Jiangsu Yoke Technology Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

jiangsu yoke technology
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Jiangsu Yoke Technology Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jiangsu Yoke Technology Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92 1 PhireGuard DR-92: a new Flame Retardant Technology General Description Original FR technology*, particularly suited for the rigid PU foam segments Based on Cl and P as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Jiangsu Yoke Technology

1

Marketing Presentation PhireGuard DR-92

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PhireGuard DR-92: a new Flame Retardant Technology

2

General Description

 Original FR technology*, particularly suited for the rigid PU foam segments  Based on Cl and P as active FR centres.  Alternative to FR commonly used in PUR and PIR foams, in particular TCPP  High M.Wt., low volatility Flame Retardant, durable FR protection  Compatible with double belt panel lamination, discontinuous panel production,

block and spray foams, pour in place…

An alternative to TCPP: PhireGuard DR-92 !

* Technology being patented

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PhireGuard DR-92 in Details

3

Typical Properties

 Slightly yellow transparent liquid  Phosphorus content = 11%wt, Chlorine content = 17%wt  Viscosity = 450 cPs  Acid value < 0.5 mgKOH/g  Water content > 0.1 %wt  Does contain some TEP used as viscosity regulator

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PhireGuard DR-92 in PUR foam, B2

4

Formulation Results

Chemicals Loading Polyol, f=4, OHv = 400 100 Water 0.5 141-b 40 DMCHA 1.5 DC-193 1 MDI Index 130 MDI 182 PhireGuard DR-92 22 Properties Results Cream time 24s Gel time 53s Full rise time 68s Tack-free time 75s Density 30.6 DIN 4102 Surface exp. 123 mm DIN 4102 Edge exp. 139 mm DIN 4102 Rating B2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PhireGuard DR-92 in PIR foam

5

Formulation Studies

Chemicals Loading Aromatic Pester polyol, OHv = 240 100 Water 1.5 141-b 20 PMDETA 0.2 DMCHA 1.3 DC-193 1 T-131 2.2 MDI Index 207 TCPP or DR-92 30-50

 The effects of the FR loading on

the following properties have been studied:

 Density  Curing time  LOI  DIN 4102  Smoke density  Hardness

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comparison TCPP – DR92: Density and Curing time

6

30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 30 40 50 TCPP DR-92 Density, kg/m3 Wt% FR 75 80 85 90 95 100 30 40 50 TCPP DR-92 Wt% FR Curing time, sec The effects of dR-92 on foam density and process are similar to those observed with TCPP

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Comparison TCPP – DR92: LOI and DIN 4102

7

27 27.2 27.4 27.6 27.8 28 28.2 28.4 30 40 50 TCPP DR-92 LOI, % Wt% FR 8 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.8 9 9.2 9.4 9.6 9.8 10 TCPP DR-92 DIN 4102, cm – 30 wt% FR Compared with TCPP, DR-92 yields superior Fire Protection

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Comparison TCPP – DR92: LOI and DIN 4102

8

Transmittance, % Wt% FR 10 20 30 40 50 60 30 40 50 TCPP DR-92 Wt% FR 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 30 40 50 TCPP DR-91 Hardness, Shore Wt% FR Compared to TCPP, the use PhireGuard DR-92 results in less smoke Emission and less plasticization of the foam

slide-9
SLIDE 9

In Summary

9

PhireGuard DR-92 is a flame retardant particularly suited for the production of rigid polyurethane and polysocyanurate foams. In comparison with TCPP, DR-92 offers the following advantages:

 Depending on formulations details, some 10% fire protection improvement  Less smoke emission  Less foam plasticization

Whilst impacting the foam process and final foam properties in a similar way than TCPP does