lar mpd acceptance vs e q0 q3
play

LAr+MPD acceptance vs. E -q0-q3 Chris Marshall Lawrence Berkeley - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LAr+MPD acceptance vs. E -q0-q3 Chris Marshall Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 10 July, 2019 Reminder: LAr acceptance LAr detector will have very high event rate, and does not necessarily need high acceptance However, it would


  1. LAr+MPD acceptance vs. E ν -q0-q3 Chris Marshall Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 10 July, 2019

  2. Reminder: LAr acceptance ● LAr detector will have very high event rate, and does not necessarily need high acceptance ● However, it would be very bad if a particular region of phase space had zero acceptance, because then we would have no constraint on that phase space ● Important question is not what is the acceptance, but what fraction of events have non-zero acceptance ● We also want acceptance to be slowly varying vs. kinematics so that it is not sensitive to detector modeling 2 Chris Marshall

  3. Detector as seen by ν beam (XY projection) 7m Active volume F.V. 3m hadron tracks 3 Chris Marshall

  4. Same event, translated 7m Active volume F.V. 3m 4 Chris Marshall

  5. Event that is not contained with any translation 7m Active volume F.V. 3m 5 Chris Marshall

  6. But is using phi symmetry 7m Active volume F.V. 3m 6 Chris Marshall

  7. Plot from previous study ● Shows that cross section coverage is high, and slowly varying vs. neutrino energy for detectors that are >450cm long ● Implies that there are no acceptance holes in the flux peak, because >99% of cross section has non-zero acceptance 7 Chris Marshall

  8. Acceptance vs. q0-q3 ● Reviewer of the ND CDR-lite document suggested that what we should show is acceptance vs. q0-q3 in slices of neutrino energy ● q0 = energy transfer to nucleus ● q3 = 3-momentum transfer to nucleus 8 Chris Marshall

  9. q0-q3 distributions 3.5 < E ν < 4 GeV 1 < E ν < 2 GeV ● True q0-q3 distributions in GENIE for two slices of neutrino energy ● Two populations at low momentum transfer are CCQE and Δ resonance ● q0=q3 is Q 2 →0 kinematic limit ● Lower-right corner is high muon angle 9 Chris Marshall

  10. Acceptance: 0 < Eν < 1 GeV ● Caveat: this is actually selected CC ν μ events, so there is an additional requirement that isn't related to acceptance: the muon must be long enough to identify as a muon and not a pion ● Upper-right corner efficiency is low because muon is very soft 10 Chris Marshall

  11. Acceptance: 1 < Eν < 2 GeV ● Black regions on the right plot (log scale) are basically <1% acceptance ● These are effectively “acceptance holes”, but we can't say if it's 1% or 0 with this level of MC statistics 11 Chris Marshall

  12. Acceptance: 2 < Eν < 2.5 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer 12 Chris Marshall

  13. Acceptance: 2.5 < Eν < 3 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer 13 Chris Marshall

  14. Acceptance: 3 < Eν < 3.5 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer 14 Chris Marshall

  15. Acceptance: 3.5 < Eν < 4 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer 15 Chris Marshall

  16. Acceptance: 4 < Eν < 5 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer 16 Chris Marshall

  17. Acceptance: 5 < Eν < 6 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer ● Small hole at high muon angle, but very, very few events 17 Chris Marshall

  18. Acceptance: 6 < Eν < 8 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer ● Small hole at high muon angle, but very, very few events 18 Chris Marshall

  19. Acceptance: 8 < Eν < 10 GeV ● Basically > few% acceptance everywhere, and very high acceptance at low momentum transfer ● Small hole at high muon angle, but very, very few events 19 Chris Marshall

  20. Fraction of events in Eν-q0-q3 regions with acceptance ● >99% have non-zero acceptance out to 10 GeV ● >98% have >2% acceptance out to 5 GeV 20 Chris Marshall

  21. Acceptance is high in peak region ● Acceptance is >30% for most q0-q3 regions in the flux peak, and >50% for a lot of the space 21 Chris Marshall

  22. Conclusions ● 7x3x5m detector has no significant acceptance holes, including muon + hadron containment ● Acceptance vs. q0-q3 is high in region where most events are, and has a region of low acceptance at high Q2 and higher neutrino energy ● Most of the cross section is in phase space with high acceptance 22 Chris Marshall

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend