Magnetism of Eu and Dy under Extreme Pressures Wenli Bi Advanced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

magnetism of eu and dy under extreme pressures
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Magnetism of Eu and Dy under Extreme Pressures Wenli Bi Advanced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Magnetism of Eu and Dy under Extreme Pressures Wenli Bi Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne COMPRES (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) 1 High pressure SMS experiment setup Ruby%system% 21# 2 Basic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Magnetism of Eu and Dy under Extreme Pressures

Wenli Bi

Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne COMPRES (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

High pressure SMS experiment setup

Ruby%system%

21#
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Basic Mössbauer parameters of 151Eu

  • R. Röhlsberger, Nuclear Condensed Ma/er Physics with Synchrotron Radia8on, (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005), Ch. 2, p. 25.

151

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

quadrupole interaction in Eu magnetic interaction in Eu

Hyperfine interactions of 151Eu

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Simulations of Mӧssbauer spectra of Eu

Energy domain Time domain

Simulated Mössbauer data in 151Eu

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experimental lab Mössbauer data in 151Eu

Cohen et. al., Phys. Rev. 184, 263 (1969). Barrett and D. Shirley, Phys. Rev. 131, 123 (1963). Shaken et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 312 (1985). Malik et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 316 (1985).

QS = 33 mm/s H = 26.5 T

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Eu2+: (4f7, J=7/2) Eu3+: (4f6, J=0)

Data taken from Mössbauer effect data center, http://www.medc.dicp.ac.cn/

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 Courtesy of E. E. Alp

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Bi et al., Phys. Rev. B. 93, 184424 (2016).

magnetic sc

Pressure induced magnetic transition in Eu (4f75d06s2 J = 7/2)

10 10

2

10 10

2

10

4

10 10

2

10

4

10

2

10

4

counts

10 10

2

10

4

10 10

2

10

4

10 10

2

10 10

2

20 40 60 80

time (ns)

10 10

2

  • 60 -40 -20

20 40 60

velocity (mm/s) 8 GPa 12.3 GPa 17.5 GPa 47 GPa 59 GPa 67 GPa 81 GPa 93 GPa 101 GPa

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Röhler, Phys. B+C 144, 27 (1986). Bi et al., Phys. Rev. B. 93, 184424 (2016).

No significant valence change in Eu

experiment data ab-initial

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Basic Mössbauer parameters of 161Dy (4f95d16s2, J = 15/2)

  • R. Röhlsberger, Nuclear Condensed Ma/er Physics with Synchrotron Radia8on, (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005), Ch. 2, p. 25.

151

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Lim et al., Phys. Rev. B 91, 045116 (2015). Samudrala et al., High Press. Res. 34, 266 (2014).

Doniach model

TRKKY ~ J 2 Tk ~ exp(⎮J⎮)

Magnetism in Dy

slide-13
SLIDE 13

40 cm/s spliMng (0.12 ns), beyond the APD Qme resoluQon (1 ns). As a result, only the inner spliMng can be resolved from Qme domain spectrum.

13

77"K"

G.J."Bowden,"D.S.P."Bunbury,"and"J.M."Williams,"Proc."Phys."Soc."91,"612"(1967)."

~"0.1"ns" ~"0.4"ns" ~"5"ns" velocity (cm/s)

Hhf = 550 T

slide-14
SLIDE 14

20 40 60 80 100 120 time (ns) counts 0.01 ns 0.1 ns 1 ns

Dy SMS simulation with different detector time resolution Hhf = 574 T

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Y. V Shvyd’ko et al., Europhys. LeX. 56, 309 (2001).

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Magnetic hyperfine field in Eu (6s24f75d0)

hf C CE n

H H H H = + +

C

H

CE

H

n

H

at#4.2#K#

HC:$insensi,ve#to#volume#change.# HCE$and#Hn:$dependent#of#volume#(pressure)# #change.#RKKY#interac,on.# $

Elmegid$and$Kaindl,$hyperfine$interac7ons$4,$420$(1978).$ Klein,$Wortmann$and$Kalvius,$18,291$(1976);$$ Nowik,$Dunlap$and$Wernick,$Phys.$Rev.$B$8,$238$(1973).$ Hüfner$and$Wernick,$Phys.$Rev.$173,$448$(1968)$ $