introduction to higgs bundles lecture ii
play

Introduction to Higgs bundles Lecture II Steve Bradlow Department - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction to Higgs bundles Lecture II Steve Bradlow Department of Mathematics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign July 23-27, 2012 Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 1 / 25 Disclaimer These slides are


  1. Introduction to Higgs bundles Lecture II Steve Bradlow Department of Mathematics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign July 23-27, 2012 Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 1 / 25

  2. Disclaimer These slides are precisely as they were during the lecture on July 25, 2012. As such, they contain several omissions and inaccuracies, in both the mathematics and the attributions. Some of these, it must be admitted, are blemishes which reflect the author’s limitations, but others reflect the fact that: The slides formed but one part of the lectures. They were accompanied by verbal commentary designed to explain and embellish the contents of the slides This is not a paper. Any talk has to strike a balance between accuracy and accessibility. This balance inevitably involves the inclusion of some half-truths and/or white lies. The author apologizes to anyone who is in any way led astray by the inaccuracies or slighted by the omissions. Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 2 / 25

  3. Goals and plan for this mini-course What are Higgs bundles? How do they relate to surface group representations? What do we gain by taking the Higgs bundle point of view? The Plan: 1 (Lectures I and II)Description of surface group representations from a bundle perspective, with necessary background to define Higgs bundles and to see their relation to the representations 2 (Lecture III) Examples and properties of Higgs bundles Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 3 / 25

  4. Synopsis of Lecture I S a closed surface of genus g ρ : π 1 ( S ) → GL ( n , C ) ← → E → S with F D = 0 Introduce: Σ = ( S , J ) E = ( E , ∂ E ) 2 ∂ E : Ω 0 ( E ) → Ω (0 , 1) ( E ) Have: with ∂ E = 0 Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 4 / 25

  5. Synopsis of Lecture I S a closed surface of genus g ρ : π 1 ( S ) → GL ( n , C ) ← → E → S with F D = 0 Introduce: Σ = ( S , J ) E = ( E , ∂ E ) 2 ∂ E : Ω 0 ( E ) → Ω (0 , 1) ( E ) Have: with ∂ E = 0 with D 2 = 0 D : Ω 0 ( E ) → Ω 1 ( E ) Seek: Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 4 / 25

  6. Hermitian metrics on complex bundles E → ( M , J ) A smoothly varying family H ( , )of hermitian metrics on E x , defines H ( S , S ′ )( x ) ∈ C for sections S , S ′ ∈ Ω 0 ( E ) Facilitates local unitary frames, and thus Local trivializations for which all g αβ ∈ U ( n ) ⊂ GL ( n , C ), i.e. Defines a reduction of structure group from GL ( n , C ) to U ( n ). End of Lecture I Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 5 / 25

  7. Metric/connection compatibility E → ( M , J ) , D , H Say D is unitary with respect to H if... For any S , S ′ ∈ Ω 0 ( E ), dH ( S , S ′ ) = H ( DS , S ′ ) + H ( S , DS ′ ) In any local unitary frame the connection 1-form A is u ( n )-valued, i.e. T = 0 A + A Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 6 / 25

  8. Metric/connection compatibility E → ( M , J ) , D , H Say D is unitary with respect to H if... For any S , S ′ ∈ Ω 0 ( E ), dH ( S , S ′ ) = H ( DS , S ′ ) + H ( S , DS ′ ) In any local unitary frame the connection 1-form A is u ( n )-valued, i.e. T = 0 A + A Chern connection Given ∂ E and H there is a unique connection, D ∂ E , H such that 1 D (0 , 1) ∂ E , H = ∂ E , and 2 D ∂ E , H is unitary with respect to H Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 6 / 25

  9. Metric/connection compatibility E → ( M , J ) , D , H Say D is unitary with respect to H if... For any S , S ′ ∈ Ω 0 ( E ), dH ( S , S ′ ) = H ( DS , S ′ ) + H ( S , DS ′ ) In any local unitary frame the connection 1-form A is u ( n )-valued, i.e. T = 0 A + A Chern connection Given ∂ E and H there is a unique connection, D ∂ E , H such that 1 D (0 , 1) ∂ E , H = ∂ E , and 2 D ∂ E , H is unitary with respect to H Note: There is no reason why D ∂ E , H should in general be flat Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 6 / 25

  10. Modifications to D ∂ E , H E → ( M , J ) , D , H For any pair of connections D 1 and D 2 � D 1 ( fS ) = ( df ) S + fD 1 ( S ) D 2 ( fS ) = ( df ) S + fD 2 ( S ) the difference Φ = D 1 − D 2 gives φ : Ω 0 ( E ) → Ω 1 ( E ) with Φ( fS ) = f Φ( S ) Φ ∈ Ω 1 ( End ( E )) . i.e. Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 7 / 25

  11. Modifications to D ∂ E , H E → ( M , J ) , D , H For any pair of connections D 1 and D 2 � D 1 ( fS ) = ( df ) S + fD 1 ( S ) D 2 ( fS ) = ( df ) S + fD 2 ( S ) the difference Φ = D 1 − D 2 gives φ : Ω 0 ( E ) → Ω 1 ( E ) with Φ( fS ) = f Φ( S ) Φ ∈ Ω 1 ( End ( E )) . i.e. Goal Find Φ ∈ Ω 1 ( End ( E )) so that D = D ∂ E , H + Φ is flat . Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 7 / 25

  12. Modifications to D ∂ E , H E → ( M , J ) , D , H For any pair of connections D 1 and D 2 � D 1 ( fS ) = ( df ) S + fD 1 ( S ) D 2 ( fS ) = ( df ) S + fD 2 ( S ) the difference Φ = D 1 − D 2 gives φ : Ω 0 ( E ) → Ω 1 ( E ) with Φ( fS ) = f Φ( S ) Φ ∈ Ω 1 ( End ( E )) . i.e. Goal Find Φ ∈ Ω 1 ( End ( E )) so that D = D ∂ E , H + Φ is flat . Higgs bundles show how..... Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 7 / 25

  13. Higgs (vector) bundles on Riemann surfaces A Higgs bundle on a Riemann surface Σ = ( S , J ) is a pair ( E , ϕ ) where E = ( E , ∂ E ) is a rank n holomorphic bundle, ϕ ∈ Ω (1 , 0) ( End ( E )) is holomorphic (i.e. ∂ E ϕ = 0) impose ϕ ∧ ϕ = 0 if base has dim C > 1 impose Tr ( ϕ ) = 0 if G = SL ( n , C ) Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 8 / 25

  14. The Higgs field: ϕ ∈ Ω (1 , 0) ( End ( E )) with ∂ E ϕ = 0 In a local holomorphic frame for E , with local coordinate z on Σ, ϕ = φ ( z ) dz , ∂ where φ ( z ) ∈ gl ( n , C ) and ∂ z φ = 0. Write ϕ ∈ H 0 ( End ( E ) ⊗ K Σ ) where K Σ = ( T ∗ Σ) 1 , 0 , or ϕ : E → E ⊗ K Σ Example If E = Σ × C = O Σ and ϕ is any holomorphic abelian differential, then ( E , ϕ ) is a rank 1 Higgs bundle. [Teaser: Later we will see (rank 2) Higgs bundles with Higgs fields defined by quadratic differentials] Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 9 / 25

  15. Recipe for a flat connection ( E = ( E , ∂ E ) , ϕ ∈ H 0 ( End ( E ) ⊗ K Σ )) 1 Take a metric H on E 2 Construct D ∂ E , H 3 Construct ϕ ∗ H ∈ Ω (0 , 1) ( End ( E )) using H ( ϕ ( u ) , v ) = H ( u , ϕ ∗ H ( v )) T ( z ) dz ] [If ϕ = φ ( z ) dz then ϕ ∗ H = φ Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 10 / 25

  16. Recipe for a flat connection ( E = ( E , ∂ E ) , ϕ ∈ H 0 ( End ( E ) ⊗ K Σ )) 1 Take a metric H on E 2 Construct D ∂ E , H 3 Construct ϕ ∗ H ∈ Ω (0 , 1) ( End ( E )) using H ( ϕ ( u ) , v ) = H ( u , ϕ ∗ H ( v )) T ( z ) dz ] [If ϕ = φ ( z ) dz then ϕ ∗ H = φ ( ϕ + ϕ ∗ H ) ∇ H = D ∂ E , H + � �� � Ω 1 ( End ( E )) Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 10 / 25

  17. Recipe for a flat connection ( E = ( E , ∂ E ) , ϕ ∈ H 0 ( End ( E ) ⊗ K Σ )) 1 Take a metric H on E 2 Construct D ∂ E , H 3 Construct ϕ ∗ H ∈ Ω (0 , 1) ( End ( E )) using H ( ϕ ( u ) , v ) = H ( u , ϕ ∗ H ( v )) T ( z ) dz ] [If ϕ = φ ( z ) dz then ϕ ∗ H = φ ( ϕ + ϕ ∗ H ) ∇ H = D ∂ E , H + � �� � Ω 1 ( End ( E )) 4 [Challenge] pick H so that ∇ H is flat. Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 10 / 25

  18. ( E , ϕ ) , ∇ H = D ∂ E , H + ϕ + ϕ ∗ H The Curvature Challenge Denote curvature by F ∇ H = ∇ 2 H and F ∂ E , H = D 2 ∂ E , H ⇒ F ∂ E , H + [ ϕ, ϕ ∗ H ] = 0 Hitchin ′ s F ∇ H = 0 � ⇐ ∂ E ϕ = 0 ∂ E ϕ = 0 equation The immediate questions 1 For which ρ : π 1 ( S ) → GL ( n , C ) can we construct the corresponding flat bundle in this way? 2 What does existence of solutions say about the Higgs bundle, i.e. can we answer (1) purely in Higgs bundle terms? Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 11 / 25

  19. Connections in the presence of metric D , H on E → S A metric H on E reduces the structure group of E to U ( n ) decomposes End ( E ) = E H ( u ( n )) ⊕ E H ( m ) gl ( n , C ) = u ( n ) ⊕ m ( m = { Hermitian matrices } ) Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 12 / 25

  20. Connections in the presence of metric D , H on E → S A metric H on E reduces the structure group of E to U ( n ) decomposes End ( E ) = E H ( u ( n )) ⊕ E H ( m ) gl ( n , C ) = u ( n ) ⊕ m ( m = { Hermitian matrices } ) Then any connection D decomposes as D = D H ⊕ Φ with D H unitary Φ ∈ Ω 1 ( E H ( m )) ⇒ F H + [Φ , Φ] = 0 F D = 0 ⇐ D H (Φ) = 0 [ F D = D 2 ; F H = D 2 H ] Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 12 / 25

  21. Comparison with Hitchin equations D , H on E → Σ If Σ = ( S , J ) then on ( E , H ): ∇ H = ( ∂ E + D (1 , 0) ∂ E , H ) + ( ϕ + ϕ ∗ H ) with Φ = ϕ + ϕ ∗ H D H = D ∂ E , H = D H + Φ Steve Bradlow (UIUC) Higgs bundles Urbana-Champaign, July 2012 13 / 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend