Learning Objectives: Intro on the premise of modern cancer - - PDF document

learning objectives
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Learning Objectives: Intro on the premise of modern cancer - - PDF document

Disclosure Future of Cancer Therapy: I have no relevant financial relationships with any companies related to the content of Intro to CAR T cells this course. UCSF Continuing Medical Education 2019 Asian Health Symposium San Francisco, CA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1 | [footer text here] James Lee, MD/MHS October 10th, 2019

UCSF Continuing Medical Education

2019 Asian Health Symposium San Francisco, CA

Future of Cancer Therapy: Intro to CAR T cells

1

Disclosure

I have no relevant financial relationships with any companies related to the content of this course.

2

Learning Objectives:

§ Intro on the premise of modern cancer immunotherapy § Basic scientific background of CAR T cell therapy § Clinical indications for CAR T cell therapy § CAR T cell therapy toxicity and management § Recognize why immunology is so cool

3 4

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 | [footer text here]

STAGE IV CANCER SURVIVAL

Traditional Therapies Immunotherapy

1 0 0 % 0 %

% of Treated Patients Alive Time

Patients ultimately succumb to their disease

Traditional Cancer Therapies

1 0 0 % 0 % Long Term Benefit Traditional Therapies

% of Treated Patients Alive Time

Immunotherapy Combinations of Immunotherapy What used to a hypothetical curve is now a reality

5

Not helpful ! Won’t remember!!

6

In the beginning…the sabre-toothed tiger

(image: Getty) https://www.mirror.co.uk

Need context:

7

The innate immunity

  • Macrophages
  • Neutrophils
  • Basophils
  • Eosinophils
  • Dendritic cell
  • Natural Killer cell

The adaptive immunity

  • T cells
  • B cells

Response time Hours Days

Receptor recognizes set patterns, Co-evolved, only changes through evolution Receptor can recognize 1015 possible patterns, dynamic change depending on exposure through 1 lifetime

Defense against “non-self” invaders

8

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 | [footer text here]

Annu Rev Med. 1999;50:369-86. Daud et al, CIR, 2017

Ok, but can they recognize cancer?

Self ? Or non-self??

9

Tu Tumor antigen

Ok, but can they recognize cancer?

Na Native T cell receptor

T cell biology T cell Tumor cell

10

T cell Biology- priority is self preservation

MHC I/II CD4/8 αβ ζ ζ CD3

Tumor/virus infected cell

T cell

tumor peptide Signal 1 = Activation and proliferation Signal 2 +

CD28 4-1BB OX40 CD80 4-1BBL OX40L

APC

11

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy

12

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 | [footer text here]

T cell genetically modified with CAR to go after “self”

  • Specificity of a

monoclonal antibody

  • Not dependent on

MHC

  • Activates T cells

with Signals 1 & 2

Maus et al, Frontiers, 2018

13

  • 2. T cell

transduction

  • 1. T cell

isolation by leukapheresis

  • 3. T cell expansion

Tumor specific CAR gene introduction

Chimeric Antigen Receptor

Na Native TCR CR CAR

14

Courtesy of Michael Jensen, MD, www.washington.edu

15

*Lymphodepletion chemo followed by 5x107-5x108 cells

CAR T cell clinical schema

16

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 | [footer text here]

First ideal cancer target – CD19

CD19 as ideal target because:

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

preB-ALL B cell lymphomas and leukemias myelomas Stem Cell pre B immature B mature B plasma cell pro B

CD19 CD22 CD20 BCMA

17

r/r ALL

  • CR 80-90%

r/r DLBCL

  • CR 40-60%

FDA approved CAR T cell products Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) Yescarta (axicabtagene cilelucel)

Response rate

18

r/r ALL

  • CR 80-90%
  • 25-40%
  • 35-45%

r/r DLBCL

  • CR 40-60%
  • 15-25%
  • 15-25%

FDA approved CAR T cell products Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) Yescarta (axicabtagene cilelucel)

Response rate

Cytokine Release Syndrome (sCRS) Neurotoxicity (sNT)

r/r MM

  • similar

to DLBCL (prelim) *FDA

  • rphan

Drug status

Anti-CD19 CAR Anti-BCMA CAR

19

Cytokine Release Syndrome

Symptoms / Signs CRS Grade 1

(mild)

CRS Grade 2

(moderate)

CRS Grade 3

(severe)

CRS Grade 4

(life- threatening) Vital Signs Temperature ≥ 38.5 ºC / 101.3 ºF Yes Any Any Any Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤ 90 mmHg N/A Responds to intravenous (IV) fluids or single low- dose vasopressor Needs high- dosea or multiple vasopressors Life- threatening Need for oxygen to reach oxygen saturation (SaO2) > 90% N/A Fraction of inspired

  • xygen (FiO2)

< 40% FiO2 ≥ 40% Needs ventilator support Organ Toxicity N/A Grade 2 Grade 3 or transaminitis Grade 4 Grade 4 (excluding transaminitis)

Adapted from Lee, Blood, 2014

20

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 | [footer text here]

Cytokine Release Syndrome

CRS Key Risk Factors/Features:

  • 1. High disease burden
  • 2. Intensity of pre-conditioning chemo
  • 3. Occult infection (viral, bacterial, fungal)
  • 4. Younger age
  • 5. Usually begins within 14 days post infusion
  • 6. Elevated inflammatory lab value- CRP

, Ferritin

  • 7. Due to cytokine production (IFNg->IL-6->others)

Treatment: 1.Tocilizumab (anti-IL6)

  • 2. +/- Corticosteroids
  • 3. R/o and treat underlying infection

21

CAR T cell Neurotoxicity

Neurotoxicity Key Risk Factors/Features:

  • 1. A.k.a. cytokine release encephalopathy

syndrome, immune cell associated neutrotoxicity syndrome (CRES, ICANS).

  • 2. AMS, aphasia, seizures, cerebral edema.
  • 3. Median onset 4-5 days after infusion,
  • ften following CRS

Treatment/management:

  • 1. Serial CARTOX-10 exam
  • 2. High dose corticosteroids
  • 3. +/- Tocilizumab
  • 4. +/- Keppra seizure prophylaxis

22

CARTOX-10 Assessment

Shpall et al, Nat Rev Clin Onc, 2018

Each task = 1 point.

  • 1. Orientation: current year, month, city,

hospital, president (5 points)

  • 2. Naming: 3 objects (3 points)
  • 3. Writing: ask patient to write a standard

sentence (1 point)

  • 4. Counting/Attention: count backwards

from 10 to 1 (1 point)

23

CAR T cell Kinetics

Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 30 CRS ICANS CAR T cell expansion B cell aplasia/autoimmunity Peak circulating CAR T cell number

24

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 | [footer text here]

CAR T cell Kinetics

25

CD19 CAR T cell relapses

CD19 negative: cancer cells downregulate CD19 target. CD19 positive: possibly due to suppressive TME or novel mechanisms,

  • ften result in loss of CAR T persistence.

20-50% rate

26

Future of CAR T cell therapy- solid tumors?

No trials for solid tumors has shown similar success as CD19 CARS:

  • 1. Pediatric neuroblastoma (GD2 CAR)
  • 2. Adult sarcoma (HER2 CAR).
  • 3. Prostate cancer (PSMA CAR)
  • 4. Gliobastoma (IL13R, EGFR CAR)
  • 5. Mesothelioma/Panc Ca (Meso CAR)

27

Future of CAR T cell therapy- solid tumors?

Maus et al, Frontiers, 2018

Notable works in progress: 1. Improving CAR costim signal to amplify function, persistence 2. Make CAR T cells deliver cytokines to modify TME, cheaper? 3. Remote controlled CAR that can shut down 4. CARs that can recognize more than 1 antigen (synNotch, Tandem CAR) 5. CRISPR for function and make safer / off-the-shelf universal donor CARs Key challenge: The immune system’s priority is self preservation and maintain homeostasis, CAR T cells will trigger suppressive feedback.

28

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 | [footer text here]

Thank you

29