Irrigated Agricultural Production Bruce Montgomery MN Department of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

irrigated agricultural production
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Irrigated Agricultural Production Bruce Montgomery MN Department of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Understanding Nitrogen Dynamics When Converting Forest/Managed Timber to Irrigated Agricultural Production Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture Past Work Experienceassessing the environmental impacts of the Garrison


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Understanding Nitrogen Dynamics When Converting Forest/Managed Timber to Irrigated Agricultural Production

Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Oakes Irrigation Test Area

Past Work Experience………assessing the environmental impacts of the Garrison Diversion Irrigation Project in North Dakota

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Key Environmental Issues---Garrison Diversion

Could we manage nitrogen losses adequately to protect Hudson Bay with this massive irrigation expansion? Biota transfer from the Missouri River into Hudson Bay was another significant concern.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Understanding Nitrogen Behavior Is Critical

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Drastic Land Use Changes Such as Plowing Virgin Prairie or Woodlands Will Have Temporal Impacts on the Release of Organic Nitrogen These Changes Are Rarely Documented

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Large Undisturbed Soil Columns Were Used at the N.D. Research Sites to Monitor Nitrogen Movement

NDSU Research

slide-7
SLIDE 7

“Nitrogen Flush” from the Conversion of Dryland to Irrigated Conditions Took Two to Five Years to Equilibrate

Jan-89 Jan-90 Jan-91 Jan-92 Jan-93 Jan-94 Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01

Nitrate-N (mg L

  • 1)

20 40 60 80 Observed data Equation [1] fit 10 mg L-1 MCL 95 % Confidence Interval Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Jan-89 Jan-90 Jan-91 Jan-92 Jan-93 Jan-94 Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Nitrate-N (mg L-1) 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Observed concentrations Equation [1] fit 10 mg L-1 MCL Calculated from soil test N

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Undisturbed Soil Columns Intermediate Monitoring Wells NDSU Research NDSU Research

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Understanding the accelerated mineralization rates from the Garrison Diversion Project provided the

  • pportunity to:
  • Significantly reduce nitrogen fertilizer rates for the

first 2-3 years after the conversion;

  • Separate water quality impacts from the organic N

pool vs from the addition of nitrogen fertilizer

NDSU Research

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Implications Of Land Conversion within the Pineland Sands Area?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A Few Quick Stats Regarding the Potlatch/RDO Land Conversion Issue

  • Potlatch has sold 60,000 acres of timber/pine

plantation holdings in MN but only 6,000- 8,000 suitable for irrigation;

  • The RDO Corporation originally planned to

convert about 7,800 acres for agricultural use;

  • Potlatch: Taxes are 2-3 X as high in Minnesota

than the southern states and northern trees take 50-70 years to mature while southern trees take 25-30.

Ag Week Pates 6-2015

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Anticipating many environmental questions from the public, the foundation for a very unique partnership and water quality demonstration site began in 2013

Byron Township Demonstration Site

Cass County, MN

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Byron Township Demonstration Site

Cass County, MN

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Byron Site is Equipped to Monitor Nutrient and Percolation Losses Beyond the Root Zone

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Typical Long-Term Installation Field Design Used by the MN Department of Agriculture

>24” deep

Installation Notes:

  • All piping placed below the depth of tillage operations
  • Lysimeters pull water from a depth of 4-6 feet deep
  • Below the crop root zone
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Demonstration Goals at the Byron Site

Starting with “NEAR PRISTINE” CONDITIONS……… Quantify the magnitude of temporal N flushes from the conversion of “managed timber” to irrigated production; Quantify nitrate leaching losses over multiple rotations which would include seed potatoes once every 3rd or 4th year; Minimize inputs and potentially reducing N losses by integrating “low input” crops within the rotation; Use cover cropping systems to the fullest extent possible to control off-season losses AND to minimize the use of soil fumigants such as Vapam.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Some Evidence of a Temporal Nitrate Flush During the First Production Year But Dissipated Relatively Quickly

(Crop: Soybeans No Commercial Nitrogen Applied)

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 Average Nitrate-N Below the Root Zone

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Nitrogen Losses Will Occur Even When BMPs and Water Management Are Implemented

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1993-97 Simulation Year

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Nitrogen Rates (Lb/A) Yields (Bu/A)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Nitrate-N Loss

Conceptual Relationship under Corn Production: Inputs, Yields and Environmental Outputs

“Background” Losses Under Row Crop Systems Add’l Losses at Rec. Rate Excess Inputs

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Typical Irrigated Crop Rotation with Late Season Potatoes---Pineland Sands Region

Russet Potatoes Corn Edible Beans

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Proposed Alternative Rotation at Byron

Potential N Inputs Reduced: 70-80% Potential Irrigation Use Reduced: 30-40%

Seed Potatoes Dark Red Kidney Beans Soybeans Peas

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Cover Crops Following Short Season Crops Will Serve an Important Role in Reducing Fall Soil Nitrate Levels

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Rye and oats have been used as a successfully as a cover crop following a short-season crop such as small grains, peas or early season potatoes in Central Minnesota. Brown mustard, show here, produces ITCs (isothiocyanate compounds) which have a biocidal effect similar to Vapam.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Additional Rotations Proposed in Phase 2 of the Special Study (State Agencies)

Traditional Irrigated Rotation Crops---No Potatoes Late Season Potatoes with Conventional Rotation Existing Byron Site-Low Impact Crops with Seed Potatoes Late Season Potatoes Rotated with Low Impact Crops

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Today’s “Take Home” Message

  • The unique partnership and associated demonstration

site is well positioned to answer some probing nitrogen related questions about timberland conversion and the long-term substantiality of a “highly input reduced” rotation;

  • Outcomes will help refine agricultural practices across

Minnesota’s irrigated acres;

  • Additional sites are highly recommended to accurately

reflect agricultural practices and rotations currently practiced across the Pineland Sands;