Integrated Development Plan Feedback Session – October 2017 Theme: Service with pride and dignity IDP Community Presentation by MMC,
PURPOSE • Give feedback on issues raised during the Constituency Consultations; • Outline the City’s strategies, outcomes and priorities towards development; • To give an overview of the region in terms of its demographic status and key development challenges; and • To report on the implementation of the Region’s CBP Projects 2
Contents • COJ’s Strategic Imperatives: 1. Vision and Mission 2. IDP Priorities and GDS Outcomes • What is an IDP • Challenges Facing the City • What we aim to achieve • About the Region: 1. Demographic Figures 2. Types of Dwelling • Key issues • Feedback on issues • Service Delivery Breakdown and Capex Allocation • CBP Approved Projects • Conclusion and way forward 3
Strategic direction: Vision and Mission Vision: “A Joburg that works is a South Africa that works” Mission: “To create an enabling economic environment by making Joburg more responsive in the delivery of quality services” Vision Mission Outcomes Priorities 6
Strategic direction: GDS Outcomes Outcome 1 A growing , diverse and competitive economy that creates jobs Outcome 2 Enhanced, quality services and sustainable environmental practices Outcome 3 An inclusive society with enhanced quality of life that provides meaningful redress through pro-poor development Outcome 4 Build caring , safe and secure communities Outcome 5 An honest , transparent and responsive local government that prides itself on service excellence 5
Strategic Imperatives Priorities of the Administration Promote economic development and attract investment towards achieving 5% COJ STRATEGIC PRIORITIES Priority 1 economic growth that reduces unemployment by 2021. Ensure pro-poor developmen t that addresses inequality and poverty and provides Priority 2 meaningful redress Priority 3 Create a culture of enhanced service delivery with pride Create a sense of security through improved public safety Priority 4 Create an honest and transparent City that fights corruption Priority 5 Create a City that responds to the needs of citizens , customers, stakeholders and Priority 6 businesses Priority 7 Enhance our financial stability Encourage innovation and efficiency through the Smart City programme; and Priority 8 Preserve our resources for future generations Priority 9 6
What is an IDP? PROCESS: Through which the City prepares a strategic development plan which extends over a five year period- coinciding with the Council’s Term of Office (Section 25: MSA 32 of 2000); DOCUMENT: The Integrated Development Plan (IDP Document) is a product of the Integrated Development Planning Process; PLANNING INSTRUMENT: The IDP Document is a principle planning instrument that guides and informs all planning and budgeting in the City; • GUIDING TOOL: the IDP helps the City through community consultations and engagement with pertinent stakeholders to : 1. Identify Key Development Challenges; 2. Formulate its Vision, Mission and Priorities; 3. Develop Appropriate Strategies; 4. Develop relevant organisational structure and mechanisms to realise the vision; 5. Align the Budget with priorities. 7
Challenges facing the City Population estimate: 4.94 million residents (8.9% of South Africa’s total population) Youth Population: 33.2%, 40% of whom are unemployed Total number of households: 1.85 million Housing backlog of over 300,000 with 158,000 on the free housing list Net in-migration of 3,000 people per month Slow economic growth and high unemployment with a marginalised informal economy Slow and unequal service delivery with an infrastructure backlog of R170 billion. Inadequate provision for repairs and maintenance . High rates of poverty and inequality High levels of corruption Severe safety concerns and inadequate police visibility 8
What we aimed to achieve Infrastructure 60% of Capex to be spent in poor areas Progressive allocations towards 10% on repairs and maintenance Service with Pride a way of life Declaration of corruption as Public Enemy Number 1 Establishment of Group Forensic Investigations Unit Establishment of Professional Civil Service and acceleration of Skills Audit Re-integration of entities and regionalisation of services Improve safety and security Measurable improvement in public safety – additional 1500 JMPD officers Multi-Departmental approach to drug epidemic 9
What we aimed to achieve Visible service delivery Centralised grass cutting Street Lights and Traffic Lights Working – 20% reduction in downtime Clean up the city – A re sebetseng War against potholes – more than 120,000 fixed over the past year Better services for the poor Upgrading of 51 informal settlements Increased allocation to Pikitup to increase cleaning services in informal settlements Extended hours at clinics and public libraries in poor communities 10
What we aimed to achieve Addressing the Housing Crisis Fast track completion of housing projects and issuing of title deeds Completion of open and transparent housing list Undertaking study to find a new model for housing provision noting that the RDP model has proven unsuccessful at addressing the crisis. A focus on developing affordable housing in the Inner City . 11
Corruption busting efforts We have established the Group Forensic Investigations Unit under the leadership of General Shadrack Sibiya . Since their establishment, corruption amounting to more than R15 billion in lost or misused funds has been uncovered. There are over 2,000 cases under investigation . The City has taken aggressive action against those implicated : Over 500 people have been arrested , including employees of the City. more than 100 City employees have been suspended 13 employees have resigned , and 12 7 have been dismissed
About Region B Demographic Profile (Brief Summary) • Overview According to the census 2011 the population of the Region is 351 473 and the population growth in the region is projected as follows: African : 5.5% White : 1.6% Coloured : 1.4% Asian : 6.3% 7
About Region B Socio-Economic Profile 14
About Region B Region B Joburg Other deprivation Population Discouraged Total number of Ward Working Age Employed Unemployed economically Rank 10 = most Density Work-Seeker households not active deprived 58 4 31 418 72.12% 48.02% 8.61% 1.66% 41.72% 8 040 68 6 33 029 71.13% 49.05% 22.40% 2.09% 26.47% 8 927 69 4 33 712 77.41% 47.44% 13.22% 1.07% 38.27% 10 827 82 5 35 385 70.14% 43.62% 18.21% 3.24% 34.94% 9 351 86 2 34 377 73.44% 62.46% 6.58% 1.24% 29.72% 11 166 87 1 16 704 71.76% 74.02% 2.21% 0.43% 23.34% 6 115 88 1 24 251 72.74% 74.62% 3.23% 0.39% 21.76% 9 221 90 2 22 863 74.45% 79.23% 2.58% 0.52% 17.66% 10 804 98 2 30 305 72.69% 73.19% 6.72% 0.57% 19.52% 10 540 99 1 20 118 72.36% 76.36% 3.35% 0.48% 19.82% 7 526 102 2 32 875 74.32% 71.61% 3.57% 0.53% 24.29% 12 588 104 2 29 423 75.19% 77.70% 4.37% 0.38% 17.55% 11 657 117 1 19 568 72.18% 79.40% 2.78% 0.26% 17.56% 8 766 15
About Region B Types of Dwelling 16
About Region B Region B Informal dwelling Traditional (shack; not in Townhouse House or dwelling/hut/stru Informal dwelling backyard; e.g. in Flat or apartment Cluster house in (semi-detached Semi-detached House/flat/room brick/concrete cture made of (shack; in an in a block of flats complex house in a house in backyard block structure traditional backyard) informal/squatter complex) materials settlement or on a farm) 67% 0% 14% 0% 1% 3% 9% 2% 0% 49% 0% 13% 1% 0% 16% 7% 3% 8% 72% 0% 13% 1% 1% 0% 7% 1% 0% 50% 1% 32% 0% 1% 1% 5% 3% 3% 70% 0% 7% 6% 6% 0% 7% 1% 0% 79% 0% 5% 1% 1% 2% 7% 0% 0% 73% 0% 12% 3% 3% 1% 4% 0% 0% 51% 0% 26% 5% 8% 0% 5% 0% 0% 47% 1% 26% 7% 14% 1% 3% 0% 1% 66% 0% 18% 3% 4% 0% 5% 0% 0% 54% 1% 20% 7% 10% 1% 5% 0% 0% 61% 0% 13% 7% 10% 1% 4% 1% 1% 17 72% 0% 10% 2% 4% 0% 7% 0% 0%
Summary of Key Issues Total Community Issues Raised Per Dept. & Total Municipal Entity Department / Municipal Entity 13 25 City Power 21 12 20 Health 19 20 18 18 17 17 COMDEV 18 15 13 DED 12 19 10 10 Housing 10 7 18 City Parks 5 10 JMPD 2 1 1 2 SAPS 0 10 Joburg Water 20 JRA 7 Pikitup 21 Social Development 1 Department of Education 1 Transportation 18 169 Grand Total
Feedback on issues 19
Recommend
More recommend
