Kenmore -Town of Tonawanda Union Free School District PHASE 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kenmore town of tonawanda union free school district
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kenmore -Town of Tonawanda Union Free School District PHASE 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kenmore -Town of Tonawanda Union Free School District PHASE 2 CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION August 12, 2014 We educate, prepare, and inspire all students to achieve their highest potential 2014 2015 2016 J F M A M J J A


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kenmore -Town of Tonawanda Union Free School District

PHASE 2 CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION August 12, 2014

We educate, prepare, and inspire all students to achieve their highest potential

slide-2
SLIDE 2

REFERENDUM

SED BID CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REFERENDUM PLANNING

Where we are

2014 2015 2016

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

slide-3
SLIDE 3

REFERENDUM

4/1/14 District adopts Consolidation Scenario I 11/14/12 UB Summit 1 4/11/14 UB Summit 2 Where we are

2012 2013 2014

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The “OACM Team”

  • Mr. Bob Dana

BOE President KTUFSD

  • Mr. Steve Brooks

BOE Vice President KTUFSD

  • Mr. Mark Mondanaro

District Superintendent KTUFSD

  • Mr. Gerry Stuitje
  • Asst. Superintendent for Finance KTUFSD
  • Mr. Jeffrey Hatten

Director of Facilities KTUFSD

  • Mr. Nick DiFrancisco

Senior Building & Grounds Advisor KTUFSD

  • Mr. Martin Wende

Director of Information Technology KTUFSD

  • Mr. Brett Banker

Supervisor of Health Services, PE, Recreation & Athletics

  • Mr. Scott Jones

Owner, Gordon W. Jones Associates, Architects

  • Mr. Steve DiMatteo

Project Architect, Gordon W. Jones Associates, Architects

  • Mr. Ray Waite

Project Engineer, M & E Engineering, PC

  • Mr. John Ticco

Executive VP, Campus Construction Management Group Inc.

  • Mr. Tom Caruso

Vice President, Campus Construction Management Group Inc.

  • Mr. Mark Voorhees

Project Executive, Campus Construction Management Group Inc.

  • Ms. Carrie Preston

Project Manager, Campus Construction Management Group Inc.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Study

  • The team studied close to 1000 needs identified through the

scoping process.

  • rganized the scope into categories
  • estimated costs of the identified items
  • prioritized the scope items
  • The goal: recommend to the BOE items they should consider as

part of their next Capital Improvements Project.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Study Results:

  • The study showed the District has needs in excess of $170 million
  • The preliminary financial study showed the District could address

approximately $30 million of needs in a Capital Project without a tax increase to the District Residents

  • The study identified:
  • significant Information Technology needs across the District that

may be impacted by the Smart Schools Bond Act

  • several needs not eligible for New York State building aid
  • a separate voter proposition was identified that may have a tax

impact

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Proposition 1 - Priority of Scope:

Health and Safety, ADA, and Code Compliance Building Envelope Academic Program Information Technology Consolidation Scenario “I”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Health & Safety 21% Academic Prog. & IT 31% Building Envelope 36% IT Allowances- PARCC 12%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ken-West 14% Ken-East 25% FMS 11% HMS 13% Edison El. 7% Franklin El. 6% Hoover El. 11% Lindbergh El. 13%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Capital Reserve

  • Existing:

$5,800,000

  • Unused Cap. Outlay

$80,000

  • Addition from Fund Balance

$170,000 Total Capital Reserve $6,050,000 Remaining QZAB $1,137,939 Bonds/BANs $22,702,061 Total $29,890,000

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Assumptions:

  • QZAB rate at current 0.40%
  • Bond rate at the state assumed amortization

rate (currently 2.25%)

  • Project costs are 97.5% eligible for aid
  • Building Aid ratio of 79.8% (9 year avg.)

Result: No tax impact

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Proposition 2 Process

Arts & Athletics

  • Health and Safety, ADA, and Code Compliance
  • Academic Program
  • Information Technology
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Adams Field 41% Ken-West 30% Crosby Field 29%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ken-West 31% Ken-East 22% Franklin 22% Hoover 25%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Financing is totally from borrowing:

Bonds/BANs $21,671,000 Total $21,671,000

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Assumptions:

  • Bond rate at the state assumed amortization

rate (currently 2.25%)

  • Project costs are 94% eligible for aid
  • Building Aid ratio of 79.8% (9 year avg.)

Result:

  • Average annual payment of $433,459
  • Tax rate increase of $.26/thousand
  • Cost to $100,000 market value house: less

than $1 per month

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Kenmore -Town of Tonawanda Union Free School District

THANK YOU

We educate, prepare, and inspire all students to achieve their highest potential

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Proposition 1 – Scope Summary

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Potential Proposition 1 Scope Items

Franklin & Hoover Complexes

  • Masonry Restoration
  • Envelope Reconstruction
  • ADA Upgrades
  • Computer Lab Upgrades

Lindbergh & Edison Elementary Schools

  • Roof Replacements
  • Bus Loop (Lindbergh)
  • Envelope Reconstruction
  • Life Safety System Upgrades
  • HVAC Upgrades
  • Computer Lab Upgrades
  • Sewer System Upgrade (Edison)
  • Door Replacements
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Potential Proposition 1 Scope Items

Kenmore West

  • Locker Replacement
  • New Bus Loop / Drop off
  • First Floor Guidance / Attendance Area
  • Roofing
  • Computer Lab Upgrades
  • Second Floor Existing Guidance to 3 new classrooms
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Potential Proposition 1 Scope Items

Kenmore East

  • New Parking Lot on Fries Road
  • ADA Upgrades
  • Gym / Locker Room Addition
  • Misc. Classroom Renovations
  • Computer Lab Upgrades
  • New Toilet Rooms 2nd & 3rd Floor
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Proposition 2 – Scope Summary

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Potential Proposition 2 - Scope Items

Kenmore West & Kenmore East Auditoriums

  • Sound System Upgrades & Acoustical Doors
  • House Lighting
  • Dimming System and Stage & Theatrical Lighting
  • Carpet Replacement
  • Painted Walls
  • Auditorium Projector with Motorized Screen & Lift
  • Stage Sprinkler System
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Potential Proposition 2 - Scope Items

Franklin Complex & Hoover Complex Auditoriums

  • Seating Replacements & Aisle Lighting
  • Carpet Replacement
  • Painted Walls
  • Refinishing of Stage Floor
  • Electrical Work for Control Booth
  • Auditorium Projector with Motorized Screen & Lift
  • Stage Sprinkler System
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Potential Proposition 2 - Scope Items

Adams Field

  • Synthetic Turf Field for Football, Soccer, Field Hockey & Lacrosse
  • New 8-Lane Track
  • Re-grading of Natural Turf Practice Fields
  • New Stadium Lighting
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Potential Proposition 2 - Scope Items

Ken West Site

  • New Synthetic Turf Soccer, Baseball & Softball Field
  • Re-grading of Natural Turf Practice Fields
  • New Natural Turf JV Softball Field
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Potential Proposition 2 - Scope Items

Crosby Field

  • Synthetic Turf Multi-purpose Fields, within the Existing

Track

  • Re-Grading of Natural Turf Practice Fields
  • Storage Building for Equipment, Toilet Rooms &

Concessions

  • New Bleachers & Team Seating
  • Team Field House ADA Renovations
slide-41
SLIDE 41