Integrating national items into questionnaires of international large - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

integrating national items into questionnaires of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Integrating national items into questionnaires of international large - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

10 13 September, 2018, Penang, Malaysia Capacity development workshop Conceptualization, Measurement and Use of Contextual Data Integrating national items into questionnaires of international large scale studies: The case of Iran Dr.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Capacity development workshop “Conceptualization, Measurement and Use of Contextual Data”

10‐13 September, 2018, Penang, Malaysia

Integrating national items into questionnaires of international large‐scale studies: The case of Iran

  • Dr. Masoud Kabiri

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WHAT ARE TIMSS AND PIRLS ASK IN THEIR BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRES?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives of designing background questionnaires

  • Gathering information about major factors

affecting on students achievement

  • Accessing to priori information to better

estimate the students achievement: estimation Plausible Values in Bayes theorem

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The leading Questions

  • What should students learn?
  • Who provides the instruction?
  • How is the instruction organized?
  • Where does instruction take place?
  • When does instruction take place?
  • What have students learned?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Model of Potential Educational Experiences (Chen & Hsieh, 2008)

What are students expected to learn? Who delivers the instructions? How is instruction

  • rganized?

What have students learned? System School Classroom Student

National/Regional curriculum goals

(intended curriculum) School goals Teachers’ content goals (implemented curriculum) Official Teacher Certification qualifications Teacher professional

  • rganization &

environment Teacher characteristics a.Background b.Subject matter

  • rientation

c.Pedagogical beliefs System characteristics

1.Tracking 2.Grade level 3.Content decisions 4.Related characteristics

School course

  • ffering &

instructional support functions Instructional activities Implemented curriculum

Student characteristics 1.background 2.Household economic capital 3.Household cultural capital 4.Attitude 5.Activities 6.expectations

TIMSS test

  • utcomes

Attained curriculum

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Conceptual framework of determinants of student outcomes (Nilsen, Gustafsson, and Blömeke)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Various aspects of items in BQ in TIMSS

  • Types of background questionnaires in TIMSS

and PIRLS:

– Student questionnaire – Home questionnaire (grade 4 only) – Teacher questionnaire (for grade 8 math and science questionnaires, seperatly) – School questionnaire

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Student Background questionnaire

  • Contains the responses of the students

– Attitude towards the subject measured – Personal/academic backgrounds – School experiences – Career/educational goals – Social‐economic statues (SES)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Teacher Background questionnaire

  • Contains responses of the teachers

– Background and education – Instructional practices – Academic climate of school – Resources for Teaching – Homework

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

School Background questionnaire

  • Contains the responses of the school

principals

– School Enrollment and Characteristics – School climate – Availability of resources

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Home Background questionnaire

  • Contains the responses of the parents of

tested students to home background

– Early literacy activities – Home educational resources – Language in the home – Out‐of‐school (literacy) activities

slide-12
SLIDE 12

WHAT DID WE WANT TO ADD INTO TIMSS/PIRLS QUESTIONNAIRES?

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Problems in TIMSS and PIRLS questionnaires

  • International questionnaires collect

comprehensive, but:

– It collected to explain leaning of students, but not necessarily policy making about learning – Amount of asked information is limited relatively to other questionnaires (especially in school questionnaire) – Some of useful information were not covered

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Reason for importance of adding national items

  • Gathering information in nationally

representative samples

  • Linking to students achievement
  • Obtaining baseline to record change (in the

case od repeating the items)

  • No more expense to gather data

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Challenges of adding items (Limitations)

  • Should not change the context of questionnaires
  • Should not be so many that respondents being

tired and refuse to response either whole or a part of questionnaire

  • Should not enter meanwhile of items, they

should add at the end of questionnaire

  • Should be presented like the international items

(in content and layout)

  • Adapting the codebooks and NAFs in order to

integrate new questions

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

How selecting the items

  • Analyzing the TIMSS/PIRLS background

questionnaire to find gap informations

  • Interview with some policymakers
  • Review background questionnaire of major

large‐scale assessment: PISA, TALIS, NAEP, TEDS, NALS, ALL, ICCS, ICILS, PIAAC

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sample items

  • School:

– Size of school – Enrolment policy – Administrative activities – School authorities

  • Teacher:

– Recruitment mode – Professional development – Assessment and evaluation in school – Attitudes to textbooks

  • Parent:

– Educational costs for children – Cooperation with school – Spent time with children

  • Student

– Working with calculator

17