It It's 's Sim imple e as as AB ABC: K : Kee eepin ing Stud tuden ents ts
- n T
It It's 's Sim imple e as as AB ABC: K : Kee eepin ing Stud - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
It It's 's Sim imple e as as AB ABC: K : Kee eepin ing Stud tuden ents ts on T n Track ck for Suc ucces ess s Our agenda Panel discussion (10:15 11:00) Audience Q&A (11:00 11:20) Table exercise Actions
Panel discussion (10:15 – 11:00) Audience Q&A (11:00 – 11:20) Table exercise – Actions to Move the Field Forward
(11:20 – 11:45)
Moderator: Lyndsay Pinkus, Director, National and Federal Policy Initiatives, Data Quality Campaign (moderator) Panelists
Hedy Chang, Director, Attendance Works Doug Elmer, Director, Diplomas Now Joanna H. Fox, Deputy Director, Capacity Building, Everyone
Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University
Dr. Martha Abele Mac Iver, Research Scientist, Center for
Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University
Maria Santos, Deputy Superintendent for Instruction,
Leadership and Equity in Action, Oakland Unified School District
Julie Turner, Dothan City Schools, Al
Dothan City Schools
three indicators of failure (attendance, discipline infractions, and a grade below seventy)
month
time once per week until student shows improvement in all areas
does not show improvement after two weeks of meeting with the counselor
coaches to re-engage parents in their student’s education
grade)
potential drop out meeting with counselor
to solve any issue student has to cause him/her to drop out
dropping out (Example Accelerated Recovery Center)
Director, Diplomas Now
EARLY WARNING INDICATOR (EWI) SYSTEM AND TIERED INTERVENTIONS
the design of the school and working closely with teachers and administrators to provide whole school, targeted, and intensive supports at the appropriate intensity and scale
system that supplies timely, relevant student data and can track interventions and their outcomes
Mission, Vision, and Goals
Core Education Plan (Tier I)
EWI Data
Design and Implement Tier II /III Supports
Trend Analysis
– Asset based mission building (Tier I) vs. providing extra supports/interventions (Tier II and III) – Whole School Reform v. Individual Intervention
student support staff, external partners)
– Providing context to data – Leveraging all resources – Integrating approaches
Attendance Works
Addressing Chronic Absence: Why It Matters, What Can You Do
19
Average Daily Attendance: The percentage of
enrolled students who attend school each day.
Satisfactory Attendance: Missing 5% or less in an
academic year.
Chronic Absence: Missing 10% or more of school
in an academic year for any reason—excused or unexcused.
Severe Chronic Absence: Missing 20% or more
days of school per year – approximately two months
Truancy: Typically refers only to unexcused
absences and is defined by each state.
Defining Key Terms
20
Moving into Action Requires Knowing If Chronic Absence is a Problem
Most Schools Only Track Average Daily Attendance and
Variation in Chronic Absence for Schools with 95% ADA in Oakland, CA
5.8% 9.3% 12.4% 12.5% 14.2% 17.3% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0%
98% ADA = little chronic absence, 95%ADA = don’t know; 93% ADA = significant chronic absence
Percentage of Oregon students who are chronically absent, by grade Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ODE data, 2009-10.
Grade
0-5% days missed in K 5-10% days missed in K 10-20% days missed in K > 20% days missed in K 0-5% days missed in 5th 5-10% days missed in 5th 10-20% days missed in 5th > 20% days missed in 5th
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 200 210 220 230 240
There is a clear and consistent relationship between early attendance and later achievement
Average reading RIT scores for two cohorts of Oregon students, by absence rates in kindergarten and 5th grade Source: ECONorthwest analysis of ODE data, 2009-10.
23
Note: Since state funding is based upon attendance, this is not just a matter of achievement but of resources.
Chronic Absence Affects 1 of 9 OUSD Students
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% Of Active Students Grade Level
% Chronically Absent Students
2010-11 School Year
24
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Of Active Students Grade Level
% Chronically Absent Students By Ethnicity 2010-11 School Year
African American
Asian Latino
White
African American and Latino Students Most Affected
25
50% 19% 31% Chronic Absence By Level (Total # Chronic Absence in 2011: 4,639 Students)
Elementary Middle School High School
Half of Oakland’s Chronically Absent Students Are in Elementary School
26
27
Patterns Change Substantially By High School
28
Schools + Communities CAN Make a Difference
Characteristics of Successful Attendance Initiatives
Partner with community agencies to help parents
carry out their responsibility to get children to school.
Make attendance a priority, set targets and monitor
progress over time.
Examine factors contributing to chronic absence,
especially from parent and student perspectives.
Clearly communicate expectations to parents. Begin early, ideally in Pre-K. Combine universal strategies that create an engaged
learning environment & build a culture of attendance with targeted interventions.
Offer positive supports before punitive action.
29
Recovery Programs
intervention
Recovery Programs
student with poor attendance.
matters and how to help each other get students to school.
childhood
Intervention Programs Universal/Preventive Programs
30
Variation Helps Identify Good Practice and Need for Intervention
Chronic Absence Levels Among Oakland Public Schools in 2009-10
Nominate a spokesperson 10 minutes to discuss Each table: 1 minute to report out to group