Long Baseline Neutrino Physics with Theia 70m 18m Mike Wilking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

long baseline neutrino physics with theia
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Long Baseline Neutrino Physics with Theia 70m 18m Mike Wilking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Long Baseline Neutrino Physics with Theia 70m 18m Mike Wilking Stony Brook University T HEIA25 MOOD Workshop November 12th, 2019 20m Challenges in DUNE LBL Physics E rec for selected E true bins fully reconstructed Ar 3.5 kt-yr 40


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THEIA25

70m 20m 18m

Long Baseline Neutrino Physics with Theia

Mike Wilking Stony Brook University MOOD Workshop November 12th, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Challenges in DUNE LBL Physics

  • Subtle mistakes in our modeling of ν-Ar interactions on argon

can produce large biases on neutrino oscillation parameters

  • Missing energy (e.g. neutrons) cause feed-down in Erec vs

Etrue

  • Mismodeling the shape of this feed-down can cause biases
  • Understanding the detector uncertainties is also critical

(e.g. in hadronic energy measurements)

ν

Ar μ

fully reconstructed

p

Energy measurement

n n

Missing energy

π0 π+

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 (GeV)

Rec.

E 10 20 30 40 3.5 kt-yr ×

  • like Events / 40
e

ν Selected

π+

Erec for selected Etrue bins

slide-3
SLIDE 3

DUNE-PRISM to the Rescue?

  • DUNE-PRISM can provide strong constraints on ν-Ar interaction modeling
  • By measuring a continuously varying set of neutrino energy spectra, the Etrue ->

Erec relationship can be constrained

  • However, challenges still remain
  • Differences in detector efficiency and resolution between the ND (ArgonCube +

Muon spectrometer) and FD still must be precisely understood

  • Since the FD is on-axis, DUNE-PRISM cannot sample higher energies to constrain

high-Eν feed-down (other strategies, such as changing the horn current are under investigation)

  • Uncertainties in the neutrino flux prediction must be well constrained


(beamline geometry, wrong-sign backgrounds, etc.)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Advantages of Adding a WbLS Detector

  • A WbLS detector provides several complementary features

to the DUNE LBL program

  • A different (simpler?) target nucleus
  • Different detector systematic uncertainties (and

coupling of detector modeling to cross section modeling)

  • Improved neutron detection
  • Good energy resolution
  • Fast timing
  • In the era of systematics limitations (i.e. when a 4th

detector would come online), providing extra constraints

  • n systematic uncertainties will be a high priority
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Theia LBL Sensitivity Studies

  • The initial LBL studies have focused on a pure

water (Cherenkov-only) phase

  • The additional benefits of WbLS have not yet

been included (hadronic energy measurements, neutron tagging, etc.)

  • Previous studies of a Water Cherenkov detector in

the LBNF beam occurred in LBNE

  • These studies used older (“SK1”) reconstruction

tools and analysis techniques

  • An updated set of studies has been conducted for

Theia based on the latest Water Cherenkov analysis tools

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Neutrino&running&

Reconstructed Energy (GeV) Number of Events

NUEQE=562 ANUEQE=4 NUENQE=684 ANUENQE=7 NC=1390 BEAM NUE=289 NUMU CC=75

50 100 150 200 250 300 2 4 6 8

Reminder of LBNE Studies

  • LBNF beam with a water Cherenkov

detector at Homestake

  • Prior studies (LBNE) made the following

assumptions:

  • 1. Only single-ring events are selected

(~20% νe-CCnQE efficiency)

  • Largest interaction mode at DUNE

energies of ~2-3 GeV is resonance (CCπ) events

  • 2. Neutral current background rejection

is based on older reconstruction tools
 (pre-FiTQun and even pre-POLFit)

  • Both of these assumptions have been

revisited with updated reconstruction tools

(GeV)

  • E
  • 1

10 1 10

2

10

/ GeV)

2

cm

  • 38

(10

  • cross section / E
  • 0.2

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 (GeV)

  • E
  • 1

10 1 10

2

10

/ GeV)

2

cm

  • 38

(10

  • cross section / E
  • 0.2

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

TOTAL QE DIS RES

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Advances in Cherenkov Reconstruction

  • Since the LBNE WC studies, the FiTQun

event reconstruction package has been implemented in T2K & SK

  • A likelihood-based fitter that generates

charge and time PDFs for all PMTs for any proposed set of final state particles

  • Substantial improvements are seen in

e/μ separation and NC (π0) rejection

  • FiTQun is now exclusively used for all T2K
  • scillation analyses, and in the latest SK

atmospheric analysis

  • FiTQun can naturally incorporate

scintillation light, but this has not yet been implemented

Visible energy [MeV]

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Miss-ID rate [%]

