Low-Mass Dark Matter Searches Using Quantum Sensing and Readout - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

low mass dark matter searches using quantum sensing and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Low-Mass Dark Matter Searches Using Quantum Sensing and Readout - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Low-Mass Dark Matter Searches Using Quantum Sensing and Readout with MKIDs and Paramps Ritoban Basu Thakur on behalf of Golwala-group New Directions in the Search for Light Dark Matter Particles 2019/06/06 Overview Detector requirements


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Low-Mass Dark Matter Searches Using
 Quantum Sensing and Readout with MKIDs and Paramps

New Directions in the Search for Light Dark Matter Particles 2019/06/06

Ritoban Basu Thakur

  • n behalf of Golwala-group
slide-2
SLIDE 2

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Overview

Detector requirements for various detection channels Kinetic inductance detector basics KID-based architectures for different science goals and expected energy resolutions

Small detectors focused on energy resolution for low-mass reach (< GeV, << GeV) Large detectors focused on ER/NR rejection and position reconstruction for neutrino floor reach at 0.5-5 GeV

Progress to date and plans With thanks to:

SuperCDMS Pyle, Zurek, Kurinsky, McKinsey et al

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Rapid Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Motivation for Small Sub-eV 
 Resolution Detectors

Current technologies ~1 eV threshold

MeV thermal relics, eV dark photons

Need new technologies to access 
 keV thermal relics, meV dark photons! Sharp targets due to simplicity:

same diagrams for annih. and scatt. no accidental cancellations

4

103 102 101 100 101 102 103

mχ [MeV]

1045 1044 1043 1042 1041 1040 1039 1038 1037 1036 1035 1034 1033 1032

σe [cm2]

BBN Stellar bounds Freeze-in

SuperCDMS G2 DAMIC-1K LBECA SENSEI-100g ZrTe5 Al SC

Xenon10

Dark photon mediator mA0 ⌧ keV GaAs Al2O3 Al2O3 (mod) p h

  • n
  • n

s c i n t i l l a t

  • r

101 102 103

mX (keV)

10−43 10−42 10−41 10−40 10−39 10−38 10−37 10−36 10−35 10−34

σn (cm2)

H e ( m u l t i p h

  • n
  • n

)

Al2O3

ω > 1 meV ω > 25 meV ω > 50 meV ω > 75 meV

10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 102

mA [eV]

10−18 10−16 10−14 10−12 10−10

κ

Stellar constraints

Al SC

e excitation

Ge

phonon excitation

S i

Dirac material M

  • l

e c u l e s

Direct detection constraints 1 kg-yr, Sapphire 1 kg-yr, GaAs

dark photon absorption DM-electron scattering (light mediator) DM-nucleon scattering

slide-5
SLIDE 5

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Basics of Kinetic Inductance Detectors

Superconductors have an AC inductance due to inertia of Cooper pairs

alternately, due to magnetic energy stored in screening supercurrent

Changes when Cooper pairs broken by energy, creating quasiparticles (qps) Sense the change by monitoring a resonant circuit Key point: superconductors provide very high Q (Qi > 107 achieved), so thousands of such resonators can be monitored with a single feedline

enormous cryogenic multiplex technology relative to existing ones very simple cryogenic readout components

... ...

Cryostat Frequency Synthesizers IQ Mixers I Q 5

Day Mazin

sub-meV
 pair- breaking
 energy

slide-6
SLIDE 6

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Basics of Kinetic Inductance Detectors

Superconductors have an AC inductance due to inertia of Cooper pairs

alternately, due to magnetic energy stored in screening supercurrent

Changes when Cooper pairs broken by energy, creating quasiparticles (qps) Sense the change by monitoring a resonant circuit Key point: superconductors provide very high Q (Qi > 107 achieved), so thousands of such resonators can be monitored with a single feedline

enormous cryogenic multiplex technology relative to existing ones very simple cryogenic readout components

... ...

