IPC Outcomes and Evaluation Emma Rowse and Laura Wheeler Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IPC Outcomes and Evaluation

Emma Rowse and Laura Wheeler

• Outcomes for the IPC programme
• Our evaluation partnership
• What and why – our outcomes framework
• How - data collection and evaluation process
• Tools and support
• What else…?

Overview

1. People with complex needs and their carers have better quality

• f life and can achieve the outcomes that are important to them

and their families through greater involvement in their care, and being able to design support around their needs and circumstances 1. Better integration and quality of care, including better user and family experience of care 2. Prevention of crises in people’s lives that lead to unplanned hospital and institutional care by keeping them well and supporting self-management – so ensuring better value for money

IPC Outcomes

SW IPC Evaluation

AHSN University of Plymouth SW Commissioning Support Unit Individual site skills and expertise NHS England evaluation team SW evaluation group

Our evaluation partnership

Kernow Integrated Car are Pio ioneer Programme:

• Living Well Pioneer programme

Som Somerset pr programmes:

• Vanguard South Somerset
• Test & Learn Sites in 3 Localities
• SPQS (Somerset Practice Quality Scheme)

Integrated Car are Ex Exeter (I (ICE) E)

• Defined population within Exeter

Wes estbank Nei eighbourhood Fr Friends:

• GP & acute led identification of those at

requiring additional support Nei eighbourhood Hea ealth Watch:

• Volunteer led

Sou South De Devon and and Torbay Integrated Car are Pio ioneer:

• Newton Abbott Frailty Hub
• Hele & Watcombe Family Hub

Integrated Per ersonal al Commissi sioning g (I (IPC):

• Regional Collaborative

Primary Car are Workforce Sus ustainability

• Mapping new models of care
• Sharing and learning repository
• Primary Care capacity - Pharmacy

Mul ultiple Prim ime Min inisters Ch Chal allenge Fun Fund ini initiatives Sou South Wes est Qu Quality Improvement and and Patient Sa Safety Col

• llaborative

Regi egion wid ide system in interoperability Pathway cos

• sting

Region wide, to model demand, provide linked data set for analysis and local service development

Regio ional l Socia ial l Investment Fun und pr proje

• ject

Bes est Practice res esearch pr projects Ind ndustry led led inn innovations

Improvement projects in SW

What – our outcomes framework

Agree which IPC cohort you are working with Identify 5-10 people to work with

Approach person to

• ffer IPC

conversation/phone/ letter

Define and document any sub- selection criteria

Pre-IPC Intervention

Offer declined and reason captured

Conversation with person completed:

• Care plan completed

with goals and action plan defined

• Consent form to share

information signed

• Baseline Wellbeing,

Experience and PAM data captured

• Informal carer

identified if appropriate

Identify budget/allocati

• n and agree

access method Identify budget/allocati

• n and agree

access method

Practitioner Experience baseline survey captured

Send Wellbeing, Experience and care plan baseline paperwork data for central inputting

Send Wellbeing, Experience and care plan baseline paperwork data for central inputting Send Wellbeing, Experience and care plan baseline paperwork data for central inputting IPC site lead liaise with partner data and IG leads to agree cost/activity data required, when and how data will be transferred

IPC site lead begins inputting data capture spreadsheet

IPC site lead agrees information sharing agreement and get all partners to sign

IPC site lead sends data capture sheet for central inputting

Get practitioners together for facilitated learning session and case study capture

CSU sends pseudonymissati

• n database to

each provider in a site with data specification

Site lead and team interviewed to capture learning and lessons

Experiential/Early evaluation from conversation captured at the learning event and practitioner case studies

IPC site lead sends data capture sheet for central inputting

3 month check

• n financial

impact

Data provider sends pseudonymised data by secure email to CSU CSU link pseudonymised data and send to AHSN and IPC finance lead for analysis

Review - 3 Months

Undertake PERSON'S 6 month:

• Care plan review
• Wellbeing
• Experience
• PAM
• Capture case

study

Undertake CARERS 6 month:

• Wellbeing
• Experience
• Capture case

study

Undertake 2nd Practitioners survey CSU sends pseudonymisation database to each provider in a site with data specification IPC site lead and team interviewed to cature learning and lessons Data provider sends pseudonymised data by secure email to CSU

CSU link pseudonymised data and send to AHSN and IPC finance lead for anaylsis

6 month/Intermediate Evaluation carried out by University of Plymouth analysing all data and providing regional report

Experiential/Ear ly evaluation from site interviews

6 month/Intermedi ate Evaluation carried out by University of Plymouth analysing all data and providing regional report

Send paperwork data for central inputting Send paperwork data for central inputting

6 month/Interm ediate Evaluation carried out by University of Plymouth analysing all data and providing regional report 6 month/Interm ediate Evaluation carried out by University of Plymouth analysing all data and providing regional report

Review - 6 Months

Send out Person's POET Questionnaire Send out Carers POET questionnaire Final 12 month evaluation carried out by University of Plymouth Final 12 month evalaution carried out by University of Plymouth

Key IPC site lead Operational practitioners Information/finance practitioners in site partner

• rganisations

IPC evaluation team

Review - 12 Months

• Outcomes framework
• Data collection process and checklist
• Information governance advice, toolkit and templates
• Measurement tools
• Site data collection sheets
• Financial analysis
• Secure data pseudonymisation and linkage
• Facilitating local conversations

Tools and support

• What do you need to do in your site to agree outcomes

and data collection processes?

• What information governance issues do you need to

address?

• What else can we do to support you on the ground?

Discussion