1
Joint Regional Seminar 2016 Risk Analysis of Equity-linked Products - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Joint Regional Seminar 2016 Risk Analysis of Equity-linked Products - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Joint Regional Seminar 2016 Risk Analysis of Equity-linked Products 1 Equity-linked products 2 Structured products Market-linked investment (Investment-linked products) Credit-linked notes (CLN) Interest rate-linked notes
2
Equity-linked products
3
Structured products
- Market-linked investment (Investment-linked products)
– Credit-linked notes (CLN) – Interest rate-linked notes – Equity-linked note (ELN) – FX and commodity-linked notes – Equity-indexed annuities (EIA) – Variable annuities (VA)
- Guaranteed benefits
- Embedded options
– Exotic option features
4
EIA vs VA
- Equity-indexed annuities (EIA)
– Like a call option
- Variable annuities (VA)
– Like a put option
Fixed Annuity 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
$100,000
(fixed at 4%)
$4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
Indexed Annuity 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
$100,000
(capped at 8%) (floor rate: 0%)
$4,000 $5,000 $8,000 $2,000
Periodic interest credit between $0 and $8,000 PTP indexing
Index: 100 104 105 108 109 102 99
$8,000
EIA guarantee
index payoff
VA guarantee
- Guaranteed minimum
maturity benefit (GMMB)
- Guaranteed minimum death
benefit (GMDB)
- Guaranteed minimum
accumulation benefit (GMAB) VA guarantee
index payoff
5
Historical development of investment-linked insurance
- UK
– Unit-linked policy (1957)
- US
– Variable life (mid-1970s) – Variable universal life (1986)
- HK
– Investment-linked long-term insurance products (late 1980s) – [OCI] As of 2013, office premiums amounted to
- HKD 69,895.8 million in-force business (29.0%)
- HKD 19,115.7 million new business (21.5%)
(of total office premiums of individual life business)
6
Special Features
- Airbag
- Daily accrual
- Early call
Acknowledgment: Investor Education Centre
- Airbag
- Daily accrual
- Early call
7
Examples
- Target redemption note
- Autocall structured deposit
- Accumulators
- Variable life insurance
- Equity indexed annuity
Target Redemption Note – Example (2004):
- 7.5% USD Target Redemption Index Linked Deposit
- Selling point
Enjoy potentially higher returns with Index Linked Deposit
- 100% principal protection plus 7.5% guaranteed coupon return over a
maximum of 5-year investment period
- 1st year annual coupon is guaranteed at 3.5% (), payable semi-
annually.
- The remaining coupon rate of 1% will be based on the LIBOR
- movement. The inverse floater formula is
Max{7% – 2 × (6-month LIBOR), 0}
- However, the total coupon received cannot shoot beyond the target
accumulation rate of 7.5%. If the coupon payment accrued during the deposit period is less than the target rate, then the remaining amount will be paid at maturity. Otherwise, it will be terminated earlier. Autocall Structured Deposit – Example (2009):
- Selling point
Profit from China’s equity market recovery
- 7-year contract
- Principal received upon maturity only.
- If it is redeemed or sold prior to maturity, the
investor may face fees.
- hard to sell in the secondary markets.
- Coupon payment: 5% guaranteed () at the end of the first year
- If the worst off stock in the basket > 10%, it is “auto-called” and will pay.
- Otherwise, the contract continue to the next year until the 7th in which no
coupon would be paid except for the guaranteed 5%.
8
Risk involved in equity-linked investments
- Not principal protected
- Limited potential gain
- Credit risk of the issuer
- No collateral
Acknowledgment: Investor Education Centre
- Limited market making
- Different from investing
in the reference asset(s)
- Conflicts of interest
Practical issues in modeling
- Model financial market events
Deterministic or random
- Model policyholder events
Based on various contingencies
9
Data issues
- Data source:
Actuarial organizations such as Society of Actuaries Canadian Institute of Actuaries Bloomberg Yahoo! Finance
- Data should be readily available and clean
- Good data enhances credibility of modeling
results
10
11
Level of data
- Country or region index:
Standard & Poor 500, Hang Seng Index
- Sub-index:
Hang Seng Property Index
- Individual stocks
- Which one should be used?
- What is the composition of your portfolio?
Length of historical data
- Usually starts from initial public offering
- Maybe too short for long term estimations
- Proxies can be prior company; parent, sister or
competitor in same industry
- Maybe too long and include extreme events
- Beware of change in name or type of shares
12
Frequency of data
- Annual
- Monthly
- Daily
13
Issues with daily equity data
- Missing data
- Typos in data
- Data for holidays (calendar days vs trading days)
- Typhoons (exchange closure)
- Trading suspension
14
Timing of daily equity data
- Last or mid-day
- Time difference for data from different exchanges
- Closing: median of last 5 trades
- Adjusted closing
15
Adjustment of equity data
- Merger or split
- Currency
- Dividend: cash or stock
- Price vs return
16
Size of data files
- Can be very large
- Difficulty in storing and transferring data
17
Modeling approaches
- Deterministic vs stochastic
- Choice of model
18
Deterministic approach
- Factors:
– Interest rate – Dividend rate – Economic growth rate
- Relationship of equity returns with these factors
- Scenarios to be tested
19
Stochastic approach
- Number of simulation paths
- Does it involve nested stochastic?
- Is the range of results reasonable?
- Is it necessary to truncate the extreme values?
20
Choice of model
- Requirements for a model to work
- Will the model produce odd patterns of results?
- Is it appropriate for the product under study?
- Compare modeling results with theoretical values
- Monitor differences between actual and modeled
values
21
Types of models
- Cascade model: Wilkie model
- Log-normal model
- Draw down model
- Regime switching model
- Stochastic volatility model
22
Wilkie model
23
Log-normal model
yt = μ + σεt with εt ~ N(0, 1)
- r
yit = μi + σiεit with εit ~ N(0, 1) and E(εitεjt) = ρij where i ≠ j
24
Draw down model
yt = κ + βdt + σεt with εt ~ N(0, 1) and dt = Min(0, dt-1 + yt)
25
Regime switching model
In regime 1, yt = μ1 + σ1εt with εt ~ N(0, 1) In regime 2, yt = μ2 + σ2εt with εt ~ N(0, 1) Pr(Going to regime 2 | Regime 1) = p12 Pr(Going to regime 1 | Regime 2) = p21
26
Stochastic volatility model
27
Goodness of fit measures
- Log-likelihood
- Akaike information criteria
AIC = - 2*log-likelihood + 2*npar
- Schwartz Bayes criteria
SBC = - 2*log-likelihood + npar*log(nobs)
- Quantile-Quantile (QQ) plot of residuals
28
Calibration of equity returns
- Criteria on percentiles for different time horizons
- How stringent are the calibration criteria?
- Is correlation among returns reflected?
- Can some parameters be negative?
- When will the scenarios have to be re-calibrated?
29
Simplified model
- For quick turnaround
- Must provide reasonably good fit to full model
- Can be used to predict outcome of full model run
30
Risk measures
- Standard deviation
- Value at risk
- Conditional tail expectation
- Opportunity cost compared to another investment
31
Q & A
32