ITAR and EAR Compliance R Review and Investigations i d I i i - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

itar and ear compliance r review and investigations i d i
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ITAR and EAR Compliance R Review and Investigations i d I i i - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A ITAR and EAR Compliance R Review and Investigations i d I i i Conducting Internal Audits and Evaluating Whether to Disclose Potential Violations to Mitigate Penalties WEDNES DAY,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presenting a live 90‐minute webinar with interactive Q&A

ITAR and EAR Compliance R i d I i i Review and Investigations

Conducting Internal Audits and Evaluating Whether to Disclose Potential Violations to Mitigate Penalties

T d ’ f l f

1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific WEDNES DAY, JUNE 26, 2013

Today’s faculty features:

Thaddeus R. McBride, Partner, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Washington, D.C. Reid Whitten, Sheppard Mullin, Washington, D.C. Randall H. Cook, S enior Attorney, Sikorsky Aircraft, S tratford, Conn. Randall H. Cook, S enior Attorney, Sikorsky Aircraft, S tratford, Conn.

The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's

  • speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you

have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tips for Optimal Quality

S d Q lit S

  • und Quality

If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-871-8924 and enter your PIN when prompted Otherwise please send us a chat or e mail when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@ straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.

Viewing Qualit y

To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again press the F11 key again.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Continuing Education Credits

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY

For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps:

  • In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of

attendees at your location attendees at your location

  • Click the S

END button beside the box If you have purchased S trafford CLE processing services, you must confirm your participation by completing and submitting an Official Record of Attendance (CLE Form). Y

  • u may obtain your CLE form by going to the program page and selecting the

appropriate form in the PROGRAM MATERIALS box at the top right corner. If you'd like to purchase CLE credit processing, it is available for a fee. For additional information about CLE credit processing, go to our website or call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Program Materials

If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps:

  • Click on the + sign next to “ Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-

hand column on your screen hand column on your screen.

  • Click on the tab labeled “ Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a

PDF of the slides for today's program.

  • Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.

Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.

  • Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Export Compliance Export Compliance Reviews and Investigations Reviews and Investigations

Strafford Webinar June 26, 2013

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Agenda

  • Background

g

  • Identifying potential violations
  • Commencing an investigation
  • Conducting an investigation

g g

  • The disclosure decision
  • Discussion

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Defense Exports

  • Articles designed or modified for military use

I l d d f i d t h i l d t – Includes defense services and technical data

  • Regulator: U S Department of State Directorate
  • Regulator: U.S. Department of State, Directorate
  • f Defense Trade Controls
  • Regulations: International Traffic in Arms

Regulations

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Defense Exports (cont’d)

  • Defense articles, technical data, and services

listed on U S Munitions List listed on U.S. Munitions List

  • License or other authorization required for most

License or other authorization required for most exports to most destinations

  • Certain destinations subject to embargo

– Includes China and other trading partners

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dual Use / Commercial Exports

  • All items not designed or modified for military use

and not otherwise listed on USML and not otherwise listed on USML

– Includes technology and software

  • Regulator: U.S. Department of Commerce,

Bureau of Industry & Security y y

  • Regulations: Export Administration Regulations

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Commercial Exports (cont’d)

  • Items classified on Commerce Control List

B d f h t i ti – Based on performance characteristics

  • Licensing requirements based on:

– Destination controls – End-use restrictions E d t i ti – End-user restrictions

  • “License Exception” or exemption covers exports
  • f most items to most places

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Export Classification

  • Essential to know whether item is controlled

under the ITAR or EAR under the ITAR or EAR

– Tailor appropriate compliance measures to classification – Only way to assess if there’s been a violation – Investigative steps will depend on determination

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Identifying Potential y g Violations

slide-13
SLIDE 13

How Violations are Identified

  • Internally
  • Compliance review or audit
  • Compliance review or audit
  • Whistleblower
  • Government inquiry

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Internal Identification

  • Compliance “red flag” raised by employee. Could

arise in ways such as the following: arise in ways such as the following:

– Diligence during license preparation – Diligence on transaction partner – Screening of customer E d f d t l hi i t – End user of product proposes unusual shipping route – Question raised during compliance training g p g

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Compliance Review / Audit

  • Compliance best practice to conduct appropriate,

periodic reviews of export compliance systems periodic reviews of export compliance systems

  • May identify violations during steps such as:

May identify violations during steps such as:

– Personnel interviews – Reviews of export licenses and other records – Site inspections, e.g., walking the floor

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Whistleblower

  • Ensure personnel are aware of means to report

violations violations

  • Provide for anonymity if whistleblower desires it

y y

  • No retaliation for good faith reports
  • Review all allegations appropriately

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Government Inquiry

  • Customs seizure
  • Informal inquiry

– Letter requesting information / a meeting – FBI Outreach (e.g., ANSIR)

  • Subpoena

Subpoena

– Is company a witness or target? – Communicate with prosecutor / agent p g – Review materials before submission

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Commencing an g Investigation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Initial Review

  • Is compliance red flag indicative of actual

violation? violation? I i di t t i t ?

  • Is any immediate containment necessary?

Sh ld l b lt d?

  • Should counsel be consulted?
  • Who will prepare the investigative plan?

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Investigation Plan

  • IMMEDIATE steps to preserve data
  • Identify members of team and contact information

M i li f i ti ti

  • Memorialize scope of investigation
  • Establish clear benchmarks to guide the

g investigation Investigation process should be standard Investigation plan should respond to facts

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Preserving Data

  • Preservation or other retention notice
  • Initial notice may be OK; can supplement later
  • Broad, clear language about what to preserve
  • Disseminate widely
  • Require acknowledgment from recipients

q g p

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Investigation Team

  • Should outside counsel be involved?
  • Are forensic accountants needed?
  • Should internal audit have a role?
  • Should internal audit have a role?
  • What J/C resources are required?
  • What internal IT resources are needed?
  • Reporting line to GC? Board? Audit Committee?

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Stakeholder Buy-in

  • Ensure investigation process engages the

enterprise enterprise

– Devise investigation plan to minimize business disruption – Make business leaders a resource for information Make business leaders a resource for information – Improve chances of cooperation and efficiency – Establish rapport for implementation of corrective actions

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Investigation Scope

  • Cover all possible violations related to identified

issue issue

– Is problem isolated? Systemic? – Does it cut across enterprise? Is it endemic to particular business operation or unit?

  • Focus: set reasonable boundaries
  • Managed: Scope should be able to evolve

Adjust scope and plan to account for facts – Adjust scope and plan to account for facts – Engage executives and decision makers – Manage scope to time available Manage scope to time available

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Containment

  • Halt any ongoing violation, especially if “knowing”

– Seek return of wrongfully exported item – Request segregation or destruction of escaped technology or data

  • Implement immediate steps to protect against

similar violations

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conducting an g Investigation

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Collecting Data

  • Ensure integrity of data collected

– Can data be self-collected? – Are forensic images needed? – Is information needed from individuals’ laptops, PDAs, etc? D d t i l t t f th i f ti – Do data privacy laws protect any of the information needed for the investigation?

  • Make sure appropriate universe of data is

collected collected

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Reviewing Data

  • Use search terms, dates, and other filters to

narrow universe of data narrow universe of data

  • Volume of data:

– Is tiered review appropriate? – Should contract attorneys be engaged?

  • Recognize compliance considerations

– US person review may be required – Export authorization for foreign person reviewers if needed

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Interviews

  • Timing

Thi k b t th d f i t i b t i – Think about the order of interviews but recognize practical considerations – Interviews are usually best after document review Interviews are usually best after document review

  • Location

Location

– Company’s facility to minimize disruption – Offsite to maximize discretion

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Interviews (cont’d)

  • Interviewee

I U j h i t – Issue Upjohn warning or not – Whether interviewee needs counsel

  • Attendance at the interview

– Internal investigation personnel? Internal investigation personnel? – Outside counsel? How many?

