How a healthcare company increased demand for services 300%
Lead Capture
Jon Ciampi
VP, Marketing, Business Development & Corporate Development
CRC Health
Daniel Burstein
Director of Editorial Content
MECLABS
Lead Capture How a healthcare company increased demand for services - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lead Capture How a healthcare company increased demand for services 300% Jon Ciampi Daniel Burstein VP, Marketing, Business Development Director of Editorial Content & Corporate Development MECLABS CRC Health Session Speaker Jon
How a healthcare company increased demand for services 300%
Lead Capture
Jon Ciampi
VP, Marketing, Business Development & Corporate Development
CRC Health
Daniel Burstein
Director of Editorial Content
MECLABS
Session Speaker
2Jon Ciampi
VP, Marketing, Business Development & Corporate Development CRC Health Jon oversees all marketing and business development efforts for CRC Health, a $450M revenue company. He manages the strategic accounts team and contracting team focused on 200 insurance contracts accounting for $200M of CRC’s revenue, including large accounts like Aetna, Cigna and Magellan. He also oversees all growth initiatives from cradle to grave, including two acquisitions. Jon started his career at Wells Fargo and Oracle, and he holds two patents in analyzing and rating electronic documents.
Black & White Headshot
Experiment #1: Landing page
Experiment ID: Southern Indiana Clinic Testing Phase: Value Proposition
Background: An opiate treatment facility. Objective: Increase lead generation. Primary Research Question: Which landing page will generate the most leads? Test Design: A/B split test
Research Notes:
Experiment #1: Results
Design Inq/Click Control – Previous Landing Page 4.56% Treatment – Optimized Page 5.45% Relative Difference
19%
Experiment #1: Results
66% Increase in Admits per Click
Although the inquiries per click were only up 19%
Design Inq/Click Admits/Click Control – Previous Landing Page 4.56% 0.74% Treatment – Optimized Page 5.45% 1.24% Relative Difference
19% 66%
!
The value proposition became more exclusive
Department Growth v. Company Growth
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 2011-2012 2012-2013 Increase in Department Business Growth
Jon could have focused on:
8Lead qualification Cost per lead Marketing Automation software Technology Keyword research
But instead, Jon focused on:
9Lead qualification Cost per lead Marketing Automation software Technology Keyword research
About CRC Health
A subsidiary of Bain Capital, CRC Health Group is the largest and most comprehensive network of specialized behavioral care services in the nation.
Understanding motivation Driving traffic Communicating the value proposition
Motivate
Cost-Per-Click to Obtain Conversion
Profit Zone
Maximum Spend $192K
$(120.00) $(80.00) $(40.00) $- $40.00 $80.00 $120.00 1 26 51 76 101 126 151 176 201 Profit Profit with 25% increase for calls Avg CPCClient Current Spend $60K
35,000 Keywords
Which ones are here? Which ones are here?
Motivate
Keywords
Motivate
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cobalt/Motivate
http://www.flickr.com/photos/biggreymareMotivate
http://www.flickr.com/photos/subewlMotivate
What would you type?
Motivate
Linguistic Analysis Highlights Motivational Tendencies and Openness to Value Prop
Keyword CTR for Center v. Facility
Center 9.36% Drug 3.31% Facility 42.11% None 18.43% (blank) 17.56% Grand Total 17.45%
Ad CTR for Center v. Facility
Center 1.56% Facility 0.84% None 0.85% Grand Total 0.92%
Query Analysis Ad Analysis
Facility is what they think of, but a Center is what they want
Takeaway
“Center” vs. “Facility”
Motivate
Linguistic Analysis Highlights Motivational Tendencies and Openness to Value Prop
Query Analysis
“Medical”
Ad CTR for Medical
Medical 0.92% None 0.92% Grand Total 0.92%
Keyword CTR for Medical
Medical 18.14% None 17.44% Grand Total 17.45%
Despite internal beliefs, Medical doesn’t sell
Takeaway
Ad Analysis
Motivate
Conversion Conversion
Long-Tail Keywords Optimize Conversion “Rehab”
“Rehab” + “alcohol” “Rehab” + “drugs” “Rehab” + “treatment center”
Understanding motivation Driving traffic Communicating the value proposition
Traffic
Experiment #2:
Experiment ID: Sierra Tucson Testing Phase: Value Proposition
Background: An addiction and mental health rehabilitation facility. Objective: Increase clickthrough rate. Primary Research Question: Which PPC ad will obtain the most clickthroughs? Test Design: A/B split test
Research Notes:
Sierra Tucson (Value Proposition)
Traffic
Experiment #2: Branded PPC
Sierra Tucson Care Center Considered a Top Recovery Clinic Get a Free Assessment. Call Now!
Control Treatment
Company Logic We have the most doctors, therefore we have the best care.
AZ Alcohol Detox Facility Considered a Top Addiction Clinic Traditional & Alternative Therapies
Customer Logic I am afraid to send my husband away to someone who will not care for him like I will.
Traffic
Experiment #2: Non-Branded PPC
Customer Logic I am afraid to send my husband away to someone who will not care for him like I will.
Sierra Tucson Care Center Considered a Top Depression
Therapies AZ Alcohol Detox Facility Exclusive, Luxury Rehab Facility. 1 Clinical Staff Per 3 Patients.
Company Logic We have the most doctors, therefore we have the best care.
Control Treatment
Traffic
Testing Phase: Behavioral Psychology
Highest Performing Branded Ads (>1000 Impressions Lowest Performing Branded Ads (>1000 Impressions Ad CTR Ad CTR Bayside Marin - Recovery 21.84% Bayside Marin Clinic 0.97% Not Your Ordinary Health Program. Rehab Shouldn't Stop Your Career. Health Recovery Center. Call Now. For Top Executives Seeking Comfort. Bayside Marin Center 6.98% Bayside Marin Clinic 1.09% We Provide Private, VIP Recovery. Rehab Shouldn't Stop Your Career. Your Own Room, Beautiful Facility. Your Own Room, Beautiful Facility. Bayside Marin Center 6.18% Bayside Marin Clinic 1.11% Rehab Shouldn't Stop Your Career. Alternative Health Recovery Center. For Top Executives Seeking Comfort. Very Private & Exclusive. Call Now. Bayside Marin Center 4.97% Bayside Marin - Official 1.14% Everything You Need to Recover. Exclusive Treatment Recovery Center Private Room, Chef, Healthy Living. Private Chef, Pool, Gym Call Now. Bayside Marin Center 4.32% Bayside Marin Treatment 1.23% Alternative Health Recovery Center. Everything You Need to Recover. Very Private & Exclusive. Call Now. Private Room, Chef, Healthy Living.“Center” “Clinic”
Traffic
Experiment #2: Results
14,000 % Increase in CTR for Branded Ads 3,300 % Increase in CTR for Non-branded Ads
By focusing on value proposition, the test achieved a 14,000% increase on branded ad clickthrough rates, and a 3,300% increase in non-branded CTR.
!
Design Branded PPC Non-Branded PPC Control – Focus on Luxury 0.31% 0.13% Treatment – Focus on Value Prop 44.2% 4.41% Relative Difference
14,000% 3,300%
Traffic
Value prop tested to over 45,000 referents
Tested 9 value props
In-house list Purchased list
Traffic
Experiment #3: In-house email test
Experiment ID: Sierra Tucson List Testing Phase: Value Proposition
Background: Treatment center for addictions and behavioral disorders. Objective: Increase open and clickthrough rate. Primary Research Question: Which email will get the most clicks? Test Design: Subject line test
Research Notes:
Traffic
Experiment #3: Subject lines
Problem Subject Lines Treatment fails patients Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical supervision Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned Solution Subject Lines CRC matches clients to the right level of care Referrals to CRC lead to satisfied clients We measure therapeutic alliance in real time
Traffic
Sample Email
Claim of Value: Most recommended network by clinical professionals throughout the United States. Subject Line: The nation’s most trusted treatment programs Category: Trust
Traffic
Experiment # 3: Results
Problem Subject Lines Open Rate CTR Treatment fails patients
31.8%
14.49% Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical supervision
30.81% 9.23%
Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned
29.98% 9.02%
Solution Subject Line Open Rate CTR CRC matches clients to the right level of care
30.96%
2.30% Referrals to CRC lead to satisfied clients
28.72% 3.70%
We measure therapeutic alliance in real time
28.72% 9.09%
Traffic
Experiment #3: Results
Value Prop Phase 1 Message 01P Outdated addiction treatment fails patients Value Prop Phase 2 Message 05S CRC matches clients to the right level of care Value Prop Phase 2 Message 06P Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical supervision Value Prop Phase 3 Message 08P Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned Value Prop Phase 2 Message 04S Referrals to CRC lead to satisfied clients Value Prop Phase 3 Message 08S We measure therapeutic alliance in real time
31.80% 14.49% 30.96%
2.30%30.81%
9.23%29.98% 9.02% 28.72%
3.70%28.72% 9.09%
Problem/Solution Subject Line Open Rate CTR
Lesson 1: Patient-focused messaging motivates in-house list, increasing CTR Lesson 2: Problem statements more powerful than solution statements
Traffic
Experiment #4: Purchased email list test
Experiment ID: Sierra Tucson List Testing Phase: Value Proposition
Background: Treatment center for addictions and behavioral disorders. Objective: Increase open and clickthrough rate. Primary Research Question: Which email will get the most clicks? Test Design: Subject line test
Research Notes:
Traffic
Experiment #4: Purchased list subject lines
Same content as in-house Role Subject 08P THERAPISTS
Treatment Fails Patients
08P THERAPISTS
Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned
01S PSYCHIATRISTS Improving addiction treatment with science
& research
01P PSYCHIATRISTS Outdated addiction treatment fails patients 01P PSYCHOLOGISTS Outdated addiction treatment fails patients 06P PSYCHOLOGISTS Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical
supervision
Traffic
Experiment #4: Results
Role Subject Open Rate CTR 08P THERAPISTS
Treatment Fails Patients 7.34% 12.50%
08P THERAPISTS
Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned 10.24% 11.54%
01S PSYCHIATRISTS Improving addiction treatment with science
& research
7.68% 8.55% 01P PSYCHIATRISTS Outdated addiction treatment fails patients 8.55% 4.76% 01P PSYCHOLOGISTS Outdated addiction treatment fails patients 7.06% 3.52% 06P PSYCHOLOGISTS Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical
supervision
7.25% 3.45%
Traffic
Experiment #4: Results
Role Subject Open Rate CTR 08P THERAPISTS Outdated Addiction Treatment Fails Patients
7.34% 12.50%
08P THERAPISTS Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned
10.24% 11.54%
01S PSYCHIATRISTS Improving addiction treatment with science & research 7.68% 8.55% 01P PSYCHIATRISTS Outdated addiction treatment fails patients 8.55% 4.76% 01P PSYCHOLOGISTS Outdated addiction treatment fails patients 7.06% 3.52% 06P PSYCHOLOGISTS Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical supervision 7.25% 3.45%
Patient-oriented problem statement motivates purchased list as well
Understanding motivation Driving Traffic
Communicating the value proposition
Value Prop
Value Prop Communication: Segmentation
Psychiatrist Engagement Therapist Engagement 7.61% Overall Open rate 3.36% Overall CTR 9.81% Overall Open Rate 6.38% Overall CTR
Top messages were scientific-based Top messages were relationship-based
Improving addition treatment with science and research Treatments fail patients The strongest clinical supervision in the nation Treatments fail patients Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical supervision
Value Prop
Value Prop Communication: Segmentation
Psychiatrist Engagement Therapist Engagement 7.61% Overall Open rate
3.36% Overall CTR
9.81% Overall Open rate
6.38% Overall CTR
Top messages were scientific-based Top messages were relationship-based
Improving addition treatment with science and research Outdated addiction treatments fail patients The strongest clinical supervision in the nation Outdated addiction treatments fail patients Treatment fails when therapists & clients aren’t aligned Most rehabs can’t provide effective clinical supervision
Different audiences need different value prop communication
Value Prop
Learning about your audience
Psychiatrist Engagement Therapist Engagement
Easy to get a meeting, less likely to engage Look for analytical, science, and research discussions Concerned with clinical excellence Over 80% don’t do therapy Told in stories vs. numbers Emotionally driven Clinical excellence, supervision and therapeutic alliance Want personalized touch; relationship
Value Prop
43Results: Value Proposition Optimization
Inquiries Admissions Value Proposition Testing Begins
Value proposition testing results show 3x to 4x increase in demand for services.
