Large-Eddy Simulation of typical industrial bends In-plane and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

large eddy simulation of typical industrial bends
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Large-Eddy Simulation of typical industrial bends In-plane and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Products Solutions Services Large-Eddy Simulation of typical industrial bends In-plane and out-of- plane bend at Re =20000 by V. Kumar, B. Kissling*, P. Panathansiou and F. Aydin * Experimental data Slide 1 03/03/2014 V. Kumar Large-Eddy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

03/03/2014 Products Solutions Services

Large-Eddy Simulation of typical industrial bends

In-plane and out-of-plane bend at Re =20’000

by V. Kumar, B. Kissling*, P. Panathansiou and F. Aydin

* Experimental data Slide 1

  • V. Kumar
slide-2
SLIDE 2

03/03/2014

E+H Flowtec AG

  • Endress+Hauser Flowtec is a world leader in industrial flow meters
  • Flow meters based on the principles
  • Thermal, magnetic-inductive, vortex, ultrasonic and Coriolis
  • Production centers in four continents

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Reinach-CH Cernay-Fr Europe Asia North America Asia Greenwood / USA Suzhou / China Aurangabad / India Itatiba / Brazil

  • S. America

Slide 2

  • V. Kumar
slide-3
SLIDE 3

03/03/2014

Product Portfolio

Line sizes from 1 mm to 3000 mm

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends

4 Line Display Touch Control 2 Line Display Pushbutton Proso sonic c Flow Promass ss Promag Prowi wirl rl t-mass ss

Slide 3

  • V. Kumar
slide-4
SLIDE 4

03/03/2014

Where CFD is playing its role?

  • Optimizing the design of the flow meters
  • Flow meters can resolve effects of the order of 0.05% to 1%
  • highly accurate models and high quality grids are required
  • To investigate installation effects on the flow meters
  • how does the flow develops after a disturbance
  • Typical disturbances are bends, diffusors, reducers

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends

→ It is very important for a turbulence model to accurately model the effects near the wall

Slide 4

  • V. Kumar
slide-5
SLIDE 5

03/03/2014

Bend Simulations

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 5

  • V. Kumar
slide-6
SLIDE 6

03/03/2014

Bend configurations investigated

In-plane or 90° bend Out-of-plane bend

  • Fully-developed inlet generated by a periodic pipe simulation
  • Approx. 40D downstream length in the simulation
  • LES, Realizable k-eps two-layer, RSM two-layer and SST models tested
  • Measurements done using clamp-on ultrasonic sensors over the 0 to 360° at

different L/D’s downstream the bends.

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 6

  • V. Kumar
slide-7
SLIDE 7

03/03/2014

Mesh

For the LES simulation:

  • Grid resolution 𝑠+ ≅ 15, 𝑨+≅ 30, 𝜄+ =15; ∆𝑧+< 1, 𝑇𝑠 < 1.2
  • Base size => 0.015 D
  • ∆𝑧+ is estimated from 𝑆𝑓𝜐 = 0.199 𝑆𝑓7/8
  • Approx. 10 Million Cells for both the cases

→Mesh variation and boundary layer variations were also carried

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 7

  • V. Kumar
slide-8
SLIDE 8

03/03/2014

LES mesh size and effort requirement

  • Computational effort goes with 𝑶𝟐.𝟔 or 𝑺𝒇𝟒.𝟘
  • 10-20 Million cells grids are computationally affordable for LES

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends

Affordable for industry

  • ca. 2 days wall time with full

16 nodes, L/D~40

Slide 8

  • V. Kumar
slide-9
SLIDE 9

03/03/2014

LES Methodology

  • Ratio of turbulent length scale and grid-size must be controlled
  • A RANS simulation carried out before starting an LES

𝑆𝑀 = ∆ 𝑚𝑢𝑣𝑠𝑐 ≤ 0.5, 𝑚𝑢𝑣𝑠𝑐 = k3/2 ε

  • CFL <1 in 96-99% cells
  • Second order time- and space (BCD) discretization
  • WALE Sub-grid model with wall-limiter and Cw =0.544
  • Simulations are carried until the averaged mean flow does not change

anymore

  • 100k time-steps with time-integration started after 20k steps.

→Synthetic turbulence at the inlet to avoid laminarization

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 9

  • V. Kumar
slide-10
SLIDE 10

03/03/2014

In-Plane Bend

Velocity field downstream in-plane bend

  • Flow development using RKEPS

slowest among all

  • SST shows artifacts close to the bend
  • RSM is closest to LES
  • Same grid for LES and RANS

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 10

  • V. Kumar
slide-11
SLIDE 11

03/03/2014

Axial and radial velocity profiles

  • All RANS models predict much slower flow development for the in-plane

bend

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 11

  • V. Kumar
slide-12
SLIDE 12

03/03/2014

Comparison with measurements

  • LDA Measurements by Kalpakli and Orlu, Int. J Heat and Fluid Flow 2013

at 0.67D Downstream the 90° bend

  • Reasonably well agreement between two independent studies

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 12

  • V. Kumar
slide-13
SLIDE 13

03/03/2014

Ultrasonic measurements vs Simulations

5D Downstream 30D Downstream

  • Deviation from mean flow velocity is plotted
  • LES shows a very good agreement throughout
  • RSM the best among RANS

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 13

  • V. Kumar
slide-14
SLIDE 14

03/03/2014

Out of plane bend at Re =20’000

  • RSM gives artifacts
  • SST results are similar to RSM
  • Realizable k-epsilon model seems to be

best performing

  • LES predicts different swirl decay than

all RANS models

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 14

  • V. Kumar
slide-15
SLIDE 15

03/03/2014

Comparison with ultrasonic measurements-I

  • At 3D downstream
  • RKEPS-2L is underpredicting the flow distortion
  • LES is very close to the measurements
  • Both RSM and SST shows artificial effects

→ We performed transient RANS as well without much improvement

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 15

  • V. Kumar
slide-16
SLIDE 16

03/03/2014

Comparison with ultrasonic measurements-II

  • At 11 D downstream
  • RSM model seems to recover further downstream
  • In LES, swirl seems to be much faster, i.e. tangential stresses are under

predicted

→ We tested various mesh sizes and different subgrid models

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 16

  • V. Kumar
slide-17
SLIDE 17

03/03/2014

Conclusions

In-plane bend:

  • Both RSM and LES are well predicting the flow up to 30D downstream
  • Realizable K-Epsilon model predicts slower decay of disturbances
  • SST significantly worse than others

Out-of-plane bend:

  • RANS are better predicting the rotational decay
  • Close to the bend, both RSM and SST are not performing well
  • LES is predicting very well close to the bend
  • However further downstream, swirl decay much slower than as predicted by RANS

and in experiments

  • LES models and grid-resolution to be thoroughly investigated for swirling flows

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends Slide 17

  • V. Kumar
slide-18
SLIDE 18

03/03/2014

Thank you

Large-Eddy Simulation of flows after typical industrial bends

Vortictiy field in 90° bend

Slide 18

  • V. Kumar