Inhalation Exposure and Disposition of PCBs NIEHS Superfund Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

inhalation exposure and disposition of pcbs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Inhalation Exposure and Disposition of PCBs NIEHS Superfund Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Inhalation Exposure and Disposition of PCBs NIEHS Superfund Research Program and EPA Clu-In Webinar PCBs in Schools: Session 1 Overview and Exposure Assessment April 21, 2014 Peter S. Thorne, MS, PhD Professor and Head, Department of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Inhalation Exposure and Disposition of PCBs

NIEHS Superfund Research Program and EPA Clu-In Webinar PCBs in Schools: Session 1 Overview and Exposure Assessment

April 21, 2014

Peter S. Thorne, MS, PhD Professor and Head, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Director, Environmental Health Sciences Research Center

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Human Exposure to PCBs

Ingestion and Occupational  Inhalation

  • Legacy pollution – Highly stable PCB mixtures

▫ Aroclors (US and UK) Clofen (Germany) ▫ Phenoclor (France) Kanechlor & Santotherm (Japan)

  • Sources: transformers, capacitors, machining oils, hydraulic

fluids, plasticizers in caulk

  • Modern day PCB exposures: (legacy), paints, pigments - 50

PCB congeners detected in yellow paint

▫ Most frequently detected in yellow azo pigments1: PCB 11, 8, 6, 4, 1, 12/13, 2, 3, 209, 52 ▫ Includes non-aroclors: PCB 11, 209

1Hu and Hornbuckle. ES&T. 2010, 44, 2822–27.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Human Exposure to PCBs

Ingestion  Inhalation

  • Increasing awareness of PCBs in schools

▫ Airborne exposures are important ▫ How to remediate contaminated schools? ▫ How low is safe?

  • PCBs in homes and apartment buildings in Denmark,

Germany, U.S.

▫ Caulk and sealants, paints and pigments ▫ Other synthetic building materials?

  • Dredging, hauling, disposal of contaminated sediments

concern for community level exposures

Marek et al. (2010) ES&T, 44, 2822–2827. Meyer et al. (2013) Int J Hyg Environ Hlth, 216, 755-762. Kohler et al. (2005) ES&T, 39 167-173. Herrick et al (2004) EHP, 112, 1051-1053.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What do we know about the fate of inhaled PCBs?

  • We have conducted 6 inhalation studies in

rodents

▫ Aroclor 1242 ▫ Chicago Air Mixture (CAM) ▫ PCB 11 ▫ PCB 3 ▫ 14C-PCB 11 ▫ CAM+ (CAM supplemented with PCB 11)

  • Studies include acute, subacute, subchronic
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Our rodent studies show rapid distribution and metabolism of inhaled PCB congeners

  • Aroclor 1242 study
  • Acute and subacute inhalation studies
  • Rats exposed via inhalation
  • t1/2= liver: 5.6 h; lung: 8.2 h; brain: 8.5 h; blood: 9.7 h
  • Lung, liver, adipose tissue levels higher than brain or blood
  • 10 d exposure  6.6 μg/g lipid weight in lung & liver
  • Minimal toxicity at 1400 μg (5.6 mg/kg)
  • Hu X, Adamcakova-Dodd A, Lehmler HJ, Hu D, Kania-Korwel I, Hornbuckle KC,

Thorne PS. Time course of congener uptake and elimination in rats after short- term inhalation exposure to an airborne polychlorinated biphenyl(PCB) mixture. Environ Sci Technol, 44(17):6893-6900, 2010.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • CAM Subchronic Study
  • Exposure atmospheres match the PCB profile of urban air
  • 4-week nose-only inhalation studies.
  • Inhalation exposure contributes to body burden of mostly tri-

to hexa-chlorobipenyls

  • Distinct congener spectrum was found: similar between lung,

serum, liver, brain and adipose tissue.

  • Accumulation of neurotoxic PCBs in brain: PCB28, 105 and 118.
  • Hu X, Adamcakova-Dodd A, Lehmler HJ, Hu D, Hornbuckle K, Thorne PS.

Subchronic inhalation exposure study of an airborne polychlorinated biphenyl mixture resembling the Chicago ambient air congener profile. Environ Sci Technol, 14(59):9653-62, 2012. PMID: 22846166

Our rodent studies show rapid distribution and metabolism of inhaled PCB congeners

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Generation: 520 μg/m3

P C B c o n g e n e r n u m b e r

5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 5 6 0 6 5 7 0 7 5 8 0 8 5 9 0 9 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 2 0 1 2 5 1 3 0 1 3 5 1 4 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5 2 0 0

M a s s p e rc e n ta g e (% )

2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6

M e a s u re d P ro file o f C A M a tm o s p h e re

4 (2 3 % ) 1 8 1 7 1 8 + 3 0 3 1 1 9 2 0 + 2 8 4 4 + 4 7 5 2 6 6 6 1 + 7 0 + 7 4 + 7 6

9 5 8 3 + 9 9 1 0 5 9 0 + 1 0 1 + 1 1 3 1 1 8 1 1 0 + 1 1 5 1

7 5 8 0 8 5 9 0 9 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 2 0 1 2 5 1 3 0 1 3 5 1 4 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5 1 6 0 1 6 5 1 7 0 1 7 5 1 8 0 1 8 5 1 9 0 1 9 5 2 0 0 2 0 5 0 .0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 .0 1 .2 8 6 + 8 7 + 9 7 + 1 0 9 + 1 1 9 + 1 2 5

1 2 9 + 1 3 8 + 1 6 3 1 5 3 + 1 6 8

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • A distinct profile of

~25 accumulated congeners in tissue

C o n g e n e r p ro file in L u n g

1 3 5 7 9 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 7 1 9 2 1 2 3 2 5 2 7 2 9 3 1 3 3 3 5 3 7 3 9 4 1 4 3 4 5 4 7 4 9 5 1 5 3 5 5 5 7 5 9 6 1 6 3 6 5 6 7 6 9 7 1 7 3 7 5 7 7 7 9 8 1 8 3 8 5 8 7 8 9 9 1 9 3 9 5 9 7 9 9 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 5 1 0 7 1 0 9 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 5 1 2 7 1 2 9 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 5 1 3 7 1 3 9 1 4 1 1 4 3 1 4 5 1 4 7 1 4 9 1 5 1 1 5 3 1 5 5 1 5 7 1 5 9 1 6 1 1 6 3 1 6 5 1 6 7 1 6 9 1 7 1

M a s s p e rc e n ta g e (% )

5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 2 0 + 2 8 (3 6 .9 % ) 8 1 5 5 2 6 0 6 6 6 1 + 7 0 + 7 4 + 7 6 9 5 8 3 + 9 9 1 0 5 9 0 + 1 0 1 + 1 1 3 1 1 0 + 1 1 5 1 1 8 1 4 7 + 1 4 9 1 5 3 + 1 6 8 1 2 9 + 1 3 8 + 1 6 3

C o n g e n e r p ro file in B lo o d

1 3 5 7 9 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 7 1 9 2 1 2 3 2 5 2 7 2 9 3 1 3 3 3 5 3 7 3 9 4 1 4 3 4 5 4 7 4 9 5 1 5 3 5 5 5 7 5 9 6 1 6 3 6 5 6 7 6 9 7 1 7 3 7 5 7 7 7 9 8 1 8 3 8 5 8 7 8 9 9 1 9 3 9 5 9 7 9 9 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 5 1 0 7 1 0 9 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 5 1 2 7 1 2 9 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 5 1 3 7 1 3 9 1 4 1 1 4 3 1 4 5 1 4 7 1 4 9 1 5 1 1 5 3 1 5 5 1 5 7 1 5 9 1 6 1 1 6 3 1 6 5 1 6 7 1 6 9 1 7 1

M a s s p e rc e n ta g e (% )

5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 8 1 5 2 0 + 2 8 5 2 5 5 6 6 6 1 + 7 0 + 7 4 + 7 6 8 3 + 9 9 9 5 1 0 5 9 0 + 1 0 1 + 1 1 3 1 1 8 1 4 7 + 1 4 9 1 2 9 + 1 3 8 + 1 6 3

8

Tissue Blood Lung

4 wk PCB

Exposed 12.88 ± 1.38* 67.19 ± 4.14** Sham Exposed 2.30 ± 1.29 7.46 ± 0.98 Sentinels 2.65 6.85

∑PCB in tissue after exposure (ng/g tissue weight) *p < 0.001, **p < 0.0001

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Our rodent studies show complete uptake from the lung and rapid metabolism of inhaled PCB 11

  • 14C-PCB 11 ADME study
  • Time course studies of absorption, distribution metabolism

and excretion of 14C PCB11 and its metabolites were conducted and achieved a mass balance.