Cryostat Frequency Synthesizers IQ Mixers I Q 6

Day Mazin

sub-meV
 pair- breaking
 energy

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Detector physics

slide-8
SLIDE 8

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Quasiparticles to Conductivity

MB gives characteristic T and
 ℏ𝜕/∆ dependence Key features

Quiescent nqp exponentially suppressed as T decreases*

* as long as no anomalous qp recombination physics * as long as no anomalous qp creation

Responsivity only weakly T

  • dependent

(not exponential!)

8

Mattis-Bardeen Relations

10-20 10-15 10-10 10-5 100 nqp/(2N0Δ) 10-20 10-15 10-10 10-5 100 [σ-σ(0)]/|σ(0)|

  • (imaginary part)

real part Recall σ(0) = jσn(πΔ/hν)

0.1 T/Tc 1 2 3 4 5 [2N0Δ/nqp] [σ-σ(0)]/|σ(0)| = [2N0Δ] ∂(σ/|σ(0)|)/∂nqp

real part

  • (imaginary part)

| | σ1 |σ(0)| = 4 π nqp 2N0∆ 1 ⌦ 2π kT

sinh ⇥ ¯ hω 2kT ⇤ K0 ⇥ ¯ hω 2kT ⇤ σ2 |σ(0)| = 1 − nqp 2N0∆ ⌅ 1 + ↵ 2∆ πkT exp ⇥ − ¯ hω 2kT ⇤ I0 ⇥ ¯ hω 2kT ⇤⇧ (0) )

  • 2

∆ 4 1 ⇥ ¯ ⇤ ⇥ ¯ ⇤ | | 2N0∆ ∂(σ1/|σ(0)|) ∂nqp

  • T

= 2N0∆ nqp σ1 |σ(0)| = 4 π 2N0∆ ∂(σ2/|σ(0)|) ∂nqp

  • T

= 2N0∆ nqp σ2 − σ2(0) |σ(0)| =

conductivity fully inductive
 at T = 0

ℏω/∆ = 0.06

weak T

  • dependence

thermally 
 generated
 quasiparticle density quiescent fractional 
 conductivity deviation
 from T=0 value
 fractional
 responsivity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

≥ δ devel τ τ §4.2.2

Noroozian Lifetime (msec)

Nonidealities: Quasiparticle Density and Lifetime Limits

Quasiparticle response 
 governed by quasiparticle 
 lifetime, observed to 
 follow
 
 
 where n∗ may be a 
 limiting qp density Frequently written as
 
 
 with the recombination 
 constant Sets bandwidth over which noise integrated: larger 𝜐qp is better Many ms lifetimes achievable but perhaps only at low readout powers Need to make conservative assumptions about 𝜐qp to avoid optimistic predictions

9

τqp = τmax 1 + nqp/n∗

102 103 102 101 101

100 1,000 750 500 250

Al flms BCS theory Ta flms

75 50 25 0 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

100 0.03 0.3

Ta relaxation time (µs)

Ta relaxation time (µs)

Reduced temperature (T/Tc)

T/Tc

Al relaxation time (µs)

Al relaxation time (µs)

Barends et al PRL (2008) 
 as reproduced in Zmuidzinas, ARCMP (2012) asymptotic regime; limiting excess qp density n∗, or something else? related to disorder? (Barends et al implantation experiment)

1 τqp = 2 R nqp + 1 τmax R = (2 n∗ τmax)−1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Science: goals & prospects

slide-11
SLIDE 11

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Small-Detector (gram-scale) Architectures

Goal: detection of sub-eV energies from:

Dark phonon absorption, DM-e scattering,
 scalar-mediated nucleon scattering at very low recoil
 energies, directly producing phonons w/o e-h pairs

Methods:

Detection of qp creation in superconducting target 
 via phonon or qp collection
 (Hochberg, Zhao, Zurek, arXiv:1504.07237)

Phonons appropriate when 2∆substrate > hνphonon: phonons 
 propagate quasi-ballistically with long decay times 
 (100 µs - ms: SuperCDMS, Gaitskell thesis w/high RRR Nb) Quasiparticles appropriate when 2∆substrate < hνphonon: 
 phonons cannot propagate, but qp’s can, w/long decay times
 (e.g.: probably Al, other low T superconductors: untested!)

