Management of an Appendiceal Mass - Approach to acute presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

management of an appendiceal mass
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Management of an Appendiceal Mass - Approach to acute presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Management of an Appendiceal Mass - Approach to acute presentation of appendiceal neoplasms Dr. Claudia LY WONG, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round Presentation, Princess Margaret Hospital, April 20,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round Presentation, Princess Margaret Hospital, April 20, 2013

Management of an Appendiceal Mass

  • Approach to acute presentation of appendiceal neoplasms
  • Dr. Claudia LY WONG, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Case Scenario

✤ M/42; unremarkable past health ✤ Periumbilical pain shifted to right

lower quadrant for two days

✤ Associated with nausea and

subjective account of fever

✤ Physical examination: ✤ Temperature 38.9oC; Stable

hemodynamics

✤ Localized tenderness and “fullness”

  • ver right lower quadrant
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Suspected Appendiceal Neoplasm

✤ A CT scan was performed ✤ Complex cystic appendix with

thickened wall

✤ Suspicious of underlying

neoplasm

✤ Tachycardia, persistent

tenderness and pyrexia despite antibiotic therapy

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

  • 1. Overview of commonest appendiceal neoplasms and mucocele
  • 2. Management of acutely presenting appendiceal mass suspicious of

underlying neoplasm

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Differential diagnoses

✤ Neoplasms of vermiform

appendix

Connor et al. (1998) Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies.

Secondaries from urogenital tract (ovaries), large bowel, lung and breast

Others (rare): ganglioneuroma, pheochromocytoma, mesenchymal tumors, Kaposi sarcoma

✤ Appendiceal mucocele

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Appendiceal Neoplasms & Mucoceles

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Appendiceal Carcinoid

✤ Neuroendocrine origin, arise from

primitive stem cell

✤ Classified according to location of

primitive gut

✤ Deep in mucosa for intestinal

carcinoids

✤ Appendix is the commonest site

for carcinoid tumor

✤ Carcinoid is the commonest

primary neoplasm of the appendix

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Appendiceal Carcinoid

✤ 0.3-0.9% appendicectomies; usually

asymptomatic, incidental finding in appendicitis

✤ Most affect distal 1/3; invade wall ✤ Symptoms occur with metastasis

(rare)

✤ Liver metastases are rare;

Lymphatic spread as 1* route

✤ Worse outcome with large size

(>1.5-2cm), goblet cell carcinoid (adenocarcinoid)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

✤ Benign: adenomas, cystoadenomas ✤ Malignant: adeno/ cystoadenocarcinomas ✤ More goblet cells in appendix than in colon

  • > majority of neoplasms are mucinous in

nature

Intestinal and Mucinous Neoplasms

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cystoadenocarcinoma (mucinous)

✤ Appendiceal carcinomas: 90% mucinous

(vs intestinal type)

✤ Mucinous subtype: ✤ Tip or along lumen ✤ Mucocele formation ✤ Dissemination to peritoneal space,

pseudomyxoma peritonei

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Adenocarcinomas (intestinal)

✤ Appendiceal carcinomas: 10% intestinal

type

✤ Intestinal subtype: ✤ Appendiceal orifice ✤ Lymph node spread

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Appendiceal Mucoceles

Morphological description

Cystic dilatation of appendix caused by accumulation of mucus secretion

0.2-0.4% appendicetomy specimens

Course and prognosis depends on histological subtype

Luca et al. Surgical Management of Appendiceal Mucocele. Arch

  • Surg. 2003; 138: 585-590

Often asymptomatic (51%); abdominal pain (27%), mass (16%), weight loss (10%), appendicitis (8%)

In the presence of pseudomyxoma peritonei or mucinous dissemination, 80-90% are malignant

52% 20% 18% 10%

Histological Subtypes of Appendiceal Mucoceles Mucinous cystadenomas Mucosal hyperplasia Simple mucoceles/retention cysts Mucinous cystadenocarcinomas

A rare but not entirely separate entity

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Management of Suspected Appendiceal Neoplasms

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 1. Emergency Surgery

✤ Detailed laparoscopy ✤ Macroscopic features of index lesion: ✤ Location on appendix, caecal involvement ✤ Mesoappendiceal involvement ✤ Size of lesion (>2cm) ✤ Any mucinous dissemination or spontaneous perforation ✤ Any other primary lesion (appendiceal secondary?)

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 1. Emergency Surgery

✤ Pathology and histological characteristics of appendiceal tumor determine extent of

definitive surgical resection and need of prophylactic lymph node removal

✤ Achieve macroscopic resection margin, including mesoappenix ✤ Appendicectomy, ileocaectomy, right hemicolectomy? ✤ Avoid trauma or rupture during removal ✤ Use of endobag; retrieval from midline (facilitate port site removal if necessary) ✤ Thorough peritoneal washout if mucinous dissemination ✤ Wait for histology result and consider second operation

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 2. Further Investigations?

✤ Non-carcinoid neoplasms: ✤ Tumor markers: CA-125, CA-19-9,

CEA (in mucinous peritoneal carcinomatosis)

✤ Computed tomography: look for

distant metastasis, serve as baseline for disease monitoring

✤ Carcinoid neoplasms: ✤ Serotonin metabolite 5-HIAA 24-

hour urine sample; chromogranin A (lower specificity)

✤ Nuclear imaging: OctreoScan

(somatostatin analogue) (80% carcinoid with somatostatin receptor); metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan

✤ PET scan: based on metabolism of

trytophan

Surveillance colonoscopy: ALL appendiceal neoplasms are associated with synchronous or metachronous colonic neoplasms

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 3. When to Consider Completion

Right Hemicolectomy?

✤ Prophylactic resection for occult lymph node metastasis ✤ Based on histolopathological findings of initial resection ✤ Carcinoid: right hemicolectomy is recommended for lesions >2cm ✤ Increased probability of nodal involvement 30% (<0.1% for lesions

<1cm) (Sutton et al); controversy for lesions between 1-2cm

✤ Involvement of mesoappendix, atypical microscopic foci, mitotic count

  • f 2 or more per HPF, goblet cell type
slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 3. When to Consider Completion

Right Hemicolectomy?

✤ Adenocarcinoma: tradition approach is to offer right hemicolectomy ✤ Much higher incidence of lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma

(66.7%) than mucinous carinoma (4.2%) (Gonazlex Moreno et al)

✤ >2cm, poor differentiation, lymphovascular permeation, submucosal

invasion

✤ Mucinous adenocarcinoma: more selective approach to right

hemicolectomy

✤ Median survival similar for those with or without lymph node

involvement (28 vs 26 months) (Kiran at al)

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 3. When to Consider Completion

Right Hemicolectomy?

✤ Presence of mucinous dissemination: ✤ Low grade mucinous neoplasms: no recurrence in 6-year follow-up ✤ vs those with extra-appendiceal spread: 45% 5-year survival ✤ Radical resection does not alter prognosis of mucinous neoplasm with

peritoneal dissemination

✤ Not advisable unless intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive

surgery

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 4. Adjunctive Therapy?

✤ Carcinoid neoplasms: ✤ Metastatic carcinoid: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin ✤ Hepatic metastases: resection/ablation, interferon, hepatic artery

embolization (>50% involvement), long-acting somatostatin analogue (carcinoid syndrome)

✤ Non-carcinoid neoplasms: NO controlled study ✤ Same regime as colonic adenocarcinoma ✤ Poor tumor response in case of peritoneal dissemination; intraperitoneal

heated chemotherapy

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Management Algorithm for Suspected Appendiceal Neoplasm

Acute appendiceal mass (suspicious CT findings)

Emergency resection (macroscopic margin + mesoappendix)

Further investigations (tumor markers, imaging, colonoscopy)

Determine need for completion right hemicolectomy

Specialist centre referral/Oncologist referral/Surveillance Failed antibotic therapy Histology proven neoplasm

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusion

✤ Appendiceal neoplasms are rare but often present as acute appendicitis ✤ Most common lesions are carcinoid neoplasms & adenoma/

adenocarcinoma of intestinal and mucinous types

✤ Initial treatment without prior histological diagnosis proves a challenge ✤ Achieve macroscopic margin with careful specimen handling ✤ Option of a planned second operation is available ✤ Follow up management including surveillance colonoscopy is necessary

slide-25
SLIDE 25

References

Walters et al. Treatment of appendiceal adenocarcinoma in the United States: penetration and

  • utcomes of current guidelines. Am Surg. 74(11):1066-8, 2008 Nov

Murphy et al. Management of an Unexpected Appendiceal Neoplasm. British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 783 – 792

Groth et al. Appendiceal carcinoid tumors: Predictors of lymph node metastasis and the impact of right hemicolectomy on survival. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan 1;103(1):39-45.

Goede, A. C., Caplin, M. E. and Winslet, M. C. (2003), Carcinoid tumour of the appendix. Br J Surg, 90: 1317–1322

Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Jan;41(1):75-80.

Whitefield et al. Surgical management of primary appendiceal malignancy. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14, 1507-1511

Luca et al. Surgical Management of Appendiceal Mucocele. Arch Surg. 2003; 138: 585-590