  • Hu X, Adamcakova-Dodd A, Thorne, PS. The fate of inhaled 14C-labelled

PCB11 and it metabolites in vivo. Environ. Internat., 63:92-100, 2014.

3,3’-Dichlorobiphenyl

C l C l

slide-10
SLIDE 10

[14C]-PCB11 Study

  • Even though we find PCB 11 in the indoor air of every home and

school, virtually nothing is known about its fate and toxicity

  • Objective: To determine the fate of PCB 11 in rats
  • Approach: build a mass balance model for PCB 11 and its metabolites

Instill [14C]-PCB 11 into the lung and evaluate the ADME Mass in Mass out Mass Stored Mass Metabolized

Cage wash

3,3’-Dichlorobiphenyl

C l C l

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Heat Map of Radioactive PCB 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The majority of dose is excreted in hours

  • Fecal elimination is the major pathway of excretion.
  • Exhaled PCB 11 accounts for <0.2% of administered dose.
  • Absorption of PCB in lung is complete.

96% in tissues 10% in tissues

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rapid elimination from most tissues

Phase

t½-1 t½-2

Trachea 9 min 2.6 hr Thyroid 14 min 5.3 hr Lung 13 min 3.7 hr Liver 24 min 3.7 hr Heart 12 min 3.9 hr Pancreas 21 min 7.7 hr Brain 12 min 2.7 hr Diaphragm 18 min 3.9 hr Blood 33 min 4.1 hr Salivary gland 14min 4.3 hr Spleen 15 min 6.3 hr Thymus 14 min 4.7 hr Muscle 14 min 6.4 hr Testis 17 min 3.9 hr Seminal vesicles 19 min 4.1 hr Minutes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary from PCB 11 animal studies

  • Complete and fast uptake of inhaled PCB

▫ PCB11 is 99.8% absorbed after lung exposure.

  • Rapid distribution of PCB11

▫ High tissue concentration of PCB11 at 12 min after exposure ▫ Delayed uptake in adipose tissue and other fatty tissues (skin, epididymis)

  • Extremely fast elimination of PCB11 and metabolites

▫ 50% of dose excreted by 12 h ▫ 37% of dose in intestinal digestive matter that was about to be excreted ▫ The initial elimination phase is very short (t½ = 10-30 min) ▫ Biomarkers may demonstrate same-day exposures

  • Phase II metabolites dominate in systemic circulation

▫ PCB11 and OH-PCB11s decay most rapidly to minimal levels within 25 min ▫ Phase II metabolites serve as better biomarkers of PCB11 exposure

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The AESOP Study

(Airborne Exposures to Semi-volatile Organic Pollutants)

  • Community-based, two-cohort study of PCB exposures

among adolescent children and their mothers

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The AESOP Study

  • Prospective cohort study of PCB exposures in school

children and their mothers

  • Focus on air exposures and lower chlorinated

congeners

  • Two communities:

▫ Columbus Junction ▫ East Chicago

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

East Chicago and Indiana Harbor and Ship Canal

IHSC dredging began Nov 2012 – IHSC is a source of PCBs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Columbus Community School District

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Columbus Community Schools

Serving small rural towns and farm families

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Artist: Jeanne DeWall

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The AESOP Study Aims & Enrollment

  • 1. Measure exposures of atmospheric PCBs at homes & schools in both cohorts.
  • 2. Analyze blood and urine for PCBs and PCB metabolites.
  • 3. Gather demographic, residential, occupational, activity and dietary

information from subjects by questionnaire.

  • 4. Utilize exposure and questionnaire data to develop an exposure model for

the atmospheric PCB congeners.

