KINDERGARTEN OCTOBER 2, 2014 1 KINDERGARTEN AT THE ECC Race to the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kindergarten
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

KINDERGARTEN OCTOBER 2, 2014 1 KINDERGARTEN AT THE ECC Race to the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE KINDERGARTEN OCTOBER 2, 2014 1 KINDERGARTEN AT THE ECC Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge New Jersey Kindergarten Entry Assessment (NJKEA) Pilot Professional Development Opportunities Technical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE KINDERGARTEN OCTOBER 2, 2014

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

KINDERGARTEN AT THE ECC

  • Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge

 New Jersey Kindergarten Entry Assessment

(NJKEA) Pilot

 Professional Development Opportunities

  • Technical Assistance from both NJDOE and

Teaching Strategies

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PURPOSE

  • Follow up to July Kindergarten Presentation
  • Answer questions proposed by members of the

Board of Education and public

Are their alternative programs to FDK? What are the benefits of FDK? What districts have FDK? Why not? What districts charge for FDK? How much? What are the facilities challenges and how have

districts dealt with those challenges?

What is the time frame for moving ahead with FDK?

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • The output of the education system in

kindergarten is the same, despite structural differences in how kindergarten is provided.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON CORE

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Solve addition and subtraction word problems, and

add and subtract within 10. (K.OA.1)

  • For any number from 1 to 9, find the number that

makes 10 when added to the given number. (K.OA.4)

  • Analyze and compare two- and three-dimensional

shapes, in different sizes and orientations, using informal language to describe their similarities, differences, parts and other attributes. (K.G4)

THE COMMON CORE

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Identify basic similarities in and differences between

two texts on the same topic. (RI.K.9)

  • Participate in shared research and writing projects.

(W.K.7)

  • Distinguish shades of meaning among verbs describing

the same general action (e.g., walk, march, strut, prance) by acting out the meanings. (L.K.5.d.)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

  • In order to master these skills some children

receive:

  • 1,080 hours of instruction

AND some only 540 hours of instruction

  • 78% 80% of New Jersey School Districts offer

Full-day Kindergarten

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

3 Hour Half Day Kindergarten Schedule

8:45 -- 9:05 20 minutes Arrival and Morning Meeting 9:05 – 9:25 20 minutes Shared Reading 9:25 –10:25 60 minutes Choice Time (Literacy and Play-based Centers, Guided Reading) Ongoing Investigations and Project Work 10:25 – 10:55 30 minutes Snack, Outdoor Recess and/or Movement Activities 10:55 – 11:25 30 minutes Math Explorations alternated with Writing Workshop 11:25 – 11:45 20 minutes Sharing, Review, Closing, and Dismissal

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Full Day Kindergarten Schedule

8:45 -- 9:00 15 minutes Arrival 9:00 – 9:15 15 minutes Morning Meeting 9:15 – 9:35 20 minutes Shared Reading 9:35 –10:35 60 minutes Choice Time with Ongoing Investigations and Project Work and Guided Reading 10:35 – 10:50 15 minutes Cleanup and Sharing 10:50 – 11:20 30 minutes Snack and Outdoor Recess 11:20 – 12:10 50 minutes Math Instruction and Explorations 12:10 – 12:40 30 minutes Lunch 12:40 – 1:05 25 minutes Rest, Independent Reading, and Read Aloud 1:05 – 1:35 30 minutes Writer’s Workshop 1:35 – 2:15 40 minutes Choice Time with Ongoing Investigations and Project Work 2:15 – 2:50 40 minutes Specials 2:50 – 3:10 20 minutes Sharing, Review, Closing, and Dismissal

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

COMPARABLE DISTRICTS

  • Peer Group 41/53 offer FDK
  • IJ District Factor Group

Space Constraints Expense – Associated costs Availability of Private Programs within

the community

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PROPOSED COMMUNITY SURVEY

1.

Which best describes you?

  • Berkeley Heights resident whose children are of kindergarten age or

younger.

  • Berkeley Heights resident whose child/children are currently attending

district

  • schools.
  • Berkeley Heights resident whose school age child/children attend private
  • school.
  • Other Berkeley Heights resident.

Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Disagree

2.

I believe that the current half-day kindergarten program is preparing my child for the next academic year.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 4. A full-day kindergarten program would contribute to greater

academic success in the content areas (mathematics, language arts literacy, social studies, science) as compared to half-day programs. Yes, No, Undecided

  • 5. If proposed, would you support a referendum to increase

property taxes for a full-day kindergarten program?

  • 6. If a full-day kindergarten program was offered at the Early

Childhood Center, would you enroll your child?

  • 6. If yes, would you be willing to pay a fee for a full-day

kindergarten?

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

  • Extended Day Program
  • ½ Year Full Day/Half Day
  • Redistricting

 Two PreK-2nd Schools  Two 3rd – 5th Schools  Loss of Neighborhood Schools

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

COST OF FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN

  • Berkeley Heights Certified Cost $ 10,365
  • Mountainside
  • Summit WRAP (additional ½ day)

$ 5,500

  • St. Andrew’s (8:55-2:35)

$ 8,700

  • Primrose School (inclusive of before/aftercare)

$13,500

  • Our Lady of Peace

$ 7,000

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • One-time Costs

 Referendum for building addition at MKM ECC and start up

costs.

  • On-going Costs

 Increase budget using banked cap for initial

implementation costs

  • Unanswered Questions

 How would this impact transportation?

  • Reduce mid-day routes & add buses to beginning and end of day.

Potential savings $20,000

  • Do we continue courtesy busing?

 What building renovations are required?

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ONE TIME COSTS

  • Construction
  • Classroom Furniture
  • Technology Equipment
  • Estimated Cost: $3 – 3.5 Million

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ON-GOING COSTS

  • Salaries and benefits

$ 427,000

 Teachers

5.5

  • Additional personnel

$ 197,000

 Special teachers

1.0

 Custodian

.5

 Playground aides

and HELP 9 (PT)

  • Utility costs

$ 7,800

  • Instructional supplies

$ 5,400 TOTAL $637,200

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

  • Unanswered Questions

 How would this impact transportation?

  • Reduce mid-day routes & add buses to beginning and

end of day. Potential savings $20,000

  • Do we continue courtesy busing???

 What building renovations are required?

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LASTING BENEFITS?

In 2007, researchers followed students entering full and half day kindergarten throughout their third grade year. Students who were in the full day cohort exceeded the national average on standardized tests

  • ut performing their half day counterparts. The study

ended when the students completed third grade. At the duration of the study, the students were still exceling beyond the half day students.

Walstrom, K., Michlin, M., & Hansen, A. (2007). Full-Day Kindergarten. University of Minnesota: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement. 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

FADE OUT

  • A meta-analysis by Harris Cooper and

Associates indicates, Students in full-day programs did better on academic achievement tests at the end of the year than children who attended half-day programs. These academic differences fade out by the end of 3rd grade.

Cooper, H.; Allen, A. B.; Patall, E. A.; Dent, E.L. 2010. 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TIMELINE

  • November, 2014

 Conduct survey

  • December, 2014

 Create a feasibility committee inclusive of board members,

administration, teachers, and parents.

  • January-June, 2015

 Conduct a review of buildings and grounds to accommodate full

day Kindergarten.

 Explore additional options including, moving preschool offsite,

extended day for students considered “at-risk”, restructuring school configuration, (K-2, 3-5), a township referendum for addition to existing ECC.

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Summer, 2015

 Report findings to Board of Education

  • November, 2015

 Referendum

  • April, 2016

 County approves budget

  • Summer, 2016

 Construction

  • September, 2016

 Implementation

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE KINDERGARTEN OCTOBER 2, 2014

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE KINDERGARTEN JULY 24, 2014

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

CONSULTATION

  • New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association

Early Childhood Committee

  • Vincent J. Costanza, Ed.D.

Executive Director Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge NJ DOE Division of Early Childhood

  • Kathleen Priestley

Consultant to the National Institute for Early Education Research and Advocates for Children of New Jersey

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

EXCITING NEWS

  • Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC)

 Pilot District for New Jersey Kindergarten Entry

Assessment (NJKEA)

 Professional Development Opportunities

  • State Steering Committee charged with creating 1st

through 3rd Grade Guidelines

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL

  • Consider what students need for 1st grade success.
  • To enhance “readiness” for first grade, consider
  • ptions including but not limited to, full day

kindergarten, “progressive” kindergarten (starts with 1/2 day, ends with full day), extended day kindergarten, transitional primary programs, putting K/1st back in elementary schools.

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Solve addition and subtraction word problems, and

add and subtract within 10. (K.OA.1)

  • For any number from 1 to 9, find the number that

makes 10 when added to the given number. (K.OA.4)

  • Analyze and compare two- and three-dimensional

shapes, in different sizes and orientations, using informal language to describe their similarities, differences, parts and other attributes. (K.G4)

THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF KINDERGARTEN

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Identify basic similarities in and differences between

two texts on the same topic. (RI.K.9)

  • Participate in shared research and writing projects.

(W.K.7)

  • Distinguish shades of meaning among verbs describing

the same general action (e.g., walk, march, strut, prance) by acting out the meanings. (L.K.5.d.)

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

  • In order to master these skills some children receive:
  • 1,080 hours of instruction

AND some only 540 hours of instruction

  • 78% of New Jersey School Districts offer Full-day

Kindergarten

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Researchers have found many connections between cognitive competence and play, particularly high-quality dramatic play. The benefits of play include self-regulation; memory development; divergent thinking; problem solving; language development; and academic skill development in literacy, math, social studies, and science.

Bergen, 2002; Bodrova & Leong, 2004; Charlesworth, 2007; Krafft & Berk, 1998; Fantuzzo & McWayne, 2002; Howes & Matheson, 1992; Klein, Worth & Linas, 2004; Newman, 1990; Nourot & Van Hoorn, 1991

PLAY lS IMPORTANT FOR LEARNING

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

INVESTIGATIONS/ PROJECT WORK

Concepts are best taught through project-based learning, a balance of child-initiated and teacher-guided learning that starts with a central idea and is studied over an extended period of time.

Heroman, C., & C. Copple. 2006. Teaching in the kindergarten year. In D. Gullo (ED.) K Today: Teaching and learning in the kindergarten

  • year. Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

When children are in environments where learning is

  • ccurring in a meaningful context, where they have

choices, and where they are encouraged to follow their interests, learning takes place best.

Singer, D., Golinkoff, R., & Hirsch-Pasek, K. (Eds.) (2006). Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social emotional growth. New York: Oxford University Press. 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

According to Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs teachers should offer open- ended art experiences and integrate the arts into other areas of the curriculum.

Copple, C., & S. Bredekamp. Eds. 2009. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: Serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children. 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Weaving gross motor activity into indoor and outdoor learning experiences addresses a kindergartner’s developmentally appropriate need for movement while facilitating large muscle development It also gives children a break from academic learning, helping them to better concentrate and self regulate for the duration

  • f the day.

Kindergarten Implementation Guidelines NJDOE, 2011 p69 36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

3 Hour Half Day Kindergarten Schedule

8:45 -- 9:05 20 minutes Arrival and Morning Meeting 9:05 – 9:25 20 minutes Shared Reading 9:25 –10:25 60 minutes Choice Time (Literacy and Play-based Centers, Guided Reading) Ongoing Investigations and Project Work 10:25 – 10:55 30 minutes Snack, Outdoor Recess and/or Movement Activities 10:55 – 11:25 30 minutes Math Explorations alternated with Writing Workshop 11:25 – 11:45 20 minutes Sharing, Review, Closing, and Dismissal

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Full Day Kindergarten Schedule

8:45 -- 9:00 15 minutes Arrival 9:00 – 9:15 15 minutes Morning Meeting 9:15 – 9:35 20 minutes Shared Reading 9:35 –10:35 60 minutes Choice Time with Ongoing Investigations and Project Work and Guided Reading 10:35 – 10:50 15 minutes Cleanup and Sharing 10:50 – 11:20 30 minutes Snack and Outdoor Recess 11:20 – 12:10 50 minutes Math Instruction and Explorations 12:10 – 12:40 30 minutes Lunch 12:40 – 1:05 25 minutes Rest, Independent Reading, and Read Aloud 1:05 – 1:35 30 minutes Writer’s Workshop 1:35 – 2:15 40 minutes Choice Time with Ongoing Investigations and Project Work 2:15 – 2:50 40 minutes Specials 2:50 – 3:10 20 minutes Sharing, Review, Closing, and Dismissal

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Full-day kindergarten enrollment provides the

  • pportunity for greater student academic achievement

and social and behavioral development; and the full-day kindergarten schedule gives teachers flexibility to devote greater amounts of time to research-based instructional methods.

The Effects of Full-Day Versus Half-Day Kindergarten: Review and Analysis of National and Indiana Data

The Effects of Full-Day Versus Half-Day Kindergarten

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • MKM

SURVEY RESULTS

Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree

I believe that the Early Childhood Center is preparing my child for his

  • r

her next academic year.

  • 46%
  • 23%
  • 26%
  • 5%
  • I

am confident in the Early Childhood Center’s ability to meet my child's learning needs.

  • 28%
  • 23%
  • 48%
  • 1%
  • I

would support moving Kindergarten and 1st Grade to the neighborhood schools.

  • 16%
  • 13%
  • 13%
  • 34%
  • 24%

The current half-day kindergarten program provides my child with the skills necessary for future learning.

  • 9%
  • 14%
  • 7%
  • 37%
  • 33%

An extended day kindergarten would provide my child with the skills necessary for future learning.

  • 63%
  • 13%
  • 13%
  • 8%
  • 3%

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • MKM

SURVEY RESULTS

Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree

If

  • ffered,

I would be interested in an extended day kindergarten. 71% 11% 9% 3% 6% I would be willing to pay a fee for an extended day program. 21% 15% 21% 17% 26% A full day kindergarten program is necessary to develop the skills essential for future learning. 54% 9% 20% 11% 6% If

  • ffered,

I would be interested in full day kindergarten 74% 7% 5% 7% 7% I would be willing to pay a fee for a full day kindergarten program.

  • 21% 10%

20% 18% 31%

  • YES

NO

  • I

would support a township referendum to support the implementation

  • f

full day kindergarten program.

  • 85%
  • 15%
  • 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42

LASTING BENEFITS

In 2007, researchers followed students entering full and half day kindergarten throughout their third grade year. Students who were in the full day cohort exceeded the national average on standardized tests out performing their half day counterparts. The study ended when the students completed third grade. At the duration of the study, the students were still exceling beyond the half day students.

Walstrom, K., Michlin, M., & Hansen, A. (2007). Full-Day Kindergarten. University of Minnesota: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement. 42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

RESEARCH

Full-day kindergarten is a necessary component of a comprehensive early learning continuum and boosts children’s cognitive learning, creative problem-solving and social competence.

~Children’s Defense Fund: Full-Day Kindergarten in NJ Washington, DC January 2013

A half-day program is inadequate to teach the Common Core, let alone master it. ~Dr. Ellen Wolock, NJDOE

DECE

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Opportunities to address standards in

meaningful ways

  • Integration of content areas through investigations

and sustained projects

  • Ample Choice/Center Time
  • Uninterrupted Instructional Block
  • Time to play, socialize, collaborate,

and practice self-regulation

  • Reduced Stress

IMPACT

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

MOVING FORWARD

  • Create a feasibility committee inclusive of board members,

administration, teachers, and parents.

  • Conduct a review of buildings and grounds to accommodate full day

Kindergarten.

  • Conduct an audit of costs associated with full day Kindergarten.
  • Explore additional options including, moving preschool offsite,

extended day for students considered “at-risk”, restructuring school configuration, (K-2, 3-5), a township referendum for addition to existing ECC.

  • After reviewing information from the NJKEA pilot, any additional

research and budget impact make a final recommendation and develop an implementation plan by June 2015 regarding full day kindergarten.

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE KINDERGARTEN

46