Leadership and Governance in Twenty-first Century California - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

leadership and governance in twenty first century
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Leadership and Governance in Twenty-first Century California - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Association of California Community College Administrators Leadership and Governance in Twenty-first Century California Constance M. Carroll, Ph.D. Chancellor San Diego Community College District THE ONLY CONSTANT IS CHANGE.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Association of California Community College Administrators

Leadership and Governance in Twenty-first Century California

Constance M. Carroll, Ph.D.

Chancellor San Diego Community College District

slide-2
SLIDE 2

“THE ONLY CONSTANT IS CHANGE.”

  • Heraclitus
slide-3
SLIDE 3

National Community College Context

Public: 986 Private: 115 Tribal: 31 Total: 1,132

Source: AACC 2014 Fact Sheet

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

America at the “Tipping Point”

U.S. Population, Actual and Projected: 2012 and 2050

2012 2050

Population (in millions) 316 438 Share of total Foreign born 13% 19% Racial/Ethnic Groups White 63% 47% Hispanic 17% 29% Black 13% 13% Asian 5% 9% Age Groups Children (17 and younger) 24% 23% Working age (18-64) 62% 58% Elderly (65 and older) 14% 19%

Source: 2012 data: U.S. Census Bureau Source: 2050 projection: Pew Research Center, 2008

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

State “Minorities”

Hawaii 83% California 65% New Mexico 64% Texas 58%

States That Have Reached the “Tipping Point”

5

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2012

slide-6
SLIDE 6

California Demographic History

6

30% 40% 60% 70% 80% 90%

White Latino/Hispanic

40% 13% 38% 3% 6% 12% 78%

California Population by Race/Ethnicity, 1970–2010

African American Multiracial

20% 10% 0% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Source: United States Census Bureau, decennial censuses and American Community Survey

100% 50%

Asian/Other

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CHANGING METHODS

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Laboratory Contract Education Workforce Training Global Education Open-Entry Open Exit Online MOOCs

Learning Communities

Lecture

Community College

Changing Instructional Delivery & Learning Methodologies

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Changing Student Support Systems

FROM: TO:

Online Systems

  • Registration
  • Counseling
  • Learning Support

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CHANGING STUDENTS

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The American Community Colleges Students

13 Million Students:

8 million credit · 5 million non-credit

  • 45% of U.S. Undergraduates
  • 45% of First-Time Freshmen
  • 57% Women, 43% Men
  • 60% Part-Time, 40% Full-Time
  • Average Age – 28 years

Source: AACC 2014 Fact Sheet

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

72 Districts

California Community Colleges

Urban

112 Colleges

Suburban Rural A Diverse System 2.1 MILLION STUDENTS

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CCC System Demographics

American Indian 0%

Asian 12%

Pacific Islander 1% Filipino 3% Latino/ Hispanic 38% African American 7% White 30% Two or More Races 3% Unknown 6%

Source: http://datamart.cccco.edu/Students/Student_Term_Annual_Count.aspx

112 colleges 2,292,252, students

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

UC System Demographics

American Indian 1% Asian 33% Filipino 4% Latino/ Hispanic 19% African American 4% White 33% Unknown 6%

Source: http://legacy-its.ucop.edu/uwnews/stat/statsum/fall2012/statsumm2012.pdf

10 universities 238,686 students

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CSU System Demographics

American Indian 0% Asian 16% Pacific Islander 0% Filipino 1% Latino/Hispanic 35% African American 5% White 31% 2 or More Races 5% Unknown 7%

Source: http://www.calstate.edu/AS/stat_reports/2013-2014/feth02.htm

23 universities 436,560 students

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Statewide K-12 Student Demographics

Source: http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/App_Resx/EdDataClassic/fsTwoPanel.aspx?#!bottom=/_layouts/EdDataClassic/profile.asp?Tab=1&level= 04&reportNumber=16#studentsbyraceethnicity

9,919 schools 6,226,989 students

American Indian 1% Asian 9% Pacific Islander 1% Filipino 2% Latino/Hispanic 53% African American 6% White 25% Two or More Races 2% Unknown 1%

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CHANGING MISSION & LEADERSHIP ISSUES

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

California Community Colleges Student Success Task Force Final Recommendations

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Background and History

Pursuant to Senate Bill 1143, the California Community Colleges Board

  • f Governors established the Student Success Task Force with the

charge of examining best practices and models for accomplishing student success and presenting recommendations 12-month strategic planning process to improve student success

  • January – June 2011: The Task Force began its work.
  • July – September 2011: Developed recommendations.
  • September 30, 2011: Released draft recommendations, which were

vetted statewide at conferences and public town halls.

  • December 7, 2011: The Task Force reviewed feedback on draft

recommendations and revised to form finalized recommendations.

  • January 9, 2012: Final recommendations were approved by the

Board of Governors.