Cohort Location Total Households* Children Mothers Urban East Chicago 129 63 66 (35 girls) 63 Rural Columbus Junction 135 61 74 (40 girls) 61 Total enrollment 264 124 140 124

*Household = home with enrolled child(ren) and his/her mother

slide-22
SLIDE 22

AESOP Cohort Demographics

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Demographics of the AESOP Study schools and communities.

School and Community-level Data East Chicago Columbus Junction West Side Middle School Block Middle School Columbus Community Middle School Grades 6-8 7-8 6-8 Year Built* 1976 1968 1918 Enrollment 497 493 237 Free/Discounted Lunch 82% 81% 63% Hispanic 52.1% 42.0% 61.6% White (non-Hispanic) 3.6% 0.4% 37.6% African American 43.5% 56.0% 0.8% Multirace/other 0.8% 1.6% 0% Population East Chicago (29,698) Louisa Co. (11,278) Median household income $27,700 $47,900 Income below poverty line 35.0% 18.9% Residents foreign born 14.7%, 91% Latino 20.9%, 97% Latino† Education < high school 27.4% 34.2% High school 36.0% 28.2% Some college 23.8% 23.0% College degree or higher 12.8% 14.6% † Non-citizens are grossly under-represented in this figure.

School Data Community Data

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Health status data for AESOP Study subjects (mean ± stddev or %)

East Chicago Columbus Junction Children Mothers Children Mothers Age at enrollment, yrs 13 ± 1 41 ± 6 13 ± 1 46 ± 4 Body Mass Index, kg/m2 24.0 ± 6.6 33.7 ± 8.2 23.8 ± 5.3 30.4 ± 7.4 % Breastfed 33 %

  • 68 %
  • Cholesterol, mg/dL

149 ± 26 179 ± 37 145 ± 25 170 ± 30 % Overweight (Obese) 33 (15) 90 (61) 36 (14) 70 (41)

  • Rates of breastfeeding were low in East Chicago,

especially among Black women

  • The community is concerned about obesity and

type II diabetes

2012 BRFSS data Adult Obesity Prevalence

slide-25
SLIDE 25

AESOP Exposure Measurements

25

Paired indoor and outdoor samples quarterly at homes and schools (N=3200) Passive Air Sampler Blood collected annually in the home from mother and child (N=940)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Columbus Junction Schools have 7 times the ∑[PCB] of Homes

8 11 18/30 31 40/41/71 44/47/65 49/69 61/70/74/76 66 90/101/113 110/115 147/149 153/168 100 200 300 400 500 600 1 4 8 12/13 17 21/33 25 32 37 40/41/71 44/47/… 48 52 57 60 64 72 79 82 *85/11… 89 94 99 106 108/124 114 122 132 136 142 146/161 152 156/157 161 167 171/173 176 180/193 184 188 192 196 201 [PCB] (pg/m3)

(b) Inside CJ Schools (n=12), ∑[PCB] = 7800 ± 3000 pg m-3

95

8 11 18/30 31 40/41/71 52 61/70/74/76 66 90/101/113 95 110/115 147/149 153/168 20 40 60 80 100 120 1 4 8 12/13 17 21/33 25 32 37 40/41… 44/47… 48 52 57 60 64 72 79 82 *85/11… 89 94 99 106 108/124 114 122 132 136 142 146/161 152 156/157 161 167 171/173 176 180/193 184 188 192 196 201 [PCB] (pg/m3)

(a) Inside CJ Homes (n=38), ∑[PCB] = 1100 ± 300 pg m-3

52

PCB Congener

Preliminary Data

slide-27
SLIDE 27

8 11 18/30 31 40/41/71 44/47/65 49/69 52 61/70/74/76 66 90/101/113 95 110/115 147/149 153/168 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 1 4 8 12/13 17 21/33 25 32 37 40/… 44/… 48 52 57 60 64 72 79 82 *85/… 89 94 99 106 108/… 114 122 132 136 142 146/… 152 156/… 161 167 171/… 176 180/… 184 188 192 196 201 [PCB] (pg/m3)

(c) Inside EC Homes (n=33), ∑[PCB] = 2,300 ± 800 pg m-3

8 11 18/30 31 40/41/71 44/47/65 49/69 52 61/70/74/76 66 90/101/113 95 110/115 147/149 153/168 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1 4 8 12/13 17 21/33 25 32 37 40/41/71 44/47/65 48 52 57 60 64 72 79 82 *85/116… 89 94 99 106 108/124 114 122 132 136 142 146/161 152 156/157 161 167 171/173 176 180/193 184 188 192 196 201 [PCB] (pg/m3)

(d) Inside EC Schools (n=16), ∑[PCB] = 12,500 ± 6,900 pg m-3

East Chicago Schools have 5 times the ∑[PCB] of Homes

PCB Congener

Preliminary Data

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Modeling Approach

Where ExpPCBj is PCB exposure for the jth congener, Ti is the time spent in location i in hours per year; Q is the inhalation rate in m3 d-1; and [PCB]j (ng m-3) is the measured airborne concentration of PCBj.

Ti values have been obtained for three locations (home, schools, and

  • utside) using time-activity questionnaires completed each year.

Q will be calculated based on age, sex, height, and race/ethnicity.

𝐹𝑦𝑞𝑄𝐷𝐶𝑘 = 𝑈𝑗 ∗

3 𝑗=1

𝑅 ∗ 𝑄𝐷𝐶𝑘 = (μ𝑕 𝑧𝑠−1)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Average modeled PCB inhalation exposure for EC children and mothers average 20.1 μg/yr and 13.2 μg/yr. CJ children and mothers average 7.4 μg/yr and 3.0 μg/yr. Inhalation exposure for CJ subjects is less than half that of modeled exposure for EC subjects.

Preliminary Data

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Indoor Air PCB Concentrations in Homes

  • Median ∑PCB indoor air concentrations for EC

homes (3.37 ng m-3) were significantly higher (p=0.05) than for CJ homes (1.05 ng m-3)

  • One outlier home in EC had ∑PCB concentrations of

164 ng m-3

  • Two outlier homes in CJ had ∑PCB concentrations of

16 ng m-3 and 23 ng m-3

  • PCB inhalation exposure for individuals in these

homes were 20 to 50 times greater than the median PCB inhalation exposures in EC, and CJ, respectively.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Evaluation of Lipids, PCBs, OH-PCBs

 30 mL blood collected annually from each subject  Cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL  209 PCB congeners  64 OH-PCBs  Urine collection next year  PCB sulfates

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Concentrations of the sum of all detected PCBs (left) and OH-PCBs (right).

Mothers > Children. Several individuals have values well above the 95% percentile (circles) Most frequently detected congeners (red=100% detection)

East Chicago Columbus Junction Children Mothers Children Mothers 153+168 153+168 153+168 153+168 138+163+129 138+163+129 138+163+129 193+180 193+180 193+180 193+180 203 11 203 15 170 15 187 3 146 8 202 2 137 3 137 11 138+163+129 2 167 14 198+199 28+20 118 146 156+157

Children are Enriched with Lower chlorinated PCBs

slide-33
SLIDE 33

PCB Congeners in Serum

A total of 174 PCB congeners were detected in the samples

153 11

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusions from the AESOP Study

  • PAS facilitate exposure assessment for mono- to

hexa-chlorinated PCBs

  • Children & adults have significant inhalation exposures
  • Older schools represent a 10-fold higher source of semi-

volatile PCBs than most homes

  • Children’s sera are enriched with lower chlorinated PCBs

compared to their mothers

  • PCB 11, a non-Aloclor, is among the highest serum PCBs and

reflects current exposure

  • PCB 153 is high in adults but low in children and reflects

legacy exposure

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The AESOP Study

  • It takes a village:

AESOP Study Team: Jeanne DeWall, Study Coordinator Barb Mendenhall, Nancy Morales, Bilingual Field Staff Keri C. Hornbuckle, Analytical Core Director & Co-Investigator Rachel Marek, Wen Xin Koh, Blood Analyses Matt Ampleman, Air & Questionnaire Data Analysis Andres Martinez, Dingfei Hu, Air Analyses Kai Wang, Mike Jones, Biostatistics Craig Just, David Osterberg, Comm. Outreach

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Acknowledgements

  • AESOP Study subjects
  • Funding from NIH/NIEHS P42 ES013661
  • EC and CJ Community Advisory Boards

36

isrp