Higgs bundles, spectral data and applications Laura P. Schaposnik - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

higgs bundles spectral data and applications
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Higgs bundles, spectral data and applications Laura P. Schaposnik - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

H IGGS BUNDLES R EAL SLICES OF H IGGS BUNDLES M ONODROMY OF ( B , A , A ) - BRANES Higgs bundles, spectral data and applications Laura P. Schaposnik University of Illinois AMS-EMS-SPM International Meeting 2015 Porto, 10 - 13 June 2015 H IGGS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

Higgs bundles, spectral data and applications

Laura P. Schaposnik

University of Illinois

AMS-EMS-SPM International Meeting 2015 Porto, 10 - 13 June 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE PLAN

1

Higgs bundles

The Hitchin fibration. Spectral data approach. Hyperkähler structure.

2

Real slices of Higgs bundles

A triple of involutions. Branes and Langlands duality. (B, A, A)-branes and low rank isogenies.

3

Monodromy of (B, A, A)-branes

(B, A, A)-branes and split real forms. Braids and polyhedrons. Character varieties.

Based on: arXiv:1301.1981 arXiv:1111.2550 And work w/

  • D. Baraglia

1309.1195 1506.00372

& /w

  • S. Bradlow

1506.XXXXX

slide-3
SLIDE 3

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

CONSIDER A COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACE Σ OF g ≥ 2 AND K := T∗Σ.

A Higgs bundle is a pair (E, Φ) for: E a holomorphic vector bundle, and Φ : E → E ⊗ K holomorphic map.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

CONSIDER A COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACE Σ OF g ≥ 2 AND K := T∗Σ.

A Higgs bundle is a pair (E, Φ) for: E a holomorphic vector bundle, and Φ : E → E ⊗ K holomorphic map. For Gc ⊂ GL(n, C), define Gc-Higgs bundles by adding conditions on (E, Φ).

slide-5
SLIDE 5

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

CONSIDER A COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACE Σ OF g ≥ 2 AND K := T∗Σ.

A Higgs bundle is a pair (E, Φ) for: E a holomorphic vector bundle, and Φ : E → E ⊗ K holomorphic map. For Gc ⊂ GL(n, C), define Gc-Higgs bundles by adding conditions on (E, Φ). (E, Φ) is an SL(n, C)-Higgs bundle if ΛnE ∼ = O, and Tr(Φ) = 0.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

CONSIDER A COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACE Σ OF g ≥ 2 AND K := T∗Σ.

A Higgs bundle is a pair (E, Φ) for: E a holomorphic vector bundle, and Φ : E → E ⊗ K holomorphic map. For Gc ⊂ GL(n, C), define Gc-Higgs bundles by adding conditions on (E, Φ). (E, Φ) is an SL(n, C)-Higgs bundle if ΛnE ∼ = O, and Tr(Φ) = 0. For G real form of Gc, the definition can be extended to G-Higgs bundles. Stability can be defined through Φ-invariant subbundles of E.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

CONSIDER A COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACE Σ OF g ≥ 2 AND K := T∗Σ.

A Higgs bundle is a pair (E, Φ) for: E a holomorphic vector bundle, and Φ : E → E ⊗ K holomorphic map. For Gc ⊂ GL(n, C), define Gc-Higgs bundles by adding conditions on (E, Φ). (E, Φ) is an SL(n, C)-Higgs bundle if ΛnE ∼ = O, and Tr(Φ) = 0. For G real form of Gc, the definition can be extended to G-Higgs bundles. Stability can be defined through Φ-invariant subbundles of E. MG the moduli space

  • f

S- equivalence classes of polystable G-Higgs bundles

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

CONSIDER A COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACE Σ OF g ≥ 2 AND K := T∗Σ.

A Higgs bundle is a pair (E, Φ) for: E a holomorphic vector bundle, and Φ : E → E ⊗ K holomorphic map. For Gc ⊂ GL(n, C), define Gc-Higgs bundles by adding conditions on (E, Φ). (E, Φ) is an SL(n, C)-Higgs bundle if ΛnE ∼ = O, and Tr(Φ) = 0. For G real form of Gc, the definition can be extended to G-Higgs bundles. Stability can be defined through Φ-invariant subbundles of E. MG the moduli space

  • f

S- equivalence classes of polystable G-Higgs bundles For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin fibration is h : MGc → AGc =

n

  • i=1

H0(Σ, Ki) (E, Φ) → (Tr(Φ), . . . , Tr(Φn))

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

CONSIDER A COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACE Σ OF g ≥ 2 AND K := T∗Σ.

A Higgs bundle is a pair (E, Φ) for: E a holomorphic vector bundle, and Φ : E → E ⊗ K holomorphic map. For Gc ⊂ GL(n, C), define Gc-Higgs bundles by adding conditions on (E, Φ). (E, Φ) is an SL(n, C)-Higgs bundle if ΛnE ∼ = O, and Tr(Φ) = 0. For G real form of Gc, the definition can be extended to G-Higgs bundles. Stability can be defined through Φ-invariant subbundles of E. MG the moduli space

  • f

S- equivalence classes of polystable G-Higgs bundles For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin fibration is h : MGc → AGc =

n

  • i=1

H0(Σ, Ki) (E, Φ) → (Tr(Φ), . . . , Tr(Φn))

slide-10
SLIDE 10

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial,

slide-11
SLIDE 11

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K. The spectral data associated to a Higgs bundle is the curve S together with a line bundle on it satisfying certain conditions.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K. The spectral data associated to a Higgs bundle is the curve S together with a line bundle on it satisfying certain conditions. GL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Jac(S).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K. The spectral data associated to a Higgs bundle is the curve S together with a line bundle on it satisfying certain conditions. GL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Jac(S). SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Prym(S, Σ).

slide-15
SLIDE 15

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K. The spectral data associated to a Higgs bundle is the curve S together with a line bundle on it satisfying certain conditions. GL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Jac(S). SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Prym(S, Σ). We say a fibre is smooth if it is over a point defining a smooth S.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K. The spectral data associated to a Higgs bundle is the curve S together with a line bundle on it satisfying certain conditions. GL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Jac(S). SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Prym(S, Σ). We say a fibre is smooth if it is over a point defining a smooth S. Important: S smooth ⇒ char(Φ) irreducible

slide-17
SLIDE 17

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K. The spectral data associated to a Higgs bundle is the curve S together with a line bundle on it satisfying certain conditions. GL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Jac(S). SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Prym(S, Σ). We say a fibre is smooth if it is over a point defining a smooth S. Important: S smooth ⇒ char(Φ) irreducible ⇒ no Φ-invariant subbundles

slide-18
SLIDE 18

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

SPECTRAL DATA APPROACH

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE HITCHIN MAP h : MG → AG

For classical Higgs bundles the Hitchin map sends (E, Φ) to the coeffi- cients ai = Tr(Φi) of the characteristic polynomial, and the polynomial det(Φ − ηI) = ηn + a1ηn−1 + . . . an−1η + an = 0 defines the spectral surge π : S → Σ in the total space of K. The spectral data associated to a Higgs bundle is the curve S together with a line bundle on it satisfying certain conditions. GL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Jac(S). SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles. Smooth fibres are Prym(S, Σ). We say a fibre is smooth if it is over a point defining a smooth S. Important: S smooth ⇒ char(Φ) irreducible ⇒ no Φ-invariant subbundles ⇒ (E, Φ) stable.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

HYPERKÄHLER STRUCTURE

OF THE MODULI SPACES MGc.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

HYPERKÄHLER STRUCTURE

OF THE MODULI SPACES MGc.

There are three compatible complex structures I2 = J2 = K2 = −1 and associated symplectic forms ωI, ωJ, ωK. Thus, a subspace can be holomorphic or Lagrangian with respect to each of these structures.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

HYPERKÄHLER STRUCTURE

OF THE MODULI SPACES MGc.

There are three compatible complex structures I2 = J2 = K2 = −1 and associated symplectic forms ωI, ωJ, ωK. Thus, a subspace can be holomorphic or Lagrangian with respect to each of these structures. A Lagrangian subspace supporting a sheaf on it is an A-brane.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

HYPERKÄHLER STRUCTURE

OF THE MODULI SPACES MGc.

There are three compatible complex structures I2 = J2 = K2 = −1 and associated symplectic forms ωI, ωJ, ωK. Thus, a subspace can be holomorphic or Lagrangian with respect to each of these structures. A Lagrangian subspace supporting a sheaf on it is an A-brane. A holomorphic subspace supporting a sheaf on it is a B-brane.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

HYPERKÄHLER STRUCTURE

OF THE MODULI SPACES MGc.