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

  • µ

FiTQun apfit

(MeV) γ True Energy of the Less Energetic

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Rejection Efficiency π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

fiTQun POLFit

MC π0 events 0 to 500 MeV/c

Fraction of μ misIDed as e Improved low-E γ Detection

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FiTQun π0 Rejection

  • Goal: identify a low-E photon in the


presence of a high-E photon

  • To reject π0: Compare best fit likelihoods of π0 fit &

single-e fit (as a function of reconstructed π0 mass)

  • Large improvement in finding low energy 2nd ring
  • ~70% reduction in π0 background relative to POLFit


(but not even POLFit was used in the LBNE studies)

Vertex Photon Conversions

π0 γ γ

Mass (MeV/c) π

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 fiTQun POLFit

T2K νe Background

(MeV) γ True Energy of the Less Energetic

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Rejection Efficiency π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

fiTQun POLFit

MC π0 events 0 to 500 MeV/c

)

2

Mass (MeV/c π

50 100 150 200 250

)

e

/L

π

ln(L

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Signal

e

ν Background π

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Multi-Ring Events

  • FiTQun can currently reconstruct up to 6

rings in a staged approach

  • Each step sequentially adds a “track-

like” (π+) or “shower-like” (e) ring

  • The chain terminates when adding a

ring does not sufficiently improve the fit

  • Ring counting & PID are significantly

improved

Atmospheric MC Event

Reconstructed charge Predicted charge

10

Hit Charge Distribution

Atmospheric MC Event

Reconstructed charge Predicted charge

10

Reconstructed “Mean” Charge

π e ee eπ πe ππ eee No Improvement Fit Improves eeπ πee πeπ

Sample Fit Sequence

eeπe eeππ πeπe πeππ Fit Improves Fit Improves πeππe πeπππ ππe πππ ππee ππeπ πππe ππππ

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“1-Ring” νe-CCπ+ in T2K

  • The newest T2K νe sample is νe-CCπ+

where the π+ is below Cherenkov threshold

  • Still a 1-ring event, but with a Michel

electron

  • Previously, these events were

contaminated with νμ-CC background

  • Improved e/μ separation now allows

for a high purity 1-ring, 1-Michel νe selection

  • Eventually, Theia may have a better tag
  • f below Cherenkov pions via

scintillation (if separable from protons, etc.), but this is not yet included

e CC1

selection: reconstructed energy

Reconstructed energy distribution of CC1

  • enriched

e sample.

FiTQun selection yields a much smaller numu CC background, which has a large systematic uncertainty. fiTQun APfit

energy (MeV) ν Reconstructed 500 1000 Number of events

0.5 1 1.5

POT)

20

10 × (7.48 CC

e

ν Osc. CC

e

ν Osc. CC

µ

ν /

µ

ν CC

e

ν /

e

ν Beam NC =0.0217

13

θ

2

MC w/ sin

Xiaoyue Li fiTQun event selection February 10, 2017 19 / 69

e CC1

selection: reconstructed energy

Reconstructed energy distribution of CC1

  • enriched

e sample.

FiTQun selection yields a much smaller numu CC background, which has a large systematic uncertainty. fiTQun

energy (MeV) ν Reconstructed 500 1000 Number of events

0.5 1 1.5

POT)

20

10 × (7.48 CC

e

ν Osc. CC

e

ν Osc. CC

µ

ν /

µ

ν CC

e

ν /

e

ν Beam NC =0.0217

13

θ

2

MC w/ sin

APfit

Xiaoyue Li fiTQun event selection February 10, 2017 19 / 69

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Theia νe Samples (0 vs 0+1 Decay-e)

  • By adding in the new “1-ring” CCπ+ sample, we

see a very large gain in νe CC non-QE efficiency

  • More than 50% increase in the 2-3 GeV region
  • These events have the largest cross section at

the DUNE oscillation maximum

nue&QE& nuebar&QE& nue&NQE& nuebar&NQE& NC& numu&CC&

0 decay Electrons ≤1 decay Electrons

FiTQun FiTQun

x 25%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Boosted Decision Tree π0 Cut

  • The best-fit likelihoods and reconstructed kinematics of the

multi-ring fits were combined into a boosted decision tree

  • The primary goal of this cut is to remove neutral current

(π0) background (as in the LBNE analysis)

THEIA collaboration meeting

NC νe

slide-13
SLIDE 13

1-Ring Event Samples

  • The 1-ring, 0-decay-e sample has a

substantially reduced NC background

  • The new 1-ring, 1-decay-e sample increases

the statistics by ~30%

  • The purity of this sample is also higher

Neutrino&running&

Reconstructed Energy (GeV) Number of Events

NUEQE=562 ANUEQE=4 NUENQE=684 ANUENQE=7 NC=1390 BEAM NUE=289 NUMU CC=75

50 100 150 200 250 300 2 4 6 8

1-ring, 0 decay e 1-ring, 1 decay e

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Multi-ring Samples

  • Additional 2- and 3-ring samples also have controllable

backgrounds

  • Selections have not yet been optimized for CP sensitivity
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sensitivity

