Living Costs and Food Survey (LCF) David Hayes and Andrea Finney - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

living costs and food survey lcf
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Living Costs and Food Survey (LCF) David Hayes and Andrea Finney - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

13 September 2013; 12:15 Dominant patterns of expenditure among older people in the United Kingdom: Segmenting the older consumer using the Living Costs and Food Survey (LCF) David Hayes and Andrea Finney Personal Finance Research Centre


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dominant patterns of expenditure among

  • lder people in the United Kingdom:

Segmenting the older consumer using the Living Costs and Food Survey (LCF) David Hayes and Andrea Finney Personal Finance Research Centre University of Bristol BSG Annual Conference 2013

1 www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc

13 September 2013; 12:15

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The bigger project: Financial dimensions of wellbeing among older people

  • Funded by Economic and Social Research Council
  • Secondary Data Analysis Initiative
  • Collaboration with ILC-UK (think tank); and Prof.

Kelvyn Jones (methodological expertise)

  • Using nine datasets: BSFC; ELSA; EU-SILC; US;

WAS; WVS and LCF; and two qualitative datasets

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Patterns of expenditure among older people in the United Kingdom

  • Describe average expenditure by age group and
  • ther key variables of interest (descriptive);
  • Segment older households based on their

patterns of expenditure (cluster analysis);

  • Interpret the clusters (descriptive/CHAID

analysis).

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Data Considerations

  • Detail of expenditure unique to LCF
  • Using the 12 COICOP classifications
  • Household level equivalised expenditure
  • Good sample of HRPs aged 50+ (n = 2,931)
  • To cover transition into and beyond retirement
  • Good distribution of age groups (even 80+ ~ 12%)

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Alcohol & tobacco
  • Clothing & footwear
  • Communication
  • Education
  • Food & non-alc. drinks
  • Health
  • Household goods &

services

  • Housing, fuel & power
  • Miscellaneous goods &

services

  • Recreation & culture
  • Restaurants & hotels
  • Transport

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 5

COICOP Classifications

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Step one: Descriptive statistics

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Absolute and equivalised expenditure by age

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 7

510 189 286 160 100 200 300 400 500 600 50 but under 55 yrs 55 but under 60 yrs 60 but under 65 yrs 65 but under 70 yrs 70 but under 75 yrs 75 but under 80 yrs 80 and above Pounds per week (£) Absolute Equivalised

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Spending by category: equivalised expenditure

  • PROPORTION spent on:
  • Food & non-alc. drink increases with age-12% to 19%
  • Housing, fuel & power doubles from 12 to 24%
  • Communication remains constant at 3%
  • Clothing & footwear halves from 6% to 3%
  • Transport decreases from 18% to 7%
  • Recreation drops from 16% to 11%

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Step two: Cluster analysis

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The cluster analysis process

  • Exploring how types of expenditure co-vary
  • Identifies dominant patterns
  • Classifies people into segments based on these
  • Cluster variate are the 12 COICOP categories
  • Removed outliers (5 SDs) –n of 2,769/mean £217
  • Two stage process – hierarchical/k-means cluster

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Six cluster solution

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 11

The average equivalised expenditure across the sample is £217. Percentage in cluster (%) Mean weekly expenditure Cluster one 46 138 Cluster two 19 228 Cluster three 9 245 Cluster four 11 231 Cluster five 12 405 Cluster six 4 392

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Drivers of cluster membership

  • Highly statistically significant variations in

expenditure for all 12 categories

  • Three categories were particularly strong
  • Alcohol and tobacco
  • Clothing and footwear
  • Housing, fuel and power

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Step three: Interpreting the clusters

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cluster one – Conservative Consumers

  • Spend less on non-essentials (recreation, hotels)
  • Transport (£18) much lower than average (£32)
  • Only 47% connected to the internet
  • More likely to be the oldest old (22% cf. 15%)
  • 38% in the lowest income quartile; 60% retired
  • 56% gave benefits as main source of income.

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Cluster two – The Foodies

  • Very high expenditure on food (£58 to £34 ave)
  • Close to average expenditure in other categories
  • A half (54%) live in two-adult households
  • Very few households are renting (12%, cf.25%)
  • Only 18% in lowest income quartile
  • Larger houses (58% cf. 50% with 6+ rooms)

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Cluster three - The Smokers

  • Very high spend on alcohol and tobacco (£36 per

week/15% of total expenditure, cf. 3%)

  • £28 a week on tobacco
  • One of the ‘younger’ clusters (62% under 65)
  • Almost a third still in full-time employment
  • Home-ownership is relatively low (42% cf. 54%)

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Cluster four - The Burdened

  • Very high housing costs (39%; 16% average)
  • All other expenditure is relatively low
  • Low transport costs (lowest petrol expenditure)
  • 72% in rented accommodation (cf. 25%)
  • More single households

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cluster five – The Socialites

  • Eating out, holidays and recreation (£76)
  • 24% (cf.15%) on transport costs
  • Three quarters under 65; 41% working full time
  • Income – 57% earnings; 33% investments
  • More than half in highest income quartile
  • 90% of households connected to the internet

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cluster six - Recreation and Clothing

  • Along with cluster 5, the other high-spenders
  • High spend on clothing, transport and recreation
  • Only 21 per cent of this cluster are 70 and above
  • Two-thirds in larger houses (6+ rooms)
  • 20% say benefits main income (cf. 10% socialites)
  • Half of the cluster in the highest income quartile

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CHAID – Decision Tree Analysis

  • Partitions data into mutually exclusive subsets

that best describe the dependent variable (cluster membership)

  • Housing tenure the most significant predictor
  • Followed by income, age and output area

classification (within tenure)

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Tenure

  • Rent from LA/HA – 45% Burdened; 24% Smokers
  • Own outright – 63% of Socialites; 60% Foodies
  • Own with mortgage – 34% Socialites; 32% R&C
  • Conservative Consumers in line with average
  • Homeowner – 29% Burdened; 74% Conservative

Consumers; 97% Socialites

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Output Area Classification (2001 Census)

  • ONS - groups output areas into clusters based
  • n similar characteristics
  • Blue collar -Smokers & Conservative Consumers
  • Prospering suburbs – Socialites & R&C
  • City Living – Recreation and Clothing (10%)
  • Constrained by Circumstances – Burdened (rent)

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summing up

  • Equivalised expenditure decreases with age
  • Six clusters of older people emerge
  • Often defined by one category (e.g. Smokers)
  • Key correlates: tenure, age, and income
  • Policy implications for health, expenditure

poverty and housing poverty

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Limitations/Future work

  • Hostels, boarding houses, and institutions such

as rest/care and nursing homes are excluded

  • Age or generational effects – a need for

longitudinal analysis

  • CCs potentially a diverse group of households
  • Further analysis to unpack extent to which their

spending is driven by positive/negative constraints

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Questions and further discussion

www.pfrc.bris.ac.uk/esrc 25

  • http://www.bris.ac.uk/geography/research/pfrc/esrc/
  • david.hayes@bristol.ac.uk
  • @PFRC_David