Learning to Love Data
JEFF CAPOBIANCO, PHD
Learning to Love Data JEFF CAPOBIANCO, PHD What well be discussing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Learning to Love Data JEFF CAPOBIANCO, PHD What well be discussing together! Why the strong focus on Data today in the healthcare marketplace? What can we do to reframe how we think about and use data? How can we use
JEFF CAPOBIANCO, PHD
Why the strong focus on “Data” today in the “healthcare marketplace”? What can we do to reframe how we think about and use data? How can we use data to assess services quality and outcomes to drive treatment decisions? How can we use it to inform clinical practice to help our clients achieve their goals?
“Hey Jeff…” What I’ve heard about Data/Measurement
“Behavioral Health staff aren’t good at math…after all that’s why I went into Behavioral health…” “What we do and who we work with are too complex to measure…” “You can’t hold me accountable for a consumer achieving a treatment plan metric…” “The demand to use data is just another way to get us to work harder/more…to talk about productivity” “Our EMR is not useful…and I don’t see that changing anytime soon…no really I’m serious.”
"The concept of value-based health care purchasing is that buyers should hold providers
brings together information on the quality of health care, including patient outcomes and health status, with data on the dollar outlays going towards health. It focuses on managing the use of the health care system to reduce inappropriate care and to identify and reward the best-performing providers. This strategy can be contrasted with more limited efforts to negotiate price discounts, which reduce costs but do little to ensure that quality of care is improved."
Source: Theory & Reality of Value-Based Purchasing: Lessons from the Pioneer. November 1997. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/meyer/index.html
Low Intensity/$ High Intensity/$$$ Moderate Intensity/$$ Level of Service Criteria/Cost
Screening & Assessment Target Parameters Length of Care/ Time to Tx
Moderate Intensity 9-18 Months High Intensity 18 -28 Months
Improved Academic Performance Substance Cessation
PHQ-9 Score <10 Appt’s Kept Use of Crisis Plan No self harm No Hosp. & ED Use Satisfaction
Medication On-going Screening Crisis Plan
Smoking Cessation Academic Supports
Service Bundle
Female, 18 yrs old Substance Addicted (nicotine) Depressed Self-harming Poor Academic Performance
Low Intensity 0-9 Months Level of Engagement Maintenance/ Relapse Prevention Precontemplation & Contemplation Action Preparation
Effective Healthcare
satisfaction
Efficient Healthcare
specifications
Fee-for-Service/Volume-Based Care
Focus is on Efficiency
Value-Based Purchasing
Focuses on Efficiency & Effectiveness Measurement-based Care
“The main reason seems to be a lack of integration of (data) health IT into clinical workflow in a way that supports the cognitive work of the clinician and the workflows among (partner) organizations, within a clinic and within a visit.”
Source: Carayon & Karsh, (2010). AHRQ Publication No. 10-0098-EF
BENEFITS
1. More efficient workflow (e.g. less time spent handling laboratory results) 2. Improved access to clinical data 3. Streamlined referral processes 4. Improved quality of care--Better health
5. Improved patient safety, including fewer prescribing errors and fewer hospital readmissions 6. Cost savings (e.g. eliminating costs of storing paper records) 7. Increased revenue (e.g. government incentives for use of health IT) 8. Pay-for-performance incentives
BARRIERS
1. Lack of Leadership 2. Lack of strategic plan for data use & health IT 3. Costs of EHR implementation 4. Cost of establishing and maintaining links between EHRs and HIE networks 5. Security and privacy issues 6. Liability Provider’s concern to be held liable for information from outside sources/labs 7. Misaligned incentives (who pays and who benefits) 8. Provider reluctance to relinquish control of patient information to competing systems 9. Technical barriers (e.g. lack of interoperability among EHRs) 10. Lack of IT training and support
Source: Fontaine, Ross, et al. (2010). Systematic Review of HIE in Primary Care Practices, JABPM
Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions Better Results
by Davenport, Harris & Morison
D for accessible, high-quality Data E for an Enterprise orientation L for analytical Leadership T for strategic Targets A for Analytical talent
coherent and meaningful manner
purposefully
What is the ultimate purpose of data?
