Kirkham Weir & Sluice Future and Preferred Options June 2016 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kirkham weir sluice
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kirkham Weir & Sluice Future and Preferred Options June 2016 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kirkham Weir & Sluice Future and Preferred Options June 2016 Claire Barrett-Mold Future of Kirkham weir and sluice 2 Options Appraisal Objectives Deliver an options appraisal for the future of Environment Agency assets at Kirkham


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kirkham Weir & Sluice

Future and Preferred Options

June 2016

Claire Barrett-Mold

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Future of Kirkham weir and sluice

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Options Appraisal Objectives

Deliver an options appraisal for the future of Environment Agency assets at Kirkham Consider and appraise all potential options Involve engagement with communities informed by local Involve engagement with communities informed by local views Involve engagement with larger stakeholders Identify a preferred option(s) for consideration by the Doing More for the Derwent Project Board.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Constraints Overview

INSERT CONSTRAINTS PLANS

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Constraints Overview

INSERT CONSTRAINTS PLANS

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Options Appraisal Workshop

Technical specialists represented their particular areas of expertise Workshop discussion identified two key aspects as to how the

  • ptions would affect the River Derwent at Kirkham, and

thereby condition of the SSSI / SAC: Direction of flow (over weir / over sluice); and Water depths (maintain / partially reduce / full lowering).

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Preferred Options

No one option confers the best outcome for all topics. All agreed preferred direction of flow was along natural channel; therefore sluice to be decommissioned into fixed feature. All agreed reducing extent of impounded water offered additional benefits, but: although environmental benefits increase in proportion to reduction of impoundment; equally, risks increase in proportion to extent water levels lowered.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Preferred Options

Therefore we are left with two potential options:

  • 1. Larinier fish pass in the location of the existing fish pass

and partially lower the level of the weir; and

  • 2. Full removal of the weir only.

Conclusion – seek option to improve adapt weir to: Improve fish passage; and Lower water levels to a level ‘to be determined’.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Project Progression

We need to determine future of weir and sluice. Looking at further studies to help us determine final preferred option:

Ground stability Hydrology (surface water) studies Hydrology (surface water) studies Hydrogeological studies Greater economic clarity No decision has yet been made

10