LPA LPA Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District Facilities Master - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LPA LPA

Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District

Facilities Master Plan

Governing Board FMP Process Presentation

July 9, 2015

1

50 years 285 people 80 staff dedicated

to education

40+Master Plans

san antonio sacramento san diego irvine san jose

welcome

fairfield–suisun usd

San Jose San Diego Sacramento Irvine

2

LPA core FMP team

LPA LPA

Jim Kisel

AIA, LEED AP BD+C Principal Director of School Planning

Steve Newsom

AIA, LEED AP BD+C Associate Project Director

Lindsay Hayward

LEED AP BD+C Associate Educational Facilities Planner

San Jose San Diego Sacramento Irvine

integrated design process

client-inclusive & stake-holder driven

a holistic tic approac proach h to problem lem solving ing that at places es the client ent in the cente ter foster tering ing part rtic icipa ipatio ion n and d direct rect inter teraction tion with th the multidis ltidiscip iplina linary ry team am of specialis ialists

• FMP is the first step in the facilities improvement process
• recommended every 3-5 years by CDE and to apply for state funding
• important to engage district and community stakeholders
• data driven decision making
• sustainable focus facilitates good stewardship
• development of high performance learning environments
• building upon FSUSD mission and strategic plan

3

create value / district strategic goals

Fairfield-Suisun USD – mission statement

“a premier learning community that empowers each student to thrive in an ever-changing world”

Fairfield-Suisun USD - district goals and major activities for the 2014-2015 school year

goal #1 – implement, support, and monitoring of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) goal #2 – maintain a safe environment for students and staff goal #3 – maintain fiscal solvency, liquidity, and effective use of District resources goal #4 – maintain positive District and community relations goal #5 – to function as a continually effective Governance Team

4

create value / district facilities master plan goals

1 – focused master plan

• maintenance & repair driven
• proposed scopes managed to an available funding budget
• school & community expectations tempered

2 – comprehensive long term vision

• starts with educational philosophy for how students will learn in the future
• meets District’s goals within the mission and vision statement
• discovers the impact of educational programs to facilities
• phased implementation approach

defining success – a “road map” to the future

5

Budget Estimates & Prioritization Final Facilities Master Plan Recommendations

create value facilities master plan components

• Campus Overview
• Existing Conditions
• Health/Life Safety Issues
• Code/ADA Compliance
• Building Systems
• Visual Observations

Facilities Condition Assessments

• Local Revenue
• State Eligibility
• Voter Approved

Options

• Funding Plan

Scenarios

Financial Analysis

• Enrollment Trends
• Site Capacities
• Student Loading

Standards

• Attendance Boundaries
• New Development

Demographics Review

• District Mission Statements
• Guiding Principals
• Student Learning

Methodologies

• Program Standards
• Technology Integration
• Increased Student Outcomes

& Achievement

Educational Vision & Goals

• Community Stakeholders
• District Staff
• School Site Principals
• Communicate Needs
• Campus Master Plan Concepts
• Build Support for District Goals

Collaboration Cost Estimates & Prioritization Final Facilities Master Plan Recommendations

6

7

common themes…inspire curiosity 21st century skills – the 5 c’s

Critical Thinking Creativity Collaboration Communication Community

common core integration healthy students / healthy schools learning environment / learning styles

Visual Audio Tactile Kinesthetic

social & casual learning spaces business & community linkages technology transparency improving student outcomes & achievement goal

enrich lives program vision exploration

7

8

facilities needs assessment building upon the good work done to date

for site work, existing buildings and utility systems upgrade and/or replacement, levels of scope and improvement recommendations can be assessed to help the fairfield-suisun unified school district strategize and prioritize future projects.

prove it / existing facility assessments

• district data / record drawings research
• coordination with previous program goals
• site walks & principal interviews/questionnaires
• deferred maintenance items
• building code / ada / health & life safety issues
• lder campus needs, building & utility systems condition
• external & internal landscape and athletic fields assessment
• campus safety & fencing
• energy efficiency & prop 39 funding
• longevity vs. future maintenance costs

critical itical first t step: ep: assem emblin ling g an accura rate te existing ting facilit ilities ies data tabase e to predic edict future re constr truc uction tion costs

8

facilities needs assessments educational program vision implementation planning

prove it / facilities master plan digital deliverable

• executive summary
• guiding principles vision
• educational program standards
• technology readiness
• sq. ft. & physical characteristics
• campus overview
• code, health & student/staff safety issues
• classroom capacity & space utilization
• maintenance & operational efficiency
• building materials & systems condition
• school site master plan diagrams
• cost estimates
• funding source analysis
• scope prioritization
• communication of recommendations

9

inter + act committees & stakeholder engagement

District Focus Groups Outreach Fairfield -Suisun USD Governing Board Facilities Master Plan Committee (FMPC) School Site Input

Elementary School Programs

4

GB Site

English Learner Services Community Forums (1 Per Region)

Number of Meetings/Interactions

5

Staff Survey

Public Safety Academy College & Career Academy

Executive Steering Committee (ESC)

ESC FMPC

Community

Technology Support Services (TSS) Child Nutrition Maintenance & Facilities Special Education Secondary School Programs

Charrette Charrette

1

day

1 1 1 1 ea.

Principal Surveys School Site Focused Interactions High School Students

1+1

1x ON- LINE

ASB

3 #

Facilities Assessment & Educational Program Vision

• verlay to develop school site master plans

1x ON- LINE

Charrette

Early Childhood Programs

1

8

10

inter + act FMP committee members

Facilities Master Plan Committee (FMPC) (30-45 Committee Members Total – Meets Monthly)

District Participants

• (3) Governing Board Members
• Superintendent
• Asst. Supt. Business Services
• Asst. Supt. Instructional Services & ES/Secondary Directors
• Director Facilities, Maintenance & Facilities Staff
• (6-8) Teachers & Administrators Representatives

(Cross Section of Roles/Disciplines)

• Certificated Employee Representative
• Classified Employee Representative
• Student & PTA Representatives (1-2/HS Attendance Area)

Community Members

• (4-6) Community Leader Representatives
• Governmental Agencies
• (4-6) Business Community Representatives
• Engaged FSUSD Parents
• Community College Representative
• Senior Community Representative
• Tax Group Representative
• Chamber of Commerce Representative
• Real-estate Organizations Representative

(Purpose is to develop District wide master plan program/facilities vision and standards with a goal to equally weight the total number of FSUSD and local community participants on the FMPC group.)

11

inter + act proposed scheduled

12

• 1. people driven
• 2. research informed
• 3. learner centered
• 4. exploratory
• 5. transparent
• 6. implement-able
• 7. long range
• 8. regularly updated

we believe that a sustainable master plan is…

LPA

creating sustainable places and spaces that enrich the lives of those who use them

13

Governing Board Discussion…