To turn it into Help! Continuous Quality Help!
Data
Information Knowledge
HELP
needs
proposition to funders to keep and expand services
they want
discussion of symptom monitoring tool data,
Continuous Quality Improvement first
Quality Help
Continuous Quality Improvement Process to Respond to Findings
1/10/2020 16
Strategic Plan Provide smoking cessation services Performance Target 100% of consumers will be screened for smoking
Compare Results
Target=100% Actual=60%
Take Corrective Action
Keep Monitoring?
Dashboard Data aggregated & displayed
Consumer Care Pathway
(Staff trained to provide smoking screening)
Adjust Objectives ?
Target Performance Actual Performance Staff enter screening data
Medical Record
Screening data stored
Data
Information KnowledgeAction
Intake Discharge/ Referral
Adapted from: Kolhbacher, et al. (2008) AHCMJ
Strategic Plan Provide smoking cessation services Performance Target 100% of consumers will be screened for smoking
Compare Results
Target=100% Actual=60%
Take Corrective Action
Keep Monitoring?
Dashboard Data aggregated & displayed
Consumer Care Pathway
(Staff trained to provide smoking screening)
Adjust Objectives ?
Target Performance Actual Performance Staff enter screening data
Medical Record
Screening data stored
Data
Information KnowledgeAction
Intake Discharge/ Referral
Adapted from: Kolhbacher, et al. (2008) AHCMJ
Plan Do Study Act
Continuous Quality Help Process to Respond to Client Needs
Develop Person Centered Plan based
Support Client in Doing the Plan Engage to Study & see if it worked? If it worked, Celebrate! If it didn’t work, Celebrate the effort & develop a better plan!
Person Centered Plan Goal Area: Smoking 30 Day Action Plan: Reduce smoking by3 cigs a day through mindfulness
Meet with Client & Compare Results
Target=3 cigs Actual=1 cig.
Update PCP with new goal? New Skills? Keep PCP as is?
Diary Card Data aggregated & displayed
Client’s Experience/Work btw Appts
Adjust Objectives ?
Target Performance Actual Performance client enters # smoked daily
Diary Card
Data
Information Knowledge
HELP
Client Leaves Appt Client Returns to Appt
1. Choose an area of your practice that is of great concern (people are not getting better…) or great excitement (we’re doing great work here but have no data to show for it). 2. Find a data point(s) that is relevant and determine how to capture and process the data (e.g., reliable and valid tools, registry, dashboards, etc.)
clients, and their natural supports by using a data tracer checklist
progress
Source: Adapted from Data Fluency by Gemignani & Gemignani
The metric can be impacted by the client Data are modestly collectable by reliable source Method for collecting is understood Client understands how the data tells their story
your client’s person centered plan into metrics that provide timely information and insights that enable people to proactively improve decisions, optimize processes, and plans.
shared process like strategic organizational improvement
23
Rates, etc.
Insurance Mix, etc.
Performance on Scope of Practice Tasks
Between Organizations, Clinicians, Teams, etc.
Motivational Interviewing Scales, Labs, Assessment/Screening Results, Vitals, etc.
Medication Reconciliation, Referral Appt Attendance, etc.
data are out of specification (e.g., A1c > 6)
w w w . T h e N a t i o n a l C o u n c i l . o r g
25
Purpose of using a Data Tracer Checklist is to trace data from granular level/first collection through to everyday aggregation/use.
you want to access to address a clinical or administrative concern
report/dashboard these data?
data are being collected and how it serves them/their needs?
care provider(s), administrator(s), funder(s) & accrediting bodies?
tweaking to your clinical practice could have major dividends.
by staff to improve workflow processes.
It’s all continuous quality improvement!
What is a question, concern or insight you have from what we’ve discussed? What could you do tomorrow so that your data are helpful?
Jeff Capobianco capoj@umich.edu For CTAC questions, email ctac.info@nyu.edu
Wednesday, January 15th at 12 PM
Thursday, January 23rd at 12 PM
Tuesday, January 28th at 12:30 PM