There are three compatible complex structures I2 = J2 = K2 = −1 and associated symplectic forms ωI, ωJ, ωK. Thus, a subspace can be holomorphic or Lagrangian with respect to each of these structures. A Lagrangian subspace supporting a sheaf on it is an A-brane. A holomorphic subspace supporting a sheaf on it is a B-brane. Hence one can have (B, A, A), (A, B, A), (B, B, B), (A, A, B)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

HYPERKÄHLER STRUCTURE

OF THE MODULI SPACES MGc.

There are three compatible complex structures I2 = J2 = K2 = −1 and associated symplectic forms ωI, ωJ, ωK. Thus, a subspace can be holomorphic or Lagrangian with respect to each of these structures. A Lagrangian subspace supporting a sheaf on it is an A-brane. A holomorphic subspace supporting a sheaf on it is a B-brane. Hence one can have (B, A, A), (A, B, A), (B, B, B), (A, A, B) How can we construct families of them, and what can we say about their topology?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

A TRIPLE OF INVOLUTIONS ij : MGc → MGc

DEFINING FAMILIES OF BRANES IN MGc. BARAGLIA-S. 2013

Gc complex Lie group; G real form of Gc fixed by an anti-holomorphic involution σ; ρ compact anti-holomorphic involution of Gc; f : Σ → Σ real structure. i1 : (E, Φ) → (σρ(E), −σρ(Φ))

slide-26
SLIDE 26

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

A TRIPLE OF INVOLUTIONS ij : MGc → MGc

DEFINING FAMILIES OF BRANES IN MGc. BARAGLIA-S. 2013

Gc complex Lie group; G real form of Gc fixed by an anti-holomorphic involution σ; ρ compact anti-holomorphic involution of Gc; f : Σ → Σ real structure. i1 : (E, Φ) → (σρ(E), −σρ(Φ)) Fixes a (B, A, A)-brane, the moduli space of G-Higgs bundles. i2 : (E, Φ) → (fρ(E), −fρ(Φ))

slide-27
SLIDE 27

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

A TRIPLE OF INVOLUTIONS ij : MGc → MGc

DEFINING FAMILIES OF BRANES IN MGc. BARAGLIA-S. 2013

Gc complex Lie group; G real form of Gc fixed by an anti-holomorphic involution σ; ρ compact anti-holomorphic involution of Gc; f : Σ → Σ real structure. i1 : (E, Φ) → (σρ(E), −σρ(Φ)) Fixes a (B, A, A)-brane, the moduli space of G-Higgs bundles. i2 : (E, Φ) → (fρ(E), −fρ(Φ)) Fixes an (A, B, A)-brane, some of whose give representations that ex- tend to a 3-manifold bounding Σ. i3 := i1 ◦ i2 fixes an (A, A, B)-brane,“ pseudo real Higgs bundles”.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

BRANES AND LANGANDS DUALITY

BARAGLIA-S. 2013

The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

BRANES AND LANGANDS DUALITY

BARAGLIA-S. 2013

The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

BRANES AND LANGANDS DUALITY

BARAGLIA-S. 2013

The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The number of tori in the fibres for i2 can be calculated in terms of invariants of f : Σ → Σ. Langlands duality gives a correspondence between MGc and MLGc.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

BRANES AND LANGANDS DUALITY

BARAGLIA-S. 2013

The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The number of tori in the fibres for i2 can be calculated in terms of invariants of f : Σ → Σ. Langlands duality gives a correspondence between MGc and MLGc. It also tells us what type dual branes have.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

BRANES AND LANGANDS DUALITY

BARAGLIA-S. 2013

The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The number of tori in the fibres for i2 can be calculated in terms of invariants of f : Σ → Σ. Langlands duality gives a correspondence between MGc and MLGc. It also tells us what type dual branes have. Conjecture (Baraglia-S. 2013). Since (A.B, A) are self dual, the dual brane for i2 is the one fixed by Li2.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

BRANES AND LANGANDS DUALITY

BARAGLIA-S. 2013

The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The fixed points of i2 and i3 give a (singular) Lagrangian fibration over the real locus of the Hitchin base. The number of tori in the fibres for i2 can be calculated in terms of invariants of f : Σ → Σ. Langlands duality gives a correspondence between MGc and MLGc. It also tells us what type dual branes have. Conjecture (Baraglia-S. 2013). Since (A.B, A) are self dual, the dual brane for i2 is the one fixed by Li2. The dual (B, B, B) branes for i1 are supported over the moduli space of Higgs bundles for Nadler’s group.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

(B, A, A)-BRANES AND LOW RANK ISOGENIES

Inducing relations between (B, A, A)-branes, Bradlow-S. 2015

slide-35
SLIDE 35

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

(B, A, A)-BRANES AND LOW RANK ISOGENIES

Inducing relations between (B, A, A)-branes, Bradlow-S. 2015 I2 : MSL(2,C)×SL(2,C) → MSO(4,C) I3 : MSL(4,C) → MSO(6,C)

L1

  • L = p∗

1L1 ⊗ p∗ 2L2

  • L2
  • S1

π1

  • S1 ×Σ S2

p1

  • π
  • p2

S2

π2

  • Σ
slide-36
SLIDE 36

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

(B, A, A)-BRANES AND LOW RANK ISOGENIES

Inducing relations between (B, A, A)-branes, Bradlow-S. 2015 I2 : MSL(2,C)×SL(2,C) → MSO(4,C) I3 : MSL(4,C) → MSO(6,C)

L1

  • L = p∗

1L1 ⊗ p∗ 2L2

  • L2
  • S1

π1

  • S1 ×Σ S2

p1

  • π
  • p2

S2

π2

  • Σ

The induced map is a 22g+1 fold-cover I2 : MSL(2,R)×SL(2,R) → MSO(2,2), of certain components in MSO(2,2).

slide-37
SLIDE 37

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

(B, A, A)-BRANES AND SPLIT REAL FORMS

CONSIDER G THE SPLIT REAL FORM OF Gc

Theorem (S., 2013)

The space MG intersects the smooth fibres of the Hitchin fibration h : MGc → AGc in torsion two points. For Example: the smooth fibres for SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles are Prym(S, Σ).

slide-38
SLIDE 38

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

(B, A, A)-BRANES AND SPLIT REAL FORMS

CONSIDER G THE SPLIT REAL FORM OF Gc

Theorem (S., 2013)

The space MG intersects the smooth fibres of the Hitchin fibration h : MGc → AGc in torsion two points. For Example: the smooth fibres for SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles are Prym(S, Σ). Then SL(n, R)-Higgs bundles correspond to L ∈ Prym(S, Σ) such that L2 ∼ = O.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

(B, A, A)-BRANES AND SPLIT REAL FORMS

CONSIDER G THE SPLIT REAL FORM OF Gc

Theorem (S., 2013)

The space MG intersects the smooth fibres of the Hitchin fibration h : MGc → AGc in torsion two points. For Example: the smooth fibres for SL(n, C)-Higgs bundles are Prym(S, Σ). Then SL(n, R)-Higgs bundles correspond to L ∈ Prym(S, Σ) such that L2 ∼ = O. Since we have a finite covering of the Hitchin base, we can study the monodromy action of loops in the base.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

MONODROMY THROUGH BRAIDS AND POLYHEDRONS

FOR SL(2, R)-HIGGS BUNDLES AND L-TWISTED RANK 2 HIGGS BUNDLES

slide-41
SLIDE 41

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

MONODROMY THROUGH BRAIDS AND POLYHEDRONS

FOR SL(2, R)-HIGGS BUNDLES AND L-TWISTED RANK 2 HIGGS BUNDLES

For rank 2 Higgs bundles the Hitchin base is H0(Σ, K2) and the discriminant is given by differentials with multiple zeros.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

MONODROMY THROUGH BRAIDS AND POLYHEDRONS

FOR SL(2, R)-HIGGS BUNDLES AND L-TWISTED RANK 2 HIGGS BUNDLES

For rank 2 Higgs bundles the Hitchin base is H0(Σ, K2) and the discriminant is given by differentials with multiple zeros. For SL(2, R) (S. ‘11) L-twisted Higgs bundles (Baraglia-S.‘15).

slide-43
SLIDE 43

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

MONODROMY THROUGH BRAIDS AND POLYHEDRONS

FOR SL(2, R)-HIGGS BUNDLES AND L-TWISTED RANK 2 HIGGS BUNDLES

For rank 2 Higgs bundles the Hitchin base is H0(Σ, K2) and the discriminant is given by differentials with multiple zeros. For SL(2, R) (S. ‘11) L-twisted Higgs bundles (Baraglia-S.‘15). It is an affine moduli space - topology determined by the monodromty and the twisted Chern class.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

MONODROMY THROUGH BRAIDS AND POLYHEDRONS

FOR SL(2, R)-HIGGS BUNDLES AND L-TWISTED RANK 2 HIGGS BUNDLES

For rank 2 Higgs bundles the Hitchin base is H0(Σ, K2) and the discriminant is given by differentials with multiple zeros. For SL(2, R) (S. ‘11) L-twisted Higgs bundles (Baraglia-S.‘15). It is an affine moduli space - topology determined by the monodromty and the twisted Chern class. The monodromy action is given by Picard-Lefschetz transformations.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

slide-46
SLIDE 46

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

slide-47
SLIDE 47

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

1

3.22g + g − 3 for Rep(GL(2, R));

slide-48
SLIDE 48

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

1

3.22g + g − 3 for Rep(GL(2, R));

2

2.22g + 2g − 3 for Rep(SL(2, R));

slide-49
SLIDE 49

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

1

3.22g + g − 3 for Rep(GL(2, R));

2

2.22g + 2g − 3 for Rep(SL(2, R));

3

22g + g − 1 for Rep0(PGL(2, R)); 22g + g − 2 for Rep1(PGL(2, R));

slide-50
SLIDE 50

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

1

3.22g + g − 3 for Rep(GL(2, R));

2

2.22g + 2g − 3 for Rep(SL(2, R));

3

22g + g − 1 for Rep0(PGL(2, R)); 22g + g − 2 for Rep1(PGL(2, R));

4

2g − 1 for Rep0(PSL(2, R)); 2g − 2 for Rep1(PSL(2, R));

slide-51
SLIDE 51

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

1

3.22g + g − 3 for Rep(GL(2, R));

2

2.22g + 2g − 3 for Rep(SL(2, R));

3

22g + g − 1 for Rep0(PGL(2, R)); 22g + g − 2 for Rep1(PGL(2, R));

4

2g − 1 for Rep0(PSL(2, R)); 2g − 2 for Rep1(PSL(2, R));

5

3.22g + 2g − 4 for Rep2g−2(Sp(4, R));

slide-52
SLIDE 52

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

1

3.22g + g − 3 for Rep(GL(2, R));

2

2.22g + 2g − 3 for Rep(SL(2, R));

3

22g + g − 1 for Rep0(PGL(2, R)); 22g + g − 2 for Rep1(PGL(2, R));

4

2g − 1 for Rep0(PSL(2, R)); 2g − 2 for Rep1(PSL(2, R));

5

3.22g + 2g − 4 for Rep2g−2(Sp(4, R));

6

6.22g + 4g2 − 6g − 3 for Rep(SO(2, 2));

slide-53
SLIDE 53

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

CHARACTER VARIETIES

REAL CHARACTER VARIETIES Rep(G) = Homred(π1(Σ), G)/G

Corollary (Baraglia-S., 2015)

For the following real character varieties, the number of connected components are:

1

3.22g + g − 3 for Rep(GL(2, R));

2

2.22g + 2g − 3 for Rep(SL(2, R));

3

22g + g − 1 for Rep0(PGL(2, R)); 22g + g − 2 for Rep1(PGL(2, R));

4

2g − 1 for Rep0(PSL(2, R)); 2g − 2 for Rep1(PSL(2, R));

5

3.22g + 2g − 4 for Rep2g−2(Sp(4, R));

6

6.22g + 4g2 − 6g − 3 for Rep(SO(2, 2));

(2) and (4) in [Goldman ‘88], (3) in [Xia ‘97, ‘99], (5) in [Gothen ‘01]

slide-54
SLIDE 54

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

What is next?

slide-55
SLIDE 55

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

slide-56
SLIDE 56

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

slide-57
SLIDE 57

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

slide-58
SLIDE 58

HIGGS BUNDLES REAL SLICES OF HIGGS BUNDLES MONODROMY OF (B, A, A)-BRANES

Gracias!