Is there a Chinese Idea of a University? Simon Marginson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Is there a Chinese Idea of a University? Simon Marginson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Peking University Graduate School of Education Lecture 3 on 13 June 2019 Is there a Chinese Idea of a University? Simon Marginson Department of Education, University of Oxford ESRC/HEFCE Centre for Global Higher Education Higher School
The PKU lectures
Date Title Dimension of HE
11 June
- 1. Higher education as student self-formation
student
12 June
- 2. Higher education and common goods
society
13 June
- 3. Is there a Chinese ‘Idea of a University’?
university
17 June
- 4. Dynamics of the global research system
knowledge
knowledge
society university student
Is there a Chinese ‘Idea of a University’?
- ‘Ideas of a European-American University’: JH Newman,
Kant/von Humboldt, Clark Kerr, Triple Helix, etc
- China’s traditions in governance and higher education
- China’s dynamic achievement in the last 25 years: does
this signify a new ‘Idea’?
- Reforms and changes in governance and funding
- Deng Xiaoping reforms
- Decentralisation and autonomy
- Dual governance system in universities
- University culture
- Knowledge
- Academic life
- Conclusions: Yes and no
Ideas of a European-American University
- JH Newman: The Idea of a University (1852)
- Wilhelm von Humboldt and the University of Berlin (1809)
- Clark Kerr: The Uses of the University (1963)
- Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff (1995)
John Henry Newman
Wilhelm von Humboldt
Clark Kerr
Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff
China’s traditions in governance and higher education
East West State Centralising, comprehensive, stronger than other elements Episodically centralising but more contested, and more limited role Other social elements Subordinated to the state, which intervened at will From time to time church, nobles, towns had independent authority State strategies Managed decentralisation, training of own officials Manage the aristocracy, negotiate within division of powers Knowledge Partial truths. Practical. From time to time, synthesising Universalising, specialist. High status theory often separate from practice Higher education State sponsored training of
- fficials in academies
Incorporated universities partially independent of church and state
Gross Enrolment Ratio (%): 1970-2017
0.1 0.5 1.1 2.4 3.0 4.5 7.6 18.9 24.1 45.4 51.0
10 20 30 40 50 60
China world
R&D as proportion (%) of GDP, 1991-2017:
USA, UK, Germany, China, Japan, South Korea
USA 2.79% UK 1.66% Germany 3.02% China 2.13% Korea 4.55%
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
United States United Kingdom Germany China South Korea Japan
Japan 3.20%
National investment in R&D, 2016
OECD data, $s billion, constant 2010 USD PPP
464.3 410.2 149.5 104.1 75.9 55.8 42.9 37.2 32.5 26.1 24.7 18.0 17.3 16.0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Annual number of published papers
United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea: 2003-2016
50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 United States China United Kingdom Germany South Korea Japan
Growth of China-associated science papers
Proportion (%) of worldwide papers in Scopus: 2000-2016
12.4 13.8 14.0 15.1 18.7 21.9 23.0 23.0 23.4 23.2 24.5 25.8 24.3 26.8 32.3 32.2 34.6 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Additional papers with Chinese names, all countries (unweighted) Papers solely authored in China Total = proportion of all papers in Scopus with Chinese names
Top universities in STEM research
(1) physical sciences and engineering, and (2) mathematics and complex computing, Papers in top 5 per cent of their field by citation rate, World: 2014-2017
University System Physical sciences & engineering University System Maths & computing
Tsinghua U
CHINA
776 Tsinghua U
CHINA
236 MIT
USA
691 Harbin IT
CHINA
182 Stanford U
USA
598 Zhejiang U
CHINA
155 UC, Berkeley
USA
580 Huazhong U S&T
CHINA
153 Harvard U
USA
552 U Electronic S&T
CHINA
143 Zhejiang U
CHINA
509 Xidian U
CHINA
142 Nanyang TU
SINGAPORE
503 Beihang U
CHINA
141 U Science & T.
CHINA
452 MIT
USA
138 U Cambridge
UK
449 Nanyang TU
SINGAPORE
137 Shanghai JTU
CHINA
398 NU Singapore
SINGAPORE
137 ETH Zurich
SWITZERLAND
394 Shanghai JTU
CHINA
130 Peking U
CHINA
389 City U HK
HK SAR
124 Imperial CL
UK
388 South East U
CHINA
123 NU Singapore
SINGAPORE
384 Stanford U
USA
119
Top universities in Biomedical and Life/Earth
University System Top 5% papers in Biomedical and Health Sciences University System Top 5% papers in Life and Earth Sciences
Harvard U
USA
2935 Harvard U
USA
261 Johns Hopkins U
USA
1085 Wageningen U
NETHERLANDS
253 U Toronto
CANADA
1071 U Washington Se.
USA
231 UC San Francisco
USA
967 ETH Zurich
SWITZERLAND
227 Stanford U
USA
915 UC Davis
USA
227 U College London
UK
850 UC Berkeley
USA
223 U Pennsylvania
USA
782 Cornell U
USA
206 U Michigan
USA
766 U Oxford
UK
200 U Washington Se.
USA
719 U Queensland
AUSTRALIA
187 U Oxford
UK
718 Stanford U
USA
187 Columbia U
USA
689 U Wisconsin-Madd.
USA
180 U Texas HSC Hou.
USA
667 U British Columbia
CANADA
170 Yale U
USA
661 MIT
USA
162 UC San Diego
USA
635 Ghent U
BELGIUM
161 UC Los Angeles
USA
602 Zhejiang U
CHINA
160 Duke U
USA
584 U Minnesota - TC
USA
159 U Pittsburg
USA
583 U Cambridge
UK
158
Deng Xiaoping reforms from 1978 onwards
- Why: Deng “considered science to be the most crucial of the four
modernizations, the one that would drive the other three (industry, agriculture and national defense).” (Vogel, 2011, p. 197)
- Depoliticisation: “Deng said that science had no class character; it
could be used by all classes and all countries despite their different political and economic systems” (Vogel, 2011, p. 201). It was enough that scientists were loyal to country and party (p. 202)
- China needed original and basic science: Deng saw
internationalization not as a source of borrowed science but a guide to building China’s own capacity.
Centrally controlled depoliticisation
and the dual authority system in science
“Deng also responded to the continuing complaints of scientists that their professional work should be directed by someone familiar with the content. He directed that scientific institutes be reorganized with three top leaders at each institute. The party leader would manage overall policy, but the basic work of the institute would be under the direction of a leader trained in
- science. A third leader would be in charge of ‘rear services’, with
responsibility for improving the living conditions and for ensuring that the scientists had adequate supplies to carry on their work. Aware that intellectuals were upset that they had to spend so much time engaged in physical labor and political education, Deng established a new rule that at least five-sixths of the scientists’ work week was to be spent on basic research.”
- Vogel, E. (2011). Deng Xiaoping and the transformation of China. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press (p. 208).
Decentralisation and autonomy
- Since the 1990s, shift from from state leadership and
control, to state facilitation and supervision
- Autonomy of university leaders has increased over time
- Universities remain firmly nested in government policies
and strategies
- Increasingly, devolved autonomy has taken corporate
neoliberal forms, being associated with increased competition and private fund-raising. This has potential to shape the contents of knowledge and academic work
Dual governance system in universities
- Roles of president and party secretary overlap closely, and
can vary. Not all party secretaries act solely as agents of the party-state
- Integration is obtained through the formal accountability
- f the president to the party committee
- Secures a close working relationship between party-state
and university, facilitating state drivers of performance
- Recently the role of the party in universities was
strengthened, with the president becoming vice party secretary.
Knowledge
- The map of disciplines is the Western map, but it is
incomplete (sciences are lop-sided, social science and humanities under-valued)
- Project of uniting Eastern and Western epistemologies is
discussed but not much is happening
- Output driven by internationalisation strategies and
rankings tends to be less engaged with real life problems and innovations in China itself – undermining traditional commitments to applied knowledge and serving society
- Difficult for a Leninist party-state to embrace a plurality of
new concepts and critical ideas in social science
- Humanities could be a fecund source of new national
narratives but again state enthusiasm is limited
Academic life
- Faculty have agency, as in most countries, and in China can
draw on the deep well of scholarly tradition
- That tradition emphasises the effective freedom (positive
freedom) of the faculty, their sense of responsibility and their power to contribute
- Control freedom (negative freedom) lacks the sharp
resonances it has the West
- The relentless demands of the performance economy, and
the pathologies associated with it (faked research, publish
- r perish etc) are a larger problem than state repression
Conclusions 1
- Arguably, the Chinese university is still pursuing its foundational
project of the late Imperial and early Republican periods, that of a force for modernisation that is largely external to China
- The orthodox Western disciplines frame university knowledge,
synergies with Chinese tradition are under-developed
- However, where China has developed a unique ‘Idea’ is in the
governance of higher education—where a focused state is combined with autonomous disciplinary science in corporate universities, and regulated by dual university/state authority. Despite inner tensions this approach has proven highly functional
Conclusions 2
- State regulation and corporate universities in the neoliberal
era may have weakened essential elements of China’s educational tradition, e.g. global disciplinary research not indigenous knowledge and synthesis, weaker orientation to practical knowledge, unbalanced bias in favour of STEM
- China’s higher education combines: (1) Leninist party-state,
(2) corporate university, (3) engagement in disciplinary
- research. In China’s highly centralised polity there is always
potential for the balance to tip too far towards item (1)
- To develop an ‘Idea of the University’ with a distinctive