  • Develop and follow interview outline
  • Interview notes – how detailed?

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Site Visits

  • Gather information about the site prior to visit

Id tif l ith l t i f ti – Identify personnel with relevant information – Learn who key management personnel are – Understand day-to-day facility/site operations – Understand day-to-day facility/site operations

  • Careful observation and notes of the site
  • Inspect sensitive areas for accessibility

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Transaction Audits

  • Review specific transactions as needed
  • Consider forensic or data analysts
  • Look for markers of problems
  • Look for markers of problems

– Poorly maintained records – Incomplete license files p – Other compliance red flags

  • No record of prohibited party screening
  • Shipping documents lack destination control statement
  • Shipment volumes that exceed license

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Developing Corrective Actions

  • Build causal analysis and corrective action

development into investigation development into investigation

– Relevance of reported facts determined by materiality to root causes and corrective actions to root causes and corrective actions – Root cause analysis should grapple with why escape

  • ccurred and what action or process would have
  • ccurred and what action or process would have

addressed it Corrective actions should effectively efficiently address – Corrective actions should effectively efficiently address root causes – Engage busines in analysis and commitment – Engage busines in analysis and commitment

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Internal Coordination

  • Build disclosure coordination, alignment and

review into investigation plan timing review into investigation plan timing

– Disclosure report of investigation’s scope, analysis and corrective actions must be vetted and endorsed by corrective actions must be vetted and endorsed by client and EO Build a process that facilitates engagement and – Build a process that facilitates engagement and alignment Don’t jam the process at the end get the report into the – Don t jam the process at the end, get the report into the review process timely

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Memorialize Findings

  • Investigative report

S f i d i d t d – Summary of issue and review conducted – Detailed analysis of issues reviewed – Recommend corrective actions / next steps – Recommend corrective actions / next steps – Consider who should receive the report

  • Reporting to senior management and/or Board

– When is it appropriate? pp p – What is the correct form?

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Disclosure Disclosure

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Disclosure under the ITAR

  • Mandatory disclosure: exports to countries listed

in § 126 1 of the ITAR in § 126.1 of the ITAR

  • DDTC ‘may consider’ voluntary disclosure to be a

DDTC may consider voluntary disclosure to be a mitigating factor when determining penalties

  • DDTC considers failure to report violation an

adverse factor when determining actions in response to violation

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Disclosure under the EAR

  • No mandatory disclosure
  • BIS considers disclosure an indicator of a party’s

intent to comply with export control requirements

  • Disclosure given ‘great weight’ in determining

appropriate penalty pp p p y

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Disclosure Considerations

  • Benefits

Di l dit – Disclosure credit – Mitigation of potential penalties – Goodwill with regulating agency – Goodwill with regulating agency – Predictability

  • Drawbacks

– Risk to reputation of violation Risk to reputation of violation – Opening up new investigations or inquiries – Endure penalties that might not have been imposed

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Considerations (cont’d)

  • Timing

After violation is confirmed? – After violation is confirmed? – Before conducting investigation? In middle of investigation? Once investigation is complete?

  • Initial notifications

– ITAR specifically provides for written initial notification – May make sense to call agency even prior to that – Consider amount of detail to include

  • Want to give government sense of issue
  • Don’t want to provide inaccurate information
  • Don t want to provide inaccurate information

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Considerations (cont’d)

  • Final Disclosure

E l i i d t d t d t d – Explain review conducted so government understands review was thorough – Outline findings (limit your advocacy here) Outline findings (limit your advocacy here) – Specify corrective actions taken – Identify mitigating factors (this is your chance to advocate!)

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Thank You Thank You

Randy Cook Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation +1 (203) 383-7081 randall.cook@sikorsky.com Thad McBride Sheppard Mullin +1 (202)469 4976 +1 (202)469-4976 tmcbride@smrh.com Reid Whitten Reid Whitten Sheppard Mullin +1 (202) 469-4978 r hitten@smrh com rwhitten@smrh.com