Lower Boise River Phosphorus TMDL Lauri Monnot Idaho Department of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lower boise river phosphorus tmdl
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lower Boise River Phosphorus TMDL Lauri Monnot Idaho Department of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lower Boise River Phosphorus TMDL Lauri Monnot Idaho Department of Environmental Quality April 2012 Basics of Phosphorus and Phosphorus Pollution Phosphorus in Nature Nutrient Spiraling Aquatic Plants Dissolved Nutrients (luxury


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lower Boise River Phosphorus TMDL

Lauri Monnot Idaho Department of Environmental Quality April 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Basics of Phosphorus and Phosphorus Pollution

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Phosphorus in Nature

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Nutrient Spiraling

Dissolved Nutrients (orthophosphate) Aquatic Plants (luxury consumption) Plants Die Water Column River Bottom Sediment Uptake by Rooted Plants

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Phosphorus in the Boise River Where does it come from?

– Point Sources

– WWTF

» Municipal wastewater » Industry » Hatcheries

– Stormwater

– Nonpoint sources

– Agricultural – Septic systems – Groundwater

– Background

– Natural weathering – Biological processes

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Phosphorus Load (2008 IP)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Phosphorus Standards

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Water Quality Standards (WQS)

  • Rules developed by states to define how much
  • f a pollutant can be present without

impairment of beneficial uses

IDAPA 58 TITLE 01 CHAPTER 02 58.01.02 - WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

WQS Types

  • Numeric criteria - defines a number or

concentration for a pollutant

– Simple WQ target definition

  • Narrative criteria – free from….

– Flexible, assimilative capacity differs

slide-10
SLIDE 10

States with Numeric Nutrient Criteria

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Nutrient WQS is Narrative for Idaho

  • Surface waters of the state shall be free from

excess nutrients that can cause visible slime growths or other nuisance aquatic growths impairing designated beneficial uses (IDAPA 16.01.02.200.06).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What Do the Data Say?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

1999 Lower Boise SBA Conclusions

  • TP concentrations during the growing season at Middleton and Parma are

more than sufficient to support algae growth

  • DO % saturation rarely below WQS
  • DO concentration always met or exceeded 6.0 mg/l
  • Water column Chl-a data do not indicate excessive growth of algae
  • Periphytic Chl-a exceed suggested nuisance thresholds but there was an

absence of DO problems

  • High sediment concentrations in the river below Caldwell may preventing

algae growth Status Summary- Data do not show major impairment of beneficial uses due to nutrients and associated nuisance aquatic growths. However, high nutrient concentrations and periphytic algae levels imply that nutrients are a potential threat to aquatic life and recreational uses.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Lower Boise River Implementation Plan 2008

  • SR-HC TMDL (2004) load allocation 0.07 mg/l

TP for all tributaries to achieve beneficial uses

  • Plan to meet the Boise River target at Parma

for SR-HC TMDL

– Gathered available data (post 1999 SBA) – Pollutant source inventory – Developed load allocations to reach target

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LBR Nutrient Impairment

  • 2008 Integrated Report DEQ proposed to de-

list for nutrients

– 1999 SBA supports de-listing

  • EPA denied delisting - comments on delisting

proposal for 2008 IR

– http://www.deq.idaho.gov/media/773615-2008- ir-epa-response-lower-boise-river-hem-creek- 101309.pdf

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Reminder

  • Surface waters of the state shall be free from

excess nutrients that can cause visible slime growths or other nuisance aquatic growths impairing designated beneficial uses (IDAPA 16.01.02.200.06).

  • Boise River does not meet this standard

– Proceed with TMDL

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lower Boise River Phosphorus TMDL Questions?