Instantons and Berry’s connections
- n quantum graph
Inori Ueba (Kobe Univ.)
2020/11/16 Strings and Fields 2020 Collaborator : Tomonori Inoue, Makoto Sakamoto (Kobe Univ.)
- No. 22
Instantons and Berrys connections on quantum graph Inori Ueba - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Instantons and Berrys connections on quantum graph Inori Ueba (Kobe Univ.) 2020/11/16 Strings and Fields 2020 Collaborator : Tomonori Inoue, Makoto Sakamoto (Kobe Univ.) No. 22 Introduction Quantum graphQM on the 1D graph
Instantons and Berry’s connections
Inori Ueba (Kobe Univ.)
2020/11/16 Strings and Fields 2020 Collaborator : Tomonori Inoue, Makoto Sakamoto (Kobe Univ.)
Introduction
Quantum graph:QM on the 1D graph with edges and vertices
Applications
⋯
Boundary conditions at vertices are important 1
Introduction
Quantum graph:QM on the 1D graph with edges and vertices Extra dimension = Quantum graph
Applications
⋯
Topology of boundary conditions
Fermion generation structure in the standard model Boundary conditions at vertices are important e.g. 1
(I. Ueba et al, J.Phys.A 52 (2019) 45, 455401)
Summary of this talk
Here we focus on the Berry’s connections Instantons appear as Berry’s connections
Summary of this talk
We want to reveal the structure
2
Contents
3
Contents
3
Quantum graph and boundary condition
j1 + j2 = j3 + j4 j1 j2 j3 j4
Quantum graph:Quantum mechanics on the 1D graph with edges and vertices Conservation of probability currents Boundary conditions for wave functions 4
Rose quantum graph
cut the edges without the current flow
Rose graph is known as a master graph
rose graph
5
Rose quantum graph
cut the edges without the current flow
Rose graph is known as a master graph
rose graph
5
Rose quantum graph
cut the edges without the current flow
Rose graph is known as a master graph
rose graph
5
KK decomposition of Dirac field
⋯ ⋯
m1 m2
⋯ ⋯
mn ψ(i)
R,n(x)
ψ(i)
L,n(x)
+ ] Ψ(x, y) = ∑
i ∑ n [
ψ(i)
R,n(x)
ψ(i)
L,n(x)
f (i)
n (y)
g(i)
n (y)
⋯ ⋯ ⋯ ⋯
KK mode functions 4D chiral fields
n : mode number
i : degeneracy
new particles particles in SM
6
Zero modes on quantum graph
[iγμ∂μ+ ]Ψ(x, y) = 0 + ] Ψ(x, y) = ∑
i ∑ n [
ψ(i)
R,n(x)
ψ(i)
L,n(x)
f (i)
n (y)
g(i)
n (y)
γ5∂y + M
= 0 for zero modes
f (i)
0 (y) ∝
F(i)
1 e−My
(L0 < y < L1) ⋮ F(i)
N e−My
(LN−1 < y < LN) g(j)
0 (y) ∝
G(j)
1 e+My
(L0 < y < L1) ⋮ G(j)
N e+My
(LN−1 < y < LN)
L0 L1 L2 LN−1 LN
⋯ ⋯
y
L0 < y < L1 L1 < y < L2 LN−1 < y < LN L2 < y < L3
7
[iγμ∂μ+ ]Ψ(x, y) = 0 γ5∂y + M
= 0 for zero modes
L0 L1 L2 LN−1 LN
⋯ ⋯
y
f (i)
0 (y) ∝
F(i)
1 e−My
(L0 < y < L1) ⋮ F(i)
N e−My
(LN−1 < y < LN) g(j)
0 (y) ∝
G(j)
1 e+My
(L0 < y < L1) ⋮ G(j)
N e+My
(LN−1 < y < LN)
L0 < y < L1 L1 < y < L2 LN−1 < y < LN L2 < y < L3
Zero modes on quantum graph
⃗ F (i) = F(i)
1
⋮ F(i)
N
⃗ G( j) = G( j)
1
⋮ G( j)
N
# of independent vectors # of zero modes
7 + ] Ψ(x, y) = ∑
i ∑ n [
ψ(i)
R,n(x)
ψ(i)
L,n(x)
f (i)
n (y)
g(i)
n (y)
L0 < y < L1 L1 < y < L2 LN−1 < y < LN L2 < y < L3
Boundary condition on quantum graph
Current conservation j(y) = ¯ Ψ(x, y) iγ5 Ψ(x, y) j(La−1 + ε) =
N
∑
a=1
j(La − ε)
N
∑
a=1
BC for zero modes ⃗ ⃗
⃗
Δ( f )† ⃗ F (i) = 0 Δ(g)† ⃗ G(j) = 0
N × l complex matrix N × (N − K + l) complex matrix rank(Δ( f )) = l rank(Δ(g)) = N − K + l Δ( f ) : Δ(g) :
K = 0, 1, ⋯, 2N l = { 0, 1, ⋯, K (0 ≤ K ≤ N) K − N, ⋯, N (N < K ≤ 2N)
8
L0 < y < L1 L1 < y < L2 LN−1 < y < LN L2 < y < L3
Boundary condition on quantum graph
Current conservation j(y) = ¯ Ψ(x, y) iγ5 Ψ(x, y) j(La−1 + ε) =
N
∑
a=1
j(La − ε)
N
∑
a=1
BC for zero modes ⃗ ⃗
⃗
Δ( f )† ⃗ F (i) = 0 Δ(g)† ⃗ G(j) = 0
N × l complex matrix N × (N − K + l) complex matrix rank(Δ( f )) = l rank(Δ(g)) = N − K + l
K = 0, 1, ⋯, 2N
Δ( f ) : Δ(g) : ⃗ G( j) ⃗ F (i) N − l independent vectors
(i = 1, ⋯, N − l)
K − l independent vectors
(j = 1, ⋯, K − l)
g( j)
0 (y)
f (i)
0 (y)
(i = 1, ⋯, N − l) (j = 1, ⋯, K − l)
l = { 0, 1, ⋯, K (0 ≤ K ≤ N) K − N, ⋯, N (N < K ≤ 2N)
8
Generations of fermions in SM
# of # of
−
= N − K |N − K| chiral fermions
⋯ ⋯
mn ψ(i)
R,0(x)
ψ(i)
L,0(x)
N − l K − l
K = N − 3 (N + 3)
for 3 generations K = 0, 1, ⋯, 2N l = { 0, 1, ⋯, K (0 ≤ K ≤ N) K − N, ⋯, N (N < K ≤ 2N) 9
Contents
10
Contents
Topological quantities
monopole, instanton, ⋯
10
Berry’s connection
H(R)|ϕ(R)⟩ = E(R)|ϕ(R)⟩ ≡ A γ = i∮C ⟨ϕ(R)|d|ϕ(R)⟩
Berry’s connection Berry’s phase
R : parameters in the system R
varies adiabatically depending on the time
|ϕ(R(t = 0))⟩ ⟶ ei∫T
0 dt E(R(t))+iγ|ϕ(R(t = T))⟩
R1 R2 R3 C R(t = T) = R(t = 0) 11
|ϕ(i)(R(t = 0))⟩ ⟶ ei∫T
0 dt E(R(t))
∑
j
(U(C))ij|ϕ(j)(R(t = T))⟩
Non-abelian Berry’s connection
H(R)|ϕ(i)(R)⟩ = E(R)|ϕ(i)(R)⟩ (A)ij = ⟨ϕ(i)(R)|d|ϕ(j)(R)⟩
non-abelian Berry’s connection
Degeneracy of the states
R1 R2 R3 C R(t = T) = R(t = 0)
U(C) = P exp (i∮C A)
R
varies adiabatically depending on the time
12
Berry’s connection on quantum graph
Berry’s connection for zero modes (A( f ))ij = ∫ dy f (i)†
0 (y) d f (j) 0 (y) =
⃗ F (i)†d ⃗ F (j)
A( f ) = F†dF Δ( f )†F = 0 F†F = 1N−l
F ≡ ( ⃗ F (1) ⋯ ⃗ F (N−l))
(i, j = 1, ⋯, N − l)
(A)ij = ⟨ϕ(i)(R)|d|ϕ(j)(R)⟩
For the quantum graph mode functions parameters in BC R1 R2 R3 C R(t = T) = R(t = 0)
If we define
13
Yang-Mills instanton
Fμν = ± ˜ Fμν
Self dual equation on ℝ4
Q = − 1 16π2 ∫ d4x Tr Fμν ˜ Fμν ∈ ℤ
( ˜ Fμν ≡ 1 2 ϵμνρλFρλ)
Instanton solutions
Instanton has a nontrivial topological charge
It is known how to construct the general instantons
14
ADHM construction for SU(n) instanton
Δ†
[2k]×[n+2k]V[n+2k]×[n](x) = 0 ,
V†V = 1n Aμ(x) = V†(x) ∂μV(x)
② Find matrix
(n + 2k) × n
V(x)
③ SU(n) instanton with
Q = k
Δ[n+2k]×[2k](x) = a[n+2k]×[2k] + b[n+2k]×[2k] ⋅ (xμeμ ⊗ 1k) rank(Δ) = 2k , [Δ†Δ , σi ⊗ 1k] = 0
eμ = (−iσi , 12)
(n + 2k) × 2k
complex matrix
ℝ4
coordinates of
(n + 2k) × 2k matrix Δ(x)
① Introduce
conditions :
ADHM data :
ADHM construction : method of constructing the general instantons
15
Berry’s connection and instanton
Δ( f )†[l]×[N] F[N]×[N−l] = 0 F†F = 1N−l A( f ) = F†dF Δ†
[2k]×[n+2k](x) V[n+2k]×[n](x) = 0
A(x) = V†(x) dV(x) V†V = 1n Berry’s connection ADHM construction
Δ( f)[N]×[l] = Δ[N]×[l](x) A( f) = Q = l/2
SU(N − l) instanton with
l : even
BC ADHM Berry’s connection Normalization Boundary condition Instanton Zero mode equation Normalization &
In the case that 16
Summary
Summary and discussion
Instantons in the parameter space
ADHM construction
Discussion
boundary conditions ?
⋯
17
Back up
4D mass matrix
5D Yukawa interacton term mαβ = gY∫ dy ϕ(y)(f (0)′
α (y)) *g(0) β (y)
∫ d4x∫ dy gY ¯ Ψ′(x, y) Φ(x, y) Ψ(x, y) + h . c . ∫ d4x mαβ ¯ ψ′
R,α(x) ψL,β(x) + h . c .
4D mass term 4D mass matrix 4D mass matrix is given by
α, β : generations ϕ(y) : VEV of scalar field
f (0)′
1 (y)
g(0)
1 (y)
y
f (0)′
2 (y)
g(0)
2 (y)
⋯
m11 m12 m22
19
L0 < y < L1 L1 < y < L2 LN−1 < y < LN L2 < y < L3
Fermion generation structure
Overlap of localized modes Mass hierarchy (m11 ≪ m22) Overlap of different generations (m12) Flavor mixing Complex mode functions due to BC Origin of CP phase Topology of BC Generations
f (0)
1 (y)
g(0)
1 (y)
y
f (0)
2 (y)
g(0)
2 (y)
⋯
m11 m12 m22
20
mαβ = gY∫ dy ϕ(y)(f (0)′
α (y)) *g(0) β (y)
4D mass matrix α, β : generations ϕ(y) : VEV of scalar field