1 SIP History Societal impact of pain (SIP) is a social platform - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 sip history
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

1 SIP History Societal impact of pain (SIP) is a social platform - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 SIP History Societal impact of pain (SIP) is a social platform created in 2009 which supports national stakeholder in developing national platforms Joint initiative of the European Pain Federation (EFIC) and the pharmaceutical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

SIP History

  • Societal impact of pain (SIP) is a social platform created in 2009 which supports national

stakeholder in developing national platforms

  • Joint initiative of the European Pain Federation (EFIC) and the pharmaceutical company

Grünenthal GmbH

  • The Platform provides opportunity for discussion for healthcare professionals, pain

advocacy groups, politicians, healthcare insurance providers, representatives of health authorities, regulators and budget holders

  • Main goals
  • Raise awareness of the impact the pain has on our societies, health and economic

systems

  • Exchange information and share best-practices across all member states of the EU
  • To develop and foster European-wide policy strategies and activities for an

improved pain care in Europe (Pain Policy)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Why SIP Spain?

  • Great support of SIP from Spanish authorities and politicians
  • The biggest number of SIP Endorser is from Spain, demonstrating high interest in SIP (96 national and regional associations)
  • Including different levels and profiles with the common goal for a better pain care in Spain
  • The variability of situations in Spain with different autonomous communities, patient- and political organizations can contribute

to develop future regional projects, and involvement in SIP can promote certain stakeholders as decision makers or influencers for this regional initiatives

  • Supporting and facilitating the inclusion of the different regions is of great importance
  • Multi-stakeholder approach
  • Meetings include various speaker and stakeholders to create the best possible content to be attractive to these various roles
  • Promote regional pain strategies/ plans
  • Share the need of including a 360º pain management focus on the political agenda
  • Patient centricity: Give “voice” to the patient
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Generate an awareness forum on the societal impact of pain (SIP) to support exchange of initiatives and new proposals focused on a better pain management with involvement of different profiles and stakeholder levels (decision makers or influencers)

WG 2: “TECHNICAL” WG 3: “PATIENT PROFILE” WG 1: “POLITICAL” Focus on exchange - best practices sharing Focus on plans for a specific interest or patient group Pain plans as priority of the system, with an adequate measurement

  • Protocols or organizational structures
  • Educational and training plans on pain
  • Specific initiatives for the management of pain in

chronic, old, fragile or paediatric patients.

  • Active patient
  • Health politics initiatives
  • Pain as a quality indicator for its assessment

Prioritization

  • f initiatives

according to

  • pportunities

assessment after SIP Working Groups Focus Potential topics

Objectives of SIP Spain

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Event coordination

Permanent commission: Steering committee includes:

Scientific societies REPRESENTING Patient Associations Management REPRESENTING Management (Quality) Patient Associations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 JUNE JULY- AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

Timeline

Selection of speakers/ coordinators/ moderators

11

Event planning and development of contents Selection of attendees Working with the steering committee in the definition of contents Kick-off meeting

  • 3 working-groups:
  • 1 coordinator
  • 1 moderator
  • 3 speakers
  • Each group chooses 3

concrete subjects

  • Each subject should

include the current situation, good practice examples, suggestions for improvement and political recommendations

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Event Program

Plenary Sessions at the Ministry of Health Working groups at a Hotel nearby

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Participants of Groupwork

Patient Associations Stakeholders from regional Health System (Health Care or Pharmacy Mgmt.) KOLs – reference for the public system, responsible of pain plans or representative of key scientific societies 35 % 40 % 25 %

75

participants

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Conclusion Groupwork

  • Relevance of the systematic measurement

and assessment of pain, including patient experience (satisfaction)

  • Pain level as key indicator of quality of

care received

  • Management of pain should be a strategic

element of the health systems

  • Training of HCP is key to ensure a proper

communication as pain is treated by different roles (continuity of pain care)

  • Thus, pain should be a institutional
  • bjective at all levels
  • Active patient – his/her experience as

measurement of quality and shared decision making

  • Ease the access to pain care – new

technologies might be of help

  • Societal impact of pain is higher tan other

pathologies with more “media presence” – avoid underestimation.

  • Need to investigate and work on visibility
  • f special population groups (chronic,

paediatric)

  • Should be a “must-have” training course

for HCP.

  • “Pain belongs to everyone”
  • Patients participation in the development
  • f pain care plans and include their

experiences

GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3

Pain as an indicator of quality of care Coordination and continuity of care Attention to pain in chronicity and in

  • ther population profiles

24 partici pants 22 partici pants 29 partici pants

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Highlights SIP

  • The development and formulation of conclusions and recommendations from the

different working groups during the symposium

  • necessary to establish pain as a priority and transversal element in the framework of

national health strategies and policies

Make noise to put pain care in focus

  • Unite all organizations and societies advocating better pain care to jointly address,

define and foster pain policies or regional initiatives

  • Best practices sharing

Multi-stakeholder approach

  • An active role of the patient in the management of pain
  • Improvement of pain management would provide substantial economic and social

benefits

Patient in the center

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Impact of SIP in the media

Social media impacts

337 posts 100 Total users Reach 152160 430737 Impressions

Tipo de interacción #Hashtags

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Impact of SIP in the media

General and specialized media impacts

31 impacts 4,958,714 Audience 98,416 € ROI (Return on investment

Press Release and video news

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

THANK YOU VERY MUCH!

María Soledad García Penalta PAE Board Member marisol.garcia.penalta@pae-eu.eu