JP Morgan 2014 Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conference - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

jp morgan 2014 global high yield leveraged finance
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

JP Morgan 2014 Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conference - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

JP Morgan 2014 Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conference February 2014 Cautionary statements All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated


slide-1
SLIDE 1

JP Morgan 2014 Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conference

February 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary statements

All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, which address events or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production, cash costs and all-in sustaining costs (and its components) and for growth capital expenditures, including the expected drivers of those figures and the nature and amount of particular expected expenditures; the expected throughput and recovery rates at New Afton; planned modifications to the New Afton Mine and mill, the expected timeline, outcomes, cost and payback period of any such modifications; planed modifications to other operations; expected future mining activities; planned exploration expenditures (and their accounting treatment) and drilling activities and costs; exploration potential and the goals and expected results of future exploration activities; the estimation of mineral reserves and resources and the realization of such estimates; the results of the Rainy River and Blackwater feasibility studies, including the expected production, costs, stripping ratio, mining and processing method and rate, stockpiling plan, recovery rates, mine life, infrastructure, NPV, IRR and payback period (and related sensitivities associated with each project; the potential annual production, cash costs and capital costs, and the potential for a block cave, at the El Morro project; the timing of permitting activities and environmental assessment processes; and the timeline for development of Rainy River, including targeted timing for commissioning and full production. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding our forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, New Gold’s MD&A, its Annual Information Form and its Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no significant disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold operates, or may in the future operate, being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (3) the accuracy of New Gold’s current mineral reserve and resource estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Mexican Peso and U.S. dollar being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) labour and material costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) permitting and arrangements with First Nations and other Aboriginal groups in respect of Rainy River and Blackwater being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all environmental approvals (including the environmental assessment process for the Blackwater and Rainy River projects), required permits, licenses and authorizations being obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines; and (9) the results of the feasibility studies for the Rainy River and Blackwater projects being realized. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated reserves and resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political

  • r economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the

validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for the Blackwater and Rainy River projects; in Mexico, where Cerro San Pedro has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our environmental authorization (EIS); and in Chile, where the courts have temporarily suspended the approval of the environmental permit for El Morro; the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves and resources; competition; loss of key employees; additional funding requirements; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the feasibility studies for Rainy River and Blackwater; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of First Nations and other Aboriginal groups; uncertainties with respect to obtaining all necessary surface and other land use rights or tenure for Rainy River; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements, including those associated with the environmental assessment processes for Blackwater and Rainy River. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The preliminary information provided for production, sales, total cash costs(1) and all-in sustaining costs(2) are approximate figures and may differ from the final results in the 2013 annual audited financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis. The footnotes to this presentation contain important information, refer to appendices and endnotes found at the end of the presentation.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Portfolio

  • f assets

in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history

  • f value

creation

New Gold investment thesis

3

18.5 Moz gold reserves ~$90 million investment by Board & Management Targeting ~$825/oz all-in sustaining costs(1) ~900 Koz annual production potential from growth projects +250% increase in share price since March 2009

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Portfolio of assets in top-rated jurisdictions

Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro El Morro Peak Mines

Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 10 years Mine Life: 14 years Mine Life: 8+ years Mine Life: 2+ years Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 6+ years

#2

CANADA

#6

UNITED STATES

#5

MEXICO

#3

CHILE

#1

AUSTRALIA

OPERATING DEVELOPMENT

4

Mining investment – country rankings(1)

  • 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Collectively ~$90 million invested in New Gold

5

BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Former Chairman, UBS Securities Canada Robert Gallagher President & Chief Executive Officer Vahan Kololian Founder, Terra Nova Partners Martyn Konig Former Executive Chairman, European Goldfields Pierre Lassonde Chairman, Franco-Nevada Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Raymond Threlkeld Mining Consultant EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Robert Gallagher President & Chief Executive Officer Brian Penny Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Ernie Mast Vice President Operations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

2013 consolidated operational results

GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)

398 $377 $899 1.6 85

  • High end of outlook
  • New Afton and Peak

Mines met guidance

  • In line with outlook
  • High end of guidance
  • In line with outlook
  • In line with outlook
slide-7
SLIDE 7

2013 ACTUAL

398 Koz

2014 GUIDANCE

7

2014 consolidated guidance

  • 1. Gold sales expected to be in the same range as production.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. All total cash cost estimates (excluding historical amounts) in this presentation assume commodity price assumptions of: Gold - $1,300 per ounce, Silver - $20.00 per
  • unce, Copper - $3.25 per pound, and CDN/USD - $1.11, AUD/USD - $1.14, MXN/USD - $13.00.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. All all-in sustaining cost estimates (excluding historical amounts) in this presentation assume commodity price assumptions of: Gold - $1,300 per ounce,

Silver - $20.00 per ounce, Copper - $3.25 per pound, and CDN/USD - $1.11, AUD/USD - $1.14, MXN/USD - $13.00.

380 – 420 Koz $377/oz $320 – $340/oz $899/oz $815 – $835/oz

Gold production(1) Total cash costs(2) All-in sustaining costs(3)

  • Continued gold production

increases at New Afton offset by lower production forecast at Cerro San Pedro

  • Copper production to increase

by approximately 12 percent

  • Depreciation of Canadian and

Australian dollars benefits New Gold costs

  • Total cash costs(2) and all-in

sustaining costs(3) well below industry average

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Among lowest-cost producers, established track record

  • 2014E all-in sustaining costs(2) to

decrease by over $70 per ounce versus 2013

  • Costs benefiting from depreciating

Canadian and Australian dollar

  • Generating over $200 per ounce

incremental margin versus average

  • f peer-companies(3) that have

provided 2014 guidance

New Gold 2014 Reported Average(4)

~$825

8

Lower costs driving higher margins(1)

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. Based on comparison with costs published by issuers listed in note 4. The manner in which costs are determined may vary from one issuer to another.
  • 4. Average includes: Agnico-Eagle, Alamos, Aurico, Barrick, Detour, Eldorado, Goldcorp, IAMGOLD, Kinross and Newmont. The manner in which costs are determined may vary from one issuer to another.

~$825/oz

~$825

~$1,045/oz

2014E GUIDANCE – ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/OZ)(2)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Capitalization and liquidity

9

  • 1. Cash and equivalents as at December 31, 2013.
  • 2. $44 million of total $150 million currently used for Letters of Credit at December 31, 2013.
  • All corporate debt due in 2020
  • r beyond
  • Two senior unsecured note offerings

during 2012 ($300 million at 7.00%, $500 million at 6.25%)

  • Paid $66 million to eliminate legacy

gold hedges on May 15, 2013

Liquidity Position $414mm $106mm

$520mm

Cash and Equivalents(1) Undrawn Credit Facility(2)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Bonds outstanding

10

  • Initial offering of $300

million unsecured notes in April 2012, with an additional offering of $500 million unsecured notes in November 2012

  • Corporate debt ratings of

BB- / B1(1) (stable)

Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) Face Value $300 million $500 million Maturity April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 Interest Rate 7.00% 6.25% Payable Semi-annually Semi-annually Current trading value ~102.75 ~97.0 Yield to worst 6.2% 6.7% Rating BB-/B2 BB-/B2 Key features

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after April

15, 2016 at 103.5% down to 100% of face after 2018

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after

November 15, 2017 at 103.125% down to 100% of face after 2020

  • 1. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

$262 $491 $309 $688 $414

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Cash

Strong financial position

11

$324 $530 $696 $791 $832

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 2009 2010 2011 2012 LTM (9/30/2013) Revenue Adjusted EBITDA

REVENUE AND ADJUSTED EBITDA(1) ($MM) CASH POSITION ($MM) TOTAL DEBT METRICS(3)

2.0x 0.9x 0.6x 2.1x 2.2x 14% 18% 11% 20% 20%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0.0x 0.5x 1.0x 1.5x 2.0x 2.5x 3.0x 2009 2010 2011 2012 LTM (9/30/2013)

Total Debt/Adjusted EBITDA Total Debt/Total Capitalization

  • Strong credit metrics and cash position
  • Continued growth in revenue and

EBITDA

  • LTM EBITDA/Interest ratio of 7.3x
  • Net Debt(2)/LTM EBITDA(1) ratio of 0.9x
  • 1. Refer to Endnotes on EBITDA under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 2. Cash and equivalents and net debt as at September 30, 2013.
  • 3. Total debt excludes El Morro.
slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Located 10 kilometres from Kamloops,

British Columbia

  • Dedicated labour force
  • Commercial and full production achieved

ahead of schedule

  • 2013 performance – 87Koz gold

production, 72 million pounds of copper production at total cash costs(2) of ($1,196) per ounce

12

  • 1. Refer to New Gold’s February 6, 2014 news release for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations.
  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statements and note on total cash cost under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Location Canada Mine type Underground Reserves1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlb) 0.9 / 904 M&I resources1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlb) 2.3 / 1,988 2014E production/yr (Au Koz/ Cu Mlb) 102-112k/78-84m 2014E total cash cost per ounce2 ($1,260)–($1,240) 2014E capital expenditures ($mm) $115

New Afton

Measured and Indicated Gold Resource(1) 2.3 Moz Measured and Indicated Copper Resource(1) 2.0 Blb

slide-13
SLIDE 13

New Afton – A special asset

13

87 102-112

First nine months of 2013 earnings from mine operations

New Afton

= +58%

Gold (Koz)

72 78-84

Copper (Mlbs)

2013 2014E 2013 2014E

NEW AFTON Upside Contribution Jurisdiction Production

Near-term mill expansion Longer-term C-zone potential

British Columbia, Canada

#2

Country Ranking(1)

  • 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”.

2015 to benefit further from mill expansion

slide-14
SLIDE 14

9,262 11,055 11,967 12,460 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 12 19 21 21 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013

THROUGHPUT (tonnes per day)

New Afton moved successfully beyond design capacity

  • Gyratory crusher commissioned in

January 2013

  • Completed construction of

32 drawbells in 2013

  • Achieved increase to 12,000 tonnes

per day three months ahead of schedule in September 2013

  • Successfully evaluated potential for

further throughput increases going forward

  • 10-fold increase in C-zone Measured

and Indicated resources

14

New Afton – 2013 highlights

15 22 25 25 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013

PRODUCTION (Koz) PRODUCTION (Mlbs)

GOLD COPPER QUARTERLY AVERAGE THROUGHPUT

PRODUCTION (Koz)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mill expansion capital estimates

15

Engineering, Construction and Equipment $26 million Building and Site Works $12 million Owner’s Costs $2 million Contingency $5 million

ESTIMATED EXPANSION CAPITAL

$45 MILLION

  • Below is a summary of the key capital estimates for the expansion project

Target: 14,000 tonnes per day at higher metal recoveries

  • $35 million of capital to be spent in 2014 with remainder in 2015
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Value creation through mill expansion

16

IRR of +50% and payback period of less than two years

2014 TARGETED AVERAGES RUN RATE TARGETED AVERAGES WITH MILL EXPANSION

Throughput Gold recovery Copper recovery 12,500 14,000 ~85% ~87-88% ~86% ~88-89%

+12% +2-3% +2-3%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

New Afton – C-zone resource expansion

17

  • C-zone originally identified through

limited deep holes drilled from surface

  • Drilling from underground

commenced in second half of 2012

  • During 2013 completed 41 holes

totaling 26,800 metres

  • Increased tonnes and grade of

Measured and Indicated resource resulting in 10-fold increase in contained gold and copper

  • Incremental increase to Inferred

resource

Tonnes (000’s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Measured 618 0.75 0.91 15 12 Indicated 25,223 0.84 0.91 678 504 Total M&I 25,842 0.83 0.91 693 516 Inferred 11,288 0.63 0.64 227 159

YEAR-END 2012 C-ZONE(1) YEAR-END 2013 C-ZONE(2)

Tonnes (000’s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Measured 400 0.60 0.73 8 6 Indicated 2,900 0.63 0.68 58 43 Total M&I 3,300 0.62 0.68 66 49 Inferred 13,600 0.70 0.76 307 228

  • 1. 2012 information per Annual Information Form dated March 27, 2013.
  • 2. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to February 6, 2014 news release. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and

Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

C-zone overview

18

C-zone Main A&B Zone Isometric view looking NE

YEAR-END 2013 C-ZONE(1)

Tonnes (000’s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Measured 618 0.75 0.91 15 12 Indicated 25,223 0.84 0.91 678 504 Total M&I 25,842 0.83 0.91 693 516 Inferred 11,288 0.63 0.64 227 159

  • 1. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to February 6, 2014 news release. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and

Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Located in Cobar, New South Wales,

Australia

  • Gold-copper underground mine
  • Track record of continually replacing

annual resources mined

  • 2013 performance – 101Koz gold

production, 13.4 million pounds of copper production at total cash costs(2) of $850 per ounce

19

  • 1. Refer to New Gold’s February 6, 2014 news release for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations.
  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statements and note on total cash cost under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Location Australia Mine type Underground Reserves1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlb) 0.4 / 98 M&I resources1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlb) 0.8 / 158 2014E production/yr (Au Koz/ Cu Mlb) 95-105k / 14-16m 2014E total cash costs per ounce2 $630-650 2014E capital expenditures ($mm) $40

Peak Mines

Measured and Indicated Gold Resource(1) 810 Koz Measured and Indicated Copper Resource(1) 158 Mlb

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Located in Imperial County,

California

  • 70km northwest of Yuma
  • Open pit, run-of-mine heap leach
  • peration
  • Mine acquired in 2009 through

successful business combination with Western Goldfields

  • Mesquite recommenced production

in January 2008

  • 2013 performance – 107Koz gold

production at total cash costs(2) of $907 per ounce

20

  • 1. Refer to New Gold’s February 6, 2013 news release for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations.
  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statements and note on total cash cost under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Location United States Mine type Open Pit Reserves1 – Gold (Moz) 2.2 M&I resources1 – Gold (Moz) 4.9 2014E production/yr (Au Koz) 113-123k 2014E total cash costs per ounce2 $930-$950 2014E capital expenditures ($mm) $40

Mesquite

Measured and Indicated Gold Resource(1) 4.9 Moz

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Located in the state of San Luis

Potosi in central Mexico

  • Gold-silver, open pit, run-of-mine

heap leach operation

  • 2013 performance – 103Koz gold

production, 1.3 million ounces of silver production at total cash costs(2) of $676 per ounce

21

  • 1. Refer to New Gold’s February 6, 2014 news release for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations.
  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statements and note on total cash cost under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Location Mexico Mine type Open Pit Reserves1 – Gold/Silver (Moz) 0.4 / 15.6 M&I resources1 – Gold/Silver (Moz) 0.4 / 15.9 2014E production/yr (Au Koz/ Ag Moz) 70-80k/1.1-1.3m 2014E total cash costs per ounce2 $1,030-$1,050 2014E capital expenditures ($mm) $28

Cerro San Pedro

Measured and Indicated Gold Resource(1) 0.4 Moz Measured and Indicated Silver Resource(1) 15.9 Moz

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Peer-leading growth pipeline

  • Growth projects’ production

potential equivalent to over 2x today’s production

  • Blackwater and Rainy River

acquisitions increased shares

  • utstanding by 25% in total for

potential ~175% increase in production

  • Rainy River and Blackwater benefit

significantly from Canadian dollar depreciation

  • Rainy River $0.05 change in

exchange rate equivalent to $141 million/2.8% change in pre-tax NAV/IRR

  • Blackwater $0.05 change in

exchange rate equivalent to $270 million/1.9% change in pre-tax NAV/IRR

Organic projects +900 Koz(1) per year Rainy River

2014E Gold Production Future Organic Growth Potential

El Morro

22

Four current

  • perations

Blackwater New Afton Expansion

  • 1. Based on ~325Koz annual production from Rainy River, ~485Koz annual production from Blackwater and ~90Koz annual production from El Morro as outlined in the feasibility studies for the projects.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Rainy River

23

Gold Resource/Upside Situated for Mine Development

#2

Ontario, Canada

Jurisdiction

Country Ranking(1)

+169 km2

Land Package

Multiple regional targets

RAINY RIVER

  • 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”.
  • 2. Development capital assumes $1.11 CDN/USD exchange rate.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 5. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to February 6, 2014 news release. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral

Resources” and “Technical Information”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves.

Flat terrain Close to infrastructure 17km tie-in to power

+3.8 Moz

Reserves(5)

+6.2 Moz

M&I Resources(5)

2014 Feasibility Study

First nine years:

$613/oz

Total Cash Costs(3)

$736/oz

All-in Sustaining Costs(4)

325 Koz (1.44 g/t)

Annual Production

~$840 million

Development Capital(2)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

  • 21,000 tonne per day process plan with

conventional crushing, grinding, leaching and carbon-in-pulp technology

  • Targeted commissioning in 2016 with first

year of full production in 2017

  • 14-year mine life with direct processing of
  • pen pit and underground ore for first nine

years and processing of a combination of stockpile and underground ore thereafter

  • Development capital of $885 million

inclusive of $70 million contingency (at $0.95 USD/CDN)

  • ~$840 million at $0.90 USD/CDN
  • Life-of-mine gold and silver recoveries of

91% and 64%

  • Open pit mining schedule incorporates an

elevated cut-off grade strategy during first nine years

Rainy River – Project overview(1)

Pre-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,300 1,450 1,600 US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.90 0.97 1.00 5% NPV ($mm) 138 438 579 738 1,009 IRR (%) 7.8 13.1 15.9 17.6 21.1 Payback (years) 6.8 5.4 4.7 4.3 3.6 After-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,300 1,450 1,600 US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.90 0.97 1.00 5% NPV ($mm) 100 314 416 520 706 IRR (%) 7.1 11.3 13.7 14.9 17.8 Payback (years) 6.8 5.5 4.8 4.4 3.8

  • 1. For detailed technical information with respect to the Rainy River Feasibility Study refer to our Technical Report entitled “NI 43-101 Feasibility Study of the Rainy River Project (dated February 18, 2014 filed at www.sedar.com.
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Rainy River – Indicative timeline

25

  • 1. Indicative timeline is dependent on permit approvals and other variables. There is no assurance this timeline will be achieved or that the deposit will ever reach the production stage.

Final construction during commissioning Ongoing consultation

Project Schedule Feasibility Study First Nations & Public Consultation Engineering/Procurement Environmental Assessment Permitting Construction Production 2014 2015 2016 2017

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Blackwater

26

UPSIDE GOLD RESOURCE

British Columbia, Canada

BLACKWATER Regional Upside Significant Gold Resource Jurisdiction

#2

Country Ranking(1)

8.2 Moz

Reserves(5)

9.5 Moz

M&I Resources(5)

~1,100 km2

Land Package

Initial resource at Capoose Multiple newly identified targets

  • 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”.
  • 2. Development capital assumes $1.11 CDN/USD exchange rate.
  • 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 4. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 5. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to February 6, 2014 news release. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral

Resources” and “Technical Information”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves.

17-year

Mine Life

2013 Feasibility Study

First nine years:

$555/oz

Total Cash Costs(3)

$685/oz

All-in Sustaining Costs(4)

485 Koz

Annual Production

~$1,760 million

Development Capital(2)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

  • Conventional truck and shovel open pit mine

with 60,000 tonne per day processing plant

  • Simple, conventional flowsheet using whole
  • re leach process
  • Low grade stockpiling strategy
  • Development capital of $1,865 million

inclusive of $190 million contingency (at $0.95 USD/CDN)

  • ~$1,760 million at $0.90 USD/CDN
  • Life-of-mine operational strip ratio of 1.88 to 1
  • Life-of-mine gold and silver recoveries of

87% and 49%

  • Conventional waste rock and Tailings

Storage Facility

  • Power supply from the hydroelectric power

grid, via 140-kilometre transmission line

  • Minimal off-site infrastructure required
  • Good existing access road; water supply

within 15 kilometres

  • Low environmental risk and facility designed

for closure

Blackwater – Project overview(1)

Pre-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,300 1,450 1,600 US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.90 0.97 1.00 5% NPV ($mm) 402 991 1,263 1,582 2,120 IRR (%) 7.8 11.3 13.3 14.4 16.8 Payback (years) 7.5 6.2 5.5 5.1 4.5

  • 1. For detailed technical information with respect to the Blackwater Feasibility Study refer to our Technical Report entitled “NI 43-101 Feasibility Study of the Blackwater Project.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

El Morro

28 Chile

Higher Grade Block Cave Potential EL MORRO Unique Joint Venture Structure Gold/Copper Reserve (30%) + Upside Jurisdiction 2011 Feasibility Study (30%)

#3

Country Ranking(1)

85 Mlbs

Annual Copper Production

($700/oz)

Total Cash Costs(2)

90 Koz

Annual Gold Production

Goldcorp 70% partner Funds 100% of capital New Gold retains portion of cash flow from mine start-up

2.7 Moz

Gold Reserve(3)

2.0 Blbs

Copper Reserve(3) Life of mine:

  • 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”.
  • 2. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
  • 3. For a detailed breakdown of Mineral Resources and Reserves by category, refer to February 6, 2014 news release. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral

Resources” and “Technical Information”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

  • 1. Capital estimates based on December 2011 Feasibility Study.

El Morro (30%) – Funding structure

Funded by $1.2 billion interest at 4.58% ~ $2.7 billion 70% 20% 80%

  • New Gold’s 30% share of development capital 100% carried
  • Interest fixed at 4.58%
  • Debt fully ring-fenced

30% 70% 30%

Total Capital 100% ~ $3.9 billion(1) 100% Average annual cash flow

Carried funding repayment

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Near-term catalysts

30

2014 costs declining versus 2013 New Afton production and cash flow continues to increase New Afton C-zone exploration Rainy River regional exploration Blackwater regional exploration Rainy River permitting Blackwater permitting New Afton mill expansion

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Portfolio

  • f assets

in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history

  • f value

creation

New Gold investment thesis

31

18.5 Moz gold reserves ~$90 million investment by Board & Management Targeting ~$825/oz all-in sustaining costs(1) ~900 Koz annual production potential from growth projects +250% increase in share price since March 2009

  • 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Establishing the leading intermediate gold company

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Endnotes

32

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this Report are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on November 27, 2010 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, certain information contained in this Report concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a greater amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility of pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the Reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold. Mr. Petersen is an AIPG Certified Professional Geologist and a “qualified person” under National Instrument 43-101. For additional information with respect to our Mineral Resource and Reserve estimates and the Feasibility Studies discussed herein refer to our press release dated February 6, 2014, the Rainy River technical report, the Blackwater technical report and our other technical reports available at www.sedar.com. NON-GAAP MEASURES (1) TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce figures are non-GAAP measures which are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products that ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing, administration, royalties and production taxes, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs. Total cash costs are reduced by any by-product revenue and then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs are calculated based on total cash costs, prior to any reduction for by-product revenue, being apportioned to each metal produced on a percentage of revenue basis and subsequently divided by ounces of gold

  • r silver sold or pounds of copper sold to arrive at per ounce or per pound figures. These measures, along with sales, are considered to be a key indicator of a company’s ability to generate operating

earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding our non-GAAP measures and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measures are provided in our MD&A’s accompanying our financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (2) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, sustaining capital expenditures, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the company in assessing the company’s expected operating performance, ability to generate free cash flow and its overall value. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative

  • f operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding our non-GAAP measures and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measures are provided in our MD&A’s accompanying our financial

statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (3) EBITDA “EBITDA” (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization) is a common non-GAAP financial performance measure but with no standardized meaning under IFRS. This measure is intended to provide additional information only and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Contact information

33

Investor Relations Martin Wallace Treasurer 416-324-6010 martin.wallace@newgold.com