1
STATE
TE LEV EVEL EL WOR ORKS KSHOP OP
ON ON
MACT CT
AT AT
JUD
UDICIAL IAL ACADEM DEMY JHARK RKHAND HAND
MACT CT AT AT J UD IAL A CADEM DEMY J HARK UDICIAL RKHAND HAND - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
S TATE TE L EV EL W OR EVEL ORKS KSHOP OP ON ON MACT CT AT AT J UD IAL A CADEM DEMY J HARK UDICIAL RKHAND HAND MACT CT : : An n Over ervi view 1 M OTOR OR V EHICL ES A CCIDENTS IN 2017 ICLES DENTS IN (4,64,910 4,910 ) D EA I
1
ON ON
AT AT
UDICIAL IAL ACADEM DEMY JHARK RKHAND HAND
Source: Road Accidents in India 2017, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
2
Source: Road Accidents in India 2017, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
3
Source: Road Accidents in India 2017, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
4
Source: Road Accidents in India 2017, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
5
Source: Road Accidents in India 2017, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
6
7
8
9
Before 2019 Amendment After 2019 Amendment Pre-trial Settlement under MCTAP Section 158 (6) – Information regarding accident by Police to Tribunal within 30 days Section 161 – Hit and Run cases
25,000/-
No scheme for “Golden Hour” No limitation period for presenting claim petition No appeal if the disputed amount is less than Rs.10000 Statutory recognition for pre-trial settlement under Section 149 read with Section 164
Claim petition lapses if the settlement amount is accepted by the Claimant Section 159 – Information regarding accident by Police to Tribunal within 3 months Section 161 – Hit and Run cases
Section 162 – Scheme for “Golden Hour” Section 166 (3) – Limitation period for claim application – 6 months from the date of the accident Section 169 (4) – MACT shall have all the powers of an Executing Court under the CPC No appeal if the disputed amount is less than 1 lakh
10
11
POLICE
INVESTIGATION OF ROAD
ACCIDENT CASES
INTIMATION OF ACCIDENT TO
THE CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AND
INSURANCE COMPANY DOCUMENTS TO BE
COLLECTED
VERIFICATION OF THE DOCUMENTS IN CASE OF UN-INSURED
VEHICLE OR DRIVING WITHOUT LICENCE OR FAKE LICENCE, DRIVER AND OTHER PERSONS INVOLVED TO BE PROSECUTED
TO COMPLETE
INVESTIGATION WITHIN 30
30
DAYS AND TO FILE DAR
(DETAILED ACCIDENT REPORT) BEFORE THE CLAIMS TRIBUNAL TO PRODUCE THE
DRIVER(S), OWNER(S), CLAIMANT(S) AND EYE WITNESS(ES) BEFORE THE
CLAIMS TRIBUNAL COPY OF DAR TO BE
FURNISHED TO CLAIMANT(S), OWNER/DRIVER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE(S),
INSURANCE COMPANY
12
Place of occurrence Injured persons
13
Licence, Registration Certificates, Insurance Policy of the offending vehicle
Section 173, CrPC
Certificate, Identity Proof and Proof
age,
Proof, Disability Certificate and other documents
14
15
16
17
18
policy or the driving licence of the driver,
satisfaction of the Court to pay compensation that may be awarded in the claim case.
in public auction by the Magistrate concerned and the proceeds thereof shall be deposited with the concerned Claims Tribunal within 15 days
19
20
21
22
23
2019) read with Section 164
the Tribunal shall lapse (Proviso to Section 166 (1) )
24
– Functional Disability (Rekha Jain v. National Insurance Co.
permanent disability, he/she may suffer 100% functional disability
bodily injuries, must realise that the possession of one's own body is the first and most valuable of all human rights and that all other possessions and ownership are the extensions of the basic right. Bodily injuries should be equated with the deprivation which entitles a claimant to damages and the amount of damages varies in accordance with the gravity of injuries.
should keep in view the rights of the claimants under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act to determine the compensation claims of the claimants by considering the facts
Court on relevant aspects.
25
26
27
28
29
30
determination of the just compensation payable to the claimant(s) in accordance with law.
due to delay or deficiency on the part of the Investigating Officer or the Designated Officer of the Insurance Company, the Legal Services Authority shall take up the matter with the Police and/or Insurance Company, as the case may be.
31
32
blame”
to the road. She lost control of the scooter and fell on the road. The lorry, which was behind her, ran over her legs and hit another two-wheeler.
was performed. We were told that the nerves of one leg had been badly severed in the accident. The other leg was completely fractured. She is the sole bread-winner
provides for formulating a scheme for treatment during golden hour
33
adjudication before MACT even when breach of condition is not a ground;
generally prefer promptness
quantum
compensation
Singh and Others, (2004) 3 SCC 297)
power to make such an order(National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Challa Upendra Rao and Others, (2004) 8 SCC 517)
169(4)
34
(Jai Prakash v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. )
Accidents involving Insured Vehicles Hit and Run accidents involving Vehicles which remain unidentified Accidents involving Vehicles which do not have any Insurance Cover Accidents involving Vehicles with Third-Party Insurance, carrying persons who are not covered by the Insurance. Eg :- Pillion Riders
35
36
37
38
39
40
18.03.1978 to all the Insurance Companies to cover the
25.03.1977
cover pillion riders on a two-wheeler under “comprehensive policy”
the Insurance Companies reiterating the liability in respect of a pillion rider or occupants of a private car under “comprehensive policy”
* Yashpal Luthra v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2011) ACJ 1415 Del as mentioned in Jagtar Singh v. Sanjeev Kumar, (2018) 15 SCC 189
vehicle will not be covered under the policy
41
42
43
Deductions Conditions
Bachelor 1/3 Bachelor having large no. of dependants 1/3 Deceased was married having family
Family of 4-6 members 1/5 Family exceeding 6 members
44
Age of the Deceased (in years) Multiplier Scale Upto 15
18 21-25 18 26-30 17 31-35 16 36-40 15 41-45 14 46-50 13 51-55 11 56-60 9 61-65 7 Above 65 5
45
4. Future Prospects 5. Additions on Conventional Heads
– Rs.15,000/-
– Rs. 40,000/-
– Rs. 15,000/-
(National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680) 6. Interest from the date of Application – In this case it was assessed at the Rate –7.5%(Dharampal and Sons v. UP State Road Transport Corporation, (2008) 12 SCC 208)
Age Group (in years) If in Permanent Employment Self-Employed Less than 40 50% 40% 40-50 30% 25% 50-60 15% 10%
46
47
with its amenities
48
49