combustion turbine mact update
play

Combustion Turbine MACT Update Sandra Y. Snyder June 5, 2018 4:15 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Combustion Turbine MACT Update Sandra Y. Snyder June 5, 2018 4:15 pm 4:45 pm Turbine NESHAP 40 C.F.R. 63, Subpart YYYY Turbine NESHAP Final Rule Proposed rule: 68 Fed. Reg. 1,888 (Jan. 14, 2003) New if reconstructed


  1. Combustion Turbine MACT Update Sandra Y. Snyder June 5, 2018 4:15 pm – 4:45 pm

  2. Turbine NESHAP 40 C.F.R. 63, Subpart YYYY • Turbine NESHAP Final Rule  Proposed rule: – 68 Fed. Reg. 1,888 (Jan. 14, 2003) – “New” if reconstructed on or after Jan. 14, 2003  Final rule & effective date: – 69 Fed. Reg. 10,513 (Mar. 5, 2004)

  3. Turbine NESHAP 40 C.F.R. 63, Subpart YYYY • Final rule - formaldehyde emission standard  91 ppbvd @ 15%O2 for new / reconstructed turbines located at a major source of HAP emissions  Affected units are ≥ 1 MW at ISO conditions

  4. Rule Stay / De-listing Status • De-listing petition filed • EPA proposed to delist 4 subcategories • Rule stayed for Gas-Fired Turbines on Aug. 18, 2004 • But pursuant to the Plywood NESHAP case, source categories (e.g., turbines) can be delisted, but not subcategories (e.g., natural gas-fired turbines) • De-listing request for gas-fired turbine subcategories will likely be denied and stay rescinded

  5. Residual Risk & Technology Review (RTR) • Rulemaking schedule set by lawsuit re: failure to conduct 8-year RTR for 20 source categories (including turbines) • EPA outreach to stakeholders re: RTR  Mar. 2018 - INGAA submitted comments (e.g., new technology or add-on controls, catalyst costs, formaldehyde measurement)  Apr. 2018 – EPA outreach to INGAA and others  May 2018 – INGAA provided additional feedback to EPA

  6. Response to April EPA Inquiry • Concerns with EPA’s data: Some turbines have modeled risk above acceptable thresholds  1 compressor station in LA with inhalation risk above 1 in a million – Emission rate – Stack exit velocity – Exhaust temperature  Arsenic above screening value – 17 liquid-fired units

  7. Additional Concerns • Future considerations:  Standards for existing units, smaller units, etc.  Startup requirements or a “work practice” approach similar to RICE NESHAP?  EPA may allow 2 years or more to comply

  8. Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend