leica absolute distance meter
play

Leica Absolute Distance Meter Technology Days at NASA/MSFC May - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Leica Absolute Distance Meter Technology Days at NASA/MSFC May 22-23, 2002 Ron Eng NASA/MSFC 256-544-3603 ron.eng@msfc.nasa.gov Leica Disto-Pro ranging device Used during SBMD and NMSD tests for radius of curvature measurements.


  1. Leica Absolute Distance Meter Technology Days at NASA/MSFC May 22-23, 2002 Ron Eng NASA/MSFC 256-544-3603 ron.eng@msfc.nasa.gov

  2. Leica Disto-Pro ranging device • Used during SBMD and NMSD tests for radius of curvature measurements. • Time of flight ranging device. • +/- 2mm accuracy. • 1.5 to 50 meters range. • Works best with diffuse targets. • Compact. • Inexpensive. 2

  3. Requirements for measuring AMSD radius of curvature • Remote measurement device to be located at or near ROC. • Absolute distance measurement or ranging device. • 1 micron measurement resolution. • Better than 25 microns measurement accuracy. • Better than 25 microns measurement repeatability. • Greater than 50 meters range. • Specular surface and corner cube. • Fast sample rate. • Compact. • Easy to use. 3

  4. Leica laser tracker 4

  5. CPU, power supply, and ADM 5

  6. ADM on hexapod 6

  7. Ranging system principle Distance D, is determined by measuring the phase angle between the transmitted sine wave and the received sine wave. The relationship between phase angle φ r , time delay t r , and modulation frequency f 0 ,is: t r = φ r / 2 π f 0 D = C t r / 2 = C φ r / 4 π f 0 D 0 = N 0 C / 2 f 0 7

  8. ADM description IR laser diode 780nm (1mW max output) Visible laser diode for pointing Polarization modulation External modulation with LiTaO 3 crystal @700-900 MHz Differential signal detection Detection of the same signal (same phase position) Frequency Shift ==> 0° Phase Minimal measurement distance 1.5 m due to minimum bandwidth of 150 MHz Maximum measurement range 50 m Distance measurement resolution 1 µm Distance measurement accuracy better than 50 µm . 400 x 120 x 40 mm (L x H x T) 2 kg 8

  9. ADM schematic Modulator opt. pol. Isolator Beam- Optics splitter 4 2 5 /4-Plate Laser 1 Beam Splitter Crystal 6 3 12 11 Laser – Light- pointer Reflector 7 detector or Mirror Lock-In 8 Quarz, Amplifier, Sythesizer 9 Wobbler 10 Controller A\D - Converter Data- Connection 9

  10. ADM - Modulation methods Example for a π /2 shift of light External modulation with LiTaO 3 crystal Y beam (circular polarization) • not directly influencing the laser X E Y • using non linearity effects Z • beam velocity is different at different Y axis E X and E Y E X E X Z Modulation Wave E X E Y E X E Y Polarization Modulation systematical change of the beam shift by an electronic oscillation circuit π / 4 π / 2 3 π / 4 π 5 π / 4 5 π / 2 7 π / 4 2 π 0 high frequency 700 - 900 MHz 10

  11. ADM - Beam Pass and Phase Control Reflector zero current 0 (n e , n o ) polarization beam splitter with an angle of 45° to the crystal λ / 4 - plate works like an analyzer Crystal no light on the Receiver Diode linear polarized light beam 11

  12. Overview - Major Functionality Blocks Digital synthesizer Modulator HF - Circuit Differential signal detection CPU 12

  13. Modulator - High Frequency Circuit Systematical influencing of the refraction indices n e and n o of the crystal High frequency with enough power Optimized modulation voltage ==> enough modulation strength Back - Coupling (same phase) Transistor Spring E C Plate " Connected" Measuring Pin Box B U CB U EB Crystal High Frequeny Circuit Wobble - Frequency Overlay 13

  14. Digital synthesizer Synthesizer for flexible and defined frequency movement Very short reaction time Very small frequency steps (system resolution) Oszillator Phase VCO NCO 10 MHz compare 3.6 MHz Amplifier to 4 MHz 14

  15. ADM - Differential Signal Detection 1. Sample measurement [*] 2. Sample measurement [*] 180 ° -phase difference f- ∆ f f+ ∆ f Sample Int_1 Sample Int_2 Difference (Int_1-Int_2) = Int Intensity Int_2 Intensity Int_1 of Int>0 of 2. sampling 1. sampling if Int >0, measured frequency f is higher Set frequency f than frequency at minimum position 15

  16. ADM - Differential Signal Detection f- ∆ f f+ ∆ f Sample Int_1 Sample Int_2 Difference (Int_1-Int_2) = Int Intensity Int_2 Intensity Int_1 of of 2. sampling 1. sampling Int=0 if Int = 0, frequency f is set to minimum position set frequency f 16

  17. ADM - Differential Signal Detection f- ∆ f f+ ∆ f Sample Int_1 Sample Int_2 Difference (Int_1-Int_2) = Int Intensity Int_2 Intensity Int_1 of of 2. sampling 1. sampling Int<0 set frequency f if Int < 0, measured frequency f is smaller than frequency at minimum position 17

  18. Sampling along a Minimum Position Using difference method to sample along a minimum position, the intensity values will follow a line Inte nsity va lue s [in A /D con ve rter un its] 20 0 15 0 10 0 5 0 F re que ncy m ovem en t [in N S ] -15 0 -50 -2 00 -10 0 50 10 0 1 50 20 0 -5 0 -10 0 m ea sured in te nsity -15 0 fu nctio n (83 5.5 M H z) -2 00 18

  19. Micro - Controller Functionality Data- and synthesizer controlling and Data bus data transfer program memory wobble-frequency control oscillator Laser ON / OFF bus select CPU configurable measuring- and memory high frequency (Parameter) (VCO) signals hardware- measuring - Power Supply- data - interfaces switches display Reset 19

  20. Measurement flow and distance calculation start measurement set frequency at low boarder of modulation band begin with starting actions search minimum by defined frequency movement search next search exactly next minimum position minimum position minimum frequency f 0 no ∆ = − f f f enough minimum minimum position f 0+1 + positions? 0 1 0 yes = f = f N N 0 1 or ∆ ∆ 0 1 start fine f f measurement ⋅ N c = D 0 no further result ⋅ 0 2 f distance calculation measurements? display 0 yes 20

  21. Atmospheric Influence Accuracy depends on refractive index of air between the ADM and the target. Refractive Index • T = air temperature in degrees Celsius • P = pressure in millimeters of Mercury • R = relative humidity in percent ⋅ 7 5 . T −   6 + 237 3 0 6609 . + ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ 1 10 P ( . 0817 00133 . T ) − 6 + = ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ T .   N 03889479 . P 55668 10 . R 10 Gr + ⋅ 1 00036610 . T     21

  22. Shortest Distance Limitations are related to: Bandwidth of the modulator of 150 MHz Modulation frequency 22

  23. ADM measurement output ADM Measurement Refraction = 1.00027529886 A = -49849.000000 Dist. [m] C K [um] P [um] f [Hz] M [m] SD [um] 20.465532 124 -3 2 840019528 20.465532 0.000000000 20.465532 124 0 1 840019472 20.465532 0.000000000 20.465534 125 -1 2 840019472 20.465532 1.168007728 20.465534 124 -1 2 840019472 20.465533 1.168007728 20.465534 124 -1 2 840019472 20.465533 1.118282261 20.465532 123 -3 2 840019528 20.465533 1.087356019 20.465532 123 -3 2 840019528 20.465532 1.066240300 20.465534 124 0 2 840019416 20.465533 1.081365031 20.465534 123 -1 1 840019472 20.465533 1.092571186 20.465534 124 0 2 840019416 20.465533 1.054326627 20.465534 124 0 2 840019416 20.465533 1.000222061 20.465534 124 0 2 840019416 20.465533 0.996080337 23

  24. Acceptance test methods Repeatability test S.D. of 30 measurements to a corner cube <25 um S.D. of 30 measurements to a mirror <50 um Relative accuracy test 20 distance measurements to a corner cube, compare distance with LTD500, deviation ∆ D <25 um 20 distance measurements to a mirror, compare distance with LTD500, deviation ∆ D <50 um ADM LTD500 or DMI measure ∆ D 24

  25. Acceptance test methods (continue) ADM offset determination (LTD500 required) 3 distances to be measured from both directions with LTD500 3 distances to be measured from both directions with ADM Deviation between (D1 + D2) and D3 < 35 um D3 D1 D2 25

  26. Acceptance test methods (continue) Absolute distance accuracy test (LTD500 required) Measure 3 distances between 3 points with LTD500 Measure 3 distances between 3 points with ADM Deviation between (D1 + D2) and D3 < 35 um O1 O3 O2 3 NASA-ADM Mounting support = corner cube positions 26

  27. Acceptance test results Requirements ADM s/n 166 ADM s/n 406 Repeatability to S.D. < 25 um < 1.3 < 1.8 corner cube Repeatability to S.D. < 50 um < 3.5 < 2.7 mirror ∆ D < 25 um Relative accuracy < 1.1 < 1.8 to corner cube ∆ D < 50 um Relative accuracy < 19 < 35 to mirror ∆ D < 35 um Absolute distance < 21 < 36 accuracy 27

  28. Conclusions ADM measurements are very accurate and repeatable for corner cubes. Performed cryo deformation test of Gr-Ep reaction structure with ADM. Software interface is easy to use. May have problem measuring to Be mirror due to polarization properties or scatter. Currently have no method to calibrate the ADM in house. Demo is available on Friday during tour at XRCF. Demonstrate relative accuracy with a HP DMI. 28

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend