instructional student success resource space
play

Instructional & Student Success Resource Space February 24 th , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Instructional & Student Success Resource Space February 24 th , 2020 Introductions Who is in the Room? AGENDA 1. Kick-off Question 2. Master Plan Structure: Strategic Asset Management 3. Enrollment Profile & Scenarios 4. Instructional


  1. Instructional & Student Success Resource Space February 24 th , 2020

  2. Introductions

  3. Who is in the Room?

  4. AGENDA 1. Kick-off Question 2. Master Plan Structure: Strategic Asset Management 3. Enrollment Profile & Scenarios 4. Instructional Space 5. Student Success Resources 6. Exercise 7. Next Steps

  5. 2020 Campus Master Plan Schedule workshops w/committees, mtgs, focus groups, etc. May June July August September October November December January February March April May PHASES engagement observations analysis vision alignment principles concepts framework scenarios sequencing draft plan final plan report 1 2 Vision & Strategic Alignment Process, scheduling, kick-offs Strategic Plan Goals Alignment Visioning, future directions Observations, Data & Analysis Data gathering, map updates Stakeholder Open Houses submittal ABOR 3 4 Analysis: space, capacity, systems Concepts, Framework & Scenarios Stakeholder meetings as needed Organizing Principles, Concepts MP Update Overview Presentation Framework testing w/scenarios 5 Hub/Precinct Studies where needed Draft Framework Plan + Phasing Final Plan Plan, Priorities, Sequencing 6 Draft Plan Review, Stakeholder Forums Documentation & Presentations Draft Plan/Map, PPT, Exec. Summary Draft Plan Narrative + Graphics Final Draft Plan Document for review Final Draft Plan Documents

  6. Workshop 04 Recap Meetings & Work Sessions: Operations Committee Exercise: Sustainability Focus Group Exercise • • • Operations Committee Meeting Character Aspirations for the Past Achievements • • Focus Group Meetings: North-South Corridors Current Initiatives • o o Future Aspirations Instructional Sustainability o o Research Student Life

  7. Kick-off Question

  8. Kick-off Question: How does “Sustainability” interconnect with teaching, learning, and student success?

  9. Strategic Asset Management

  10. Master Plan Structure: Strategic Assets MASTER PLAN ORGANIZATION: STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT FRAMEWORK 1 STUDENT SUCCESS INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES SPACE STRATEGIC ASSET 2 MANAGEMENT SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH CAMPUS LIFE SPACE SPACE INTEGRATED 3 PLANNING PROJECTS OTHER PRESERVATION TOPICS INTEGRATED WITH ALL 3 SUPPORTING TOPICS

  11. Strategic Asset Management This planning process has the unique perspective of looking across the University’s space assets in typology classification as well as in the traditional campus context. The character, location and quantity of key strategic space types has emerged as a prime consideration for the Master Plan’s analysis and is a long term subject of management for UArizona. The prime space types have been identified as Instructional, Research and Student Success. Each typology requires current benchmarking, a projection of need into the future and a set of interim tactics for its respective management and development. Additionally, other factors effect the context and efficacy of these space types including enrollment profiles, building age, changes in program or curriculum delivery and market context. Our process aligns these resources with input from the Strategic Planning group as well the broader input of the Master Plan participants.

  12. What we want from you today: 1.Confirm that we have appropriately interpreted your feedback to-date 2.Expansion and further detailing of initial Master Plan recommendations related to Instructional Space and Student Success Resources 3.Identification of any additional recommendations or parameters related to Instructional Space and Student Success Resources

  13. Enrollment Profiles & Scenarios

  14. FUTURE ? ASG has received guidance to consider 3 possible scenarios which will impact the needs of Strategic Assets

  15. SCENARIO A:

  16. SCENARIO B:

  17. SCENARIO C:

  18. Instructional Space

  19. FRAMEWORK ALIGNMENT Instructional Space N/S Connections Key Open Spaces Gateways

  20. Workshop 04 Focus Group Notes (What we heard): • UA Instructional space committee has identified that the existing space portfolio does not support how faculty want to teach o Deficit = active/collaborative teaching environments o Surplus = quality and size issues • UA has transformed more spaces (~35) into collaborative learning environments than what is currently coded into space inventory • Training faculty to use is critical to culture shift (400 trained to date) • Need to create UA space standards for typologies (ie what is a collaborative classroom) so that inventory is consistent and accurate between Registrar and Space Planning

  21. Strategic Plan Extracts: • New core curriculum & programs that focus on the 4IR - space impact • Create structure to ensure high-quality gen ed. programs • Support cutting edge teaching methodologies in all types/formats • Pair engaging pedagogies with cutting-edge technologies • Dramatically scale active, collaborative teaching & learning spaces • Create an Experiential Learning Design Lab (faculty/industry) • Create a fully accessible, engaging, and empowered campus environment • Leverage arts and culture assets to advance creativity-based education • “Personalized, Digital U” (online integration/training for faculty and students)

  22. Projecting future needs: Space per student model (one possible approach)

  23. Space Efficiency Targets (Typical Averages) Description NASF per FTE NASF/FTE Primarily traditional in classroom formats (sizes, typologies, resources, etc.) Under <20 NASF/FTE Some variation in format, but still largely traditional Lower 20’s NASF/FTE Highly collaborative model with a mixture of more efficient spaces Upper 20’s NASF/FTE Model built around collaborative, project-based learning experience Over 30+

  24. Space Efficiency Targets (Typical Averages) Description NASF per FTE NASF/FTE Primarily traditional in classroom formats (sizes, typologies, resources, etc.) Under <20 NASF/FTE Some variation in format, but still largely traditional Lower 20’s NASF/FTE Highly collaborative model with a mixture of more efficient spaces Upper 20’s NASF/FTE Model built around collaborative, project-based learning experience Over 30+ UA Today: 17.5 21.9 44,700 Total Fall 2019 35,620 Fall 2019 ABOR ABOR FTE (UG + GR) FTE (undergrad only) NASF/FTE NASF/FTE 780,000 Planned NASF 780,000 Planned NASF

  25. So how does this relate to our 3 future enrollment scenarios? (Space per student space model)

  26. ENROLLMENT PROFILE UNDERGRADUATE COUNT / RANGE SCENARIOS EXISTING (FALL 2019) 35,620 36,500 to 39,500 34,500 to 36,500 31,500 to 34,500

  27. ENROLLMENT PROFILE UNDERGRADUATE @ 21.9 NASF COUNT / RANGE PER UNDERGRAD SCENARIOS 780,500 NASF EXISTING (FALL 2019) 35,620 Planned 20,000 to 85,000 36,500 to 39,500 NASF need 0 to +20,000 34,500 to 36,500 NASF need Surplus at current 31,500 to 34,500 ratio

  28. ENROLLMENT PROFILE UNDERGRADUATE @ 21.9 NASF @ 25 NASF COUNT / RANGE PER UNDERGRAD PER UNDERGRAD SCENARIOS 780,500 NASF EXISTING (FALL 2019) 35,620 N/A Planned 20,000 to 85,000 132,000 to 208,000 36,500 to 39,500 NASF need NASF need 0 to +20,000 82,000 to 132,000 34,500 to 36,500 NASF need NASF need Surplus at current 7,000 to 82,000 31,500 to 34,500 ratio NASF need

  29. ENROLLMENT PROFILE UNDERGRADUATE @ 21.9 NASF @ 25 NASF @ 30 NASF COUNT / RANGE PER UNDERGRAD PER UNDERGRAD PER UNDERGRAD SCENARIOS 780,500 NASF EXISTING (FALL 2019) 35,620 N/A N/A Planned 20,000 to 85,000 132,000 to 208,000 315,000 to 405,000 36,500 to 39,500 NASF need NASF need NASF need 0 to +20,000 82,000 to 132,000 255,000 to 315,000 34,500 to 36,500 NASF need NASF need NASF need Surplus at current 7,000 to 82,000 165,000 to 255,000 31,500 to 34,500 ratio NASF need NASF need

  30. Student Success Resource Space

  31. “Student Success Resources” describes a broad range of physical spaces, programs, staff, and resources that help promote and support the academic and life success of students while at UA including: • Academic Support Outside the Classroom • Student Services • Student Resources • Engagement within the Wildcat Community (Belonging) • Other items

  32. Student Success Resources Student Academic Services Two big buckets • Career Services • Academic Affairs under this umbrella: • Childcare • Academic Advising • Club & Organization Space • Admissions & Registrar We have been asked to • Collaboration Space & Lounges • Business Services holistically consider both • Community Space • Counseling Services as a part of student • Food Pantry • Disability Resource Center experience and student • Health Services • Financial Aid • Industry Space • Registrar success. Some resources • Learning Resource Centers • Student Affairs or services can fall in • Library Services • Student Financial Services both buckets. • Off-campus Student Services • Testing • Student Legal Services • Transfer Center What adjustments • Tutoring • Veteran Services • Etc. • Etc. would this group make?

  33. Student Academic Services: Excludes: • Academic Advising (College based)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend