Liberty Consolidated Planning Commission AUGUST 18, 18, 2009 2009 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

liberty consolidated planning commission
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Liberty Consolidated Planning Commission AUGUST 18, 18, 2009 2009 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Liberty Consolidated Planning Commission AUGUST 18, 18, 2009 2009 LIBERT LIBERTY CO COUNTY CO COURT RTHOUSE AN ANNEX EX Meeting Order 1.0 Old Business 1.1 Old Business Items 1.2 Old Business Tabled Items 2.0 New Business 2.1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AUGUST 18, 18, 2009 2009 LIBERT LIBERTY CO COUNTY CO COURT RTHOUSE AN ANNEX EX

Liberty Consolidated Planning Commission

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Meeting Order

1.0 Old Business

1.1 Old Business Items 1.2 Old Business Tabled Items

2.0 New Business

2.1 Consent Agenda Items 2.2 Ordinances 2.3 Zoning Petitions 2.4 Site Plans and Final Plats

3.0 General Public Comments 4.0 Other Commission Business 5.0 Adjourn

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Public Hearing Procedures

 The petition and analysis is presented by LCPC

staff

 Public hearing will be opened

 Petitioner speaks first  Other interested parties speak  Public hearing closed

 Issue then rests with the Planning Commissioners

for action

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Rules of Conduct During a Public Hearing

  • All

parties speaking will address the Board

  • f

Commissioners

  • Time allowed to speak may be limited
  • All interested parties will be allowed to speak

Anyone speaking in opposition that has contributed $250

  • r more to any local official that may act on the petition,

must disclose that during the hearing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

P u b l b l i c H e a r i n g O O p e n

Ag Agenda I Ite tem 1 1.0 Ol Old Bu Business I Ite tems

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Special Exception 2009-031-LC Petitioner: Bernard and Elaine Maley

R e q u q u e s t b y b y B e r n a r d a n a n d E l a i l a i n e M a l e a l e y, , o w n e r s o

  • f P a r c e l

0 5 4 0 5 4 , L , L C T M 3 3 4 B 3 3 4 B , c c o n s i s t i n g o

  • f 0 . 8 9 8

0 . 8 9 8 a c a c r e s o f l a n l a n d , m , m o r e o

  • r

l e l e s s , a n a n d l o l o c a t e d a t a t t h e I n t e r s e c t i o n o

  • f M a r

a r i n e r s a n a n d B r i g a n t i n e D u n m o r

  • r e R o a
  • a d . T h e

e p r o p

  • p e r

e r t y i i s s z o n

  • n e d R - 1

( S i n g l e l e F F a m i l y i l y R e s i d i d e n t i a i a l ) l ) . T h e o w n e r s r e q u e s t a s p s p e c e c i a l e x e x c e p e p t i o n t t o

  • l o c
  • c a t e a p a r k i n g l

l o t

  • t f o r
  • r a d d i t i o n a l

p a r k i n g f o r

  • r r e s i

e s i d e n t s , v v i s i s i t o r s t t o

  • S u n b u r y, a

a n d t o

  • t h e

e S u n b u b u r y C C o m m e r c i a l a l D D i s t r i c t .

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Public Notification

slide-8
SLIDE 8

GIS Map of Site

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Aerial Map of Site

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Petit itio ioner’s Narrativ ive

* note- This request is for a Special Exception

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Specia ial l Exce xcepti tion

A use… se…that w wou

  • uld n

not

  • t

be a appr ppropr priate fo for location

  • n ge

generally … y …but wh which i if control

  • lled

ed a as to numbe ber, ar , area, lo a, locat ation,

  • r
  • r rel

elation t to

  • the

e neighborhood w would i in n the o

  • pinion o
  • f the

go gove verning a author

  • rity

y prom

  • mot
  • te t

the h e hea ealth, saf afety, w , welf lfar are, m , moral als, ,

  • r
  • rder

er, c com

  • mfor
  • rt,

conven venience, e, appearan rance ce, p prosperi rity, ,

  • r
  • r gen

ener eral w wel elfare.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Communi unity ty Meeti ting ng August 3, 3, 200 2009 At the Easte tern n Distr trict Fire Stati tion

The meeting had 28 attendees. The consensus of the neighborhood was that there is no need for public parking and that the business operations at 341 Brigantine Dunmore Road are already having an impact on the residential neighborhood mainly due to late night traffic, trash, and noise disturbances. According to the

  • pinion of the citizens present at the meeting, a public parking area within the

neighborhood is not considered to have a public benefit and is viewed as detrimental and a further encroachment into a residential area, possibly supporting an expansion of existing commercial activities. Two solutions were offered during the Community Meeting: Special Event Parking: Only allow this property to be used for parking during special events four or five times a year; Explore a different location in conjunction with shuttle service (suggestions that were made: Liberty County property at the intersection of Ft. Morris Road and Brigantine Dunmore Road; Fillingame property; other Maley property on Catbird Road;)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Proposed Parking Area against two abutting residential properties

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Staff Recommendation Special Exception 2009-031-LC

Disapproval The objectives of a Special Exception as defined is, in this case, unattainable due to insufficient, substantiating reasons for public parking need and also insufficient reasoning that the proposed use would be promoting the public welfare, morals, appearance, and prosperity Note: Consider lot 40 to be used for special event parking four times a year

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Standard Conditions

1.

The applicant must obtain all required local, state and federal licenses and permits prior to commencement of any construction.

2.

All plans, documents, materials, and statements contained or implied in this application are considered to be a condition of this action.

3.

No change or deviation from the conditions of approval are allowed without prior notification and approval of the Director

  • f the LCPC or the Planning Commission, and the approving

governmental authority.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Special Conditions (1 of 2)

This parking area shall be a community parking area and designed to be an asset to the community by blending into the surrounding area and not disrupting the natural beauty and the natural settings of the land. The following items shall be considered the standards for the parking lot design:

1.

30 ft vegetated buffer consisting of two staggered rows of evergreen shrub or tree material around the property that abuts single family lots along with vinyl type privacy fencing. Additionally landscaping shall also be located on the Mariners and Brigantine Dunmore Road side a

2.

Parking restrictions need to be posted: no long term parking or storage – no overnight parking

3.

Access needs to meet commercial access width standards and be restricted to Brigantine Dunmore Road

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Special Conditions (2 of 2)

4.

Lighting has to be installed in a manner not to disturb any residential neighbors (low level lighting)

5.

Adequate street lighting shall be provided

6.

Number of parking spaces shall be restricted to no more than 50 spaces which needs to be addressed in the site plan

7.

Site plan will have to be presented to LCPC and the Board of Commissioners for approval

8.

A walking path along the edge of the road shall be incorporated into the site plan design

9.

No trees can be cut until the site plan has received approval

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Rezoning Petition 2009-030-LC Petitioner: Ann Stafford

R e q u e s t s t s u b m i t t e t t e d b b y A . G . We l l s l l s a g e n t n t f o f o r A A n n n n S t a f f o f f o r d , d ,

  • w n e r o
  • f p a r

a r c e l 0 0 5 , 0 0 5 , L C T M 1 8 7 D 1 8 7 D w h i c i c h c o n t a i n s 5 . 6 2 5 . 6 2 4 a c a c r e s

  • f
  • f l a n d , m o r
  • r e

e o r

  • r l e s

e s s , l o c

  • c a t e d o f
  • f f o f
  • f B a c o n t o w n
  • w n R o a d w

w i t h i n u n - i n c o r p o r a t a t e d L L i b e r t y C o u n t y, , G A . P e t i t i o n e r r r e q u e s t s t t o r e r e - z o n e t t h e e p r o p

  • p e r

e r t y f f r o m

  • m A R - 1 ( A g r i c u l t

l t u r a l R e s i d i d e n t i a i a l l D i s t r t r i c t ) t ) t t o R - 4 ( M o M o b i l e H H o m

  • m e P

e P a r k R R e s e s i d e n t i a l D D i s t s t r i c t ) f f o r

  • r

t h e p u r p o s e o f a m o m o b i l e h h o m e m e p p a r k . TA B L A B L E D P P E R E R P E T E T I T I O N E R E R

slide-19
SLIDE 19

( N ( N o n e )

Ag Agenda I Ite tem 2 2.1 Co Consent Ag Agenda Ite tems

slide-20
SLIDE 20

a ) a ) F l e m

e m i n g t o n

  • n P

P U D U D O r O r d i n a n c e

b ) b )

