INVESTOR PRESENTATION December 2016 Parsley Energy Overview Premier - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
INVESTOR PRESENTATION December 2016 Parsley Energy Overview Premier - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
INVESTOR PRESENTATION December 2016 Parsley Energy Overview Premier Acreage Position (1) Poised to Outperform post-OPEC Parsley Energy Leasehold Faster production ramp Ongoing resource expansion Advantaged takeaway arrangements
Parsley Energy Overview
2
Market Snapshot Premier Acreage Position(1)
NYSE Symbol: PE Market Cap: $7,573 MM(2) Net Debt: $749 MM(1,3) Enterprise Value: $8,322 MM Share Count: 208 MM(4) Midland Basin Net Leasehold Acreage: 93,000(1) Delaware Basin Net Leasehold Acreage: 43,000(1) 3Q16 Production: 43.0 MBoe/d
(1) As of end 3Q16 pro forma for closing of Glasscock County acquisition on 10/4/2016; (2) Based on 12/6/2016 closing price; (3) Net debt calculated as $950 MM total debt less $201 MM cash and cash equivalents; (4) As of end 3Q16
- Faster production ramp
- Ongoing resource expansion
- Advantaged takeaway
arrangements
- S
trong financial profile
- Favorable cost positioning
Poised to Outperform post-OPEC
Parsley Energy Leasehold
10 20 30 40 50 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Peer 6 Peer 7 PE 3Q15-3Q16 Boe/d Added per $MM of Capex 3Q15-3Q16 Production Growth 9.2 14.0 15.3 18.2 18.9 22.2 21.6 25.2 29.1 35.7 43.0 10 20 30 40 50 3 6 9 12 15 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 Net Production (MBoe/d) Rig Count Vertical Rigs Horizontal Rigs Quarterly Net Production (MBoe/ d)
Sustained Production Momentum
3
- 3Q16 production up 20%
versus 2Q16
- In November, raised FY16 guidance for third
time this year, from 36.0-38.0 to 37.0– 39.0 MBoe/ d
- 17%
compound quarterly production growth rate over ten quarters as a public company(1)
- S
trong production contribution per dollar
(1) Parsley completed its initial public offering on May 29, 2014; (2) Peers include CPE, CXO, EGN, FANG, LPI, PXD and RSPP. Calculations for peers based on reported production for prior periods and Thomson Reuters consensus production estimates as of 10/31/2016 for 3Q16. Parsley data based on actuals for all periods. Production from reported acquisitions excluded from calculations based on estimated monthly decline of 3%
Production Momentum Capital Efficient Production Growth(2)
N/M N/M
- LOE per Boe down for the 6th consecutive
quarter
- Peer-leading operating costs driven by
continuous focus on infrastructure
- ptimization and buildout
- Favorable D&C trend despite rising
completion intensity
Ongoing Cost Compression
4 Midland Basin Drilling & Completion Costs ($MM)(2)
$4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 Peers PE
LOE vs. Peers ($/Boe)(1)
(1) Peers include CPE, CXO, EGN, FANG, LPI, PXD, and RSPP. Source: company SEC filings; (2) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral
$7.0 $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.2 $4.8 $4.7 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 $4.15
Differentiated Wolfcamp Thickness Supports Resource Expansion
5 Wolfcamp A&B Gross Thickness
Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B
- Added 550 gross / 450 net drilling locations in second
(upper) Wolfcamp B interval
- Estimated NPV of $3-5 MM per location(1)
- Additional target interval enabled by high-quality
Wolfcamp, which thickens significantly in and through Parsley acreage in Upton and Reagan Counties
- 800’ -900’ Wolfcamp A/ B complex is thickest in deep
portion of the basin
N
80%
- f WC A&B
Invent ory 500’ 900’ A’ A
<500’ 500-700’ >700’
Central Basin Platform Glasscock Nose
A’ A
REAGAN UPTON GLAS S COCK MIDLAND HOWARD MARTIN 1
Parsley Leasehold
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Midland Basin Wolfcamp B Inventory
200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1 WC B Target Zone (Prior) 2 WC B Target Zones (Current) Gross Horizontal Locations +85%
(1) Estimated present value is pre-tax and unhedged; NPV range based on productivity range of 800 MBoe to 1 MMBoe EUR for 7,000’ stimulated lateral scaled proportionately to average stimulated lateral length of 6,400’; Further assumes—D&C cost: $4.4 million; Oil price: $50 per barrel; Natural gas price: $3 per mcf; NGL price: $20 per barrel; working interest: 82%; net revenue interest: 62%; LOE: $7,500 per month fixed, $2.00 per barrel of oil variable; discount rate: 10% Big Lake Fault
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 90 180 270 360 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1) Days of Production Lower WC B Upper WC B
Two Strong Wolfcamp B Targets Across Acreage
- S
tandalone Upper Wolfcamp B locations have
- utperformed the 1 MMBoe type curve by 9%
at 360-day mark
- Outperformance is 17%
when excluding wells drilled prior to June 1, 2015
- Aerially-broad dataset indicates breadth of Upper B
quality across acreage
6
(1) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime; (2) Two Upper WC B wells in southeast Reagan County not shown on map Parsley Leasehold PE Upper WC B Wells(2) PE Lower WC B Wells
10 20 30 40 10 20 30 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1) Days of Production
1 MMBoe Type Curve
Promising Results from First 3-Well Stacked Pad
- S
t rong result s from first set of simult aneously complet ed, st acked wells in t he Wolfcamp A, Upper Wolfcamp B, and Lower Wolfcamp B int ervals
- Upper WC B lat eral regist ered company’s
second highest peak 24-hour IP at 2,420 Boe/ d
- 3-well average t racking ahead of 1 MMBoe t ype
curve
- 1.5-mile lat erals complet ed wit h st andard frac design
- Locat ed in t he middle of Upt on and Reagan acreage
posit ions 7 Upper WC B Well Records 2nd Highest Company 24-Hr IP
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Bast 34-39- 4412H (Lower WCB) Grace 45-1- 4306H (Upper WCB) Robbie 17-8- 4403H (Lower WCB) Atkins 14-11- 4202H (Wolfcamp A) Dallas Keuchel 4301H (Upper WCB)
Peak 24-Hr IP (Boe/d)(1)
Parsley Leasehold Grace 3-well Pad
Grace 3-Well Stack Pad Tracking 1 MMBoe Type Curve
(1) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime
Significant Resource Expansion Potential
8
- 800’ -900’ gross thickness in Wolfcamp A&B affords 600’ -700’ between top and bottom targets, each with 200’ -
250’ vertical separation
- Wolfcamp A may support a second landing zone given thickness across acreage, amounting to four total potential
landing zones in Wolfcamp A&B
- Tests in 2017 will assess multiple Wolfcamp A targets on a standalone and combined basis
- Lateral spacing tests on schedule for 2017
- Up to 60 potential Wolfcamp A and B locations per section with fourth target and downspacing
- Approx. 600-700 ft
Current Inventory S pacing 660’ Downspaced 330’
Grace A-UB-LB Stack Test (Online) UB-LB Stack & Downspace Test (2017)
1-Mile Gun Barrel
A-UB-LB Stack & Stagger Test (4Q16)
Note: Spacing tests will be on different leases
UA-LA Stagger Test (2017)
Current Inventory per Section Potential Inventory per Section
Upper Wolfcamp A
- 15
Lower Wolfcamp A 8 15 Upper Wolfcamp B 8 15 Lower Wolfcamp B 8 15 Total 24 60
Current Inventory Inventory Upside
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 Rate of Return (% ) Oil Price
Positioned for Leading Growth
9 Increasing Stimulated Lateral Lengths
- S
ufficient inventory depth, acreage footprint, and
- perational capacity to increase rig count
- Robust return profile across commodity price
spectrum
- Rising capital efficiency through longer laterals
- S
teeper growth and enhanced returns through high average working interest and net revenue interest
- S
calable takeaway arrangements
- Inventory upside through multi-zone expansion and
downspacing
Projected Wolfcamp NPV(1)
6,432 ~7,000 ~8,000 2015 Actual 2016 Guidance 2017 Target
- Avg. Stimulated Lateral Length (Ft.)
Projected Wolfcamp Returns(1)
S t rip Prices $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 NPV ($MM) Oil Price
(1) NYMEX WTI and Henry Hub strip prices as of 12/2/2016; NGL price: 40% of WTI; $3/Mcf gas for flat pricing scenarios; Midland Basin: based on 1 MMBoe EUR type curve for 7,000’ stimulated lateral; $4.7MM D&C; 100% WI, 75% NRI; $7,500/month fixed LOE; $2.00/BO variable LOE; Southern Delaware: based on NSAI ~880 MBoe EUR type curve for 7,000’ stimulated lateral; $6.1MM D&C; 100% WI; $7,500/month fixed LOE; $2.00/BO variable LOE; Estimated ROR and NPV are pre-tax and unhedged
S t rip Prices
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 90 180 270 360 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(2) Days of Production Midland Basin
- S. Delaware
(1) Number of wells achieving a 30-day IP in 3Q16; (2) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime
Strong Productivity Across Asset Base
10
- New and exist ing wells cont inue t o out perform 1 MMBoe
t ype curve in Midland and S
- ut hern Delaware Basins
- S
t rengt hening early rat es on Midland Basin wells:
- 3Q16: 176 Boe/ d (30-day IP per 1,000’ )
- 2Q16: 171 Boe/ d (30-day IP per 1,000’ )
Midland Delaware Wells(1) 24 2 Average Lateral Length 6,644’ 7,800’ 30-day IP (Boe/d) 1,159 1,517 30-day IP per 1000’ (Boe/d) 176 194 % Oil 73% 75%
3Q16 Well Summary
Parsley Energy Leasehold Parsley Producing Wolfcamp Wells
11
Design Modifications Boosting Midland Basin Well Results
Dusek 45-4-2807H: 2-Mile Lower Spraberry
- Producing 800+ Bo/ d aft er ~90 days wit h a flat product ion
profile
- Out performing init ial 1-mile S
praberry well on absolut e and lengt h-normalized basis
- Daily rat e nearly four t imes higher at t he 90-day
mark
- Larger frac size and casing diameter enabling productivity
uplift
(1) 3-stream normalized for downtime; (2) Analogue set includes 2-mile wells within 3-mile radius completed in correlative Wolfcamp interval since April 1, 2015
Kathryn 43-42-4401H: High Proppant-Loading Frac
- Out performing analogue wells by 8%
- n average aft er
90 days
- Employed 40%
higher sand loading and fluid volumes t han st andard frac design
250 500 750 1,000 1,250 30 60 90 120 Daily Production (Boe/d)(1) Days of Production Dusek 45-4-2807H (2-mile) Skaggs 8-2808H (1-mile)
Positive Trend for 2-mile Spraberry Lateral
20 40 60 80 100 120 30 60 90 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1) Days of Production Kathryn 43-42-4401H Analogue Set
High-Proppant Well Exceeding Analogues(2)
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 30 60 90 120 150 180 Daily Rate (Boe/d)(1) Days on Production Trees State 65-64-4307H Trees State 65-36-4307H 1st Well: Trees State 16-1H
Impressive New Wells in Southern Delaware Basin
12
- Evolving drilling and complet ion design boost ing
product ivit y relat ive t o st rong init ial wells
- West: First Parsley-drilled lateral in Reeves Count y,
Lincoln 4-1-4307H, geost eered in preferred t arget zone
- East: First pad wells pumped 60%
more sand; st ill flowing at impressive rat es
East: First 2-well Pad Benefiting from Larger Frac
- Avg. Length: 7,800’
- Avg. Peak 30-day IP: 1,517 Boe/d
- Avg. Oil Cut: 75%
(1) Normalized for downtime
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 10 20 30 40 50 Daily Rate (Boe/d)(1) Days on Production Lincoln 4-1-4307H 1st Well: Ranger C4-7-4309H
West: First Parsley-Drilled Lateral Eclipsed 2,000 Boe/d
Length: 6,890’ Peak 30-day IP: N/A Oil Cut: 65%
Put on ES P
WEST EAST
Parsley Energy Leasehold New Parsley Wells Prior Parsley Wells
$900 $550 $400 200 400 600 800 1,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 ($MM) Borrowing Base Senior Notes
Liquidity Summary ($MM) First lien credit facility $600 Cash on hand $201 Total liquidity $801
- Entered new revolving credit agreement that
increases borrowing base from $475 MM to $900 MM, with elected commitment of $600 MM
- $801 MM of liquidity
- Favorable maturity schedule, with earliest notes
maturity in 2022
Strong Financial Position(1)
13
Borrowing Base Increase
(1) All data as of end 3Q16 pro forma for closing of Glasscock County acquisition on October 4, 2016 and lender commitments under the Company’s new credit facility
Favorable Debt Maturity Schedule
$475 $600 $900 200 400 600 800 1,000 Prior Current ($MM) Borrowing Base 89% Increase Commit t ed Amount Full Amount
Substantial Hedge Position
14
- Well-hedged for next several quart ers
- S
t ruct ure of oil hedges ret ains full upside exposure t o higher oil prices
- Ext ended posit ion int o 2Q18
Hedge position as of 12/6/2016; (1) When NYMEX price is above put price, Parsley receives the NYMEX price. When NYMEX price is between the put price and the short put price, Parsley receives the put price. When NYMEX price is below the short put price, Parsley receives the NYMEX price plus the difference between the short put price and the put price; (2) Premium realizations represent net premiums collected (from restructured positions) or paid (including deferred premiums), which are recognized as income or loss in the period of settlement; (3) Functions similarly to put spreads except that when index price is at or above the call price, Parsley receives the call price
2016 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 OIL: Put Spreads (MBbls/ d)
(1)
23.5 20.5 20.2 35.7 45.5 23.3 6.6 Put Price ($/ Bbl) $45.03 $45.88 $45.88 $52.79 $53.11 $53.21 $52.50 Short Put Price ($/ Bbl) $32.78 $34.14 $34.14 $41.21 $41.40 $41.43 $42.50 Premium Realizat ion ($ MM)
(2)
$5.6 ($4.9) ($4.9) ($14.2) ($17.8) ($9.5) ($2.3) Mid-Cush Basis Swaps (MBbls/ d) 8.2 11.3 11.3 12.2 12.2
- Swap Price ($/ Bbl)
($0.87) ($1.00) ($1.00) ($1.05) ($1.05) NATURAL GAS: Three Way Collars (MMBt u/ d)
(3)
- 15.8
15.7 15.5 15.5 Call Price ($/ MMBt u)
- $4.02
$4.02 $4.02 $4.02 Put Price ($/ MMBt u)
- $2.75
$2.75 $2.75 $2.75 Short Put Price ($/ MMBt u)
- $2.36
$2.36 $2.36 $2.36 2017 2018
$0 $15 $30 $45 $60 $75 10 20 30 40 50 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 WTI ($/Bbl) MBbls/d MBbls/d Hedged Weighted Average Long Put Price
2016 Guidance
15
Unit Costs LOE ($/Boe) $4.50 - $5.25 $4.25 - $4.75 Cash G&A ($/Boe) $4.50 - $5.00 $5.00 - $5.50 Production & Ad Valorem Taxes (%
- f Revenue)
6.5%
- 7.5%
6.5%
- 7.5%
Capital Program Drilling & Completion ($MM) $395 - $435 $395 - $435 Infrastructure & Other ($MM) $65 - $75 $65 - $75 Total Development Expenditures ($MM) $460 - $510 $460 - $510 Activity Gross Horizontal Completions Midland Basin Delaware Basin Average Lateral Length 80 – 90 75 - 83 5 - 7 ~7,000’ 80 – 90 75 - 83 5 - 7 ~7,000’ Gross Vertical Completions Average Working Interest 3 – 6 85 – 95% 3 – 6 85 – 95% Production Production (MBoe/d) % Oil Previous 36.0 – 38.0 65 – 70% Updated 11/2/16 37.0 – 39.0 65 – 70%
Oil as %
- f Total Production
58% 63% 65% 66% 67% 65% - 70% 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 FY16E
- In November, raised FY16 production
guidance to 37.0-39.0 MBoe/ d
- Lowered FY16 LOE per Boe guidance to
$4.25-$4.75
- Ongoing increase in oil as a percent of
total production supports margin expansion
- $801 MM of liquidity(3)
- Substantial hedge position in place
Investment Highlights
16
(1) See slide 9 for associated assumptions; (2) Adjusted for estimated PDP value but not for acquired wells in various stages of drilling and completion; (3) As of end 3Q16 pro forma for closing
- f Glasscock County acquisition on October 4, 2016 and lender commitments under the Company’s new credit facility
- Expect 72%
year-over-year production growth based on midpoint of updated 2016 guidance
- 17%
compound quarterly production growth rate over ten quarters as a public company
- Wolfcamp wells generate ROR of ~65%
- 90%
and NPV of ~$7 MM-$12 MM at strip prices(1)
- Growing horizontal production base drives higher oil percentage and lower operating costs per Boe
- Acquired ~42,000 net leasehold acres for ~$17,000 per acre(2) year to date
- Acquired mineral rights in S. Delaware Basin boost Parsley’s average NRI to 92.5%
- n affected acreage
- Potential for up to 60 Wolfcamp A and Wolfcamp B locations per section on portions of Midland Basin
acreage
- Scratching the surface of significant resource potential in the Southern Delaware Basin
Abundant Upside Strategic Acquirer Leading Growth Profile World-class Returns Strong Financial Position
Investment Highlights
17
APPENDIX
Growing, High-quality Drilling Inventory
18 Horizontal Drilling Inventory(1)
+240’
- Added 550 Wolfcamp B locations in the Midland Basin
- Ample running room with nearly 1,800 Midland Basin
Wolfcamp A and Wolfcamp B drilling locations
- Inventory upside from substantial downspacing
potential in the Midland Basin relative to current spacing assumptions
- More than 500 Wolfcamp locations in the S
- uthern
Delaware Basin with a low royalty burden of 16%
- n
average
- High average working interest across horizontal
inventory supports rapid growth potential
Gross Net Wells per Section Midland Basin Middle Spraberry 90 70 5 Lower Spraberry 380 280 8 Wolfcamp A 580 470 8 Wolfcamp B 1,200 990 8 (per target zone) Wolfcamp C 700 580 8 Cline 740 590 8 Atoka 580 460 6 Delaware Basin 2nd Bone Spring 140 130 4 3rd Bone Spring 140 130 4 Wolfcamp 570 540 8 (per target zone) Horizontal Total 5,120 4,240
- (1) As of end 3Q16 pro forma for closing of Glasscock County acquisition on October 4, 2016. Well counts rounded to the nearest ten
~$390 MM acquisition closed on October 4, 2016 includes:
- ~9,000 mostly contiguous net leasehold acres in
Glasscock County accommodating long-lateral development
- 300 gross horizontal drilling locations in primary
target intervals (Lower S praberry, Wolfcamp A, and Wolfcamp B)
- Mineral and overriding royalty interests translating
to ~5% average increase in net revenue interest (“ NRI” )
- Estimated net production of 270 Boe/ d at
acquisition announcement on August 15, 2016
- 5 saltwater disposal wells
Strategic Glasscock County Acquisition
19
Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquisition Acreage
Midland Basin
GLASSCOCK REAGAN UPTON MIDLAND MARTIN HOWARD
Midland Basin
Big Lake Fault
Favorable Reservoir Attributes
20 Overlapping Sweet Spot Wolfcamp Thickness Geothermal Gradient
Degrees Fahrenheit per 1000’ Depth
Temperature Sweet Spot Thickness Sweet Spot
Degrees Fahrenheit per 1,000’ Depth
Wolfcamp Drill Depth
Drill Depth Sweet Spot
Parsley acreage in Wolfcamp sweet spot:
- Ample thickness, with
differentiated multi- target potential in Upton and Reagan Counties
- S
ufficient depth to drive strong, pressure- fueled recovery rates
- Favorable thermal
maturity for high oil content
Prepared for Southern Delaware Rig Ramp
Marketing
- Ample options for immediate gas
and oil takeaway with nearby Waha Gas Hub and high-capacity oil transmission lines Infrastructure
- Initial water supply and disposal in
place with buildout ongoing
- Existing processing and
transmission infrastructure provides electricity hubs from which to build out power grid Surface Ownership
- Estimate at least $200 M per-well
savings on water sourcing and disposal
- Additional savings on pads,
batteries, roads, rights-of-way, and
- ther surface damages
21
60 MMcf/ d Gas Plant 200 MMcf/ d Gas Plant 150 MBo/ d Oil Transfer Line 60 MMcf/ d Gas Plant (expect ed by YE16) 120 MMcf/ d Gas Plant (Waha Hub) 160 MBo/ d Oil Transfer Line
Selected Operating Data – 3Q16
22
(1) Average prices shown in the table include transportation and gathering costs and reflect prices both before and after the effects of the Company’s realized commodity hedging transactions. The Company’s calculation of such effects includes both realized gains and losses on cash settlements for commodity derivative transactions and premiums paid or received on options that settled during the period
September 30, June 30, September 30, 2016 2016 2015 Net production volumes: Oil (MBbls) 2,669 2,157 1,153 Natural gas (MMcf) 3,553 3,154 2,628 Natural gas liquids (MBoe) 695 566 393 Total (MBoe) 3,956 3,249 1,984 Average net daily production (Boe/d) 43,000 35,703 21,565 Average sales prices(1): Oil, without realized derivatives (per Bbl) 42.23 $ 42.25 $ 44.81 $ Oil, with realized derivatives (per Bbl) 46.19 $ 47.49 $ 59.81 $ Natural gas, without realized derivatives (per Mcf) 2.38 $ 1.85 $ 2.69 $ Natural gas, with realized derivatives (per Mcf) 2.38 $ 1.85 $ 2.86 $ NGLs (per Bbl) 15.50 $ 16.51 $ 14.01 $ Total, without realized derivatives (per Boe) 33.35 $ 32.72 $ 32.38 $ Total, with realized derivatives (per Boe) 36.03 $ 36.20 $ 41.32 $ Average costs (per Boe): Lease operating expenses 4.15 $ 4.37 $ 7.63 $ Production and ad valorem taxes 2.12 $ 1.97 $ 1.75 $ Depreciation, depletion and amortization 16.62 $ 17.23 $ 23.23 $ General and administrative expenses (including stock-based compensation) 6.24 $ 5.33 $ 7.92 $ General and administrative expenses (cash based) 5.40 $ 4.28 $ 6.86 $ Parsley Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries Selected Operating Data (Unaudited) Three Months Ended
Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements
Forward-Looking Statements The information in this present ation includes “ forward-looking statements” that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private S ecurities Lit igation Reform Act of 1995. All statements,
- ther than st atements of historical fact included in t his presentation, regarding our strategy, future operat ions, financial posit ion, est imated revenues and losses, proj ected costs, prospects, plans and
- bj ectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentat ion, the words “ could,” “ believe,” “ anticipate,” “ intend,” “ est imate,” “ expect,” “ proj ect” and similar expressions
are int ended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such ident ifying words. These forward-looking statements are based on Parsley Energy, Inc.’ s (“ Parsley Energy,” “ Parsley,” or the “ Company” ) current expect ations and assumptions about fut ure event s and are based on currently available information as to t he outcome and t iming of future
- events. We caut ion you that these forward-looking statements are subj ect to all of t he risks and uncertaint ies, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, incident to
the exploration for and development, product ion, gathering and sale of oil and natural gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodit y price volatility, inflation, lack of availability of drilling and product ion equipment and services, environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating reserves and in proj ecting future rat es of production, the product ion potent ial of our undeveloped acreage, cash flow and access to capit al, the t iming of development expenditures and the risk factors discussed in or referenced in our filings with the United S tates S ecurities and Exchange Commission (“ S EC” ), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentat ion. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. Our production forecasts and expect ations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and the undertaking and outcome
- f future drilling activity, which may be affected by significant commodity price declines or cost increases.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures Adj usted EBITDAX and adj usted net income or loss are financial measures that are not presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in t he United S t ates (“ GAAP” ). Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures can be found in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in t he appendix t o t his present at ion. Industry and Market Data This presentat ion has been prepared by Parsley and includes market data and other st atist ical information from third-party sources, including independent industry publicat ions, government publicat ions
- r other published independent sources. Although Parsley believes these third-party sources are reliable as of t heir respect ive dates, Parsley has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness
- f this information. S
- me data are also based on the Parsley’ s good faith estimates, which are derived from its review of internal sources as well as the third-party sources described above.
Oil & Gas Reserves Parsley’ s proved reserves are t hose quant it ies of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be est imated wit h reasonable certainty to be economically producible— from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under exist ing economic condit ions (using unweighted average 12-month first day of the month prices), operat ing methods, and government regulations— prior to t he t ime at which contracts providing the right to operat e expire, unless evidence indicat es that renewal is reasonably cert ain, regardless of whether det erminist ic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. Proved reserves attributable to Parsley as of 12/ 31/ 15 are est imated ut ilizing S EC reserve recognition standards and pricing assumptions based on S EC pricing of $46.79 / Bbl crude, $2.501 / MMBtu gas, and adj usted realized pricing of $46.54 / Bbl crude, $16.42 / Bbl NGL, and $2.531 / Mcf residue gas. References to our est imated proved reserves as of 12/ 31/ 15 are derived from our proved reserve report prepared by Netherland, S ewell & Associates, Inc. (“ NS AI” ). We may use the term “ expected ult imate recoveries” (“ EURs” ) or other descript ions of volumes of reserves, which terms include quant it ies of oil and gas that may not meet the S EC’ s definit ions of proved, probable and possible reserves, and which the S EC's guidelines strictly prohibit Parsley from including in filings with the S EC. Unless otherwise stat ed in this presentat ion, such est imates have been prepared internally by our engineers and management without review by independent engineers. These est imates are by their nature more speculat ive than estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves and accordingly are subj ect to substant ially greater risk of being act ually realized, part icularly in areas or zones where there has been limited or no drilling history. We include these estimates to demonstrate what we believe to be the potential for future drilling and production by the Company. Actual locations drilled and quant it ies that may be ult imately recovered from our properties will differ substant ially. In addition, we have made no commitment to drill all of the drilling locations. Ultimate recoveries will be dependent upon numerous factors including actual encountered geological conditions, t he impact of future oil and gas pricing, exploration and development costs, and our fut ure drilling decisions and budgets based upon our future evaluation of risk, returns and t he availability of capital and, in many areas, t he outcome of negotiation of drilling arrangements with holders of adj acent or fractional int erest leases. Our estimates may change significantly as development of our properties provides additional data and t herefore act ual quant it ies t hat may ultimately be recovered will likely differ from these est imates. Our related expectat ions for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including est imates of production decline rates from existing wells, the undert aking and outcome of future drilling act ivit y and act ivity that may be affected by significant commodity price declines or drilling cost increases. Unless otherwise noted, Net Present Value (“ NPV” ) estimates are before taxes and assume the Company generated EUR and decline curve estimates based on Company drilling and completion cost estimates that do not include facilities, land, seismic, general and administrative (“ G&A” ) or other corporate level costs.