Detection of optical phonon production in polar materials:

GaAs (Knapen, Lin, Pyle, Zurek, arXiv:1712.06598) Al2O3 (Griffin, Knapen, Lin, Zurek, arXiv:1807.10291)

Architecture:

Single mm-scale KID on gm-scale, few-mm target substrate

Lower-gap superconductor for KID (e.g., AlMn) 
 and/or better amplifiers promise meV-scale resolution

11

KID insulating
 crystal DM-produced phonon

no quasiparticle trapping!*

insulator KID superconducting
 crystal DM-produced qp quiescent qp phonon insulator KID qp trap

*of the conventional kind with collector >> KID

b)

2 cm 1 g

slide-12
SLIDE 12

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Assume

delta-function-like energy deposition qp population dominated by readout power generation dissipation readout (no TLS noise) amplifier noise dominant over g-r noise (T ~ 0.1 Tc required) quasiparticle lifetime >> phonon absorption time, τqp >> τph,abs ~ 100 µs

  • ptimistic, requires increasing τqp from ~100 µs

Reduce ∆, TN to get well below eV resolution

12

quality factor
 due to 
 quasiparticles 1 mm2 x 10 nm resonator effective
 volume (weighted by current2) superconductivity 
 factor

r χc = 4 Q2

r

Qi Qc  1

fraction of inductance
 due to KI ~ aluminum 
 gap amplifier noise
 temperature “efficiency factors” all assumed to
 be unity by design (optimistic) efficiency for converting phonons to qps probability for
 phonon to enter KID per try superconducting 
 gap energy efficiency of 
 qp creation by 
 readout power

χqp = Qi Qi,qp  1 χBW = τqp τabs + τqp  1

normal state single-spin
 density of states

no quasiparticle trapping!

Small-Detector Architecture
 Characteristic Energy Resolution: Optimistic Prediction

σE = 2 ∆ ηph r ηread αχcχqp s N0Vr γsS1(fr, Tqp, ∆) Qi,qp s kBTN χBW σE = (0.9 eV) ✓ 0.3 ηph rηread pt 0.1 α ◆ ✓ ∆ 200 µeV ◆ s 106 Qi,qp s Vr 104 (µm)3 TN 5 K 1.6 S1(fr, Tqp, ∆)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Small-Detector Architecture
 Characteristic Energy Resolution: Conservative Prediction

Assume (conservatively):

qp population dominated by readout power generation dissipation readout (no TLS noise) amplifier noise dominant over g-r noise (T ~ 0.1 Tc required) quasiparticle lifetime in KID << phonon absorption timescale 
 (τqp << τph,abs ~ 100 µs; conservative) Reduce ∆, TN, increase τqp to get well below eV resolution

13

superconducting 
 gap energy efficiency for converting phonons to qps fraction of inductance
 due to KI probability for
 phonon to enter KID per try efficiency of 
 qp creation by 
 readout power amplifier noise
 temperature normal state single-spin
 density of states superconductivity 
 factor quasiparticle
 lifetime

no quasiparticle trapping!

~ aluminum 
 gap

σE = 2 ∆ ηph rηread αpt s 1 χcχqp s N0 γsS1(fr, Tqp, ∆) s 1 Qi,qp s kBTN τqp r Vabsλpb cs = (7 eV) ✓ 0.3 ηph rηread pt 0.1 α ◆ ✓ ∆ 200 µeV ◆ s 106 Qi,qp s Msub 1 gm λpb 1 µm 7 km/s cs 100 µs τqp TN 5 K 1.6 S1(fr, Tqp, ∆)

pair-breaking length
 in KID film substrate
 volume sound
 speed substrate
 mass
 (assuming
 silicon) quality factor
 due to 
 quasiparticles

r χc = 4 Q2

r

Qi Qc  1

“efficiency factors” 𝜓c, 𝜓qp assumed to
 be unity by design, 𝜓BW << 1 (conservative)

χqp = Qi Qi,qp  1 χBW = τqp τabs + τqp  1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

SuperCDMS 0.5-5 GeV search limited by:

Bulk cosmogenics producing electron recoils Surface background rejection

Requirements:

ER/NR rejection 
 using spectral 
 information and
 e/h quantization Position-based rejection


  • f surface bgnds

Large-Detector (kg-scale) Architectures

14

  • [/]
  • σ []
  • σ []
  • -
  • Silicon

Germanium Raw background spectra expected for 
 SuperCDMS SNOLAB dominated by :

  • ERs from cosmogenics (32Si, 3H)
  • continuum gammas
  • surface events
slide-15
SLIDE 15

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Goal:

traditional nuclear recoil search at very low 
 recoil energies (10 eVr)

Method:

10 eV resolution + 
 Neganov-Trofimov-Luke 
 phonon production by drifting 
 e-h pairs in large electric field 
 for single e-h pair detection Or, 0.25-eV resolution and no NTL

Architecture:

~100 KIDs on 10-cm-scale substrate Energy resolution
 provides ER/NR
 discrimination Fine pixelation 
 yields surface bgnd
 rejection via 
 fiducialization Also provides pos’n 
 correction 
 for energy

Large-Detector (kg-scale) Architectures

15

Recoil phonons Drift phonons Charge propagation Recoil phonons

~100V 10 cm 100-1000 g

no quasiparticle trapping! Surface 
 event: Bulk event:

Energy (eV) Energy (eV) SuperCDMS
 PRL 121: 051301 (2018)

  • D. Moore using SuperCDMS MC
slide-16
SLIDE 16

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Large-Detector Architecture
 Characteristic Energy Resolution: Conservative Prediction

Assume (conservatively):

qp population dominated by readout power generation dissipation readout (no TLS noise) amplifier noise dominant over g-r noise (T ~ 0.1 Tc required) resonator is coupling dominated (Qi >> Qc = 10k-50k) so τr < τph,r quasiparticle lifetime in KID << phonon absorption timescale (τqp << τph,abs ~ ms; conservative) Reduce ∆, TN, increase τqp to reach eV resolution

16

superconducting 
 gap energy efficiency for converting phonons to qps fraction of inductance
 due to KI probability for
 phonon to enter KID per try area of substrate
 (including sidewalls) efficiency of 
 qp creation by 
 readout power pair-breaking length
 in KID film KID resonant
 frequency amplifier noise
 temperature normal state single-spin
 density of states superconductivity 
 factor quasiparticle
 lifetime

no quasiparticle trapping!

σE = ∆ ηph rηread αpt s AsubλpbN0 γsS1(fr, Tqp, ∆) s kBTN 2πfrτqp (2) = (330 eV) ✓ 0.3 ηph rηread pt 0.1 α ◆ ✓ ∆ 200 µeV ◆ s Asub 100 cm2 λpb 1 µm 3 GHz fr 100 µs τqp TN 5 K 1.6 S1(fr, Tqp, ∆)

~ aluminum 
 gap

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Laboratory performance

slide-18
SLIDE 18

KID Performance

Reasonable yield Qi’s spread from 104 - few 106

Fab goal is a cluster > 105

Formal noise limit being studied:

GR or TLS, no evidence of TLS yet

Proper responsibly calibrations

Sub-mm community has standard techniques

slide-19
SLIDE 19

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

KID Power Pulsing

Calibration of KID response with readout power pulsing

Apply a 10 µs readout power pulse to one KID (red),


  • ff-resonance, while reading out it + another (blue)

Quasiparticle recombination visible in pulsed KID

1/(pulse amplitude) shows linear relationship with time
 as expected for pair recombination

Phonon-mediated signal seen in other KIDs (blue)

Quasiparticle decay creates phonons Phonons propagate in substrate to other KID and
 create quasiparticles there (with rise time) Those quasiparticles decay (exp. decay because δnqp/nqp small)

Calibrate position information with many localized sources!

19

pulse amplitude (A.U) 1/(pulse amplitude) (A.U) log(pulse amplitude) (A.U.)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Imminent improvements

σE ∝ ∆ s TN 5K 100µs τqp . . .

slide-21
SLIDE 21

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Colleagues at JPL (P . Day et al) are developing a quantum-limited amplifier based on:

Nonlinearity due to kinetic inductance 3-wave mixing (DC + pump)

Broadband gain and quantum-limited performance demonstrated

21

Broadband Kinetic Inductance Parametric Amplifier

Transmission line: df ∝du ∝d𝛴 (phase) u(I) = 1/ q C (Lg + Lk,0 (1 + (I/I∗)2))

∂2I ∂z2 ∂ ∂t  L(I)C ∂I ∂t

  • = 0 ,

Transmission line traveling wave eq. Sum of currents: pump, weak-signal, idler

I = 1 2 X

n

An(z)ei(knz−ωnt) + c.c. !

3-current (nonlinear) mixing

slide-22
SLIDE 22

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Colleagues at JPL (P . Day et al) are developing a quantum-limited amplifier based on:

Nonlinearity due to kinetic inductance 3-wave mixing (DC + pump) (really 4 wave, but pumps are degenerate)

Broadband gain and quantum-limited performance demonstrated

22

Broadband Kinetic Inductance Parametric Amplifier

Transmission line: df ∝du ∝d𝛴 (phase) u(I) = 1/ q C (Lg + Lk,0 (1 + (I/I∗)2))

∂2I ∂z2 ∂ ∂t  L(I)C ∂I ∂t

  • = 0 ,

Transmission line traveling wave eq. Sum of currents: pump, weak-signal, idler

I = 1 2 X

n

An(z)ei(knz−ωnt) + c.c. !

3-current (nonlinear) mixing

photon absorption is described by terms that contain

1+ 3.

In order to understand the four-wave mixing process, a closer examination of the third order nonlinear polarization must be made. The general form of the polarization may be written as shown in (3). P r E E E i k k k r i t

i ijkl j k l

( , ) ( , , , ) ( ) ( ) ( ) exp[ ( ) ]

( ) *

ω χ ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω

4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4

! ! ! ! ! = − − − + ⋅ − + c.c. (3)

ω ω ω ω2 (SRS, RIKES) 2ω ω ω ω1-ω ω ω ω2 (CARS) 2ω ω ω ω2-ω ω ω ω1 (CSRS) Laser at ω ω ω ω1

Laser at

ω ω ω ω2 χ χ χ χ(3) Material ω ω ω ω1 (TIRES)

4-wave mixing (any nonlinear optics text book)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Colleagues at JPL (P . Day et al) are developing a quantum-limited amplifier based on:

Nonlinearity due to kinetic inductance 3-wave mixing (DC + pump)

Broadband gain and quantum-limited performance demonstrated

23

Broadband Kinetic Inductance Parametric Amplifier

Transmission line: df ∝du ∝d𝛴 (phase) u(I) = 1/ q C (Lg + Lk,0 (1 + (I/I∗)2))

∂2I ∂z2 ∂ ∂t  L(I)C ∂I ∂t

  • = 0 ,

Transmission line traveling wave eq. Sum of currents: pump, weak-signal, idler

I = 1 2 X

n

An(z)ei(knz−ωnt) + c.c. !

3-current (nonlinear) mixing

Gs = |As(L)|2 |As(0)|2

0.5 1 1.5 2 5 10 15 20

fsignal / fpump Gain (dB)

Δθ = 1 radian 3 10

slide-24
SLIDE 24

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

0.32, 0.25 um

PD

Broadband Kinetic Inductance Parametric Amplifier

Colleagues at JPL (P . Day et al) are developing a quantum-limited amplifier based on:

Nonlinearity due to kinetic inductance 3-wave mixing (DC + pump)

Broadband gain and quantum-limited performance demonstrated

Devices low yield due 
 to fine features

Applied to UV/O/IR MKIDs 
 to obtain 10x lower TN

24

2 4 6 8 10 12

  • Freq. (GHz)
  • 5

5 10 15 20 25

Parametric Gain (dB)

High kinetic inductance thin films requires carful engineering of transmission lines

High Lk materials for higher gains Phase mismatch for varying frequencies for large BW Transmission / reflection optimized for large BW

slide-25
SLIDE 25

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Colleagues at JPL (P . Day et al) are developing a quantum-limited amplifier based on:

Nonlinearity due to kinetic inductance 3-wave mixing (DC + pump)

Broadband gain and quantum-limited performance demonstrated

Devices low yield due 
 to fine features

New version made showing higher Gain! Y-factor noise measurement done! New low-loss a-Si:H 
 dielectric enables 
 higher-yield version:
 gain demonstrated,
 TN = 4 x QL at 3 GHz, likely to improve to QL

Broadband Kinetic Inductance Parametric Amplifier

25

5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10

frequency (GHz)

  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

added noise (photons)

noise, 40mK, 14.747 GHz pump Quantum Limit

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Frequency [GHz]

Gain [dB]

slide-26
SLIDE 26

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Plans and Context

Near-term

Using KID pulsing scheme and 55Fe/129I x-rays to measure baseline σE; position-correct also

Mid-term

Provide position reconstruction and NR discrimination to reach neutrino floor > 1 GeV

Provide NR discrimination via e-h spectral peaks to reject dominant tritium and 32Si backgrounds Provide position reconstruction to reject non-cosmogenic surface bgnds (210Pb betas and 206Pb nuclei) Large-detector track 1: σ ~ 5-10 eV + HV: QL paramp + 1 ms qp lifetime Large-detector track 2: σ ~ 0.25 eV at 0V: QL paramp + 1 ms qp lifetime + lower ∆ + higher KI fraction

Small-detector track

Reoptimize design purely for energy resolution and small target size; σ ~ 0.15 eV possible with Al

Threshold, not position information

Continue using phonon absorption on semiconducting substrates. but begin to consider polar substrates

Start with Al2O3, try out GaAs for better mass reach.

Long-term

Revisit design for superconducting substrates, σ ~ 1 meV

Use quasiparticles or phonons? Phonon propagation challenging in superconductors (check Gaitskell). Find a configuration that works. Hybrid CPW-lumped element? Microstripline?

Other efforts? Not many!

CALDER = effort to deploy KIDs for photodetection in CUORE follow-on 0νββ expt CUPID

No scintillation in TeO2, but betas Cherenkov radiate. Separate dominant alpha background from betas by requiring Cherenkov signal. Need σ ~ 20 eV to see 100 eV signal → simpler needs.

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

New Directions in Searches for Light DM Basu Thakur/Golwala

Conclusions

KIDs coupled to insulating and superconducting substrates promise to extend reach in dark matter mass and cross section

Small-detector architectures have potential to reach thermal relic mass limit 
 via DM-e scattering and to probe boson DM in the meV - keV mass range inaccessible to coherent techniques Large-detector architectures have potential for background rejection needed to reach neutrino floor

Quantum-limited readout is critical to achieving these goals Ideas for evading standard quantum limit may provide additional gains There is a lot of work to do!

27