L i b e r e r t y C C o u n t y y Tr e e e e O r O r d i n a n c e

Ag Agenda I Ite tem 2 2.2 Ordin dinances

slide-21
SLIDE 21

P u b l b l i c H e a r i n g O O p e n

Ag Agenda I Ite tem 2 2.3 Zoning Ac Acti tions

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Special Permit 2009-036-H Petitioner: Greg Hewitt

R E Q R E Q U E S E S T B Y B Y G R E G R E G H E W E W I T T F O R R A S P E C I E C I A L P P E R M E R M I T U S U S E T T O O A L L O W F O W F O R O R A B U S U S I N E N E S S T O O W O R W O R K K O N O N V E H V E H I C L C L E S I I N S TA L A L L I N G V E H V E H I C L C L E W E W R A P R A P S A N A N D G R A P R A P H I C S C S AT 4 11 S M A I A I N S T R E E T R E E T, F F U R T R T H E R E R D E S E S C R I C R I B E D B E D A S A S L I B E R B E R T Y C O C O U N T Y TA X A X M A P A P - PA R C E L 0 5 6 D 0 5 6 D - 0 1 0 0 1 0

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Public Notification

slide-24
SLIDE 24

GIS Map of Site

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Aerial Map of Site

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Special Permit Use 2009-036-H

The use shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and intent of the land use district in which it is to be located

Prop

  • perty is

s loc

  • cated i

in the e Hist storic U Urban Cor

  • re w

e which on

  • nly a

allows c com

  • mmer

ercial uses ses si similar t to

  • O-I,

I, O O-C, , an and C C-1; 1; however, ac , actual al zo zonin ing o

  • f property is

is C-2 ( (gen ener eral commerci cial al)

The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use shall not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare

No c

  • cars c

s cou

  • uld b

be e st stor

  • red a

at this s loc

  • cation.

Wor

  • rk on
  • n cars c

s cou

  • uld on
  • nly b

be e don

  • ne b

e by appointme ment nt

The use shall not impede the orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties for the uses permitted in the district and the design shall minimize adverse effects of the use onto adjoin. properties

The e op

  • per

eration

  • n wou
  • uld h

hav ave e to

  • be

be low

  • w-key

ey; p park arking for

  • r em

employees ees an and cu custom

  • mer

ers shou

  • uld be

be tow

  • war

ards the e back back of

  • f the

e prop roper erty; park arking area area has as to

  • be

be des esigned ed to

  • City’s standard

ard with a paved ed surf rface; ace;

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Special Permit Use 2009-036-H

The use shall not have a substantial adverse effect on any known archaeological, historical, or cultural resource located on or off the site To the the best of our ur kno knowledge, no no resources of thi this na natur ture clos

  • seb

eby

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Site Photos

41 411 1 S Main Main Street Fro ront o t of Pro roperty ty 41 411 S 1 S Main Main Street Re Rear o

  • f Pr

Prope perty

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Appl Applicant’s Narra rrati tive

slide-30
SLIDE 30

O P O P T I O N O N “ “ A ” R E S R E S T R I R I C T T T H I S U U S E E F O R R O N E E Y E A R E A R U N T I L A M O R E R E S U I TA B A B L E L E L O C A C AT I O N C A N C A N B E B E F O U N D

Staff Recommendation

slide-31
SLIDE 31

D I D I S A P P R O V O VA L A S I T I I S N O T N O T I I N N K E K E E P I N G N G W I W I T H T H E E A L A L L O WA B A B L E E U S E S E S O O F T H E H E H I S T O R I R I C C U R B A N R B A N C O C O R E R E

Staff Recommendation

Option B

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Standard Conditions

1. The applicant must obtain all required local, state and federal licenses and permits prior to commencement of any construction 2. All plans, documents, materials, and statements contained or implied in this application are considered to be a condition of this action 3. No change or deviation from the conditions of approval are allowed without prior notification and approval of the Director

  • f the LCPC or the Planning Commission, and the approving

governmental authority

slide-33
SLIDE 33

R e q u e s e s t b b y y D o D o w n w n t o w n

  • w n G r

G r o u p , L L C , t t o r e z o n

  • n e a

e a c o m b i n e d a c a c r e a g e o

  • f 7 . 2 5

7 . 2 5 5 a c a c r e s o

  • f l a n

l a n d , f r o m O - I I ( o ( o f f i f f i c e i i n s n s t i t u t i o n a l ) a a n d n d R - 1 1 ( s i n i n g l e f a m a m i l i l y d w e l l i n l l i n g d d i s t r i c t ) t t o C - 2 ( g e n e r a l a l c c o m m e r c i a l a l ) . . T h e t t h r e e p r o p

  • p e r

e r t i e s a r e l e l o c

  • c a t e d a

a t t h e e i n t e r s e c t i o n o f

  • f E M e m

M e m o r

  • r i a l d

d r i v e ( e ( f k f k a E E Wa s h i n g t g t o n Av e v e n u e ) e ) a n d E O g l O g l e t h o r p e e H w y w y a n d a r e e f u r t h e r e r d e s c r i b e d e d a s L i b e r e r t y C o u n t y y M a p - P a r a r c e l s 0 5 6 B 0 5 6 B - 1 3 8 , 0 5 6 B , 0 5 6 B - 1 5 0 , a 1 5 0 , a n d 0 5 6 B - 1 5 1 . 1 5 1 . T h e a p a p p l i c l i c a n t p r o p o s e s t h e a c a c r e a g e t o b e b e d e v e l v e l o p

  • p e d

e d w i w i t h t h r e e r e e r e s t a u r a n t s a a n d a h o t e l e l

Rezoning Petition 2009-038-H Petitioner: Downtown Group, LLC

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Public Notification

slide-35
SLIDE 35

GIS Map of Site

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Aerial Map of Site

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Site Photos

The Mills H Mills House se And Su Surro rrounding P g Pro roperty ty

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Hw Hwy 84 Roa

  • ad fr

fron

  • ntage

e for for the e propos

  • sed

ed c commercial devel elop

  • pmen

ent Approx

  • x. 570

570 ft Resi siden ential al proper erty abu abutted tted on bo both th si sided by by proposed sed commer mmercial zoning

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Conceptual Drawing

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Zoning Analysis (2009-011-LC)

  • Does the property have reasonable economic value as

currently zoned?

  • Yes
  • Does the proposed use conform to the Ft. Stewart Joint Land

Use Study?

  • Yes. Property is not located within the Ft. Stewart’s Influence

Zone (3,000 ft)

  • Does the proposed use conform to the comprehensive plan?
  • Yes; these particular land uses are allowed in the Memorial

Corridor Subarea and also the mixed-use corridor subarea;

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Zoning Analysis – (continued)

  • Will there be an adverse effect on the value and usability of nearby

properties?

  • Yes. Triangular-shaped residential property consisting of 0.18 acres of land

would be completely surrounded by C-2 zoning districts Currently the properties along this stretch of Highway 84 (approx. 560 ft) between Washington Avenue and Sherwood Drive are currently either zoned residential or office institutional on either side of the road.

  • Is the proposed use suitable in view of the nearby uses?
  • No. Currently, adjacent properties are schools, offices, and residentially

zoned properties (public Pre-K school, First Presbyterian School, Board of Education, St. Stephens Catholic Church)

  • Will the proposed use create a burden on streets, schools, utilities, or the

provision of public safety?

  • Traffic most likely could be problematic with ingress and egress only a

relatively short distance (approx. 150 ft) from the traffic signal at the Washington/E Oglethorpe Hwy intersection

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Zoning Analysis (continued)

  • Would this allow a short-term gain at the expense of our local

long-term goals?

  • It could be
  • Would this change cause a “domino effect” and encourage

“sprawl”?

  • Yes
  • Are there unique historical sites which may be adversely

impacted by this zoning?

  • The current structure was built in 1932 and is a fixture in the

city landscape; however, according to the applicant, extensive renovations were done to the house in 1987, when the second story was added

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Zoning Analysis (continued)

  • Is this parcel in a flood hazard area?
  • No
  • Are there unique conditions which support approval or denial?
  • This property is located at the Hwy 84 entrance of the Memorial

Drive Sub-Area Plan that was recently adopted by the City of Hinesville

  • Is it spot zoning and unrelated to the existing pattern of development?
  • There is no property zoned C-2 in close proximity to the parcels in

question

  • If allowed, does this allow rights that are denied to others in this area?
  • No
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Purpose Statement of the Downtown Redevelopment Overlay District

“This section seeks to generate quality development, preservation of historic structures, conservation of green space, greater mixing of uses, more pedestrian-friendly, more housing options, and additional connectivity for travelers within and through the City."

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Proposed Objectives According to the Memorial Sub-Area and Hinesville Urban Redevelopment Plan

The Memorial Drive Subarea standards are mandatory and shall supersede any provisions of the Hinesville Zoning Ordinance and the City of Hinesville Subdivision Ordinance

 “Some Effort should be given to enhance streetscape amenities and

develop inviting spaces and reintroduce a unique character along the corridor.”

 “Every effort in this plan is to include careful consideration of protection

and maximizing the benefits of the area’s tree canopy"

 “Upon redevelopment the entire area will be an eclectic mixed-use

urban village.”

 “Building Entrances shall be articulated … by using one or more of the

following methods:

 …Places for human activity, incl. but not limited to plazas, courtyards,

porches, decks, outdoor seating, landscaping, gazebos, pavilions, or fountains….”

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Highlights of the Memorial Drive Sub-Area Plan – interim District Development Standards

 Buildings shall abut the supplemental zone (part

  • f the proposed sidewalk improvements) which

places them at approx. 24.5 ft back from the curb

 Intra-parcels sidewalks shall be 5 ft in width and

shall be set distinguished in color, texture, material

 Maximum number of parking spaces for

restaurants shall be 5 spaces/1,000 sq ft

 No free-standing signs allowed  The minimum height of buildings is two floors or

25 feet, whichever is less

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Highlights of the Memorial Drive Sub-Area Plan

 Allowed architectural materials: Exterior walls for

all new buildings: brick, tile, stone with weathered, polished or fluted face; real stucco;

 Sloped roofs shall be standing seam metal,

concrete roof tiles, or composition shingles

 Building harmony shall be considered

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Staff Recommendation Petition 2009-038-H

TA B L A B L E U N T I L M O R E D R E D E T E TA I A I L S C A N C A N B E B E G I V E N V E N O N T T H E E P R O R O S P E C T I V E D V E D E V E L E V E L O P M E N E N T S I N O R D R D E R E R T O B E B E A B L A B L E E T O C O C O N F I R M G E N E N E R A L E R A L C O C O M P L I A N A N C E W C E W I T H T H E E M E M E M O R I R I A L D D R I R I V E V E S U B - A R E A A R E A P P L A N A N

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Rezoning Petition 2009-034-LC Petitioner: Thomas Taylor

R e q u q u e s t t t o r e z o z o n e p p a r a r c e l 0 2 1 , L 0 2 1 , L C T M 2 6 0 A 2 6 0 A , w w h i c i c h c o n t a i n s 1 . 1 a c 1 . 1 a c r e s o f l a n l a n d , m , m o r e o

  • r l e

l e s s ; l o l o c a t e d o

  • n L i m

i m e r i c k R R o a d a d n e a r t r t h e r a r a i l r o a d t r a r a c k c k s w w h e r e r e P P r o r o s p e c t R o R o a d i n t e r s e c t c t s w i t h L i m e r i c k c k f r o r o m R 2 R 2 - A ( ( O n O n e a a n d T Tw o w o - F a m i l y i l y R e s i d i d e n t i a i a l ) l ) t o t o B B - 2 ( G e n e n e r e r a l C C o m

  • m m e r

e r c i a l D i s t s t r i c t ) f f o r

  • r a g e n

e n e r e r a l s t s t o r

  • r e

a n a n d s t o r a g e b u b u i l i l d i n g s . T h i s p r o p

  • p e r

e r t y h a s s b e e n e e n u u s e s e d f o r

  • r n e a

e a r l y 3 0 y e a e a r s a s s c o m m e r c i a l a l p p r o p e r t y. .

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Public Notification

slide-51
SLIDE 51

GIS Map of Site

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Aerial Map of Site

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Site Photo

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Survey

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Zoning Analysis (2009-034-LC)

  • Does the property have reasonable economic value as

currently zoned?

  • Yes
  • Does the proposed use conform to the Ft. Stewart Joint Land

Use Study?

  • Property is not located within the Ft. Stewart’s Influence Zone

(3,000 ft)

  • Does the proposed use conform to the comprehensive plan?
  • The comp plan encourages incorporation of “corner commercial”

sites, such as dry cleaning, convenience stores or similar retail services which are in keeping with neighborhood commercial

  • uses. (B-1)
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Zoning Analysis – (continued)

  • Will there be an adverse effect on the value and usability of

nearby properties?

  • No; this property has been used as commercial for nearly thirty

years.

  • Is the proposed use suitable in view of the nearby uses?
  • Yes; lower commercial, neighborhood commercial uses are

suitable

  • Will the proposed use create a burden on streets, schools,

utilities, or the provision of public safety?

  • No undue burden anticipated
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Zoning Analysis (continued)

  • Would this allow a short-term gain at the expense of our local

long-term goals?

  • No
  • Would this change cause a “domino effect” and encourage

“sprawl”?

  • Possibly
  • Are there unique historical sites which may be adversely

impacted by this zoning?

  • None known
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Zoning Analysis (continued)

  • Is this parcel in a flood hazard area?
  • No
  • Are there unique conditions which support approval or denial?
  • Yes; This property has been used as commercial for nearly 30 years.

(Construction Company) Rezoning this property will allow this property to be in compliance with the Liberty County Zoning Ordinance.

  • Is it spot zoning and unrelated to the existing pattern of development?
  • No; commercial properties are located across the street in close

vicinity

  • The comprehensive plan encourages small commercial businesses

close to residential neighborhoods.

  • If allowed, does this allow rights that are denied to others in this area?
  • No
slide-59
SLIDE 59

Staff Recommendation Petition 2009-034-LC

A p p r p p r o v a l w w i t h h S t a n d a n d a r d a d a n d n d S p e p e c i a l C o n d i n d i t i o n s

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Standard Conditions

1. The applicant must obtain all required local, state and federal licenses and permits prior to commencement of any construction 2. All plans, documents, materials, and statements contained or implied in this application are considered to be a condition of this action 3. No change or deviation from the conditions of approval are allowed without prior notification and approval of the Director

  • f the LCPC or the Planning Commission, and the approving

governmental authority

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Special Conditions

1. Maintain existing buffers around the perimeter of the parcel. 2. This rezoning will allow as a condition to mix the general store with mini-storage warehouses. 3. Site plans are required.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Special Exception 2009-035-LC Petitioner: Clifford Stone

R E Q R E Q U E S E S T S S U B M B M I T T E D E D B Y B Y C L C L I F F O R D R D W

  • W. S T O N E ,

E , O W N E R E R O F PA R C E L A R C E L 0 0 0 1 , L L C T C T M 2 2 7 4 W H I C H C H C O C O N TA I A I N S 6 . 4 A C R E S A C R E S O F O F L A N D , N D , M O R O R E O R O R L E S S , L L O C O C AT E D O N D O N O L O L D D D A D A I R E N N R O R O A D A D I N U N I N C O C O R P R P O R AT E D E D L I B E R T B E R T Y C O C O U N T Y. T T H E E P R O P O P E R T Y I S Z O N E O N E D D A - 1 ( A G A G R I R I C U C U LT U R A L D D I S T R I R I C T ) A N A N D T T H E O E O W N E R E R WA N A N T S T O O O P E R A E R AT E A P E R S E R S O N A L C A R E H C A R E H O M E . E .

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Public Notification

slide-64
SLIDE 64

GIS Map of Site

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Aerial Map of Site

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Site Photo

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Conceptual Layout

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Scope of Special Exception

The Special Exception is needed because:

  • Personal Care homes are only allowed in zoning district O-I

(Office Institutional). Rezoning to O-I in conjunction with a conditional use would not be appropriate zoning in an agricultural area.

  • LCPC is seeking a text amendment in the future to locate

family personal care homes as a permitted use in residential areas.

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Def efinition of

  • f a

Per ersonal C Care e Ho Home

Article II Section 2.17 Liberty County Ordinance

 Includes rest and nursing homes,

convalescent homes and boarding homes for the aged; established to render nursing care for chronic or convalescent patients, but excludes facilities for care of active or violent patients such as feeble- minded or mental patients, epileptics, alcoholics, senile psychotics, or drug addicts.

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Petitio ioner’s Narra rrati tive

“This business would be strictly for elderly non-violent individuals who need more assistance than an assisted living facility can provide but are not to the point health wise of needing to be admitted to a nursing home.”

