Introduction to Radar Based Nowcasting WOO Wang-chun Forecast - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

introduction to radar based nowcasting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Introduction to Radar Based Nowcasting WOO Wang-chun Forecast - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction to Radar Based Nowcasting WOO Wang-chun Forecast Development Division, Hong Kong Observatory E-mail: wcwoo@hko.gov.hk 26 July 2016 WMO WWRP 4th International Symposium on Nowcasting and Very-short-range Forecast 2016 (WSN16) What


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction to Radar Based Nowcasting

WOO Wang-chun

Forecast Development Division, Hong Kong Observatory

E-mail: wcwoo@hko.gov.hk 26 July 2016 WMO WWRP 4th International Symposium on Nowcasting and Very-short-range Forecast 2016 (WSN16)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What We Need...

Actual

Quantitative Precipitation Estimate (QPE)

Forecast

Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (QPF)

Severe Weather

Lightning, Gust, Hail

Services

Forecasts & Warnings

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Actual (QPE) Products

Regional Rainfall Map

  • n GIS for Forecasters

Local Rainfall Map for the Public Local Rainfall Map for Forecasters

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Forecast (QPF) Products

For Forecasters For Public For Public

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Severe Weather Products

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Services

For Internal Customer (Forecasters)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Services

For Public

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Scale matters …

slide-9
SLIDE 9

WEATHER W WARNINGS GS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Radar-based vs NWP-based

Rad Radar ar-base ased

  • Basically Image Processing

– Correlation-based – Optical flow – Convolutional LSTM

  • Good for first few hours
  • Skills deteriorates rapidly

afterwards

NWP-base ased

  • Based on Primitive Equations
  • Not so good for first few hours

due to spin-up problem

  • More skillful than Radar-based

afterwards

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Rain Gauge vs Radar vs Satellite

Accuracy Rain Gauge Radar Satellite Best Moderate Worst Spatial Resolution Discrete Continuous, up to 200 m Continuous, up to 500 m Type In-situ Remote Sensing Remote Sensing Spatial Coverage At point only Regional, effective up to 256 km (radius) Half the Globe (geostationery) Cost Cheap as single unit Expensive as network Expensive to operate Expensive to launch Cheap to use

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SWIRLS – HKO Rainstorm Nowcasting System

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SWIRLS –

Shor

  • rt-range

ge War arni ning o

  • f Int

ntense se Rai ainst nstorm i in n Local alized Systems

  • ACTUAL

:- Quant ntitative precip ipita tation e estim timatio ion ( (QPE)

– rada dar-bas ased, d, rai ainga gauge ge-base sed and b blending w with th s satellite cloud images

  • TREND :

:- Retrie ieval l of echo m motio tion

– tracki cking by by max aximum cor

  • rrelation (TR

TREC) – tracki cking by by opt

  • ptica

cal flow –

  • bj
  • bject

ct-or

  • riented tracking of s

storm motion

  • n
  • FOR

OREC ECAST : :- semi-Lag agran angian an ad advecti tion t to extrapolate r rad adar ar r reflecti ctivity u ty up to

  • 6

6 / 9 9 hour

  • urs
  • OUT

UTPUTS : S :- computa tatio ion of gridde dded p d precipi pitation no nowcas cast (QPF) and and l loca cati tions of stor

  • rm
  • bjects

cts o

  • n

n convectiv ctive w wind g gust, t, lightn tnin ing and and hail, suppor

  • rt to

to decision m

  • n making

ng

  • UN

UNCERTAINTY : :- probabilistic Q c QPF a and b blend nding ng wi with c h conv nvection

  • n-pe

permitting N g NWP WP model

  • PR

PRODUCTS : S :- now

  • wcasting pr

prod

  • ducts f

for i internal us users a and p pub ublic

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Schematic diagram showing the

calibration of radar reflectivity using real-time raingauge measurement.

  • Z-R relation for converting

reflectivity to rainfall rate

  • Gridded rainfall analysis

computed by Barnes successive correction or more advanced co- kriging algorithm

QPE – Rainfall Calibration Module

b

aR Z =

dBZi =b dBGi + 10log(a)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Barnes Analysis

  • grid-point analysis by Barnes method

– interpolation with Gaussian weighting according to distance between data & estimation point – consider correction using residuals and grouping of rainguages B G G G G G G h

B : barnes estimation (mm) L : radius of influence N0 : number of gauge report Gi : i-th gauge report (mm) wi : weight of i-th gauge hi : distance between gauge and estimation point

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Co-kriging Analysis

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

G Gi

i

h h

K(x K(x0

0)

)

G Gi

i

G Gi

i

G Gi

i

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

R R

j j

G Gi

i

h h

K(x K(x0

0)

)

G Gi

i

G Gi

i

G Gi

i

=1 =1

co-Kriging estimate: ( ) ( ) ( )

N M i i j j i j

K x x G x R λ λ = +

∑ ∑

[ ]

{ }

2 2

seek to minimize: ( ) ( ) E K x G x σ = −

=1 =1

subject to constraints: ( ) 1 & ( ) 0

N M i j i j

x x λ λ = =

∑ ∑

=1 =1 =1 =1

Solution: ( ) ( , ) ( ) ( , ) ( ) ( , ), for 1, , ( ) ( , ) ( ) ( , ) ( ) ( , ), for 1, ,

N M i GG n i j GR n j G GG n i j N M i RG m i j RR m j R RG m i j

x x x x x x x x x n N x x x x x x x x x m M λ γ λ γ µ γ λ γ λ γ µ γ + + = = + + = =

∑ ∑ ∑ ∑

 

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Rad adar ar ec echo ho trac acking i in n SWIRLS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Com

  • mparison of
  • f e

ech cho t

  • track

cking

TREC Optical flow

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1-hr Quantitative P Preci cipitation

  • n For
  • recast (

(QPF PF)

Actual Rainfall

TREC Optical flow

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Rainfall nowcast from SWIRLS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Multi-Sensor QPE/QPF

512 km 512 km 1158 km 904 km 1804 km 1728 km TMS Radar composite through collaboration with Guangdong

Satellite Channels

slide-22
SLIDE 22

9-hour Nowcast of Radar Reflectivity

Base Time : 2013-04-05 02: 12 HKT ( 6 hour forecast ) Actual Extrapolate with only Hong Kong Radars Extrapolate with Multi- Sensors

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sample Time : 2014-07-22 15:24

SWIRLS Ensemble Rainstorm Nowcast (SERN) SWIRLS Rainstorm Viewer

Thunder- storm with high gusts expected during this period Amber expected in 36 minutes with criteria M and S met

SWIRLS Severe Weather Viewer Actual Rainfall (QPE) Forecast Rainfall (QPF)

Decision Support - SWIRLS Integrated Panel

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Location-based Nowcasting Service

  • Available on “MyObservatory”

mobile app

  • rainfall nowcast for the next

2 hours at your location

– data from SWIRLS QPF

  • personalized automatic

alerting service based on user location and expected rainfall

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Location-specific Nowcasting Service

  • Personalized & customizable:

– update frequency – notification intervals – range of detection – forecast location

  • as set on a map
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Integration with GIS

  • Internet website:

http://www.weather.gov.hk/nowcast/prd/api/

  • forecast rainfall maps over

the Pearl River Delta region in the next 2 hours

  • updated every 12 min
  • downloadable as KML files
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Rainfall Nowcast on Automatic Regional Weather Forecast website

http://maps.weather.gov.hk/ocf/

slide-28
SLIDE 28

網址: : http://maps.weather.gov.hk/ocf/index_uc.html Rainfall nowcast

Click to display time series

Provide image and animation sequence of rainfall forecast map over HK and Pearl River Delta for the next 2 hours

Rainfall Nowcast

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Cell Tracking in SWIRLS

39 dBZ 39 dBZ

Group echo identification

∆ × = = = − = =

− ellipse

A dbZ I a b aE P a b a ab A ) / ( tan ) , 2 / ( 4 /

1 2 2

θ ε π ε π max dBZ <--> max rainfall ave dBZ <--> ave rainfall ave (max50% rainfall) ave (max25% rainfall)

x y

a (major axis) b (minor axis) θ (orientation)

V 

(TREC speed and direction)

area eccentricity perimeter

  • rientation

total intensity

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Tracking Capabilities

Based on moving speed, size, overlapping area

merging splitting translation

Searching radius

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Application to squall-line

Two systems merging and moving steadily towards SE

T+0min T+6min T+12min T+18min

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Lightning C Con

  • nce

ceptual M Mod

  • del
  • +/−ve charges carried by ice and graupel respectively
  • charges separated vertically by updraft
  • Important distribution in the mixed layer from 0°C to -

20°C:

0 to -20°C

+ +

  • - - -

+ + +

  • -
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Isothermal Reflecti tivity ty

  • 3D temp & height fields from hourly-updating model

analysis

  • interpolate to radar grid (cartesian)
  • interpolate reflectivity to isothermal levels

3-D temperature from NWP model

R A B D C A1 A2 D2 D1 B2 B1 C2 C1 R0

D0

A0

B0

C0

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Downburst Con

  • nce

ceptual M Mod

  • del
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Other her Sever ere e Wea eathe her N Nowcas ast Al Algorithm hms

  • Hail

– 60-dBZ TOPS > 3 km – 0-2km VIL < 5 mm

  • probability of precipitation

– Time-lagged ensemble of blending QPF

  • probability of lightning threat

– time lagged ensemble of extrapolated sub-zero reflectivity fields based on optical flow

slide-36
SLIDE 36

PoP by Time-lagged Ensemble

Aggregate latest 10 RAPIDS QPF according to exponential decreasing weights

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Probabilistic nowcast of precipitation SWIRLS Ensemble Rainstorm Nowcast (SERN)

Spread of radar rainfall nowcast via selecting various parameters in echo motion retrieval

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Design of SWIRLS Ensemble Rainfall Nowcast

  • By tuning parameters in optical flow computation, 36 sets
  • f configurations have been experimented to generate

rainfall nowcast ensemble of 36 members.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

STA TAMP - Integrated Di ed Displ play o

  • f SWIRLS De

Determini nistic a and nd Probabilistic

Select T+60 … 540 min nowcast

Radar-based / Multi- Sensor Deterministic Probabilistic Products

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Probabilities of r f rainfall e exceeding 0.5/5/ 5/20 20/30/ 30/50/ 50/70 m 70 mm per hr

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Preci cipitation

  • n at d

different p perce centiles

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Rel eliability d y diagram ( (1-hr rainfa fall fo forecast) Mar – Oc Oct 2 2014 014

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Collaboration on TC rainfall nowcast

  • Radar mosaic from PAGASA
  • Attachment programme under

ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Research Fellowship Scheme

slide-44
SLIDE 44

TC Module in SWIRLS

Typhoon Committee Research Fellowship 2012

  • Enhancement Method:

Separate the motion of TC before radar echo tracking Quantitative precipitation forecasts For TC

slide-45
SLIDE 45

TC Now

  • wcast

ast Mo Modul ule

ACTUAL Forecast using TC Module

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Performance of SWIRLS TC Module

Severe Typhoon Vicente 13HKT on 23 July 2012 Verification (15 Cases in 2003-2012) Threshold = 1mm Threshold = 20mm

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Blending Nowcast with NWP

slide-48
SLIDE 48

RAPIDS

Rainstorm Analysis and Prediction Integrated Data-processing System

  • provide 1-6 hours blended QPF
  • 2-km resolution, 6-min updating
  • NOWCASTING component – SWIRLS

– QPF by semi-Lagrangian advection of radar echoes

  • NWP component – RAPIDS-NHM

– QPF by non-hydrostatic model

RAPIDS-NHM rainfall forecast

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Mesoscale and Convection-permitting NWP System in Hong Kong Observatory

Meso-NHM

  • 10 km horizontal res.
  • 841x515x50L (model top: 22.7 km)
  • 72 hour forecast
  • 3-hourly runs (00,03,...,21 UTC) using

BC from ECMWF IFS forecasts

RAPIDS-NHM

  • 2 km res., 305x305x60L
  • model top: 20.3 km
  • 15 hour forecast
  • hourly update using BC from Meso-NHM

Hong Kong

Hong Kong

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Data Assimilation of Radar Observations in RAPIDS-NHM

Doppler velocity from radars in HK multi-layer wind retrieval (u,v) using radar mosaic CAPPI reflectivity volume for 1D retrieval (mosaic from HK + Guangdong radars)

RAPI DS-NHM

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Radar retrieval wind

  • Based on Doppler velocity from Hong Kong and radars in

Shenzhen and Guangzhou

  • Minimization of cost function to obtain (u,v,w):

– JO is proportional to the square of difference between the observed radial velocity and the radial velocity derived from retrieved 3D wind field; – JB is proportional to the square of difference between the retrieved 3D wind field and the background; – JD is the anelastic mass constraint term; and – JS is the smoothness constraint of retrieved wind field using Laplacian of wind components.

Horizontal res.: 1 km Vertical res.: 500 m Reference: Data Assimilation of Weather Radar and LIDAR for Convection Forecasting and Windshear Alerting in Aviation Applications Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications (Vol. II), 2013, pp 527-554 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-35088-7_22

slide-52
SLIDE 52

4 hour forecast from RAPIDS-NHM

Control

Pick up short-wave disturbance in coastal waters at 0400 UTC and develop another NE-SW band of simulated reflectivity

With radar wind retrieval

slide-53
SLIDE 53

50

Impact on QPF

Control Expt (no radar)

Actual rainfall analysis

RAPIDS-NHM 3-hr acc. rainfall ending at 1630H With radar wind retrieval

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Blending Nowcast and NWP

SWIRLS nowcasts for 00:30 – 01:00H Blending SWIRLS + NWP

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Summary

  • Radar data in SWIRLS nowcasting system

– Quantitative precipitation estimates – Quantitative precipitation nowcast (0-9 hr) – Severe weather parameters (lightning, hail, downburst)

  • Use of radar data in convection-permitting NWP model (RAPIDS-NHM)

– Improve very-short-range forecast

  • Blending of nowcast and NWP rainfall (RAPIDS)
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Thank you very much

  • Dr. Tin

HKO’s Mascot