A A M M J J J S O N D F
Value Prop
Experiment #6: Turn-About Ranch
Experiment ID: Turn-About Ranch Testing Phage: Value Category (Phase 1)
Background: Working cattle ranch for troubled teens. Objective: Increase the total number of leads captured. Primary Research Question: Which value category will obtain the most form submissions? Test Design: Multifactor split test
Research Notes:
Value Prop
Linguistic Analysis Highlights Motivational Tendencies and Openness to Value Prop
Query Analysis
“Luxury”
Ad CTR for Luxury
Luxury 0.96% None 0.91% Grand Total 0.92%
Query CTR for Luxury
Luxury 62.57% None 17.42% Grand Total 17.45%
Luxury is important, but quickly fades
Takeaway
Ad Analysis
Value Prop Leading with “Unique Setting” Glamorized imagery of “Dr. Phil Show” episode Rotating banner with hero shots
Experiment #6: Control
Value Prop Real people:
“A Message from
“Testimonials”
Leads with trust-based messaging:
“Recommended by doctors and therapists” “24 years in business”
Experiment #6: Treatment
Third- party credibility indicators
Value Prop
By utilizing trust-based messaging, the treatment ties better into the prospect’s thought process and generates 29.8% more leads online.
!
Design Conversion Rate Control – Lux, short copy 6.92% Treatment – Trust-based, longer copy 8.98% Relative Difference 29.8%
29.8% Increase in Total Conversion
The treatment page increased the rate of conversion by 29.8%
Experiment #6: Results
Value Prop
Experiment #1: Landing page test
Experiment ID: Southern Indiana Clinic Testing Phase: Value Proposition
Background: An opiate treatment facility. Objective: Increase lead generation. Primary Research Question: Which landing page will generate the most leads? Test Design: A/B split test
Research Notes:
Value Prop
Experiment #1: Control
Value Prop
Experiment #1: Control
Bad stock photos Bad sequencing Bad navigation and friction Bad CTA, lots of anxiety
Value Prop
Experiment #1:
Control Treatment
Value Prop
Experiment #1: Treatment
Value Prop
Experiment #1: Treatment
Less anxiety Credibility Sequencing
information
Value Prop
Experiment #1: Treatment
“Not a private Dr.’s office” “This doesn’t fit my schedule.”
Value Prop
Experiment #1: Results, revisited
66% Increase in Admits per Click
Although the inquiries per click were only up 19%
Design Inq/Click Admits/Click Control – Previous Landing Page 4.56% 0.74% Treatment – Optimized Page 5.45% 1.24% Relative Difference
19% 66%
!
The value proposition became more exclusive
Top Takeaways
Focus on sequencing Get in your customers’ mindset Look at the entire funnel 1 2 3
Black & White Headshot
Thank You
Jon Ciampi VP, Marketing, Business Development & Corporate Development CRC Health jciampi@crchealth.com
Black & White Headshot
Daniel Burstein Director of Editorial Content MECLABS @DanielBurstein