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Staff Recommendation Petition 2009-035-LC

A p p r o v

  • v a l b a s e d o n
  • n t h e

e c o n

  • n s i d e r a t i o n o f
  • f a t e x

e x t a m e n e n d m e n t t o

  • t h e

e L i b e r t y C o u

  • u n t y C

C o d

  • d e

e o f

  • f O r d i n a n c e s

w i t h S t a n d a n d a r d a d a n d n d S p e p e c i a l C C o n d i n d i t i o n s

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Standard Conditions

1. The applicant must obtain all required local, state and federal licenses and permits prior to commencement of any construction 2. All plans, documents, materials, and statements contained or implied in this application are considered to be a condition of this action 3. No change or deviation from the conditions of approval are allowed without prior notification and approval of the Director

  • f the LCPC or the Planning Commission, and the approving

governmental authority

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Special Conditions

1. Six or fewer in home care patients

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Rezoning Petition 2009-037-LC Petitioner: McKinna

R e q u e s t s t s t s t o r e r e - z o n

  • n e p

e p a r c e l e l # 11 9 1 9 0 0 7 0 0 7 f r f r o m A - 1 ( a g r i c u l u l t u r u r a l ) t ) t o R R - 1 ( s i n g l e l e f f a m i l y l y r r e s i d i d e n t i a i a l ) f o f o r a p p r p p r o x . f o f o r t y - f i v e ( 4 5 ) o r

  • r m o r
  • r e

e h o m

  • m e s

w i t i t h c e n t r a l w w a t a t e r a n a n d i n i n d i v i v i d u a l s s e p t i c s y s t e m s . . T h e s s i t i t e c o n s i s t s o

  • f t w o t r a c

a c t s o

  • f l a n

l a n d t t o t a l i n g 7 8 . 0 5 7 8 . 0 5 a c a c r e s o f l a n d , m m o r

  • r e o r

e o r l e s e s s , l l o c

  • c a t e d o n
  • n M c

M c I n t o s h L L a k e R R o a

  • a d
slide-75
SLIDE 75

Public Notification

slide-76
SLIDE 76

GIS Map of Site

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Aerial Map of Site

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Survey

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Map of Site

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Revised Site

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Project narrative

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Project narrative

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Revised Site

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Site Photo

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Zoning Analysis (2009-011-LC)

  • Does the property have reasonable economic value as

currently zoned?

  • Yes
  • Does the proposed use conform to the Ft. Stewart Joint Land

Use Study?

  • Property is not located within the Ft. Stewart’s Influence Zone

(3,000 ft)

  • Does the proposed use conform to the comprehensive plan?
  • Yes, if the parcels has water and sewer
slide-86
SLIDE 86

Zoning Analysis – (continued)

  • Will there be an adverse effect on the value and usability of

nearby properties?

  • No
  • Is the proposed use suitable in view of the nearby uses?
  • Yes
  • Will the proposed use create a burden on streets, schools,

utilities, or the provision of public safety?

  • No undue burden anticipated
slide-87
SLIDE 87

Zoning Analysis (continued)

  • Would this allow a short-term gain at the expense of our local

long-term goals?

  • No. If the developer agrees to connect proposed utilities to future

services for water and sewer the short term gain would not be at the expense of local long term goals. (refer to comp plan)

  • Would this change cause a “domino effect” and encourage

“sprawl”?

  • No
  • Are there unique historical sites which may be adversely

impacted by this zoning?

  • None known
slide-88
SLIDE 88

Zoning Analysis (continued)

  • Is this parcel in a flood hazard area?
  • No flood hazard areas. The site be checked for wetlands
  • Are there unique conditions which support approval or denial?
  • No. However, the proposed layouts for the project clearly show

areas where future residential lots will exist

  • Is it spot zoning and unrelated to the existing pattern of

development?

  • Residential uses are consistent with the existing pattern of
  • development. Development goals for this project should include

central water and central sewer

  • If allowed, does this allow rights that are denied to others in this

area?

  • No
slide-89
SLIDE 89

Staff Recommendation Petition 2009-037-LC

A p A p p r o r o v e t t h e r e r e q u e s t t o r e r e - z o n

  • n e

e t h e p p a r c e l e l s f f r o m A - 1 ( a g r i c u l u l t u r u r a l ) t ) t o R R - 1 ( s i n g l e l e f f a m i l y l y r r e s i d i d e n t i a i a l ) f o f o r a p p r p p r o x . f o f o r t y - f i v e ( 4 5 ) o r

  • r m o r
  • r e

e h o m

  • m e s

O n l y i f c e n e n t r a l w a t e r e r a a n d a c e n e n t r a l s e p s e p t i c s y s y s t e m i i s i n s t a l l e d .

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Standard Conditions

1. The applicant must obtain all required local, state and federal licenses and permits prior to commencement of any construction 2. All plans, documents, materials, and statements contained or implied in this application are considered to be a condition of this action 3. No change or deviation from the conditions of approval are allowed without prior notification and approval of the Director

  • f the LCPC or the Planning Commission, and the approving

governmental authority

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Special Conditions

1. Must get EPD approval; the layouts as submitted would exceed fifty dwelling units. 2. Central water and central sewer is required. Must connect to Flemington’s water and sewer system when it becomes available to this area. 3. Access must be clearly available for entrance to the cemetery which exist to the north of the property.

slide-92
SLIDE 92

P L AT S A N D S I T E P L A N S

Agenda Item 2.4

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Site Plan - Oak Forest Apartments

Developer: Matthew Reese Oak Forest Properties, LLC 111 Sandy Run Dr., Hinesville, Ga Engineer: Trent Long, PE Trent Long Engineering, LLC Hinesville, Ga Description: 30 unit expansion of an existing 32 unit complex Location: West side of Sandy Run Drive down and opposite from Babcock’s.

  • Gov. Authority: City of Hinesville

Site te Map ap

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Photographs

existing apartments proposed – just south of existing

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Site Plan

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Landscaping Plan

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Appro roval als

“The Liberty Consolidated Planning Commission has completed the review of the submitted documents and hereby concurs that the documents as submitted and reviewed generally meet the minimum requirements set forth in the Code of Ordinances.” Abe Nadji, P.E. Director of Engineering, LCPC

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Approve th the s site plan f for the the 3 30 unit Oa Oak k Forest t Apartments ts w with t the f followi wing Standard and S Special C Cond nditi tions

Staff Recommendation

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Standard Conditions

1.

The applicant must obtain all required local, state and federal licenses and permits prior to commencement of any construction.

2.

All plans, documents, materials, and statements contained or implied in this application are considered to be a condition of this action.

3.

No change or deviation from the conditions of approval are allowed without prior notification and approval of the Director

  • f the LCPC or the Planning Commission, and the approving

governmental authority.

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Special Condition(s)

1. 1.

Al All p par arcels o

  • f

f lan and must be be combi bined i into a a single p par arcel by by plat and deed ed prior t to issuance of

  • f the c

e certificate of

  • f occupancy

be th the C City ity of Hin inesvill lle.

slide-101
SLIDE 101

G E N E R A L P U B L I C C O M M E N T S

Agenda Item 3.0

slide-102
SLIDE 102

4.1- Executive Director ’s Report a ) G M O u p d a t e 4.2- Other Business

Agenda Item 4.0 Other Commission Business

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Final Plat for Dutchman’s Cove, Ph III

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Brigantine Dunmore Road from proposed parking area to Sunbury Crab Company

slide-105
SLIDE 105

Brigantine Dunmore from Sunbury Crab Company to proposed parking area

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Recreational Area across from proposed parking area

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Parking Area adjacent to Sunbury Crab Company

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Ordinance Requirements

  • The Liberty County Ordinance allows parking areas as by right

uses in commercial districts

  • Section 3.29.3.3 Parking spaces for all other uses (except

residential) have to be on the same lot or not more than 300 ft distance

  • Section 3.29.3.5. “Off-Street parking areas may be situated in any

residential district abutting any commercial district or industrial district to a depth not exceeding 120 feet and provided that all off- street parking lot improvements as provided in subsection 3.29.4 of this article are complied with” (screening, surfacing, lighting)

slide-109
SLIDE 109
slide-110
SLIDE 110
slide-111
SLIDE 111

Scope of Special Exception

The Special Exception is needed because:

  • The required maximum 300 ft distance is exceeded by 200 ft
  • The property is more than 120 ft deep (approx. 180 ft)
  • The property is not directly abutting a commercial district

and

  • the parking area is not proposed to have a hard surface
slide-112
SLIDE 112

The following corroborating statements/considerations:

 No public parking available in the vicinity  Proposed parking lot located along the main road (60 ft right-of-

way)

 Pedestrian traffic no more than 500 ft going past two residences

and two condo buildings

 Parking more confined to one area rather than scattered

throughout the neighborhood