Knowledge related to urban mobility and a more just society Romulo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

knowledge related to urban mobility and a more just
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Knowledge related to urban mobility and a more just society Romulo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IAP-SPEC Conference How Can Science and Technology Contribute to the Reduction of Poverty and Inequality Session 7: Tackling Poverty and Inequality Knowledge related to urban mobility and a more just society Romulo Orrico March/2019


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Romulo Orrico

COPPE/UFRJ – Transportation Engineering Program

March/2019 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Knowledge related to urban mobility and a more just society

Session 7: Tackling Poverty and Inequality

IAP-SPEC Conference How Can Science and Technology Contribute to the Reduction of Poverty and Inequality

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Goals

Show how knowledge related to urban mobility conditions is a powerful resource to promote a more equitable society, by means of three simple questions

2

Where are we? Where are we going? What can we do to change the current situation?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The city is the greatest human invention since the wheel.

3

Transport is in everything produced and consumed in the city Cities do not live without transport People do not live without mobility Mobility is imperative for the urban economy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Where are we?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Adverse land use imposes on the low-income population

  • Increased travel requirements
  • Longer trips
  • Longer journey times

Mobility and Poverty

Distribution of residences by income bracket.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cities over 200,000 inhabitants, 2018

The b The b

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Metropolises in Latin America with more than 1 million inhabitants

Country Number of Metropolises Population Brazil 26 93,270,425 Mexico 12 44,955,208 Colombia 6 20,283,848 Venezuela 5 11,940,627 Argentina 4 17,723,657 Honduras 3 2,475,000 Bolivia 3 5,063,403 Ecuador 2 5,605,489 Peru 1 9,904,727 Paraguay 1 2,482,760 Chile 1 6,683,852 Guatemala 1 2,918,000 Uruguay 1 2,059,988 El Salvador 1 1,098,000 Costa Rica 1 1,324,000 Total 68 227,788,984

These 68 metropolises congregate 35% of the region's population

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Modal Share around the world

The 5 biggest agglomerations in each continent Non-motorized Public Transport Passenger cars

OCEANIA NORTH AMERICA LATIN AMERICA EUROPE AFRICA ASIA

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Mobility is also different inside the metropolis

Rio de Janeiro, 2003

Modal share on work commute for two groups of monthly income

  • Rich: 96.5% of trips are motorized
  • Poor: 52.6% are non-motorized trips

9

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Renda > R$ 5.000 Renda entre R$101 e R$ 200

Non Motorized Public Transport Cars and taxis

Monthly Income > US$ 3,000 US$ 60 – 120

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Lower income families increase expenses in private car trips

Urban Family Transport Expenses (R$), by Income Decile Category (2009)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Private Public

10

Belém, Belo Horizonte, Curitiba, Fortaleza, Porto Alegre, Recife, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador and São Paulo.

Source: Carvalho & Pereira (2012), from the POF 2003 and POF 2009 surveys.

Zoom to poorest groups

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Issues Related to Transport Policies in Lat.Am.

Important Characteristics

1.

Latin American metropolises are mostly spread out.

2.

The sprawling process is largely supported by infrastructure investments in individual modes.

3.

Even so, public transport is still the basis of people’s mobility in these metropolises.

4.

The growth of new urban nodes is as precarious as the observed suburbanization.

5.

Despite important changes in the morphology, transport networks still maintain a perverse trend.

6.

There is a major difference in the quality of general infrastructure in the central and peripheral areas.

7.

Latin American metropolises are not rich.

8.

Motorization indices are strongly correlated with family incomes.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Central pillars of the current urban mobility inequality

Planning Sectorial planning and public transportation network concepts linked to this standard Funding Perverse mobility funding and fare policies Management Inefficient urban mobility systems management Social Control Lack of control and transparency Environment Mobility system disconnected from sustainable development

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Where are we going?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Urban Mobility and Poverty

Main proposal arising from the theoretical debate To increase the provision of services, with more moderate fares

This proposition does not lead to an actual transformation, but feeds a vicious circle:

  • It reproduces the patterns of

transport network organization and

  • peration
  • It reinforces inefficient urban growth:

downtown hypertrophy & low income households in periphery

  • Travel time and cost reductions are

necessary, but insufficient to reduce Poverty and Inequality

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Santiago TranSantiago Curitiba Corridors Bogotá Transmilénio Cali Mio Radial transport networks are part of the old paradigm

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Urban sprawling east of Rio de Janeiro 1984 to 2016

Urban sprawling as a result of car priority public polices. It increases urban size, urban costs, travel distances, travel times, and so on. 30 years waiting for a train!

26/04/2019 16

1984 2016

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Rio de Janeiro The cumulative percentage distribution of travel times between 2003 and 2012 shows a perverse tendency

17

2003 2012 minutes

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Developed Countries Suburban Areas Developed Countries Dense Areas

Strategic Decisions

Developing Countries Suburban Areas Developing Countries Dense Areas

Where to go?

18

Seamless Mobility Private Autonomy Which mobility to build? Per Capita Income Density

McKerracher, Colin; Tryggestad, Christer et ali. (2017) An integrated perspective of the future of mobility. McKinsey & Company, Inc. and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Clean and Shared

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The challenges

The main challenge to a Metropolitan Area must be to change this process.

Main objectives of Metropolitan Area Strategic Development Plan

  • To prevent sprawling
  • To strengthen selected urban nodes and

their interaction with their satellites

  • To promote the economic and social

development of the peripheral nodes

Transport Planning Challenges

  • To reduce the radial structure of

metropolitan trips

  • To optimize mobility asset use and future

investments

  • To change attitudes towards passenger car

use

26/04/2019 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mobility inclusion as a developing policy for the Reduction of Poverty and Inequality

WHAT? To improve the productivity of mobility in cities GOALS? To reduce the cost of production and consumption, increase job

  • pportunities, choices and social interaction

FOR WHOM? Poorer segment; main users of public transportation HOW? Integrating transit and mobility public policies for social inclusion

and development

WHY? Extremely high travel times of the poorest group, reduces

productivity, quality and family income.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

What can we do to change the current situation?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Main Focus To change and improve transit where we find:

22

Poor supply and quality of services Car users’ potential change Insufficient use for low-income

20 40 60 80 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Adverse conditions for NMT

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Finally

1.Redesign the transport network

to support the new multi-polar format of modern cities

2.Increase public transport

efficiency and reduce the cost to the population

3.Take action to redirect the use

  • f automobiles, so that they no

longer make demands for more infrastructure

4.Reorganize the basis of the

financing for both infrastructure and operations

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The din of the rich drowns the cries of the poor!

Pope Francis

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Romulo Orrico Coppe/UFRJ – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil romulo@pet.coppe.ufrj.br

2019/04/20 25

faleminderit

اركش

Շնորհակալություն

благодаря

hvala

tak

merci

danke ευχαριστώ

הדות

धन्रवाद

grazie ありがと 감사합니다

  • brigado

спасибо

gracias

thank you

ngiyabonga

谢谢

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) and by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil