introduction winx tm opt device
play

Introduction Winx TM (OPT) Device OPT has been shown to effectively - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2/15/2014 Oral Pressure Therapy for OSA Oral Pressure Therapy for OSA - Disclosures Richard J. Schwab, M.D. NIH grants - RO1/PPG (Obesity and OSA) Professor of Medicine Division of Sleep Medicine Consultant: Pulmonary, Allergy and


  1. 2/15/2014 Oral Pressure Therapy for OSA Oral Pressure Therapy for OSA - Disclosures Richard J. Schwab, M.D. • NIH grants - RO1/PPG (Obesity and OSA) Professor of Medicine Division of Sleep Medicine • Consultant: Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division • Apnicure - Winx TM device University of Pennsylvania Medical Center • Foramis Medical Group Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Introduction Winx TM (OPT) Device • OPT has been shown to effectively treat sleep • A novel oral pressure therapy (OPT) system (Winx TM , apnea in about 40% of patients (Colrain IM et al. ApniCure, Inc.) provides negative pressure to the oral cavity Sleep Medicine 14; 830–837, 2013) Console Mouth Piece 1

  2. 2/15/2014 AHI by Severity: Analysis Cohort (n=63) AHI and ODI: Responder Cohort (n=26) Examining the Mechanism of Action of a New Device Study Objectives and Design Using Oral Pressure Therapy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea • Objective of the study was to explore the Schwab et al, submitted to sleep (conditionally mechanism of action of the OPT (oral pressure therapy) device accepted) • Case series study of 15 responders (13 men, 2 Winx TM Device women) and 4 nonresponders (3 men) with sleep apnea. In the responders the mean AHI was 38.5 ± 23.3 events/hour before the OPT device was applied and was reduced to 6.7 ± 5.0 events/hour with the OPT device • All subjects underwent a MRI to examine the biomechanical changes associated with the OPT device 2

  3. 2/15/2014 Demographic Information for OPT Subjects Hypotheses With the application of oral pressure therapy Responders Non-Responders Characteristic p* (n=15) (n=4) (OPT): • Mean, minimum and maximum airway area in Age, mean ± SD 58.1 ± 7.7 48.0 ± 8.2 0.1133 the retropalatal region would increase BMI, mean ± SD 30.9 ± 4.0 32.9 ± 3.6 0.2621 • Retropalatal anterior-posterior and lateral airway dimensions would increase Male, N (%) 13 (87%) 3 (75%) 0.5304 • Retroglossal airway dimensions would not AHI at Baseline, mean ± SD 38.5 ± 23.3 24.3 ± 19.4 0.2208 change AHI on Device, mean ± SD 6.7 ± 5.0 27.9 ± 24.0 0.0093 • 3-dimensional centroid of the soft palate and AHI Change, mean ± SD -31.9 ± 20.2 3.6 ± 14.9 0.0059 anterior segment of the tongue would move anteriorly and superiorly *p-value from Fisher’s exact test (for categorical variable) or Wilcoxon two-sample exact test (for continuous variables) comparing responders and non-responders Methods: OPT Application 3D Image Analysis Magnetic Resonance Imaging (1.5T) BASELINE WITH OPT � During wakefulness and supine Baseline Device, No Suction Device @ 20 inches H 2 O 3

  4. 2/15/2014 Airway Percent Changes the Retropalatal Results - Retropalatal Airway Change with OPT Region for OPT Device Responders Percent Change BASELINE WITH OPT Baseline vs. OPT 0 * OPT 0 vs. OPT 20 † Baseline vs. OPT 20 * Measure Mean ± SD p‡ Mean ± SD p‡ Mean ± SD p‡ Average Retropalatal Airway Area 23.46 ± 51.81 0.1040 31.7 ± 37.98 0.0067 56.48 ± 65.63 0.0023 Per Slice (mm 2 ) Retropalatal Maximum A/P Distance -2.20 ± 15.13 0.5417 7.69 ± 8.34 0.0081 7.4 ± 17.23 0.0419 (mm) Retropalatal Maximum Cross- 8.30 ± 29.34 0.2958 66.84 ± 71.02 0.0001 78.31 ± 94.31 0.0002 Sectional Area (mm 2 ) Retropalatal Maximum Lateral 3.28 ± 16.58 0.5879 7.59 ± 12.22 0.0574 10.81 ± 16.39 0.0295 Distance (mm) Retropalatal Minimum A/P Distance 2.16 ± 41.47 0.4143 16.11 ± 29.64 0.0681 17.48 ± 63.51 0.3910 (mm) Retropalatal Minimum Cross- % Change Between Baseline and Device with 20 inches H 2 O 5.87 ± 38.60 0.9515 51.96 ± 74.78 0.0085 60.93 ± 88.64 0.0419 Sectional Area (mm 2 ) Minimum Airway Area: 116% Improvement (69 mm 2 Baseline | 149.3 mm 2 Device) Retropalatal Minimum Lateral -2.00 ± 15.08 0.6848 11.65 ± 16.53 0.0215 6.64 ± 10.89 0.0419 Maximum Airway Area: 20% Improvement (290.8 mm 2 Baseline | 347.9 mm 2 Device) Distance (mm) Yellow lines indicate minimum retropalatal airway (lateral dimension) at baseline *Change calculated with respect to baseline; †Change calculated with respect to OPT 0 ; ‡p- value from non-parametric signed rank test Airway Percent Changes the Retroglossal Airway Percent Changes the Retropalatal Region for OPT Device Responders and Non-Responders Region for OPT Device Responders Percent Change Baseline vs. OPT 0 * OPT 0 vs. OPT 20 † Baseline vs. OPT 20 * Percent Change Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Baseline vs. OPT 0 * OPT 0 vs. OPT 20 † Baseline vs. OPT 20 * Measure p‡ p‡ p‡ Non- Non- Non- Responder Responder Responder Measure Responder Responder Responder Mean ± SD p‡ Mean ± SD p‡ Mean ± SD p‡ Average Airway Area -1.28 ± 56.48 ± -1.24 ± 23.46 ± 51.81 0.05 ± 0.83 0.2327 31.70 ± 37.98 0.0614 0.0078 Average Retroglossal Airway Area Per Per Slice (mm 2 ) 0.87 65.63 0.22 -20.08 ± 28.71 0.0203 -17.68 ± 23.91 0.0203 -36.53 ± 19.15 0.0001 Slice (mm 2 ) Maximum A/P -6.17 ± 7.40 ± -4.12 ± -2.20 ± 15.13 2.15 ± 2.42 0.4118 7.69 ± 8.34 0.0059 0.1013 Retroglossal Maximum A/P Distance Distance (mm) 5.62 17.23 6.88 -19.66 ± 13.85 0.0006 2.65 ± 14.95 0.4973 -18.23 ± 14.27 0.0009 (mm) Maximum Cross- -0.86 ± -1.07 ± 78.31 ± -1.91 ± 8.30 ± 29.34 0.3275 66.84 ± 71.02 0.0007 0.0078 Retroglossal Maximum Cross- Sectional Area (mm 2 ) 1.91 2.14 94.31 3.06 -9.48 ± 27.78 0.1937 -14.03 ± 29.70 0.1189 -25.83 ± 20.54 0.0004 Sectional Area (mm 2 ) Maximum Lateral -1.12 ± 10.81 ± 0.88 ± 3.28 ± 16.58 2.21 ± 5.29 0.8706 7.59 ± 12.22 0.2454 0.0464 Distance (mm ) Retroglossal Maximum Lateral 5.00 16.39 1.93 -0.35 ± 18.59 >0.999 -13.92 ± 21.07 0.0419 -13.36 ± 25.03 0.0353 Distance (mm) Minimum A/P -2.86 ± 17.48 ± -1.64 ± 2.16 ± 41.47 1.38 ± 5.77 0.4773 16.11 ± 29.64 0.0597 0.3275 Retroglossal Minimum A/P Distance Distance (mm) 3.04 63.51 2.96 -30.46 ± 16.17 0.0002 5.76 ± 24.07 0.6257 -26.76 ± 22.50 0.0031 (mm) Minimum Cross- -1.05 ± -3.53 ± 60.93 ± -4.61 ± 5.87 ± 38.60 0.7980 51.96 ± 74.78 0.0346 0.1575 Sectional Area (mm 2 ) Retroglossal Minimum Cross- 2.16 5.00 88.64 3.61 -30.93 ± 32.95 0.0052 -9.23 ± 32.70 0.3575 -44.85 ± 21.17 0.0001 Sectional Area (mm 2 ) Minimum Lateral -1.1 ± 6.64 ± 2.93 ± -2.00 ± 15.08 0.9563 11.65 ± 16.53 4.42 ± 6.80 0.3504 0.3817 Distance (mm) 10.15 10.89 7.85 Retroglossal Minimum Lateral -18.8 ± 30.77 0.0295 -6.19 ± 55.73 0.1189 -33.86 ± 24.46 0.0002 Distance (MM) *Change calculated with respect to baseline; †Change calculated with respect to OPT 0 ; ‡p-value *Change calculated with respect to baseline; †Change calculated with respect to OPT 0 ; ‡p-value from non-parametric Wilcoxon two-sample exact test, comparing changes in responders vs. non- from non-parametric signed rank test responders 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend