Jeffrey Pine- -Mixed Conifer Forests Mixed Conifer Forests Jeffrey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
jeffrey pine mixed conifer forests mixed conifer forests
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Jeffrey Pine- -Mixed Conifer Forests Mixed Conifer Forests Jeffrey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 05, 2023 278 likes •615 views

Jeffrey Pine- -Mixed Conifer Forests Mixed Conifer Forests Jeffrey Pine in Northwestern Mexico in Northwestern Mexico Scott Stephens Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management UC Berkeley Sierra San Pedro Martir Sierra

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Jeffrey Pine Jeffrey Pine-

  • Mixed Conifer Forests

Mixed Conifer Forests in Northwestern Mexico in Northwestern Mexico

Scott Stephens Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management UC Berkeley

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sierra San Pedro Martir Sierra San Pedro Martir Mountains Mountains

Northern Baja California Mediterranean climate (more summer precipitation than most of CA.) Annual precipitation averages 24 in (61 cm)

limited precipitation record

Granitic parent material common Area has been grazed by livestock 200 years, varying intensities

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Forests in Northwestern Mexico Forests in Northwestern Mexico

Sierra San Pedro Martir (SSPM)

Within the California floristic province – unique to Northern Baja California

Forested area approximately 100,000 ac. Elevation upper plateau 8800 feet

– 3 large plateaus, peninsular mountains

Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forests

– Similar to forests in southern California and eastern Sierra Nevada

Fire suppression begins in 1970, no harvesting

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Image 1: Aerial Image 1: Aerial

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

FH Mission FH Mission

slide-9
SLIDE 9

FRI 10% FRI 10%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fire History Fire History

  • Frequency similar to Jeffrey pine

dominated forests in the eastern Sierra Nevada and Lake Tahoe

  • Interval between fires 8-15 years
  • Seasonality of past fires is different than

Sierra

– Most fires in earlywood, June and July – Few in dormant period

  • Stephens et al. 2003
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Forest Structure Sampling Forest Structure Sampling

Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forest

7 x 7 grid (200 m between plots) – Area sampled 512 acres (1.44 km2) – Grid densification in random area

  • Spatial statistics being done

Similar aspect, soils, slope, vegetation

  • Live tree plots 0.25 acre
  • Snag plots 1.0 acre
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Forest Composition Forest Composition

Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forest (percent basal area by species)

– 66.3% Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi) – 23.1% white fir (Abies concolor) – 8.4% sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana) – 1.4% lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) – 0.8 % quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides)

Average basal area 86 ft2/acre (20 m2/ha) range 25 - 218 ft2/acre (5.8-51 m2/ha)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Forest Structure Forest Structure

Live trees (above 1 inch DBH)

– Average 60 trees/acre (149 trees/ha) – Range 12 - 128 trees/acre

Structural classification of forest (hierarchical cluster analysis )

– 33% old forest, single stratum – 24% young forest, multi-strata – 43% old forest, spatially distinct multi-strata

Large amount of variability

Stephens and Gill 2005

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Regeneration in the SSPM Regeneration in the SSPM

  • Regeneration in distinct patches
  • What are the size and shapes of the

patches?

  • What percentage of this forest is currently

in patches?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Patch Definition Patch Definition

  • All areas with at least 3 trees 2.5-15 cm

DBH within a 7m x 7m area (22.5 ft x 22.5 ft.)

– Used information from 4 ha stem map

  • Line intercept method (random start)

– Total distance 8.4 km (5.22 miles) – If patch intercepted then data taken

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Patch Results Patch Results

  • Number of patches: 54
  • Average patch size 0.026 acres (0.01ha)

– Range .0025 – 0.17 acres (0.001-0.067 ha)

  • Average tree height in patch 19 ft (5.8 m)
  • Average tree height adjacent to patch

75.1 ft (22.9 m)

  • Percent of area in patches: 3.8%
  • Patch abundance (number/ha): 8.5
  • Stephens and Fry (J. Veg Sci 2005)
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tree Ages Tree Ages

  • Mapped x and y location of every tree and

seedling in two 10 acre areas

  • Cored every tree above 1 inch DBH

– Cores taken approximately 6 inches above ground level

  • All corers crossdated
  • Pattern (spatial statistics) being

investigated

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Tree Age in 10 acre Stem Map Tree Age in 10 acre Stem Map (678 total) (678 total)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

Year Number of Trees

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Snag Density Snag Density

Snags (2001 and before) –average 1.7 snags/ac (4.2 snags/ha) –0 - 9 snags/ acre (0-22.5 snags/ha) Snags (2002) (added 22 more) –average 2.1 snags/acre (5.3 snags/ha) –0 - 9 snags/ acre (0-22.5 snags/ha)

  • Drought last 4 years, more mortality in

2003

Stephens 2004, Stephens et al. 2007

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

How Common are Average How Common are Average Snag Densities in the SSPM? Snag Densities in the SSPM?

0 snags on 26% of plots Less than average density on 65% of plots Greater than 4 snags/ac (10 snags/ha) in 14% of plots Conclusion

– average densities are rare – occur in approximately 12% of plots

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Surface and Ground Fuel Loads Surface and Ground Fuel Loads

3 fuel inventory transects at each plot (147 transects) Used van Wagtendonk’s data (1996, 1998) Average surface fuel load 6.6 tons/acre (15.2 metric tons/ha) Average ground fuel load 3.5 tons/acre (8 metric tons/ha) All fuels are at very low loads, USA commonly 3-7 times larger Stephens 2004

slide-25
SLIDE 25

How Common are Average Fuel How Common are Average Fuel Loads? Loads?

Less than average load of 6.6 tons/acre (15.2 metric tons/ha) on 73% of plots Greater than 8 tons/acre (18 metric tons/ha) on 24% of plots Greater than 16 tons/acre (36.8 metric tons/ha)

  • n 8% of plots

Conclusion – average fuel loads are rare (14% of plots) – high loads in small areas, low hazard

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Wildfire July 4, 2003 Wildfire July 4, 2003

  • Started in chaparral below forest

– In SSPM lightning ignited fires suppressed by 8 person hand crew

  • Very low hazards, suppression efficient
  • Fire burned approximately 1500 acres
  • Largest fire in 20 years

– Occurred at end of severe drought – Same drought as in Southern California

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Wildfire Impacts Wildfire Impacts

  • Approximately 20% of trees killed

– 50% of the smallest and largest trees killed

  • Fire was very patchy

– directly linked to heterogeneity of forest structure and fuels – Fire maintained or increased spatial heterogeneity

  • produces fire with diverse effects
  • continues high spatial heterogeneity
  • bark beetles killing a few trees
  • Mortality very low even after 4 year

drought and wildfire

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Forest Restoration in Similar Forests Forest Restoration in Similar Forests

High amount of spatial variability desired, probably was the pre-historic landscape

– can live with some areas with high fuel hazards, high snag densities

Contrast: Large continues forested areas with high fire hazards

– very susceptible to high severity fires

Must develop methods to measure, quantify, and communicate spatial variability Currently rare in US forest management most standards and guides as for average conditions replicated at the stand level over large areas

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Carl Skinner USFS PSW Research Station Samantha Gill Cal Poly State University Ernesto Franco Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y de Educacion Superior de Ensenada, (CICESE), B.C., Mexico