  • September 27, 2012: SB 1456 (Lowenthal) enacted.
  • July 1, 2014: Student Success and Support Program; Student Equity

Plan in Budget.

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Student Success Task Force Recommendations

1. Increase College and Career Readiness 2. Strengthen Support for Entering Students 3. Incentivize Successful Student Behaviors 4. Align Course Offerings to Meet Student Needs 5. Improve the Education of Basic Skills Students 6. Revitalize and Re-Envision Professional Development 7. Enable Efficient Statewide Leadership & Increase Coordination Among Colleges 8. Align Resources with Student Success Recommendations

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

COMMUNITY COLLEGE BACCALAUREATE

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The California Context 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education University of California California State University California Community Colleges

Independent Institutions

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

 University of California

  • Primary academic research institution
  • Undergraduate through doctoral programs

 California State University*

  • Broader undergraduate through masters programs
  • Less stringent admissions requirements

 Community Colleges

  • Certificates and Associate Degrees in academic and

vocational programs

  • Open access

*Authorized to offer doctoral degrees in selected areas, SB 724 (2005)

CA Master Plan for Higher Education (1960)

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

California Community College Mission

  • Open Access to Higher Education
  • Transfer Education
  • Career Technical Education
  • Adult/Continuing Education
  • Basic Skills/Remedial Education
  • Support Services
  • Economic Development

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Changes in Degree Requirements

 The high school diploma is no longer the entry requirement for jobs.  The associate degree has been replaced by the bachelor’s degree as the entry requirement for many jobs.  The Master Plan needs to be updated to reflect new workforce realities.

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Bachelor’s Degree Pathways

 Articulation Agreement  Two + Two Program  University Center  Distance Learning/Degree Completion  Community College Baccalaureate

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

States Currently Authorizing Community College Baccalaureates

27

  • 1. New York

1970

  • 12. Indiana

2004

  • 2. West Virginia 1990
  • 13. Washington

2005

  • 3. Utah

1992

  • 14. Georgia

2005

  • 4. Vermont

1993

  • 15. North Dakota

2006

  • 5. Florida

1997

  • 16. Arkansas

2006

  • 6. Nevada

1998

  • 17. Oklahoma

2006

  • 7. Louisiana

2001

  • 18. Wisconsin

2010

  • 8. Hawaii

2003

  • 19. Illinois

2012

  • 9. Texas

2003

  • 20. Michigan

2012

  • 10. Minnesota

2003

  • 21. Colorado

2014

  • 11. New Mexico 2004
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Report Presented to the CCC Board of Governors March 4, 2014

CCC Baccalaureate Degree Study Group Conclusion

“After much discussion and feedback, the Study Group believes that the offering of baccalaureates by the California community colleges merits serious review and discussion by the Chancellor and the Board of Governors.”

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 Enables 15 districts to propose and implement one bachelor’s degree.  State Chancellor/BOG to determine pilot districts based on resources, and local and regional needs  Coordination with the state universities  Duplication of public university programs to be avoided  Legislature to set student fees, state compensation  Local boards to determine governance, administration, standards, and formats  Evaluation and report to State Chancellor and Board of Governors

SB 850 (Block, 2014):

Community College Baccalaureate Pilot Program

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

 Senate Higher Education Committee (4/24/14)  Senate Appropriations Committee (5/23/14)  Senate (5/27/14)  Assembly Higher Education Committee (6/24/14)  Assembly Appropriations Committee (TBD)  Assembly (TBD)  Senate (TBD)  Governor (TBD)

SB 850 (Block, 2014):

Approvals

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

 Added to draft standards new requirements specific to bachelor’s degree

  • Minimum 120 semester credits
  • Minimum GE requirement 36 semester credits
  • All standards apply and interpreted in the context of the degree

(e.g. faculty credentials, library resources, etc. should be appropriate to the degree)

  • Substantive Change Process

ACCJC Bachelor’s Degree Requirements

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ADULT EDUCATION

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

AB 86

Regional Consortia

 Community College Districts  K-12 Districts

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

LEADING & MANAGING THE INSTITUTION

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Leadership in the 21st Century

External Forces Internal Forces

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

State

  • Comm. Colleges

Regulations University Changes Technology Federal Regulations Demographics Accreditation Requirements & Actions Student Needs Business & Industry Legislative Term Limits District Budget & Policies State Economy

Community College

Changing External Impacts

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Community Colleges Three Types of CEOs

Chancellor

Superintendent President

President

(Institutional) College College College College

Multi-College District Single College District Single College in Multi-College District

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Community College Dynamics

Personal Informal Hands-On Intense Representative Formal Resistant to Change Intense

Small

Large

Medium Rural Suburban Urban

Advisory Board? Appointed Board? Elected Board?

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Internal Constituencies

Faculty

  • Academic
  • Vocational
  • Full-Time/Part-Time
  • Gender
  • Ethnicity
  • Age, Longevity
  • Union/Senate
  • Teaching/Non-Teaching
  • Credit/Non-Credit

Students

Resident

Commuter

Full-Time

Part-Time

Day/Evening

Involvement

Traditional

Re-Entry

Gender

Ethnicity

Administration

Executive

Middle Management

Gender

Ethnicity

Age, Longevity

History

Support Staff

Clerical

Technical

Trades

Governing Boards

Elected

Appointed

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING & GOVERNANCE

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

72 Districts

California Community Colleges Budget Process

State Budget - Proposition 98 Governor - Legislature State Board of Governors & System Local Boards of Trustees & Districts

Federal & Special Funds

  • Allocations

112 Colleges

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Budget

  • Based on Growth
  • Foundations
  • Partnerships
  • Contract Education
  • Entrepreneurship

New Funding

  • Reallocation of Resources
  • Collaboration
  • Out-sourcing

Change Mechanism

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Administration AB 1725 (1988) “Ten Plus One” Winton Act SB160 (1976) “Rodda Act” Yeshiva Decision (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Collective Bargaining Governance

Changing Decision-Making Trends

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Academic Senate Title 5 “10 + 1”

Section 53200 (c)

  • 1. Curriculum, including establishing
  • 2. Degree & Certificate Requirements
  • 3. Grading Policies
  • 4. Educational Program Development
  • 5. Standards & Policies regarding Student Preparation and success
  • 6. College Governance structures, as related to faculty roles
  • 7. Faculty roles and involvement in accreditation process
  • 8. Policies for faculty professional development activities
  • 9. Processes for program review

10.Processes for institutional planning and budget development

The “Plus 1”

Other academic and professional matters as mutually agreed upon

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Fiscal control by Legislature & State system Loss of local Board taxing ability (Prop. 13) Diminishing revenue & flexibility Increasing categorical accountability mandates New Governance requirements

  • AB 1725
  • Yeshiva Decision (1980)

Impact on employees of chronic underfunding

Challenges for Bargaining

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

LEADERSHIP AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING THE SAN DIEGO MODEL

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

The San Diego Community College District

California’s second-largest community college district. Serves the City of San Diego and surrounding region. 5 Member Elected Board of Trustees.

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

San Diego CCD Leadership Team

  • Dr. Constance M. Carroll

Chancellor Board of Trustees Bernie Rhinerson, Dr. Maria Nieto Senour, Rich Grosch, Peter Zschiesche, Mary Graham

  • Dr. Anthony Beebe

President City College

  • Dr. Pamela Luster

President Mesa College

  • Dr. Patricia Hsieh

President Miramar College Vacant Interim President Continuing Education

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

50,000 Students Enroll in Credit Programs

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50,000 Students Enroll in Continuing / Adult Education

  • Educational Cultural Complex
  • North City Campus
  • At Mesa College
  • At Miramar College
  • West City Campus
  • Cesar Chavez Campus
  • Mid-City Campus
  • Centre City Campus

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

42,000 Service Personnel Enroll at Military Base Programs

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Negotiations and Goals

Scope of Negotiations 7 Unions 3 Meet & Confer Groups Board Goals

  • Fiscal responsibility to public
  • Fairness to employees
  • Relate bargaining to state revenue
  • Eliminate acrimonious processes
  • Better coordinate bargaining with governance

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Benefit of Collective Bargaining Approach Resource Allocation Formula (RAF)

New Revenue Streams

(COLA, Growth, etc.) Employees District Budget

Units Colleges Continuing Education Other Functions

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

 Market studies to determine salary schedule alignment with benchmark districts  Each employee unit may use funding as determined, without changing working conditions or workload  Transparency of all financial information

Other Aspects

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

AFT GUILD

San Diego Community Colleges

Local 1931 of the American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO

  • Predictability for members
  • Bargaining agent decision-making flexibility
  • Removes major economic issues from contention
  • Promotes collaboration
  • Other considerations
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Collective Bargaining - Summary

  • Defines working conditions
  • Establishes Processes for

Resolving Conflicts

  • Protects Employee Rights
  • Formalizes Decision-Making

Benefits Difficulties

  • No Local Control of Revenue
  • Single-Focus Representation
  • “Exclusive”
  • May Conflict with Shared

Governance

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Cultivating a Culture of Change Within the Institution

 Open to Ideas/Innovation  Safe for Failure  Rewarding/Recognizing Success  Support (Money, Time, Connections, etc.)

Encouraging Team Approach Promoting Collaboration

 Interdepartmental  Grants  Other Institutions  Industry

Relating Change to Vision, Planning, Goals Institutionalizing Positive Outcomes Telling the Story

Elements of Successful Change

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

The World of the CEO

Capital Development

CEO Institutional Leadership & Management

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

GOOD LUCK!