Joint CFO and Channel Estimation for ZP-OFDM Modulated Two-Way Relay - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

joint cfo and channel estimation for zp ofdm modulated
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Joint CFO and Channel Estimation for ZP-OFDM Modulated Two-Way Relay - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Joint CFO and Channel Estimation for ZP-OFDM Modulated Two-Way Relay Networks Gongpu Wang , Feifei Gao , Yik-Chung Wu , and Chintha Tellambura University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Joint CFO and Channel Estimation for ZP-OFDM Modulated Two-Way Relay Networks

Gongpu Wang†, Feifei Gao‡, Yik-Chung Wu∗, and Chintha Tellambura†

†University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, ‡Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany ∗The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Email: gongpu@ece.ualberta.ca

WCNC’10

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 2

■ Introduction ■ Previous Results ■ Problem Formulation ■ Proposed Solution ■ Performance Analysis ■ Simulation Results ■ Conclusion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 3

■ Two-way relay networks (TWRN) can enhance the

  • verall communication rate [Boris Rankov, 2006],

[J.Ponniah, 2008].

T1 ✍✌ ✎☞ T2 ✍✌ ✎☞ R ✍✌ ✎☞ ✲ ✛ ✲ ✛ h1 h2 f1 fr f2

Figure 1: System configuration for two-way relay network.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Previous Results

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 4

■ Most existing works in TWRN assumed perfect

synchronization and channel state information (CSI).

■ Channel estimation problems in

amplify-and-forward (AF) TWRN are different from those in traditional communication systems.

■ Flat-fading and frequency-selective channel

estimation and training design for AF TWRN has been done in [Feifei Gao, 2009].

■ Our paper will focus on joint frequency offset (CFO)

and channel estimation for AF-based OFDM-Modulated TWRN.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Joint CFO and Channel Estimation Problems in TWRN

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 5

■ With CFOs, the orthogonality between subcarriers

will be destroyed in TWRN.

■ Even with completed estimation, data detection is

not simple as circular convolution no longer exists.

■ How to estimate the mixed CFOs and channels and

how to faciliate data detection?

■ We introduce some redundancy and modify the

OFDM TWRN system to facilitate both the joint estimation and detection.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Signals at Relay

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 6

■ The relay R will down-convert the passband signal by e−2πfrt

and obtain rzp =

2

  • i=1

Γ(N+L)[fi − fr]H(N)

zp [hi]si + nr,

(1) where Γ(K)[f] = diag{1, ej2πfTs, . . . , ej2πf(K−1)Ts} and si = FH˜ si =      si,0 si,1 . . . si,N−1      H(K)

zp [x]

         x0 . . . . . . ... . . . xP ... x0 . . . ... . . . . . . xP         

  • K columns

■ Next, R adds L zeros to the end of r and scales it by the

factor of αzp to keep the average power constraint.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Signals at Terminal T1

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 7

■ T1 will down-convert the passband signal by e−2πf1t and get

yzp =αzpΓ(N+2L)[fr − f1]H(N+L)

zp

[h1]rzp + n1 =αzpΓ(N+2L)[fr − f1]H(N+L)

zp

[h1] ×  

2

  • j=1

Γ(N+L)[fi − fr]H(N)

zp [hi]si

  + αzpΓ(N+2L)[fr − f1]H(N+L)

zp

[h1]nr + n1

  • ne

(2)

■ Next, using the following equalities

H(K)

zp [x] Γ(K)[f] = Γ(K+P )[f]H(K) zp

  • Γ(K)[−f]x
  • ,

(3) and Γ(K+P )[f]H(K)

zp [x] = H(K) zp

  • Γ(P +1)[f]x
  • Γ(K)[f].

(4)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Signals at Terminal T1

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 8

■ yzp can be rewritten as

yzp =αzpH(N+L)

zp

[Γ(L+1)[fr − f1]h1]H(N)

zp [h1] s1 + ne

+ αzpΓ(N+2L)[f2 − f1]H(N+L)

zp

[Γ(L+1)[fr − f2]h1] × H(N)

zp [h2]

(5)

■ We further note that H(N+L)

zp

[x1]H(N)

zp [x2] = H(N) zp [x1 ⊗ x2]

where ⊗ denotes the linear convolution.

■ Hence yzp is finally written as

yzp =αzpH(N)

zp

  • (Γ(L+1)[fr − f1]h1) ⊗ h1
  • azp

s1 + ne + αzpΓ(N+2L)[f2 − f1

v

]H(N)

zp

  • (Γ(L+1)[fr − f2]h1) ⊗ h2
  • bzp

s2, (6) where azp, bzp are the (2L + 1) × 1 equivalent channel vectors and v is the equivalent CFO.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Joint CFO and Channel Estimation

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 9

■ We then obtain

y = S1a + ΓS2b + ne. (7)

■ Since S1 is a tall matrix, it is possible to find a matrix J such

that JHS1 = 0.

■ Left-multiplying y by JH gives

JHy = 0 + JHΓS2

G

b + JHne

n

. (8)

■ Joint CFO estimation and channel estimation

ˆ v = arg max

v

yHJG(GHG)−1GHJHy, (9) ˆ b =(GHG)−1GHJHy, (10) ˆ a =(SH

1 S1)−1SH 1 (y − ˆ

ΓS2ˆ b). (11)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Performance Analysis

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 10

■ At high SNR, the perturbation of the estimated CFO can be

approximated by ∆v ˆ v0 − v0 ≈ − ˙ g(v0) E{¨ g(v0)}, (12) where g(v) = yHJG(GHG)−1GHJHy.

■ The NLS estimation of CFO is unbiased and its MSE is

E{∆v2} = σ2

ne

2bH ˙ GH[I − G(GHG)−1GH] ˙ Gb . (13)

■ The channel estimation ˆ

b is unbiased and its MSE is MSE{b} = (GHG)−1GH ˙ GbbH ˙ GHG(GHG)−1E{∆v2} + σ2

ne(GHG)−1.

(14)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Simulation Results

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 11 5 10 15 20 25 30 10

−9

10

−8

10

−7

10

−6

10

−5

10

−4

10

−3

SNR (dB) CFO MSE v numerical MSE N=16 v theoretical MSE N=16 v numerical MSE N=32 v theoretical MSE N=32

Figure 2: Numerical and Theoretical MSEs of CFO versus SNR

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Simulation Results

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 12

5 10 15 20 25 30 10

−4

10

−3

10

−2

10

−1

10 SNR (dB) Channel Estimation MSE a numerical MSE N=16 a numerical MSE N=32 b numerical MSE N=16 b theoretical MSE N=16 b numerical MSE N=32 b theoretical MSE N=32

Figure 3: Numerical and Theoretical MSEs of Channel Estimation versus SNR

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusion

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 13

  • 1. Adapt ZP-based OFDM transmission scheme.
  • 2. Suggest joint estimation method of CFO and

channels.

  • 3. Performance analysis: prove unbiasedness and

give closed-form MSE expression.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusion

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 13

  • 1. Adapt ZP-based OFDM transmission scheme.
  • 2. Suggest joint estimation method of CFO and

channels.

  • 3. Performance analysis: prove unbiasedness and

give closed-form MSE expression. Problem: How to obtain individual frequency and channel parameters? (Globecom 2010)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Outline Introduction Previous Results Problem Formulation Proposed Solution Performance Analysis Simulation Results Conclusion 14

Questions and discussion? Email: gongpu@ece.ualberta.ca