  • Sensitivities produced with the

same GLoBES framework used for the DUNE CDR analysis

  • Systematic assumptions are also

consistent with the CDR
 (2% signal, 5% background, uncorrelated among all samples)

  • Theia disappearance samples

are not included here (impact is minimal)

  • Both the CP and mass hierarchy

sensitivity are similar for a 10 kt LAr module, and a 17 kt Theia module

π /

CP

δ

  • 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2

χ ∆ 5 10 15 20 25 30

Mass Ordering Sensitivity

π /

CP

δ

  • 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2

χ ∆ 5 10 15 20 25 30

Theia 70 kt Theia 17 kt DUNE 10 kt (CDR) Mass Ordering Sensitivity Normal Ordering 7 years Mass Ordering Sensitivity

π /

CP

δ

  • 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2

χ ∆ = σ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

CP Violation Sensitivity

π /

CP

δ

  • 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2

χ ∆ = σ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Theia 70 kt Theia 17 kt DUNE 10 kt (CDR)

CP Violation Sensitivity Normal Ordering 7 years

CP Violation Sensitivity

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Role of the Near Detector

  • DUNE will have a high granularity C

target in the near detector (3DST)

  • This is the same detector

technology that is being used for the T2K ND280 upgrade

  • The goal is to achieve 4π muon

acceptance, and study short tracks near the vertex

  • Similar to T2K, the 3DST could

provide strong LBL constraints for Theia

  • Several possibilities exist to add

water or WbLS targets in the 3DST as well

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary I

  • Theia provides a set of LBL events that are complementary to the

LAr samples

  • Different nucleus, detector systematics, neutron detection,

energy resolution, timing, etc.

  • Advances in Water Cherenkov reconstruction techniques provide

substantial improvements over the those assumed in LBNE studies

  • Improved reduction of NC background and the addition of new

multi-particles samples have substantially improved the CP sensitivity of a water-based detector in the LBNF beam

  • A 17 kt Theia module can provide similar sensitivity in both CP &

MH to a 10 kt LAr module

  • This does not include any improvements from the scintillation

light Theia would provide

  • Many opportunities for many aspects of such a detector (optical

configuration, DAQ, electronics, calibrations, slow controls, etc.)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Theia can enhance the LBL program, and expand DUNE’s physics reach!

Directional fit (cf. Super-Kamiokande)

Solar CNO Flux @ 10% uncertainty

LEGEND-1000 CUPID CUPID-reach SNO+II PandaX-III-1000 KamLAND2-Zen NEXT-HD nEXO CUPID-1T Theia-Te NEXT-BOLD Theia-Xe

2 −

10

1 −

10 [eV]

β β

discovery sensitivity on m σ 3

0νββ: mββ @ ~6 meV

150

  • 100
  • 50
  • 50

100 150

) ° ( f D

80

  • 60
  • 40
  • 20
  • 20

40 60 80

) ° ( q D

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Entries 600 / ndf 2 c 380.6 / 1795 norm 10.24 ± 110 ) ° ( q 1.239 ± 0.5753 ) ° ( f 1.193 ± 0.8371 ) ° ( s 0.8488 ± 10.6 const. 0.02005 ± 0.3462 Entries 600 / ndf 2 c 380.6 / 1795 norm 10.24 ± 110 ) ° ( q 1.239 ± 0.5753 ) ° ( f 1.193 ± 0.8371 ) ° ( s 0.8488 ± 10.6 const. 0.02005 ± 0.3462

Michael Wurm (Mainz)

eES 200 IBD 4000 tag eff. 90% θ0 0.57±1.24 ϕ0 0.84±1.19

Reconstructing ES electron direction

SN Pointing @ 2°

12

Signal/BG spectra and observation window

5σ Observation

  • f DSNB

π /

CP

δ

  • 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2

χ ∆ = σ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

CP Violation Sensitivity

π /

CP

δ

  • 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

2

χ ∆ = σ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Theia 70 kt Theia 17 kt DUNE 10 kt (CDR)

CP Violation Sensitivity Normal Ordering 7 years

CP Violation Sensitivity

Confirm CPV w/ different systematics

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Supplement

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Increased Fiducial Volume

  • Previously in Super-K, event vertices required

“wall” > 2 m

  • The T2K event selection is now based on

“wall” and “towall”

  • An event with small “wall”, but large

“towall" can be perfectly well reconstructed

  • Reconstruction performance degrades with

small “towall”, even if “wall” > 2 m

  • New, expanded FV increases oscillated νe

events by ~25%

  • In the latest SK atmospheric analysis (2019),

a wall cut of 50 cm was used, increasing the FV even further

  • This improvement has not yet been

incorporated into the Theia analysis

track towall wall

Wall [cm] Towall [cm]

)

T2K νe

CCQE CCnQE NC Entering MisID (CC νμ)