KEY ELEMENTS OF NATIONAL FRAMEWORK ON MITIGATION OF CLIMATE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
key elements of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

KEY ELEMENTS OF NATIONAL FRAMEWORK ON MITIGATION OF CLIMATE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 08, 2024 16 likes •322 views

KEY ELEMENTS OF NATIONAL FRAMEWORK ON MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE S AUT M L UBIS 9 TH AUGUST 2011 (C) (C) The he Ran ange ge of of the the D Dif iffer eren ence ce be betw twee een n Emis Emissi sion ons s in in 19 1990

slide-1
SLIDE 1

KEY ELEMENTS OF NATIONAL FRAMEWORK ON MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE

SAUT M LUBIS 9TH AUGUST 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Scenario Category Region 2020 2050

A-450 ppm CO2-eqb Annex I

  • 25 % to – 40 %
  • 80% to -95 %

Non-Annex I Substantial deviation from baseline in Latin America, Middle East, East Asia and Centrally- Planned Asia Substantial deviation from baseline in all regions B-550 ppm CO2-eq Annex I

  • 10% to -30%
  • 40% to -90%

Non-Annex I Deviation from baseline in Latin America and Middle East, East Asia Deviation from baseline in most regions, especially in Latin America and Middle East C-650 ppm CO2-eq Annex I 0% to -25%

  • 30% to -80%

Non-Annex I Baseline Deviation from baseline in Latin America and Middle East, East Asia

(C)

(C) The he Ran ange ge of

  • f the

the D Dif iffer eren ence ce be betw twee een n Emis Emissi sion

  • ns

s in in 19 1990 90 an and d Emis Emissi sion

  • n

All llowan ance ces s in in 20 2020 20/20 /2050 50 for

  • r Variou

arious s Con

  • nce

centr ntration Le tion Levels els for

  • r Ann

nnex x I I And nd No Non-Ann nnex I x I Cou

  • untries

ntries as a as a Gr Grou

  • upa
  • Source: IPCC Working Group III, Chapter 13, Box 13.7, page 776.
  • a) The aggregate range is based on multiple approaches to apportion emissions between regions (contraction &

convergence, multistage, Triptych and intensity targets, among others). Each approach makes different assumption about the pathways, specific national efforts and other variables.Additional extreme cases – in which Annex I undertakes all reductions, or non-Annex I undertakes all reductions – are not included. The range presented here do not imply political feasibility, nor do the results reflect cost variance.

  • b) Only the studies aiming at stabilization at 450 ppm CO2-eq assume a (temporary) overshoot of about 50 ppm

(See Den Elzen and Meinshausen, 2006)

10/4/2011 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

REDUCTION IN BOX 13.7

10/4/2011 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/4/2011 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DIFFERENT PERIOD OF STABILIZATION LEVELS

10/4/2011 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/4/2011 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

KATEGORI NAMAs

  • Unilateral NAMAs/Domestically Supported NAMAs

(unsupported or self supporting): autonomous mitigation actions undertaken by developing country Parties on their own to achieve certain emission reduction level without international (outside) support under the UNFCCC framework

  • Internationally Supported NAMAs: mitigation actions

by developing country Parties supported directly by developed country Parties as internationally supported mitigation actions under the UNFCCC framework

  • Credited NAMAs (credit generating NAMAs): mitigation

actions in developing countries, which generate credits to be sold on the carbon market .

10/4/2011 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 1. UNILATERAL NAMAS/DOMESTICALLY SUPPORTED NAMAS

(UNSUPPORTED OR SELF SUPPORTING): AUTONOMOUS MITIGATION ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN BY DEVELOPING COUNTRY PARTIES ON THEIR OWN TO ACHIEVE CERTAIN EMISSION REDUCTION LEVEL WITHOUT INTERNATIONAL (OUTSIDE) SUPPORT UNDER THE UNFCCC FRAMEWORK

  • 2. INTERNATIONALLY SUPPORTED NAMAS: MITIGATION ACTIONS

BY DEVELOPING COUNTRY PARTIES SUPPORTED DIRECTLY BY DEVELOPED COUNTRY PARTIES AS INTERNATIONALLY SUPPORTED MITIGATION ACTIONS UNDER THE UNFCCC FRAMEWORK

  • 3. CREDITED NAMAS (CREDIT GENERATING NAMAS):

MITIGATION ACTIONS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, WHICH GENERATE CREDITS TO BE SOLD ON THE CARBON MARKET

KATEGORI NAMAs

10/4/2011 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/4/2011 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/4/2011 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/4/2011 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10/4/2011 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10/4/2011 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

BAU

  • The current policy, and future if exists without

any climate change policy intervention and action,

  • Market trends and its features,
  • Associated uncertainties,
  • Evolution of supply and demand,
  • Cost effectiveness, and
  • Expected performance of the system.

10/4/2011 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

national business as usual baseline

  • Establishment of aggregated business as usual

baseline of each sector, and

  • Establishment of national business as usual

baseline (aggregated business as usual baseline).

10/4/2011 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10/4/2011 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10/4/2011 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10/4/2011 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

10/4/2011 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

10/4/2011 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

10/4/2011 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

10/4/2011 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

10/4/2011 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

some important issues to be addressed in establishing NAMAs

  • Establish aggregated business as usual baseline of sectors using

sector’s development plan and future evolution of activities without explicit new climate change policy intervention and action,

  • Propose list of potential mitigation emission reduction actions of

sectors in the order according to sector’s cost effectiveness and level of implementability,

  • Integrate sector’s aggregated business as usual baseline to establish

national business as usual baseline (aggregated),

  • Construct list of national aggregated mitigation emission reduction

actions based on national cost effectiveness and level of implementability,

  • Establish NAMAs from the national aggregated mitigation emission

reduction actions in meeting the national emission reduction target, and

  • Linkage NAMAs to the UNFCCC level.

10/4/2011 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

10/4/2011 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

10/4/2011 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

10/4/2011 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

10/4/2011 28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

10/4/2011 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Terima Kasih atas Perhatiannya