Ketchum Transportation Hub Detailed Site Analysis Open House #4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ketchum Transportation Hub Detailed Site Analysis Open House #4 SITE SELECTION PROCESS OVERVIEW 18 Locations Assessed Based on Community Input from Considerations: Requirements: Open House #2 8/23/12 and 8/30/12 • Proximity to routes and where people want to go • Location must be connected to bus, • Overall cost must be considered pedestrian, and bike routes • Location must have the needed space • Impacts and compatibility with adjacent land uses are important • Location must fit with the community 6 Locations Assessed Committee & Community Input from 4 Final Locations Assessed Open House #3 10/23/12 By Committee based on Consultant (between Open House #3 and now)

Ketchum Transportation Hub Detailed Site Analysis Open House #4 SUN VALLEY RD. Locations 4 & 5 Assessments ELEPHANT’S Sun Valley Rd. & East Ave. PERCH SUN VALLEY RD . MAIN ST. EAST AVE. TOWN SQUARE DOWNTOWN CORE VICINITY MAP CONFIGURATION 5 CONFIGURATION 4 ALL TRAFFIC GENERAL TRAFFIC BUS ONLY BUS ONLY GENERAL TRAFFIC GENERAL TRAFFIC OUR ASSESSMENT OUR ASSESSMENT • Efficient use of space for buses • Keeps road open to through traffic • Close to core and activity centers • Close to core and activity centers • Very visible and easy to find • Very visible and easy to find • Net loss of 25 parking spaces (lose 29, gain 4) • Net loss of 28 parking spaces (lose 32, gain 4) • Medium/High traffic impact because of closure of East Ave. • Uses existing street right of way on 100' wide • Pedestrian crossing for bus transfers not safe or convenient street • Potential for bus-car conflicts on SV Rd. • Within funded budget ~ $400k • Within funded budget • Low traffic impact

Ketchum Transportation Hub Detailed Site Analysis Open House #4 Location # 2 Assessment SUN VALLEY RD. MAIN ST. Second St. & Washington Ave. SUN VALLEY RD . SECOND ST . FIRST T.S MAIN ST. WASHINGTON AVE. DOWNTOWN CORE VICINITY MAP CONFIGURATION 2B CONFIGURATION 2A OUR ASSESSMENT OUR ASSESSMENT • Adjacent to existing • Not as visible as other parking locations • Not as visible as • Puts activity onto other locations vacant property in • Medium traffic core impact • Low traffic impact • Close to nightlife • Close to nightlife destinations destinations • Requires closure of • Could create 2nd St (access for opportunity for parking only) additional • Bus access development somewhat • Bus access somewhat constrained constrained • Net loss of 20 • Net loss of 11 parking parking spaces spaces(lose 15,gain 4) (lose 24, gain 4) • Exceeds funded • Within funded budget-property budget ~$400k acquisition required