cultural and economic benefits.
- However, there must be a clear, demonstrable environmental benefit that
- utweighs the other potential environmental outcomes that could be
achieved from the use of that water.
- Where there are opportunities, we seek to achieve multiple
- utcomes
Water use options
2014-15 water use options documents
- Released 24 July 2014
- Developed in consultation with Environmental Water Advisory Groups
- Options are subject to CEWH decision
- Environmental needs are also identified through a combination of stakeholder
consultation, monitoring and rigorous contemporary science.
- Input can be provided at any time, not just through annual planning
Future planning
- Continue to expand consultation and local involvement
- Local knowledge is key to helping identify ways in which environmental water
can be used to its best effect.
- Long-term approach
- Focus remains on supplying water to meet demands – supply plans
CEWO decision-making process for watering actions
Planning – Options to Decision
- Real time conditions
- Collaboration
- Local advice –
CMA/LLS; EWAG;
- ther
- Delivery partners
Summary of 2014-15 water use options for the Mid-Murray Region
Applicable level(s) of resource availability Low Moderate High Very High Option 1 – Edward– Wakool system Support increased variability of river flows by contributing towards baseflows and freshes to maintain and improve ecosystem diversity and native fish populations. Support management of water quality issues within in–stream environments to protect ecosystems and their functions. Option 2 – Ephemeral water courses Support the condition and reproduction of native vegetation, fish and other vertebrates, hydrological connectivity and end of system flows, and maintenance of refuges and water quality (in particular dissolved oxygen, salinity and pH). Options unlikely to be pursued under this resource availability. Option 3 – Mid- Murray region water quality and habitat Support management of water quality issues within in–stream environments to protect ecosystems and their functions. Option 4 – Mid- Murray River Channel Support increased variability in–channel river flow by contributing towards increased baseflows and augmenting
- ther flow events to protect
and maintain the diversity and condition of native species and communities. Support variability of river flows by contributing towards increased baseflows, and augmenting natural flow events for in– channel freshes, bankfull and overbank flows to maintain and improve the diversity and condition of native species and support the recovery of floodplain ecosystems. Contribute to returning a more natural pattern of flow to elements of the hydrograph affected by regulation Support management of water quality issues within in–stream environments to protect ecosystems and their functions. Option 5 – Mid- Murray Forest Options unlikely to be pursued under this resource availability Contribute to overbank flows (infrastructure assisted) within Werai Forest, to increase ecosystem diversity and to support the condition and reproduction of wetland and floodplain vegetation, native fish, waterbirds and other vertebrates, and processes such as primary production, as well as contribute to decomposition and nutrient and carbon cycling. Options unlikely to be pursued under this resource availability. Option 6 – Fringing and isolated wetland sites and complexes To provide hydrological connectivity to refill low–lying wetlands to support wetland vegetation communities; provide habitat to maintain condition of waterbirds, fish, other aquatic vertebrates (turtles, frogs) and macroinvertebrates; and allow for movement and dispersal of aquatic animals. Options unlikely to be pursued under this resource availability.
Summary of 2014-15 water use options for the Lower Murray-Darling Region
Applicable level(s) of resource availability (see Section 4) Low Moderate High Options 1 (low), 2 (mod) and 3 (mod - high) – River Murray from Euston to Lower Lakes and Coorong Support increased variability in-channel river flow by contributing towards increased baseflows and augmenting natural flow events to protect and maintain the diversity and condition of native species and communities. Support increased variability of river flows by contributing towards increased baseflows, and augmenting natural flow events for in-channel freshes and bankfull flows to maintain ecosystem diversity and improve condition of native species. Support increased variability of river flows by contributing towards increased baseflows, and augmenting natural flow events for in-channel freshes, bankfull and overbank flows to improve the diversity and condition of native species and support the recovery of floodplain ecosystems. Option 4 – Lower Darling River Options unlikely to be pursued under this resource availability. Support increased variability of river flows by contributing towards baseflows and freshes to maintain and improve ecosystem diversity and native fish populations. Option 5 – Great Darling Anabranch Options unlikely to be pursued under this resource availability. Support in-channel flows by contributing towards baseflows, freshes and wetland inundation to maintain and improve ecosystem diversity and native fish populations. Option 6 – Nature Foundation South Australia Provide environmental water to wetlands and floodplains in the lower River Murray to maintain ecosystem diversity and improve condition of native species. Options unlikely to be pursued under this resource availability. Option 7 – Mallee Catchment Management Authority Provide environmental water to wetlands and floodplains in the lower River Murray Mallee region to rehabilitate targeted wetlands and floodplains, increase the abundance and distribution of Murray hardyhead, and improve the diversity and condition of native species
Multi-site Watering Trial and Environmental Flows d/s of Yarrawonga
Multi-site Watering Trial
- Agreement from Basin Officials Committee (BOC) to deviate from past river
- peration practice. Includes:
- Revised accounting to minimise impacts to state shares
- Agreed loss rates for environmental water releases from Hume
- Allows water to be called from specific storages
- Flow rates for environmental water releases
- Under the trial, regulated releases of environmental water d/s of Yarrawonga are
limited to 15,000ML/day
CEWH involvement
- Not involved in BOC decisions
- CEWH decides if Commonwealth environmental water will be used in any trial
- In 2014-15, only contributing to flows below 10,600ML/day d/s Yarrawonga
- CEWH has only participated in the MSWT once (2013-14)
Localism
- The Basin Plan requires greater consultation
- Localism means different things to everyone
- CEWH has a Basin-wide focus
- Localism for the CEWH is about meaningful
local engagement in decision making
- Local engagement Officers will play
an important role
- Decisions on the use of
Commonwealth environmental water are made by the CEWH
- Decisions can be delegated to
another SES officer in the CEWO/ Dept of the Environment
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring v. Research
- CEWO Long-term Intervention Monitoring (LTIM) is focused on
statutory requirements
- CEWO LTIM will result in the monitoring of catchments where around
90 per cent of Commonwealth environmental water is held.
- CEWO does not generally fund research
Coordination
- MDBA role to coordinate monitoring and evaluation across the Basin
- CEWO LTIM is overseen by a steering committee involving the MDBA
- CEWO coordinating its efforts with those also undertaking monitoring
Community involvement
- Edward-Wakool Selected Area Working Group includes agency,
research and community representation
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring v. Research
- CEWO Long-term Intervention Monitoring (LTIM) is focused on
statutory requirements
- CEWO LTIM will result in the monitoring of catchments where around
90 per cent of Commonwealth environmental water is held.
- CEWO does not generally fund research
Coordination
- MDBA role to coordinate monitoring and evaluation across the Basin
- CEWO LTIM is overseen by a steering committee involving the MDBA
- CEWO coordinating its efforts with those also undertaking monitoring
Community involvement
- Edward-Wakool Selected Area Working Group includes agency,
research and community representation
Feedback
We welcome suggestions
Contact: John Foster John.Foster@environment.gov.au
- r