Fifth & Kirkham Traffic Calming Project 5 th Avenue and Kirkham - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fifth kirkham traffic calming project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fifth & Kirkham Traffic Calming Project 5 th Avenue and Kirkham - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fifth & Kirkham Traffic Calming Project 5 th Avenue and Kirkham Street Presented at the UCSF Quarterly Parnassus Community Meeting August 24, 2016 1 Agenda Welcome and introductions 5 minutes Project history, goals, and schedule 5


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Fifth & Kirkham Traffic Calming Project

5th Avenue and Kirkham Street

Presented at the UCSF Quarterly Parnassus Community Meeting August 24, 2016

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Welcome and introductions
  • Project history, goals, and schedule
  • Concept plans and next steps
  • Questions and answers

5 minutes 5 minutes 30 minutes 20 minutes

Agenda

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Team

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC WORKS Ken Spielman, Project Manager Marci Camacho, Assistant Project Manager Thet Maung, Civil Design Engineer Andrea Alfonso, Landscape Architect Alex Murillo, Public Affairs Officer

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

History:

  • Neighbors near the Parnassus Campus expressed concern about on-

going traffic issues near the campus, especially along Fifth Avenue. UCSF held 2 community meetings on 8/29/2012 and 2/20/2013

  • UCSF staff worked with the residents to develop conceptual plans

for pedestrian safety and traffic-calming improvements for the Fifth Avenue & Kirkham Street intersection.

  • Project was approved by Transportation Advisory Committee (TASC)
  • n 11/14/2013 and final approval by MTA Public Hearing on

12/6/2013.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • The project team isn’t including a tree or a lot of plants due to

recent PUC Guidelines to protect their underground facilities. The Parnassus streetscape design team had design reviews with PUC which also influenced these concept designs. Currently maintenance is also an issue for Median Islands which further influenced concept designs that require no or minimal maintenance to ensure that they will look great over time.

  • UCSF is fully funding the project and working with City officials to

implement the improvements. Schedule:

  • Planning completed by UCSF
  • Design Feb 2016 – Oct 2016
  • Bid and Award Nov 2016 – Mar 2017
  • Construction – Spring 2017
  • Construction Duration 8 months

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5th Avenue and Kirkham Street

N

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Key Elements

Repaving Curb Ramps Crossing Improvements Median Island Design

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proposed improvements 5th Avenue and Kirkham Street

Median Island

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Median Island Concept #1 –Paved only, Options A-D

Option D: Art Mosaic Option C: Concrete Pavers Option A: Classic Red Brick Option B: San Francisco Cobblestones

5th AVENUE

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Median Island Concept #1 –Paved only, Options A-D

Median Island concept #1 description Fill the island with:

  • 1. Pavers on concrete base

Pros:

  • Attractive
  • Good visibility
  • Low maintenance
  • No water use

Cons:

  • 1 dimensional

Option C: Concrete Pavers Option B: San Francisco Cobblestones Option A: Classic Red Brick Option D: Art Mosaic 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Median Island Concept #2 – Zen Boulders

5th AVENUE

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Median Island Concept #2 – Zen Boulders

Elevation

Median Island concept #2 description Fill the island with:

  • 1. River cobble set in concrete
  • 2. 3 decorative boulders set in concrete

Pros:

  • Attractive
  • Low maintenance
  • No water use

Cons:

  • Make sure trash doesn’t collect on river

cobble and boulders. Cone of vision study required

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Median Island Concept #3 – Concrete pavers and planted pots

5th AVENUE

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Median Island Concept #3 – Concrete pavers and planted pots

Concrete Pavers

Pot detail: 2’ tall pot shown with low water use plant

Median Island concept #3 description Fill the island with:

  • 1. Concrete pavers
  • 2. 3 pots with flowering plants

Pros:

  • 3 dimensional, attractive
  • Drought tolerant, low water use plants

Cons:

  • Must care for plant
  • Make sure trash doesn’t collect on

paving and pots

  • Cone of vision study required
  • Ongoing maintenance required after 3

year maintenance period ends.

Elevation

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states:

  • Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national
  • rigin programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance.
  • San Francisco Public Works wants to ensure that residents and

communities impacted by this project have been included in the decision making process.

  • Participation in the Title VI questionnaire assists Public Works in assuring

that we have an effective and representative community outreach program

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Thank you for participating tonight!

For project specific questions contact San Francisco Public Works:

Project Team: Ken Spielman, Project Manager, at kenneth.spielman@sfdpw.org or (415) 437-7002 Marcia Camacho, Asst. Project Manager at marcia.camacho@sfdpw.org or (415) 558-4015 Alex Murillo, Public Affairs at alex.m.murillo@sfdpw.org or (415) 558-5296

Next steps:

Return your questionnaires on design concepts by 9/5/2016 For final concept design and project updates: http://tiny.ucsf.edu/5thandkirkham

16