ISO31000:2009 Risk Management Standard Implementation in Pollution - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

iso31000 2009 risk management standard implementation in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ISO31000:2009 Risk Management Standard Implementation in Pollution - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ISO31000:2009 Risk Management Standard Implementation in Pollution Prevention and Response ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION Prof. Michael Baldauf World Maritime University Valtteri Laine Lisbon the 12th October 2017 Project Manager Captain/M.Sc.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Valtteri Laine Project Manager Captain/M.Sc.

Lisbon the 12th October 2017

ISO31000:2009 Risk Management Standard Implementation in Pollution Prevention and Response ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION

  • Prof. Michael Baldauf

World Maritime University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: APPLICABILITY OF ISO31000

What is your opinion about using ISO31000:2009 standard as a guide for implementing risk management in PPR activities?

PRINCIPLES FRAMEWORK PROCESS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: SCOPE OF RISK MANAGEMENT

What should be the scope of the risk management?

  • OpenRisk focuses only on oil spill risk,

mainly at prevention and response of

  • il spills (from WS1)
  • However, maritime risk is wider (air

pollution, sewage, noise,…), and holistic (inter-)organizational risk management could combine risks, e.g. through a set of indicators for different risks, for integrated decision making (this could be a follow-up of OpenRisk)

What are benefits / challenges of aiming at a larger risk management scope?

PRINCIPLES FRAMEWORK PROCESS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT

What do you think of the 3-stage risk management process?

  • Aim is to monitor risk and facilitate decision-making on different time-scales, with different costs involved.

Is this a good aim?

  • Do you think it is practicable to implement this? What are benefits / challenges?
  • Which organization(s) could take accountability for the different stages? (HELCOM/national authorities)?

What about funding and resources for executing analyses?

Intermittent Periodic Strategic

€€€ €€ €

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: APPLICABILITY OF ISO31000

  • ) Which type of risk management

process do you associate most with your work/organization currently?

  • b) Do you think this type of risk

management process suits your purpose? Would you like to adapt a different type of risk management?

  • c) Based on the discussion in the 1st

and 2nd workshop, do you think the table accurately captures the different types of risk management processes?

  • d) Do you feel any types of risk

management processes are missing from the table?

  • e) What improvements would you

make to the table?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: PROCESS TABLE/FLOWCHART

What is your view on the description

  • f each risk management process

stage?

  • Are the aims realistic?
  • What about time scales?
  • Should there be fixed risk evaluation

criteria for each stage? Or should decision to go to next stage mainly be based on discussion between stakeholders?

  • Should the process prescribe specific tools

to be used, or be flexible to account for existing approaches?